Home Measurement of free light chains with assays based on monoclonal antibodies
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Measurement of free light chains with assays based on monoclonal antibodies

  • Henk te Velthuis , Mark Drayson and John P. Campbell EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 24, 2016

Abstract

Recently, serum free light chain (FLC) assays incorporating anti-kappa (κ) and anti-lambda (λ) FLC monoclonal antibodies have become available: N Latex FLC assay (Siemens) and Seralite® (Abingdon Health). The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of these two new monoclonal antibody-based methods. In doing so, the review will outline the performance characteristics of each method, including a summary of: assay principles, antibody specificity, analytical performance and assay performance in disease. Additionally, the review will describe the potential user benefits of adopting these new generation FLC assays, which are designed to overcome the established limitations of existing polyclonal antibody based FLC assays.


Corresponding author: John P. Campbell, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

References

1. LeFranc M-P, LeFranc G. The immunoglobulin factsbook. London: Academic Press, 2001.10.1016/B978-012441352-8/50008-4Search in Google Scholar

2. Campbell JP, Cobbold M, Wang Y, Goodall M, Bonney SL, Chamba A, et al. Development of a highly-sensitive multi-plex assay using monoclonal antibodies for the simultaneous measurement of kappa and lambda immunoglobulin free light chains in serum and urine. J Immunol Methods 2013;391:1–13.10.1016/j.jim.2013.01.014Search in Google Scholar

3. Abe M, Goto T, Kennel SJ, Wolfenbarger D, Macy SD, Weiss DT, et al. Production and immunodiagnostic applications of antihuman light chain monoclonal antibodies. Am J Clin Pathol 1993;100:67–74.10.1093/ajcp/100.1.67Search in Google Scholar

4. Nakano T, Nagata A. ELISAs for free human immunoglobulin light chains in serum: improvement of assay specificity by using two specific antibodies in a sandwich detection method. J Immunol Methods 2004;293:183–9.10.1016/j.jim.2004.08.002Search in Google Scholar

5. te Velthuis H, Knop I, Stam P, van den Broek M, Klaasse Bos H, Hol S, et al. N Latex FLC – new monoclonal high performance assays for the determination of free light chain kappa and lambda. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:1323–32.10.1515/CCLM.2011.624Search in Google Scholar

6. Berggard I, Peterson PA. Polymeric forms of free normal kappa and lambda chains of human immunoglobulin. J Biol Chem 1969;244:4299–307.10.1016/S0021-9258(18)94320-6Search in Google Scholar

7. Abraham RS, Charlesworth MC, Owen BA, Benson LM, Katzmann JA, Reeder CB, et al. Trimolecular complexes of lambda light chain dimers in serum of a patient with multiple myeloma. Clin Chem 2002;48:1805–11.10.1093/clinchem/48.10.1805Search in Google Scholar

8. Di Noto G, Cimpoies E, Dossi A, Paolini L, Radeghieri A, Caimi L, et al. Polyclonal versus monoclonal immunoglobulin-free light chains quantification. Ann Clin Biochem 2015;52:327–36.10.1177/0004563214553808Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Graziani M, Merlini G, Petrini C. Guidelines for the analysis of Bence Jones protein. Clin Chem Lab Med 2003;41:338–46.10.1515/CCLM.2003.054Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Pretorius CJ, Klingberg S, Tate J, Wilgen U, Ungerer JP. Evaluation of the N Latex FLC free light chain assay on the Siemens BN analyser: precision, agreement, linearity and variation between reagent lots. Ann Clin Biochem 2012;49:450–5.10.1258/acb.2012.011264Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Lock RJ, Saleem R, Roberts EG, Wallage MJ, Pesce TJ, Rowbottom A, et al. A multicentre study comparing two methods for serum free light chain analysis. Ann Clin Biochem 2013;50:255–61.10.1177/0004563212473447Search in Google Scholar

12. Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, Blade J, Merlini G, Mateos MV, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:e538–48.10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5Search in Google Scholar

