Use of isoelectric focusing to discriminate transient oligoclonal bands from monoclonal protein in treated myeloma
-
Robyn Henry
Abstract
A 62-year-old diabetic man with prostate cancer first presented to our clinical laboratory in 2003 with a normal serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation. In March 2009 he was diagnosed with an IgG κ myeloma. He underwent treatment and went into remission with the original paraprotein band being undetectable. Over the following 5 years, he developed oligoclonal bands and then eventually relapsed. Serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation were inconclusive, however, isoelectrofocusing identified the oligoclonal pattern then the return of the original band, indicating relapse. This case illustrates the usefulness of an isoelectric focusing method to correctly determine clonality of small abnormal protein bands. It also highlights the need for appropriate commenting on reported results so that they are not confusing for clinicians.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Jill Tate, Peter Mollee, Daman Langguth and Peter Hobson for reviewing the paper and for their helpful recommendations.
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
References
1. Hall SL, Tate J, Gill D, Mollee P. Significance of abnormal protein bands in patients with multiple myeloma following autologous stem cell transplantation. Clin Biochem Rev 2009;30:113–8.Search in Google Scholar
2. Fujisawa M, Seike K, Fukumoto K. Oligoclonal bands in patients with multiple myeloma: its emergence per se could not be translated to improved survival. Cancer Sci 2014;105:1442–6.10.1111/cas.12527Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Guimarães C, Bergantim R, Ramalho R, Couto N, Guimarães JT, Trigo F. Prognostic value of unrelated atypical serum immunofixation patterns during multiple myeloma therapy. J Hematol Oncol 2012;5:33–5.10.1186/1756-8722-5-33Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
4. Mark T, Jayabalan D, Coleman M, Pearse RN, Wang YL, Lent R, et al. Atypical serum immunofixation patterns frequently emerge in immunomodulatory therapy and are associated with a high degree of response in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2008;143:654–60.10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07374.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
5. Tovar N, Fernández de Larrea C, Aróstegui JI, Cibeira MT, Rosiñol L, Rovira M, et al. Natural history and prognostic impact of oligoclonal humoral response in patients with multiple myeloma after autologous stem cell transplantation: long-term results from a single institution. Haematologica 2013;98:1142–6.10.3324/haematol.2013.084350Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Wadhera RK, Kyle RA, Larson DR, Dispenzieri A, Kumar S, Lazarus HM, et al. Incidence, clinical course, and prognosis of secondary monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2011;118:2985–7.10.1182/blood-2011-04-349175Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
7. Churpek JE, Larson RA. The evolving challenge of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2013;26:309–17.10.1016/j.beha.2013.09.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
8. Tate J, Caldwell G, Daly J, Gillis D, Jenkins M, Jovanovich S, et al. Recommendations for standardized reporting of protein electrophoresis in Australia and New Zealand. Ann Clin Biochem 2012;49:242–56.10.1258/acb.2011.011158Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Cornell FN. Isoelectric focusing, blotting and probing methods for detection and identification of monoclonal proteins. Clin Biochem Rev 2009;30:123–30.Search in Google Scholar
10. Tate J, Mollee P, Johnson R. Monoclonal gammopathies–clinical and laboratory issues. Clin Biochem Rev 2009;30:89l O91.Search in Google Scholar
11. Schmitz MF, Otten HG, Franssen LE, van Dorp S, Strooisma T, Lokhorst HM, et al. Secondary monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance after allogenic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2014;99:1846–53.10.3324/haematol.2014.111104Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
12. Cornell FN, McLachlan R. Isoelectric focusing in the investigation of gammopathies. In: Biegler B, editor. Advanced electrophoretic techniques in clinical diagnosis. Australian Association of Clinical Biochemists Monograph Series. Sydney: AACB, 1985;31–7.Search in Google Scholar
13. Caillon H, Dejoie T, Loupp A-G. Difficulties in immunofixation analysis: a concordance study on the IFM. 2007-02 trial. Blood Cancer J 2013;3:e154.10.1038/bcj.2013.51Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
©2016 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Protein electrophoresis and serum free light chains in the diagnosis and monitoring of plasma cell disorders: laboratory testing and current controversies
- Laboratory Testing as Recommended by the Guidelines and the International Myeloma Working Group
- Laboratory testing requirements for diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma and related plasma cell dyscrasias
- Free light chain testing for the diagnosis, monitoring and prognostication of AL amyloidosis
- Laboratory testing in monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS)
- The impact of renal function on the clinical performance of FLC measurement in AL amyloidosis
- Serum and Urine Protein Electrophoresis and Immunofixation Testing
- Challenges of measuring monoclonal proteins in serum
- Screening immunofixation should replace protein electrophoresis as the initial investigation of monoclonal gammopathy: Point
- Should routine laboratories stop doing screening serum protein electrophoresis and replace it with screening immune-fixation electrophoresis? No quick fixes: Counterpoint
- Moving towards harmonized reporting of serum and urine protein electrophoresis
- Multiple qualitative and quantitative methods for free light chain analysis are necessary as first line tests for AL amyloidosis
- Use of isoelectric focusing to discriminate transient oligoclonal bands from monoclonal protein in treated myeloma
- New patterns of relapse in multiple myeloma: a case of “light chain escape” in which FLC predicted relapse earlier than urine and serum immunofixation
- Serum Free Light Chain Methods and Controversies
- Analytical issues of serum free light chain assays and the relative performance of polyclonal and monoclonal based reagents
- Measurement of free light chains with assays based on monoclonal antibodies
- Measurement of free light chains – pros and cons of current methods
- Is accuracy of serum free light chain measurement achievable?
