Home Unveiling a novel species, Pachymeniopsis shinchonai sp. nov., from Korea, with reference to phylogenetic relationships within the Grateloupiaceae (Halymeniales, Rhodophyta)
Article Open Access

Unveiling a novel species, Pachymeniopsis shinchonai sp. nov., from Korea, with reference to phylogenetic relationships within the Grateloupiaceae (Halymeniales, Rhodophyta)

  • Mi Yeon Yang

    Mi Yeon Yang is a research professor at Jeju National University. She is interested in the systematics of various red algal groups, such as Gigartinales and Halymeniales. Her research, which combines morphological and molecular approaches, has led to the description of several new species. She is also interested in the phylogeography of red macroalgae.

    ORCID logo
    and Myung Sook Kim

    Myung Sook Kim is the Director of the Research Institute for Basic Sciences and a Professor of Biology at Jeju National University, Korea. Her current research focuses on the systematics of macroalgae, the phylogeography of red algae, and understanding biodiversity changes caused by climate change.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 18, 2025

Abstract

Recent comprehensive phylogenetic and morphological analyses have led to the recognition of the Grateloupiaceae as a distinct family within the Halymeniales. Despite strong support for its monophyly, the genera within the Grateloupiaceae display diverse morphological traits and share external features that prevent accurate generic identification without additional molecular analyses. This study conducted detailed morphological observations and assessed the phylogenetic relationships of a Grateloupia-like species found in Korea, which superficially resembles “G”. imbricata. We describe Pachymeniopsis shinchonai sp. nov., characterized by erect, compressed axes branching dichotomously to subdichotomously, maturing into a dome-shape thallus. This species is distinguished from related species by its densely arranged thallus, which forms a hemispherical shape, its abundant secondary attachments adhering to adjacent branches and the substratum, and its phylogenetic position in the rbcL tree. This species contributes to the biodiversity of the intertidal zone on Jeju Island, Korea. Our phylogenetic analysis confirms the monophyly of nine clades within the Grateloupiaceae and underscores the need for further studies to resolve the generic status of Pachymeniopsis, Prionitis, and Phyllymenia, which cannot be readily distinguished by morphological criteria alone. Due to the lack of support for several genera, comprehensive collections and multi-gene analyses are essential to accurately delineate the internal generic relationships within the family.

1 Introduction

Members of Grateloupia sensu lato, which belong to the order Halymeniales, have received considerable attention for both morphological and molecular analyses (Gargiulo et al. 2013; Montes et al. 2017; Rodríguez-Prieto et al. 2022). They exhibit a diverse range of morphological characters, from pinnate forms like G. filicina (J.V.Lamouroux) C. Agardh, designated as a lectotype species, to dichotomous forms such as G. dichotoma J.Agardh, and foliose blades as seen in G. elliptica Holmes. Grateloupia C.Agardh is the largest genus in the order Halymeniales, comprising 92 currently recognized species (Guiry and Guiry 2024). Another genus, Phyllymenia J.Agardh, was originally described from South Africa based on a single species, Phyllymenia hieroglyphica J.Agardh (later synonymized as P. belangeri; Setchell and Gardner 1936), characterized by foliose blades which range from simple and cuneate to lacerate (De Clerk et al. 2005). However, as Phyllymenia was described without comparison to other genera (Agardh 1848), its generic status has been debated and reassessed through both morphological and molecular studies (De Clerck et al. 2005; Gargiulo et al. 2013; Nguyen et al. 2023; Setchell and Gardner 1936). Similarly, Prionitis J.Agardh was initially described with nine species, with Prionitis lanceolata later designated as the lectotype (Schmitz 1889). The distinction between Grateloupia, Phyllymenia, and Prionitis and several related genera such as Carpopeltis Schmitz, Cryptonemia J.Agardh and Polyopes J.Agardh remains unclear due to overlapping morphological traits (Kawaguchi 1989). Subsequently, the genus Pachymeniopsis Yamada ex Kawabata was proposed to accommodate three Japanese species having foliose blades, with Pachymeniopsis lanceolata (Okamura) Yamada ex Kawabata as the type species. Among these groups, vegetative features such as overall habit and branching patterns show little taxonomic utility (Kim et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2001; Wilkes et al. 2005).

