Home Quantification of β-region IgA monoclonal proteins – should we include immunochemical Hevylite® measurements? Point
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Quantification of β-region IgA monoclonal proteins – should we include immunochemical Hevylite® measurements? Point

  • Josie A.R. Evans EMAIL logo , Ellen L. Jenner , Hugh D. Carr Smith , Oscar Berlanga and Stephen J. Harding
Published/Copyright: October 20, 2015

Abstract

Accurate measurement of IgA monoclonal proteins presents a significant challenge to laboratory staff. IgA heavy/light chain (Hevylite, HLC) analysis is an alternative methodology for monoclonal protein assessment, giving an independent measure of IgAκ and IgAλ concentrations. Clonality is assessed by calculating the ratio of involved immunoglobulin to background uninvolved immunoglobulin concentrations (e.g. IgAκ/IgAλ in an IgAκ patient). Here we discuss the challenges faced by the laboratory in IgA monoclonal protein assessment, and compare the performance of Hevylite assays with electrophoresis and total IgA results. We present data which validates the use of Hevylite for response assessment: in most cases, Hevylite provides comparable response assignment to that provided by serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and total IgA; in other cases Hevylite provides additional information, such as detection of residual disease or relapse.


Corresponding author: Josie A.R. Evans, The Binding Site Ltd, 8 Calthorpe Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 1QT, UK

References

1. Woof JM, Russell MW. Structure and function relationships in IgA. Mucosal Immunol 2011;4:590–7.10.1038/mi.2011.39Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Bradwell AR, Harding SJ, Fourrier NJ, Wallis GL, Drayson MT, Carr-Smith HD, et al. Assessment of monoclonal gammopathies by nephelometric measurement of individual immunoglobulin kappa/lambda ratios. Clin Chem 2009;55:1646–55.10.1373/clinchem.2009.123828Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Murphy K. Janeway’s Immunobiology, 8th ed. New York, USA: Garland Science, 2011:157–200.Search in Google Scholar

4. Boyle EM, Fouquet G, Guidez S, Bonnet S, Demarquette H, Dulery R, et al. IgA kappa/IgA lambda heavy/light chain assessment in the management of patients with IgA myeloma. Cancer 2014;120:3952–7.10.1002/cncr.28946Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Katzmann JA, Willrich MA, Kohlhagen MC, Kyle RA, Murray DL, Snyder MR, et al. Monitoring IgA multiple myeloma: immunoglobulin heavy/light chain assays. Clin Chem 2015;61:360–7.10.1373/clinchem.2014.231985Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Keren DF. Protein electrophoresis in clinical diagnosis. Chicago, USA: ASCP Press, 2012.10.1007/978-1-61779-821-4Search in Google Scholar

7. Roberts-Thomson PJ, Mason DY, MacLennan IC. Relationship between paraprotein polymerization and clinical features in IgA myeloma. Br J Haematol 1976;33:117–30.10.1111/j.1365-2141.1976.tb00978.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Murray DL, Ryu E, Snyder MR, Katzmann JA. Quantitation of serum monoclonal proteins: relation of agarose gel electrophoresis M-spike and nephelometric concentration. Clin Chem 2009;55:C63a.10.1373/clinchem.2009.124461Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Katzmann JA, Snyder MR, Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Benson JT, et al. Long-term biologic variation of serum protein electrophoresis M-spike, urine M-spike, and monoclonal serum free light chain quantification: implications for monitoring monoclonal gammopathies. Clin Chem 2011; 57:1687–92.10.1373/clinchem.2011.171314Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Batinic J, Peric Z, Segulja D, Last J, Prijic S, Dubravcic K, et al. Immunoglobulin heavy/light chain analysis enhances the detection of residual disease and monitoring of multiple myeloma patients. Croat Med J 2015;56:263–71.10.3325/cmj.2015.56.263Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Ludwig H, Milosavljevic D, Zojer N, Faint JM, Bradwell AR, Hubl W, et al. Immunoglobulin heavy/light chain ratios improve paraprotein detection and monitoring, identify residual disease and correlate with survival in multiple myeloma patients. Leukemia 2013;27:213–9.10.1038/leu.2012.197Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Mirbahai L, Fourrier NJ, Harper J, Harris J, Bradwell AR, Harding SJ. Monoclonal IgA proteins migrating into the β region of serum protein electrophoresis gels can be easily identified and quantified using IgAκ and IgAλ measurements. Clin Chem 2011;57:C-64a.Search in Google Scholar

