Abstract
Background: Faecal (f-) calprotectin is a widely used marker for intestinal inflammation. However, extraction procedure is time consuming and cumbersome. The main aim of this study was to evaluate patient-performed extraction of f-calprotectin compared to extraction performed in the laboratory.
Methods: A total of 81 adult patients with an established diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease provided two samples from the same bowel movement, one conventional faeces sample and one sample with a patient administered extraction device. A laboratory technician extracted the conventional faeces sample with the same extraction device.
Results: F-calprotectin results from the laboratory-performed extraction and the patient-performed extraction correlated significantly, with a Spearman rank correlation coefficient of 0.92. Method comparison showed a slope of 1.20 (95% confidence interval 1.08–1.36) with intercept of –0.30 (95% confidence interval –9.00 to 4.62). This demonstrates a small proportional difference between the results from the home extracted samples and the results from the laboratory extracted samples, where the home extracted samples are slightly higher. However, six of the 81 patients had made obvious mistakes in the extraction process and their samples were excluded from the study.
Conclusions: Patient administered extraction of f-calprotectin can be a realistic alternative for selected patients. However, instructions must be very precise to avoid mistakes.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the following persons: IBD nurses Lise Sveen, Kjersti Martinsen, Sandie Dudley, Mette Teigen (Vestre Viken Hospital Trust), Inger-Lise Myhre (Østfold Hospital Trust) and Elisabeth Finnes Strøm (Oslo University Hospital) for assistance with collection of data, and laboratory technician Eli Kristin Arntsen (Vestre Viken Hospital Trust) for extraction and analysis of the faeces samples. The authors also thank Calpro AS for providing the ELISA kits and extraction devices used in this study.
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organisation(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
References
1. Tibble JA, Sigthorsson G, Bridger S, Fagerhol MK, Bjarnason I. Surrogate markers of intestinal inflammation are predictive of relapse in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2000;119:15–22.10.1053/gast.2000.8523Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Wagner M, Peterson CG, Ridefelt P, Sangfelt P, Carlson M. Fecal markers of inflammation used as surrogate markers for treatment outcome in relapsing inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:5584–9.10.3748/wjg.14.5584Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Dignass A, Lindsay JO, Sturm A, Windsor A, Colombel JF, Allez M, et al. Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis part 2: current management. J Crohn Colitis 2012;6:991–1030.10.1016/j.crohns.2012.09.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Sandborn WJ. The future of inflammatory bowel disease therapy: where do we go from here? Dig Dis 2012;30(Suppl 3):140–4.10.1159/000342742Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Rutgeerts P, Vermeire S, Van Assche G. Mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: impossible ideal or therapeutic target? Gut 2007;56:453–5.10.1136/gut.2005.088732Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Roseth AG, Aadland E, Jahnsen J, Raknerud N. Assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis by faecal calprotectin, a novel granulocyte marker protein. Digestion 1997;58:176–80.10.1159/000201441Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Roseth AG, Schmidt PN, Fagerhol MK. Correlation between faecal excretion of indium-111-labelled granulocytes and calprotectin, a granulocyte marker protein, in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999;34:50–4.10.1080/00365529950172835Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Berni CR, Rapacciuolo L, Romano MT, Tanturri de HL, Terrin G, Manguso F, et al. Diagnostic value of faecal calprotectin in paediatric gastroenterology clinical practice. Dig Liver Dis 2004;36:467–70.10.1016/j.dld.2004.02.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
9. von Roon AC, Karamountzos L, Purkayastha S, Reese GE, Darzi AW, Teare JP, et al. Diagnostic precision of fecal calprotectin for inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal malignancy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:803–13.10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01126.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Kristensen V, Klepp P, Cvancarova M, Roseth A, Skar V, Moum B. Prediction of endoscopic disease activity in ulcerative colitis by two different assays for fecal calprotectin. J Crohns Colitis 2015;9:164–9.10.1093/ecco-jcc/jju015Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Schoepfer AM, Beglinger C, Straumann A, Safroneeva E, Romero Y, Armstrong D, et al. Fecal calprotectin more accurately reflects endoscopic activity of ulcerative colitis than the lichtiger index, C-reactive protein, platelets, hemoglobin, and blood leukocytes. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013;19:332–41.10.1097/MIB.0b013e3182810066Suche in Google Scholar