Historically, the auxiliary cell ampullae have been emphasized as a crucial characteristic for distinguishing genera within the Halymeniales (Chiang 1970; Garguilo et al. 2013). To date, six types of auxiliary cell ampulla structure have been identified in this group. Chiang (1970) initially classified five types: Grateloupia-type, Thamnoclonium-type, Halymenia-type, Aeodes-type, and Cryptonemia-type. Later, Lee and Kim (2019) introduced an additional type, the Nesoia-type. Extensive studies have focused on the development of ampullar structures both before and after fertilization in Grateloupia sensu lato (De Clerck et al. 2005; Kawaguchi 1989; Kawaguchi et al. 2001; Lin et al. 2008). Owing to similarities in these structures, several genera, including Dermocorynus P.Crouan et H.Crouan, Pachymeniopsis, Phyllymenia, and Prionitis, were either fully or partially merged into Grateloupia (De Clerck et al. 2005; Kawaguchi 1997; Wang et al. 2001; Wilkes et al. 2005). However, Gargiulo et al. (2013) later reinstated several genera based on combined evidence from rbcL phylogenies and reinterpretation of female reproductive structures. After that, newly described genera, such as Neorubra M.S.Calderon, G.H.Boo et S.M.Boo and Mariaramirezia M.S.Calderon, G.H.Boo et S.M.Boo, were phylogenetically clarified, having been previously recognized as Grateloupia denticulata and Prionitis decipiens, respectively (Calderon et al. 2014a, 2014b).

Recently, Kim et al. (2021) conducted a comprehensive molecular phylogenetic study on the order Halymeniales, analyzing 33 of 38 recognized genera, including 30 type species. Their findings strongly supported the segregation of the family Grateloupiaceae from Halymeniaceae, based on both phylogenetic data and distinct morphological characteristics, particularly in terms of female and tetrasporangial developments. The emended family Grateloupiaceae now comprises nine genera: Grateloupia, Dermocorynus, Mariaramirezia, Neorubra, Pachymeniopsis, Kintokiocolax, Phyllymenia, Prionitis, and Yonagunia Kawaguchi et Masuda (Kim et al. 2021). Among them, the genus Pachymeniopsis was originally delineated based on species such as Pa. lanceolata, Pa. elliptica, and Pa. yendoi, all of which exhibit a foliose blade form. The initial circumscription of this genus focused on vegetative anatomy (e.g. an outer cortex of dichotomously branched, anticlinal filaments of small cells linked by numerous secondary pit-connections, and an inner cortex of large cells that become larger and more stellate towards the medulla), female reproductive features (e.g., absence of pericarps surrounding the ostiolate cystocarps), and the arrangement of reproductive structures (e.g. carpogonial branch ampullae located in the transitional region between outer and inner cortex, and cystocarps and tetrasporangia scattered over the thallus) (Kawaguchi 1997). Despite ongoing molecular studies, the generic criteria for Pachymeniopsis remain ambiguous due to the inclusion of both foliose blade and branching types within the Pachymeniopsis clade (Kim et al. 2014; Yang et al. 2015). Nevertheless, recent phylogenetic analyses have consistently demonstrated that Pachymeniopsis is well-resolved with high bootstrap values, confirming its distinct genetic identity within the Grateloupiaceae, including three currently recognized species (Calderon et al. 2014b; Gargiulo et al. 2013; Kim et al. 2021).

Korea is one of the most well-documented regions for the taxonomy of Grateloupia sensu lato (Kim et al. 2023; Lee et al. 2009; Yang et al. 2015). A detailed taxonomic study, including precise morphological investigations, delineated two foliose Pachymeniopsis species distributed in Korea (Lee and Lee 1993). Additionally, Yang and Kim (2015) employed DNA barcoding analysis to confirm the presence of 14 species within this region, including the description of Pachymeniopsis volvita. More recently, Kim et al. (2023) concentrated on Grateloupia filicina-like species in the Northwest Pacific, with a particular focus on refining the species distributions in Korea. Furthermore, since most species within Grateloupia sensu lato occur in the intertidal zone, they provide a valuable opportunity for the comprehensive phylogeographic studies aimed at exploring their population genetic structure (Yang et al. 2021a, 2021b). During a survey of intertidal macroalgae, an unidentified Grateloupia species was abundantly distributed on rocky substrata in Shinchon, Jeju, Korea, but had never been found anywhere else. To identify the species, we conducted phylogenetic analyses using both morphological and molecular methods. The aims of this study are: (i) to describe a new intertidal species of Grateloupia sensu lato from Korea based on detailed morphological observations, (ii) to resolve its taxonomic placement within the group through phylogenetic comparisons. This research enhances our understanding the diversity of Grateloupia sensu lato and supports the accurate documentation of marine biodiversity in the region.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Sampling

The specimens of the unidentified species used in this study were collected in the intertidal zone at Shinchon, Jeju-si, Jeju Island, Korea (33°32′18″N, 126°37′15″E). When the populations were discovered, in situ photographs were taken. Several plants were first kept alive in a plastic cooler and transported to the laboratory. Most collections were pressed fresh as herbarium specimens with serial numbers. Several remaining plants were preserved in 5 % formalin-seawater for morphological observations, whereas materials used in molecular studies were desiccated in silica gel. Pressed herbarium specimens are deposited in the Herbarium of Jeju National University (JNUB), Jeju and the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK), Seocheon, Korea.