- Performance goals for immunoglobulins and serum free light chain measurements in plasma cell dyscrasias can be based on biological variation
- A patient with AL amyloidosis with negative free light chain results
- Strengths and weaknesses of methods for identifying monoclonal free light chains of Ig: examples from two cases with renal disease
- Comparison of Freelite™ and N Latex serum free light chain assays in subjects with end stage kidney disease on haemodialysis
- New Laboratory Assays and Challenges
- Quantification of β-region IgA monoclonal proteins – should we include immunochemical Hevylite® measurements? Point
- Quantification of β region IgA paraproteins – should we include immunochemical “heavy/light chain” measurements? Counterpoint
- Free light chains and heavy/light chains in monitoring POEMS patients
- Monitoring free light chains in serum using mass spectrometry
- Monoclonal antibody therapeutics as potential interferences on protein electrophoresis and immunofixation
- Monitoring multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab: teasing out monoclonal antibody interference
- Interference of daratumumab in monitoring multiple myeloma patients using serum immunofixation electrophoresis can be abrogated using the daratumumab IFE reflex assay (DIRA)
- Letter to the Editor
- Discrepancy between FLC assays: only a problem of quantification?
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Protein electrophoresis and serum free light chains in the diagnosis and monitoring of plasma cell disorders: laboratory testing and current controversies
- Laboratory Testing as Recommended by the Guidelines and the International Myeloma Working Group
- Laboratory testing requirements for diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma and related plasma cell dyscrasias
- Free light chain testing for the diagnosis, monitoring and prognostication of AL amyloidosis
- Laboratory testing in monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS)
- The impact of renal function on the clinical performance of FLC measurement in AL amyloidosis
- Serum and Urine Protein Electrophoresis and Immunofixation Testing
- Challenges of measuring monoclonal proteins in serum
- Screening immunofixation should replace protein electrophoresis as the initial investigation of monoclonal gammopathy: Point
- Should routine laboratories stop doing screening serum protein electrophoresis and replace it with screening immune-fixation electrophoresis? No quick fixes: Counterpoint
- Moving towards harmonized reporting of serum and urine protein electrophoresis
- Multiple qualitative and quantitative methods for free light chain analysis are necessary as first line tests for AL amyloidosis
- Use of isoelectric focusing to discriminate transient oligoclonal bands from monoclonal protein in treated myeloma
- New patterns of relapse in multiple myeloma: a case of “light chain escape” in which FLC predicted relapse earlier than urine and serum immunofixation
- Serum Free Light Chain Methods and Controversies
- Analytical issues of serum free light chain assays and the relative performance of polyclonal and monoclonal based reagents
- Measurement of free light chains with assays based on monoclonal antibodies
- Measurement of free light chains – pros and cons of current methods
- Is accuracy of serum free light chain measurement achievable?
- Performance goals for immunoglobulins and serum free light chain measurements in plasma cell dyscrasias can be based on biological variation
- A patient with AL amyloidosis with negative free light chain results
- Strengths and weaknesses of methods for identifying monoclonal free light chains of Ig: examples from two cases with renal disease
- Comparison of Freelite™ and N Latex serum free light chain assays in subjects with end stage kidney disease on haemodialysis
- New Laboratory Assays and Challenges
- Quantification of β-region IgA monoclonal proteins – should we include immunochemical Hevylite® measurements? Point
- Quantification of β region IgA paraproteins – should we include immunochemical “heavy/light chain” measurements? Counterpoint
- Free light chains and heavy/light chains in monitoring POEMS patients
- Monitoring free light chains in serum using mass spectrometry
- Monoclonal antibody therapeutics as potential interferences on protein electrophoresis and immunofixation
- Monitoring multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab: teasing out monoclonal antibody interference
- Interference of daratumumab in monitoring multiple myeloma patients using serum immunofixation electrophoresis can be abrogated using the daratumumab IFE reflex assay (DIRA)
- Letter to the Editor
- Discrepancy between FLC assays: only a problem of quantification?