12. Schoepfer AM, Beglinger C, Straumann A, Trummler M, Renzulli P, Seibold F. Ulcerative colitis: correlation of the Rachmilewitz endoscopic activity index with fecal calprotectin, clinical activity, C-reactive protein, and blood leukocytes. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009;15:1851–8.10.1002/ibd.20986Suche in Google Scholar
13. D’Haens G, Ferrante M, Vermeire S, Baert F, Noman M, Moortgat L, et al. Fecal calprotectin is a surrogate marker for endoscopic lesions in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;18:2218–24.10.1002/ibd.22917Suche in Google Scholar
14. Lobaton T, Lopez-Garcia A, Rodriguez-Moranta F, Ruiz A, Rodriguez L, Guardiola J. A new rapid test for fecal calprotectin predicts endoscopic remission and postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis 2013;7:e641–51.10.1016/j.crohns.2013.05.005Suche in Google Scholar
15. Costa F, Mumolo MG, Ceccarelli L, Bellini M, Romano MR, Sterpi C, et al. Calprotectin is a stronger predictive marker of relapse in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn’s disease. Gut 2005;54:364–8.10.1136/gut.2004.043406Suche in Google Scholar
16. De Vos M, Louis EJ, Jahnsen J, Vandervoort JG, Noman M, Dewit O, et al. Consecutive fecal calprotectin measurements to predict relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis receiving infliximab maintenance therapy. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013;19:2111–7.10.1097/MIB.0b013e31829b2a37Suche in Google Scholar
17. Osterman MT, Aberra FN, Cross R, Liakos S, McCabe R, Shafran I, et al. Mesalamine dose escalation reduces fecal calprotectin in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:1887–93 e3.10.1016/j.cgh.2014.03.035Suche in Google Scholar
18. Lasson A, Ohman L, Stotzer PO, Isaksson S, Uberbacher O, Ung KA, et al. Pharmacological intervention based on fecal calprotectin levels in patients with ulcerative colitis at high risk of a relapse: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. United European Gastroenterol J 2015;3:72–9.10.1177/2050640614560785Suche in Google Scholar
19. Tøn H, Brandsnes, Dale S, Holtlund J, Skuibina E, Schjonsby H, et al. Improved assay for fecal calprotectin. Clin Chim Acta 2000;292:41–54.10.1016/S0009-8981(99)00206-5Suche in Google Scholar
20. Kristensen V, Lauritzen T, Jelsness JLP, Moum B. Validation of a new extraction device for measuring faecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel disease, and comparison to established extraction methods. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2015;75:355–61.10.3109/00365513.2015.1030765Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S, Colombel JF. The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut 2006;55:749–53.10.1136/gut.2005.082909Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
22. Vermeire S, Schreiber S, Sandborn WJ, Dubois C, Rutgeerts P. Correlation between the Crohn’s disease activity and Harvey-Bradshaw indices in assessing Crohn’s disease severity. Clinical Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:357–63.10.1016/j.cgh.2010.01.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
23. D’Haens G, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Geboes K, Hanauer SB, Irvine EJ, et al. A review of activity indices and efficacy end points for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2007;132:763–86.10.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.038Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
24. Labaere D, Smismans A, Van Olmen A, Christiaens P, D’Haens G, Moons V, et al. Comparison of six different calprotectin assays for the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease. United European Gastroenterol J 2014;2:30–7.10.1177/2050640613518201Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
25. af Bjorkesten CG, Nieminen U, Turunen U, Arkkila P, Sipponen T, Farkkila M. Surrogate markers and clinical indices, alone or combined, as indicators for endoscopic remission in anti-TNF-treated luminal Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2012;47:528–37.10.3109/00365521.2012.660542Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
26. Gisbert JP, Bermejo F, Pérez-Calle JL, Taxonera C, Vera I, McNicholl AG, et al. Fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin for the prediction of inflammatory bowel disease relapse. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009;15:1190–8.10.1002/ibd.20933Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
©2016 by De Gruyter
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorials
- Laboratory analytical quality – the process continues
- Measurement uncertainty – a revised understanding of its calculation and use
- Review
- Substrate-zymography: a still worthwhile method for gelatinases analysis in biological samples
- Opinion Papers
- Is the combination of trueness and precision in one expression meaningful? On the use of total error and uncertainty in clinical chemistry
- The problem with total error models in establishing performance specifications and a simple remedy
- Measurement uncertainty for clinical laboratories – a revision of the concept
- Uncertainty in measurement and total error – are they so incompatible?