2.2 Morphological observation

For morphological observations, sections were prepared manually using a razor blade or freezing microtome (Nippon Optical Works Co., Ltd., NH–101II, Tokyo, Japan). The sections were stained on slides with Wittmann’s aceto-iron-hematoxylin-chloral hydrate and mounted in 50 % Hoyer’s mounting medium, or with 1 % aqueous aniline blue acidified with 0.1 % HCl and mounted in 40 % Karo corn syrup. Photomicrographs of plant habit were captured with a TG-7 digital camera (Olympus, Japan), and anatomical images were taken using an Olympus BX51 microscope (Tokyo, Japan) with a Q-imaging digital camera (Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada).

2.3 Molecular analysis

Genomic DNA of samples was extracted from small portions of the upper branches using a MagPurix DNA Isolation Kit (Zinext Life Science, Taiwan), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C and underwent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification using AccuPower PCR Premix (Bioneer, Korea) in final volume of 20 μl. To amplify the plastid rbcL and mitochondrial COI–5P portions from the total DNA, we used the primer sets F7–R898 and F762–R1442 for rbcL (Kim et al. 2010) and GazF2–GazR1 for COI–5P (Saunders 2005). PCR was performed on an All-In-One-cycler (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea), as described by Yang et al. (2015). PCR products were visuallyed on a 1 % agarose gel, then purified and sequenced by Macrogen Co. (Daejeon, Korea). Finally, five sequences were generated from the unidentified species. In addition, we obtained a sequence of Grateloupia imbricata from the same collecting site.

All successful amplifications of the gene were sequenced in both directions. Assembly and manual editing were performed using Geneious Prime v. 2022.2.2 (http://www.geneious.com). We downloaded rbcL sequences from GenBank to compare with representative taxa of the genera within the Grateloupiaceae (Kim et al. 2021; Nguyen et al. 2023; Rodríguez-Prieto et al. 2022). Newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank and combined with downloaded GenBank sequences. Sequences were aligned using the MISCLE algorithm in Geneious and used to infer the phylogenetic analyses. Outgroup was designated with Halymenia durvillei, Halymenia dilatata, and Carpopeltis phyllophora, which belong to the family Halymeniaceae.

To infer phylogenetic relationships, we conducted maximum likelihood (ML) method with the GTR substitution model in Geneious. We used 1,000 replications under the same model settings to generate the bootstrap values. Genetic divergences were calculated using MEGA-X ver. 10.0.5 (Kumar et al. 2018). We also performed the Bayesian inference (BI) with MrBayes v.3.2.1 software (Ronquist et al. 2012). Two independent searches were done under the default setting, such as four chains of Metropolis-coupled Markov Chain Monte Carlo, sampling every 100 trees, for 20 million generations, and the same evolution model (GTR + G) used in the ML search. The burn-in point was identified graphically by tracking the likelihood for plateau. Eventually, 14,700 trees sampled in the stationary state were used to infer Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP).

3 Results

3.1 Molecular phylogeny

Phylogenetic analyses containing 95 sequences identified clades corresponding to the nine recognized genera of the Grateloupiaceae, including Pachymeniopsis (incorporating Kintokiocolax), Prionitis, Phyllymenia, Neorubra, Grateloupia, Mariaramirezia, Dermocorynus, Yonagunia, and an additional “G. subpectinata clade (=G. subpectinata group in Gargiulo et al. 2013) (Figure 1 and Supplementary Figures S1–S2). Specimens newly collected from Shinchon were phylogenetically positioned within the Pachymeniopsis clade, and did not correspond to any congeneric species (Figure 1). Consequently, we propose Pachymeniopsis shinchonai M.Y. Yang et M.S. Kim sp. nov. as a new member of the Grateloupiaceae from Korea. Pachymeniopsis shinchonai sp. nov. was resolved as a sister taxon to “G”. chiangii and “G”. cornea with an interspecific divergence of 1.9–3.0 % (ML Bootstrap [MLB] 94 %, Bayesian posterior probability [BPP] 1.0), but was distinctly separated from the morphologically similar “G”. imbricata (PV053169), which was sympatrically collected with the new species, by a divergence of 3.9 %.