13. Sasson SC, McGill K, Wienholt L, Carr A, Brown DA, Kelleher AD, et al. Comparison of the Freelite serum free light chain (SFLC) assay with serum and urine electrophoresis/immunofixation and the N Latex FLC assay. Pathology 2015;47:564–9.10.1097/PAT.0000000000000316Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Jacobs JF, Hoedemakers RM, Teunissen E, van der Molen RG, Te VH. Effect of sample dilution on two free light chain nephelometric assays. Clin Chim Acta 2012;413:1708–9.10.1016/j.cca.2012.04.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Vercammen M, Meirlaen P, Broodtaerts L, Vande B, I, Bossuyt X. Effect of sample dilution on serum free light chain concentration by immunonephelometric assay. Clin Chim Acta 2011;412:1798–804.10.1016/j.cca.2011.06.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. VanDuijn MM, Jacobs JF, Wevers RA, Engelke UF, Joosten I, Luider TM. Quantitative Measurement of Immunoglobulins and Free Light Chains Using Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem 2015;87:8268–74.10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01263Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Dispenzieri A, Kyle R, Merlini G, Miguel JS, Ludwig H, Hajek R, et al. International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Leukemia 2009;23:215–24.10.1038/leu.2008.307Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Jacobs JF, Hoedemakers RM, Teunissen E, Te VH. N Latex FLC serum free light-chain assays in patients with renal impairment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:853–9.10.1515/cclm-2013-0864Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Tate J, Bazeley S, Klingberg S, Pretorius CJ, Hutchison C, Mollee P. Comparison of the Freelite and N Latex serum free light chain (FLC) assays in chronic kidney disease. Clin Biochem Rev 2012;33:S41.Search in Google Scholar

20. Tate J, Mollee P. Towards improved measurement of serum free light chains: clinical and laboratory issues. Biochimica Clinica 2013;37:395–404.Search in Google Scholar

21. Hoedemakers RM, Pruijt JF, Hol S, Teunissen E, Martens H, Stam P, et al. Clinical comparison of new monoclonal antibody-based nephelometric assays for free light chain kappa and lambda to polyclonal antibody-based assays and immunofixation electrophoresis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;50:489–95.10.1515/cclm.2011.793Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Kim HS, Kim HS, Shin KS, Song W, Kim HJ, Kim HS, et al. Clinical comparisons of two free light chain assays to immunofixation electrophoresis for detecting monoclonal gammopathy. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:647238.10.1155/2014/647238Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Mollee P, Tate J, Pretorius CJ. Evaluation of the N Latex free light chain assay in the diagnosis and monitoring of AL amyloidosis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:2303–10.10.1515/cclm-2013-0361Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Palladini G, Bosoni T, Milani P, Pirolini L, Foli A, Li Bergolis F, et al. Use of the novel monoclonal assay for the measurement of circulating free light chain in the diagnosis, prognostication of survival and assessment of response to therapy in AL amyloidosis. Blood 2012;120:3913a.10.1182/blood.V120.21.3913.3913Search in Google Scholar

25. Schneider N, Wynckel A, Kolb B, Sablon E, Gillery P, Maquart FX. [Comparative analysis of immunoglobulin free light chains quantification by Freelite (the binding site) and N Latex FLC (Siemens) methods]. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2013;71:13–9.10.1684/abc.2012.0785Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Briand PY, Decaux O, Caillon H, Grosbois B, Le TA, Guenet L. Analytical performance of the serum free light chain assay. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:73–9.10.1515/CCLM.2010.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. de Kat Angelino CM, Raymakers R, Teunesen MA, Jacobs JF, Klasen IS. Overestimation of serum kappa free light chain concentration by immunonephelometry. Clin Chem 2010;56:1188–90.10.1373/clinchem.2010.143529Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Daval S, Tridon A, Mazeron N, Ristori JM, Evrard B. Risk of antigen excess in serum free light chain measurements. Clin Chem 2007;53:1985–6.10.1373/clinchem.2007.093377Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Bosmann M, Kossler J, Stolz H, Walter U, Knop S, Steigerwald U. Detection of serum free light chains: the problem with antigen excess. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:1419–22.10.1515/CCLM.2010.283Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Mead GP, Carr-Smith HD. Overestimation of serum kappa free light chain concentration by immunonephelometry. Clin Chem 2010;56:1503–4.10.1373/clinchem.2010.150490Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Tate JR, Mollee P, Dimeski G, Carter AC, Gill D. Analytical performance of serum free light-chain assay during monitoring of patients with monoclonal light-chain diseases. Clin Chim Acta 2007;376:30–6.10.1016/j.cca.2006.07.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Tate J, Bazeley S, Sykes S, Mollee P. Quantitative serum free light chain assay – analytical issues. Clin Biochem Rev 2009;30:131–40.Search in Google Scholar