13. Donato LJ, Zeldenrust SR, Murray DL, Katzmann JA. A 71-year-old woman with multiple myeloma status after stem cell transplantation. Clin Chem 2011;57:1645–8.10.1373/clinchem.2011.163766Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Katzmann JA, Clark R, Kyle RA, Larson DR, Therneau TM, Melton LJ, III, et al. Suppression of uninvolved immunoglobulins defined by heavy/light-chain pair suppression is a risk factor for progression of MGUS. Leukemia 2013;27:208–12.10.1038/leu.2012.189Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Tate J, Caldwell G, Daly J, Gillis D, Jenkins M, Jovanovich S, et al. Recommendations for standardized reporting of protein electrophoresis in Australia and New Zealand. Ann Clin Biochem 2012;49:242–56.10.1258/acb.2011.011158Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Adie L, Berlanga O, Carr-Smith H, Harding S. Comparison of the performance of the newly developed IgA heavy chain/light chain immunoassays with serum protein electrophoresis and nephelometric total IgA measurements for monitoring IgA multiple myeloma patients. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:0688a.10.1016/j.clml.2015.07.363Search in Google Scholar

17. Young P, Ludwig H, Zojer N, Milosavljevic D, Harding S. Use of heavy/light chain (HLC) and free light chain (FLC) ratios for monitoring oligosecretory multiple myeloma patients. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2013;13:P-236a.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-7-21
Accepted: 2015-9-23
Published Online: 2015-10-20
Published in Print: 2016-6-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Protein electrophoresis and serum free light chains in the diagnosis and monitoring of plasma cell disorders: laboratory testing and current controversies
  4. Laboratory Testing as Recommended by the Guidelines and the International Myeloma Working Group
  5. Laboratory testing requirements for diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma and related plasma cell dyscrasias
  6. Free light chain testing for the diagnosis, monitoring and prognostication of AL amyloidosis
  7. Laboratory testing in monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS)
  8. The impact of renal function on the clinical performance of FLC measurement in AL amyloidosis
  9. Serum and Urine Protein Electrophoresis and Immunofixation Testing
  10. Challenges of measuring monoclonal proteins in serum
  11. Screening immunofixation should replace protein electrophoresis as the initial investigation of monoclonal gammopathy: Point
  12. Should routine laboratories stop doing screening serum protein electrophoresis and replace it with screening immune-fixation electrophoresis? No quick fixes: Counterpoint
  13. Moving towards harmonized reporting of serum and urine protein electrophoresis
  14. Multiple qualitative and quantitative methods for free light chain analysis are necessary as first line tests for AL amyloidosis
  15. Use of isoelectric focusing to discriminate transient oligoclonal bands from monoclonal protein in treated myeloma
  16. New patterns of relapse in multiple myeloma: a case of “light chain escape” in which FLC predicted relapse earlier than urine and serum immunofixation
  17. Serum Free Light Chain Methods and Controversies
  18. Analytical issues of serum free light chain assays and the relative performance of polyclonal and monoclonal based reagents
  19. Measurement of free light chains with assays based on monoclonal antibodies
  20. Measurement of free light chains – pros and cons of current methods
  21. Is accuracy of serum free light chain measurement achievable?
  22. Performance goals for immunoglobulins and serum free light chain measurements in plasma cell dyscrasias can be based on biological variation
  23. A patient with AL amyloidosis with negative free light chain results
  24. Strengths and weaknesses of methods for identifying monoclonal free light chains of Ig: examples from two cases with renal disease
  25. Comparison of Freelite™ and N Latex serum free light chain assays in subjects with end stage kidney disease on haemodialysis
  26. New Laboratory Assays and Challenges
  27. Quantification of β-region IgA monoclonal proteins – should we include immunochemical Hevylite® measurements? Point
  28. Quantification of β region IgA paraproteins – should we include immunochemical “heavy/light chain” measurements? Counterpoint
  29. Free light chains and heavy/light chains in monitoring POEMS patients
  30. Monitoring free light chains in serum using mass spectrometry
  31. Monoclonal antibody therapeutics as potential interferences on protein electrophoresis and immunofixation
  32. Monitoring multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab: teasing out monoclonal antibody interference
  33. Interference of daratumumab in monitoring multiple myeloma patients using serum immunofixation electrophoresis can be abrogated using the daratumumab IFE reflex assay (DIRA)
  34. Letter to the Editor
  35. Discrepancy between FLC assays: only a problem of quantification?
Downloaded on 6.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2015-0696/pdf
Scroll to top button