Figure 1: 
Phylogenetic tree of the Grateloupiaceae based on rbcL sequences, estimated using the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion. Clades labeled with a generic name include the type species for each genus. Grey triangles indicate a condensed representation of the clades related to Pachymeniopsis, with the selected sequences assigned to their respective genera. Bootstrap values are provided at each node to indicate the level of support, with thick black lines emphasizing genera that received strong bootstrap support (>95 %). Asterisks (*) indicate the type species for each genus.
Figure 1:

Phylogenetic tree of the Grateloupiaceae based on rbcL sequences, estimated using the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion. Clades labeled with a generic name include the type species for each genus. Grey triangles indicate a condensed representation of the clades related to Pachymeniopsis, with the selected sequences assigned to their respective genera. Bootstrap values are provided at each node to indicate the level of support, with thick black lines emphasizing genera that received strong bootstrap support (>95 %). Asterisks (*) indicate the type species for each genus.

The phylogenetic integrity of the Grateloupiaceae was robustly supported in both ML and BI trees (100 % MLB, 1.0 BPP), but support for the internal genera was variable (Figure 1 and Supplementary Figures S1–S2). The monophyly of six clades – Pachymeniopsis (including Kintokiocolax), Prionitis, Neorubra, Mariaramirezia, Yonagunia, and “G”. subpectinata – received strong support (>95 %). In contrast, the monophyly of Grateloupia and Dermocorynus was moderately supported (84–87 % MLB), while Phyllymenia lacked support (Figure 1). The phylogenetic tree using the BI methods presented slightly different topologies compared to those generated by the ML method (Supplementary Figure S2). Specifically, the clades of Prionitis and “G”. subpectinata are shown as sister taxa in the ML analysis (Figure 1), whereas Neorubra is positioned between these two genera in the BI analysis (Supplementary Figure S2). In the BI tree, the support for the monophyly of Grateloupia and Dermocorynus increased, but Phyllymenia still did not receive support.

3.2 Description of a new species

Pachymeniopsis shinchonai M.Y. Yang et M.S. Kim sp. nov. (Figures 24).

Figure 2: 
External morphology of Pachymeniopsis shinchonai M.Y. Yang et M.S. Kim sp. nov. (A–C) In situ habit of plants growing at Shinchon, Jeju Island, showing young plant collected February 13, 2024 (A), densely arranged thallus becoming hemispherical in form, collected July 6, 2024 (B), fertile plant collected November 27, 2023 (C). (D) A partial thallus detached from the mass showing dichotomous to sub-dichotomous branching pattern, collected February 13, 2024. (E) Ventral view of hemispherical thallus collected July 6, 2024. (F) Dorsal view of hemispherical thallus collected July 6, 2024. (G) Ventral view of thallus showing a main holdfast (arrow), collected August 22, 2024. (H) Ventral view of thallus showing two holdfasts (arrows) and several secondary attachments (arrowheads), collected August 22, 2024. (I–K) Branches adhering to adjacent branches by secondary attachments (arrows). Scale bars = 2 cm (A–C, F, G), 1 cm (D–E, H), and 0.2 cm (I–K).
Figure 2:

External morphology of Pachymeniopsis shinchonai M.Y. Yang et M.S. Kim sp. nov. (A–C) In situ habit of plants growing at Shinchon, Jeju Island, showing young plant collected February 13, 2024 (A), densely arranged thallus becoming hemispherical in form, collected July 6, 2024 (B), fertile plant collected November 27, 2023 (C). (D) A partial thallus detached from the mass showing dichotomous to sub-dichotomous branching pattern, collected February 13, 2024. (E) Ventral view of hemispherical thallus collected July 6, 2024. (F) Dorsal view of hemispherical thallus collected July 6, 2024. (G) Ventral view of thallus showing a main holdfast (arrow), collected August 22, 2024. (H) Ventral view of thallus showing two holdfasts (arrows) and several secondary attachments (arrowheads), collected August 22, 2024. (I–K) Branches adhering to adjacent branches by secondary attachments (arrows). Scale bars = 2 cm (A–C, F, G), 1 cm (D–E, H), and 0.2 cm (I–K).

Figure 3: 
Vegetative structure and development of tetrasporangia of Pachymeniopsis shinchonai M.Y. Yang et M.S. Kim sp. nov. (A) Transverse section through a young branch showing the cortex and medulla. (B) Detail of cortex showing cellular cortex composed of five-cells and a network of stellate inner cortical cells. Note secondary pit-connections appear between adjacent cortical cells (arrows). (C) Longitudinal section through a young branch showing entangled tubular medullary cells with numerous branches (arrows). (D) Transverse section through middle part of a thallus showing enlarged sub-cortex and densely filled medulla. (E) Transverse section through basal part of a thallus showing a thickened cortex and dense medulla. (F) Cortex of basal part of a thallus showing a thickened cortex composed of six to seven cell layers. (G) Tetrasporangia restricted to the proliferations (arrows). (H) Tetrasporangia initial (arrow) born laterally on inner cortical cell (arrowhead) connected by pit connection (pc). (I) A transverse division of developed tetrasporangium (arrow), which is basally connected to inner cortical cell (arrowhead) by pit connection (pc). (J) Cruciately divided tetrasporangium (arrow), still basally connected to inner cortical cell. Scale bars = 60 µm (A), 40 µm (B, I), 50 µm (C, F), 100 µm (D, E), 1 mm (G), and 20 µm (H, J).
Figure 3:

Vegetative structure and development of tetrasporangia of Pachymeniopsis shinchonai M.Y. Yang et M.S. Kim sp. nov. (A) Transverse section through a young branch showing the cortex and medulla. (B) Detail of cortex showing cellular cortex composed of five-cells and a network of stellate inner cortical cells. Note secondary pit-connections appear between adjacent cortical cells (arrows). (C) Longitudinal section through a young branch showing entangled tubular medullary cells with numerous branches (arrows). (D) Transverse section through middle part of a thallus showing enlarged sub-cortex and densely filled medulla. (E) Transverse section through basal part of a thallus showing a thickened cortex and dense medulla. (F) Cortex of basal part of a thallus showing a thickened cortex composed of six to seven cell layers. (G) Tetrasporangia restricted to the proliferations (arrows). (H) Tetrasporangia initial (arrow) born laterally on inner cortical cell (arrowhead) connected by pit connection (pc). (I) A transverse division of developed tetrasporangium (arrow), which is basally connected to inner cortical cell (arrowhead) by pit connection (pc). (J) Cruciately divided tetrasporangium (arrow), still basally connected to inner cortical cell. Scale bars = 60 µm (A), 40 µm (B, I), 50 µm (C, F), 100 µm (D, E), 1 mm (G), and 20 µm (H, J).

Figure 4: 
Female reproductive structure of Pachymeniopsis shinchonai M.Y. Yang et M.S. Kim sp. nov. (A) Cystocarp-bearing proliferations (arrows) showing circular to widely expanded shapes. (B) Two-celled carpogonial branch composed of a carpogonium (cp) with a long trichogyne (tr), and hypogenous cell (hy) borne on an elongated cortical cell (arrow). (C) Auxiliary cell ampulla showing the four-celled stage of a first-order ampullar filament (af1) borne on an elongated cortical cell (arrow). (D) Further development of first-order (af1, labeled 1–7) and second-order (af2, labeled 1′–6′) ampullar filaments. (E) A later stage showing the third-order filament (af3) and auxiliary cell (aux). (F) Early post-diploidization showing the auxiliary cell (aux) and three ampullar filaments (af1–af3), which bear branches of each of the ampullar filaments (arrowheads). (G). A later stage of (F) showing the auxiliary cell (aux) enclosed by ampullar filaments (af1–af3) and numerous branches of the ampullar filaments (arrowheads). Note secondary medullar filaments (smf) surrounding the whole cystocarp. (H). Highly branched ampullar filaments and remnants of secondary medullar filaments (smf) surrounding the cystocarp. (I) Carposporophyte showing the gonimoblast initial (gi) producing gonimoblasts (g) and formation of fusion cell (fc). Note remaining branched ampullar filaments (arrowheads) and secondary medullar filaments (smf) forming the pericarp. (J) Gonimoglobes (g1, g2) differentiating into carposporangia and remains of secondary medullar filaments (smf) forming the pericarp. Scale bars = 1 mm (A), 20 µm (B, C, E–H), 10 µm (D), and 40 µm (I, J).
Figure 4:

Female reproductive structure of Pachymeniopsis shinchonai M.Y. Yang et M.S. Kim sp. nov. (A) Cystocarp-bearing proliferations (arrows) showing circular to widely expanded shapes. (B) Two-celled carpogonial branch composed of a carpogonium (cp) with a long trichogyne (tr), and hypogenous cell (hy) borne on an elongated cortical cell (arrow). (C) Auxiliary cell ampulla showing the four-celled stage of a first-order ampullar filament (af1) borne on an elongated cortical cell (arrow). (D) Further development of first-order (af1, labeled 1–7) and second-order (af2, labeled 1′–6′) ampullar filaments. (E) A later stage showing the third-order filament (af3) and auxiliary cell (aux). (F) Early post-diploidization showing the auxiliary cell (aux) and three ampullar filaments (af1–af3), which bear branches of each of the ampullar filaments (arrowheads). (G). A later stage of (F) showing the auxiliary cell (aux) enclosed by ampullar filaments (af1–af3) and numerous branches of the ampullar filaments (arrowheads). Note secondary medullar filaments (smf) surrounding the whole cystocarp. (H). Highly branched ampullar filaments and remnants of secondary medullar filaments (smf) surrounding the cystocarp. (I) Carposporophyte showing the gonimoblast initial (gi) producing gonimoblasts (g) and formation of fusion cell (fc). Note remaining branched ampullar filaments (arrowheads) and secondary medullar filaments (smf) forming the pericarp. (J) Gonimoglobes (g1, g2) differentiating into carposporangia and remains of secondary medullar filaments (smf) forming the pericarp. Scale bars = 1 mm (A), 20 µm (B, C, E–H), 10 µm (D), and 40 µm (I, J).