33. Bakker AJ, Bierma-Ram A, Elderman-van der Werf C, Strijdhaftig ML, van Zanden JJ. Quantitation of serum free light chains. Clin Chem 2009;55:1585–7.10.1373/clinchem.2008.122416Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Comenzo RL, Reece D, Palladini G, Seldin D, Sanchorawala V, Landau H, et al. Consensus guidelines for the conduct and reporting of clinical trials in systemic light-chain amyloidosis. Leukemia 2012;26:2317–25.10.1038/leu.2012.100Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Davern S, Tang LX, Williams TK, Macy SD, Wall JS, Weiss DT, et al. Immunodiagnostic capabilities of anti-free immunoglobulin light chain monoclonal antibodies. Am J Clin Pathol 2008;130:702–11.10.1309/AJCPNS6K1CYJPDBASearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Drayson M, Carr-Smith H. Clinical comparison of new monoclonal antibody-based nephelometric assays for free light chain kappa and lambda to polyclonal antibody-based assays and immunofixation electrophoresis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:587–8.10.1515/cclm-2012-0037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Wild D. The immunoassay handbook, 3rd ed. Amsterdam and London: Elsevier, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

38. Campbell JP, Stride AE, Heaney J, Cobbold M, Wang Y, Goodall M, et al. Validation of a rapid lateral-flow test for the diagnosis and monitoring of immunoglobulin free light chains: retrospective analysis of sera from patients with plasma cell dyscrasias. Clin Chem 2013;59:A51.Search in Google Scholar

39. Campbell JP, Stride AE, Brioli A, Goodall M, Morgan GJ, Drayson MT. Seralite (c) rapid point-of-care detection of free light chain escape, non-secratory relapse and light chain only relapse in multiple myeloma. Blood 2013;122:3136–3136.10.1182/blood.V122.21.3136.3136Search in Google Scholar

40. Campbell JP, Stride AE, Cobbold M, Wang Y, Goodall M, Bonney SL, et al. Rapid test to identify myeloma kidney by measurement of serum free light chains. Clin Lymphoma Meyolma Leuk 2013;13:454.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-10-2
Accepted: 2016-2-18
Published Online: 2016-3-24
Published in Print: 2016-6-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Protein electrophoresis and serum free light chains in the diagnosis and monitoring of plasma cell disorders: laboratory testing and current controversies
  4. Laboratory Testing as Recommended by the Guidelines and the International Myeloma Working Group
  5. Laboratory testing requirements for diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma and related plasma cell dyscrasias
  6. Free light chain testing for the diagnosis, monitoring and prognostication of AL amyloidosis
  7. Laboratory testing in monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS)
  8. The impact of renal function on the clinical performance of FLC measurement in AL amyloidosis
  9. Serum and Urine Protein Electrophoresis and Immunofixation Testing
  10. Challenges of measuring monoclonal proteins in serum
  11. Screening immunofixation should replace protein electrophoresis as the initial investigation of monoclonal gammopathy: Point
  12. Should routine laboratories stop doing screening serum protein electrophoresis and replace it with screening immune-fixation electrophoresis? No quick fixes: Counterpoint
  13. Moving towards harmonized reporting of serum and urine protein electrophoresis
  14. Multiple qualitative and quantitative methods for free light chain analysis are necessary as first line tests for AL amyloidosis
  15. Use of isoelectric focusing to discriminate transient oligoclonal bands from monoclonal protein in treated myeloma
  16. New patterns of relapse in multiple myeloma: a case of “light chain escape” in which FLC predicted relapse earlier than urine and serum immunofixation
  17. Serum Free Light Chain Methods and Controversies
  18. Analytical issues of serum free light chain assays and the relative performance of polyclonal and monoclonal based reagents
  19. Measurement of free light chains with assays based on monoclonal antibodies
  20. Measurement of free light chains – pros and cons of current methods
  21. Is accuracy of serum free light chain measurement achievable?
  22. Performance goals for immunoglobulins and serum free light chain measurements in plasma cell dyscrasias can be based on biological variation
  23. A patient with AL amyloidosis with negative free light chain results
  24. Strengths and weaknesses of methods for identifying monoclonal free light chains of Ig: examples from two cases with renal disease
  25. Comparison of Freelite™ and N Latex serum free light chain assays in subjects with end stage kidney disease on haemodialysis
  26. New Laboratory Assays and Challenges
  27. Quantification of β-region IgA monoclonal proteins – should we include immunochemical Hevylite® measurements? Point
  28. Quantification of β region IgA paraproteins – should we include immunochemical “heavy/light chain” measurements? Counterpoint
  29. Free light chains and heavy/light chains in monitoring POEMS patients
  30. Monitoring free light chains in serum using mass spectrometry
  31. Monoclonal antibody therapeutics as potential interferences on protein electrophoresis and immunofixation
  32. Monitoring multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab: teasing out monoclonal antibody interference
  33. Interference of daratumumab in monitoring multiple myeloma patients using serum immunofixation electrophoresis can be abrogated using the daratumumab IFE reflex assay (DIRA)
  34. Letter to the Editor
  35. Discrepancy between FLC assays: only a problem of quantification?
Downloaded on 6.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2015-0963/pdf
Scroll to top button