- General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
- Using the hazard ratio to evaluate allowable total error in predictive measurands
- Performance of electrolyte measurements assessed by a trueness verification program
- Analytical interference by monoclonal immunoglobulins on the direct bilirubin AU Beckman Coulter assay: the benefit of unsuspected diagnosis from spurious results
- Preliminary probe of quality indicators and quality specification in total testing process in 5753 laboratories in China
- Analytical and clinical evaluation of the new Fujirebio Lumipulse®G non-competitive assay for 25(OH)-vitamin D and three immunoassays for 25(OH)D in healthy subjects, osteoporotic patients, third trimester pregnant women, healthy African subjects, hemodialyzed and intensive care patients
- Patient-performed extraction of faecal calprotectin
- Comparison of the clinical utility of the Elia CTD Screen to indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cells
- Reference Values and Biological Variations
- Sex-related differences in the association of ghrelin levels with obesity in adolescents
- Gestation specific reference intervals for thyroid function tests in pregnancy
- Cancer Diagnostics
- SOX17 promoter methylation in plasma circulating tumor DNA of patients with non-small cell lung cancer
- Dopamine concentration in blood platelets is elevated in patients with head and neck paragangliomas
- Letters to the Editor
- Cancer dynamics and the success of cancer screening programs
- Mother’s instinct – a rare case of multiple test interferences due to heterophile antibodies
- Sigma metric or defects per million opportunities (DPMO): the performance of clinical laboratories should be evaluated by the Sigma metrics at decimal level with DPMOs
- A national survey of preanalytical handling of oral glucose tolerance tests in pregnancy
- Updating pregnancy diabetes guidelines: is (y)our laboratory ready?
- Low serum bilirubin values are associated with pulmonary embolism in a case-control study
- Effect of Hb H on HbA1c measurements as measured by IFCC reference method and affinity HPLC
- Adipocytes in venipunctures cause falsely elevated S-100B serum values
- Earlier detection of sepsis by Candida parapsilosis using three-dimensional cytographic anomalies on the Mindray BC-6800 hematological analyzer
- Theranos phenomenon – part 4: Theranos at an International Conference
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorials
- Laboratory analytical quality – the process continues
- Measurement uncertainty – a revised understanding of its calculation and use
- Review
- Substrate-zymography: a still worthwhile method for gelatinases analysis in biological samples
- Opinion Papers
- Is the combination of trueness and precision in one expression meaningful? On the use of total error and uncertainty in clinical chemistry
- The problem with total error models in establishing performance specifications and a simple remedy
- Measurement uncertainty for clinical laboratories – a revision of the concept
- Uncertainty in measurement and total error – are they so incompatible?
- General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
- Using the hazard ratio to evaluate allowable total error in predictive measurands
- Performance of electrolyte measurements assessed by a trueness verification program
- Analytical interference by monoclonal immunoglobulins on the direct bilirubin AU Beckman Coulter assay: the benefit of unsuspected diagnosis from spurious results
- Preliminary probe of quality indicators and quality specification in total testing process in 5753 laboratories in China
- Analytical and clinical evaluation of the new Fujirebio Lumipulse®G non-competitive assay for 25(OH)-vitamin D and three immunoassays for 25(OH)D in healthy subjects, osteoporotic patients, third trimester pregnant women, healthy African subjects, hemodialyzed and intensive care patients
- Patient-performed extraction of faecal calprotectin
- Comparison of the clinical utility of the Elia CTD Screen to indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cells
- Reference Values and Biological Variations
- Sex-related differences in the association of ghrelin levels with obesity in adolescents
- Gestation specific reference intervals for thyroid function tests in pregnancy
- Cancer Diagnostics
- SOX17 promoter methylation in plasma circulating tumor DNA of patients with non-small cell lung cancer
- Dopamine concentration in blood platelets is elevated in patients with head and neck paragangliomas
- Letters to the Editor
- Cancer dynamics and the success of cancer screening programs
- Mother’s instinct – a rare case of multiple test interferences due to heterophile antibodies
- Sigma metric or defects per million opportunities (DPMO): the performance of clinical laboratories should be evaluated by the Sigma metrics at decimal level with DPMOs
- A national survey of preanalytical handling of oral glucose tolerance tests in pregnancy
- Updating pregnancy diabetes guidelines: is (y)our laboratory ready?
- Low serum bilirubin values are associated with pulmonary embolism in a case-control study
- Effect of Hb H on HbA1c measurements as measured by IFCC reference method and affinity HPLC
- Adipocytes in venipunctures cause falsely elevated S-100B serum values
- Earlier detection of sepsis by Candida parapsilosis using three-dimensional cytographic anomalies on the Mindray BC-6800 hematological analyzer
- Theranos phenomenon – part 4: Theranos at an International Conference