3.2.1 Description

Thalli erect and epilithic with discoid holdfast; cartilaginous and up to 2–6 cm long; red to dark red; composed of 3–6 (−10) compressed main axes, 1–2 mm wide, dichotomously to subdichotomously branched in 3–4 orders with blunt apices; densely arranged and overlapped forming a hemispherical mass; often attached to adjacent branches or branchlets through secondary attachments. Thallus structure multiaxial, composed of cortical and medullary layers; thickness varied from 220 to 280 µm in the upper parts of branches, 350–380 µm in middle, and 400–450 µm in the lower parts of the thallus; outer cortex rounded to oblong, 5–8 µm in diameter, with 4–7 cells layers; subcortical cells loosely arranged, rounded to oblong, 8–12 µm in diameter; medulla densely arranged with tubular filaments, 15–35 µm long. Gametophytes and tetrasporophytes were isomorphic. Tetrasporangia transversely divided; restricted on circular proliferations; 11–13 µm wide and 40–55 µm long. Cystocarps confined to circular proliferations; non-procarpic; spherical to ovoid carposporangia, 9–15 µm wide by 10–12 µm long; gonimoblasts 110–150 µm in diameter.

3.2.2 Holotype

Designated here MABIK AL00100769, vegetative, Shinchon, Jeju-si, Jeju Island, Korea (33°32′18″N, 126°37′15″E), 06 July 2024, deposited in the herbarium of National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK). GenBank accession Number: PQ855622 for rbcL; PV053166 for COI–5P.

3.2.3 Isotype

JNUB-240706-2, vegetative, Shinchon, Jeju-si, Jeju Island, Korea, 06 July 2024, deposited in the herbarium of Jeju National University (JNUB). GenBank accession Number: PQ855623 for rbcL; PV053167 for COI–5P.

3.2.4 Etymology

The specific epithet ‘Shinchon’ refers to the type locality in Shinchon, Jeju, Korea, and ‘ai’ means children in Korean language as this alga was initially collected by children from Shinchon Elementary School. Therefore, the name literally means ‘Shinchon children’.

3.2.5 Korean name

덩이개도박 (Deongigaedobak).

3.2.6 Other specimens examined

May 6, 2023 (vegetative); July 1, 2023 (vegetative); July 3, 2023 (vegetative); October 13, 2023 (vegetative); November 27, 2023 (vegetative); February 13, 2024 (vegetative); April 21, 2024 (vegetative); April 24, 2024 (vegetative); June 23, 2024 (vegetative); July 6, 2024 (vegetative); August 17, 2024 (female); August 22, 2024 (female & tetrasporic). All specimens are collected from Shinchon, Jeju-si, Jeju Island, Korea.

3.2.7 Distribution

The species has been found only in Shinchon, Jeju Island, Korea until date.

3.2.8 Habit and vegetative morphology

Thalli are erect, up to 2–6 cm long, from discoid holdfasts. They consist of 3–6 (−10) compressed main axes, each 1–2 mm wide (Figure 2A–C). Thallus is cartilaginous, red to dark red in color. The margins of the axes slightly curve inwards (Figure 2D). Main axes are dichotomously to subdichotomously branched in 3–4 orders, with blunt apices (Figure 2D and E). As they age, the thalli become densely arranged and overlap, forming a subspherical to hemispherical mass (Figure 2F) originating from single or 2–3 holdfasts (Figure 2G and H). Thalli often form secondary attachments to adjacent branches or branchlets (Figure 2I–K), enhancing adhesion both between the branches and to the substratum. Thallus structure is multiaxial (Figure 3A–F) and composed of cortical and medullary layers (Figure 3A). The thallus thickness varies, measuring 220–280 µm in the upper parts of branches, 350–380 µm in middle, and 400–450 µm in the lower parts of the thallus. The outer cortex consists of anticlinal filaments, which are rounded to oblong and 5–8 µm in diameter, with 4–5 cell layers in upper branches (Figure 3A and B) and 6–7 cell layers in lower part of thallus (Figure 3D–F). Secondary pit-connections between adjacent cell rows are frequently observed in this layer (Figure 3B). Subcortical cells are loosely arranged, rounded to oblong, measure 8–12 µm in diameter (Figure 3B). The medulla is densely arranged with tubular filaments in longitudinal sections, featuring oblong cells, 15–35 µm long (Figure 3C). Medullary filaments are secondarily pit-connected and occasionally branch to form a network (Figure 3C).

3.2.9 Reproductive morphology

Gametophytes and tetrasporophytes were isomorphic. Gametophytes are morphologically similar to tetrasporophytes. Tetrasporangial sori are restricted on circular proliferations (Figure 3G). Tetrasporangial initials are cut off laterally from subcortical cells in the cortex, elongate, and are pit-connected (Figure 3H). They initially divide transversely, with the tetrasporangium basally pit-connected with the subcortical cell (Figure 3I), and subsequently divide longitudinally to form cruciately arranged tetraspores (Figure 3J). Mature tetrasporangia are 11–13 µm wide and 40–55 µm long.

Cystocarps are confined to circular proliferations at the distal end of branchlets, which commonly become broader than the branchlets (Figure 4A). Gonimoblasts are visible directly under a dissecting microscope as transparent dots without the need for sectioning (Figure 4A). The female reproductive system is non-procarpic, which means the auxiliary cells and carpogonial branches arise from separate cortical filaments, termed carpogonial branch ampullae (Figure 4B) and auxiliary cell ampullae (Figure 4C–F). Carpogonial branches are rare and borne on a supporting cell, and two-celled, including the hypogynous cell and carpogonium with a terminal trichogyne (Figure 4B). Auxiliary cell ampullae are more abundant than the carpogonial branch ampullae and composed of three orders of ampullar filaments. Initially, the first order of ampullar filaments in auxiliary cell ampullae is produced laterally from a subcortical cell (Figure 4C). Afterwards, the initial of the second-order ampullar filament is produced from the basal cell of the first order of ampullae filament (Figure 4D). The ampullar filaments in fully developed auxiliary cell ampullae are unbranched, 8–12 cells long, and the basal cell of the third ampullar filament enlarges and becomes darkly stained, functioning as the auxiliary cell (Figure 4E). Direct diploidization was not seen. After diploidization, the cell of the ampullar filaments branch once or twice (Figure 4F). Secondary medullary cells are then produced from surrounding vegetative cells (Figure 4G), and subsequently envelop the cystocarp. The branched ampullar filaments branch a few more times to form a cluster (Figure 4H). The secondary medullary filaments become pit-connected to the cortical layers (Figure 4G–I). The auxiliary cell produces a gonimoblast initial and subsequently fuses with its neighboring ampullar cell (Figure 4I), which is not branched. As the development of gonimoblast continues, a cavity is formed around the developing gonimoblasts (Figure 4I). One or two gonimoglobes are produced from a gonimoblast initial and mature gonimoblasts are up to 110–150 µm in diameter (Figure 4J). Most cells of gonimoblasts differentiate into spherical to ovoid carposporangia, 9–15 µm wide by 10–12 µm long (Figure 4J). The cystocarp is imbedded in the thallus and has a distinct ostiole.

The male reproductive structure was not observed.

4 Discussion

The Grateloupiaceae is a species-rich family that still requires further investigation to resolve its non-monophyletic genera. Recent extensive molecular studies have demonstrated several strongly supported genera within Grateloupiaceae, including Pachymeniopsis, Prionitis, Neorubra, Yonagunia, Dermocorynus, and Mariaramirezia (Kim et al. 2021). Despite the strong phylogenetic support for these genera, members of these genera often exhibit diverse morphological traits and share external features, highlighting the need for additional molecular analyses to ensure accurate identification at the generic levels (Calderon et al. 2014b; Kim et al. 2014; Lin et al. 2008, 2011; Nguyen et al. 2023). In this study, our molecular analyses combined with morphological observation have revealed the existence of a novel species within Pachymeniopsis, namely, P. shinchonai sp. nov. from Korea.

The new species was initially presumed to be a member of Grateloupia, due to its morphological resemblance to “G”. imbricata and “G”. crispata, with flattened blade branching dichotomously (Yoshida 1998 as Pr. imbricata and Pr. crispata). The phylogenetic analyses revealed that the new species belongs to the Pachymeniopsis clade, which has been recognized as a distinct genus supporting the monophyly with the type species (Calderon et al. 2014a, 2014b; Gargiulo et al. 2013; Kim et al. 2021). In the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1), the clade of Pachymeniopsis consists of 13 species that exhibit two thallus types; (1) branching forms as seen in Pa. shinchonai sp. nov., “G”. cornea, “G”. chiangii, “G”. angusta, “G”. imbricata, “G”. crispata, and “Pr”. taiwani-borealis (Kawaguchi 1989; Okamura 1937; Rodríguez-Prieto et al. 2022; Yoshida 1998), and (2) foliose blade forms, as seen in Pa. lanceolata, “G”. elliptica, Pa. volvita, Pa. gargiuloi, and “G”. kurogii (Kawaguchi 1990, 1997; Yang et al. 2015; Yoshida 1998), except for the parasite Kintokiocolax aggregato-cerantha. Interestingly, all species within the Pachymeniopsis clade are native to Asia. Although several species, such as “G”. imbricata, Pa. lanceolata, and Pa. gargiuloi, have been artificially introduced to Europe, America, and New Zealand (D’Archino et al. 2021; García-Jiménez et al. 2008; Montes et al. 2016, 2017; Verlaque et al. 2005), most species in the clade were originally described from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan (Guiry and Guiry 2024).

Among the species in the clade, Pa. shinchonai sp. nov. shares similarities with other related species exhibiting branching forms, particularly “G”. imbricata, “G”. crispata, and “Pr”. taiwani-borealis (Kawaguchi 1989; Okamura 1937; Rodríguez-Prieto et al. 2022; Yoshida 1998), in terms of their diochotomously to subdichotomously branched thallus, vegetative anatomical features, and the development and size of the tetrasporangium (Table 1). Notably, Pa. shinchonai sp. nov. most closely resembles “G”. crispata, sharing the crowded, overlapped apical portion that forms a hemispherical-shaped appearance (Kawaguchi 1989; Yoshida 1998). However, Pa. shinchonai sp. nov. is distinguished by its formation of abundant secondary attachments that contribute to a firmly arranged hemispherical shape by adhering not only to adjacent branches but also to the substratum, a feature not developed in “G”. crispata. In contrast, Pa. shinchonai sp. nov. differs from “G”. imbricata, which also exhibits a flabellate appearance but without overlapped branches (Yoshida 1998). Furthermore, the reproductive structure (i.e. tetrasporangia and cystocarps) of Pa. shinchonai sp. nov. are restricted to circular proliferations that become wide and sometimes bifurcate when fully mature, whereas in other related species, the tetrasporangia are scattered across the thallus or branches, as seen in “G”. imbricata (Okamura 1937), or are located at the tips of the branches, as in “G”. crispata, “G”. cornea, “G”. chiangii, and “Pr”. taiwani-borealis (Kawaguchi 1989; Rodríguez-Prieto et al. 2022; Yoshida 1998).

Table 1:

Comparison of morphological characters between Pachymeniopsis shinchonai sp. nov. and phylogenetically related species.

Morphological characters Pachymeniopsis shinchonai ‘Grateloupia’ imbricata ‘Prionitis’ taiwani-borealis ‘Grateloupia’ crispata ‘Grateloupia’ cornea ‘Grateloupia’ chiangii
Habit Erect, flattened blade branched dicho- to subdichotomously, hemispherical appearance Erect, flattened blade branched dichotomously or irregularly, fan-like appearance Prostrate, compressed blade branched subdichotomously Erect, flattened blade branched dichotomously, hemispherical appearance Erect, linear and compressed blades branched dichotomously Erect, linear and compressed blades branched dichotomously, flabellate appearance
Color Red to dark red Yellowish brown to dark red Red to dark red, yellowish in the distal end of branches Purplish red, or sometimes greenish, or yellowish Bright red to purplish red Red to purplish red
Thallus height Up to 6 cm Up to 10 cm Up to 5 cm Up to 6 cm Up to 30 cm Up to 15 cm
Blade width 1–2 mm 7–15 µm 1–1.5 mm 2–8 mm Up to 2 mm Up to 8 mm
Apices Blunt Blunt Acute to blunt Blunt and often bifurcate Acute and bifurcate Blunt and often bifurcate
Thallus thickness 220–450 µm 300–400 µm 480–550 µm 500 µm 400–600 µm 650 µm
Cortex 8–11 cell layers, laterally connected by secondary pit-connections 4–6 cell layers, laterally connected by secondary pit-connections 8–9 cell layers, laterally connected by secondary pit-connections 11 cell layers, laterally connected by secondary pit-connections 7–8 cell layers in upper and 17 cell layers in lower, laterally connected by secondary pit-connections 8–12 cell layers, laterally connected by secondary pit-connections
Medulla Simple or branched, densely arranged filaments Densely arranged filaments Densely arranged filaments Simple or branched filaments Densely arranged filaments Simple or branched, densely arranged filaments
Position of tetrasporangia On the circular proliferations Scattered over the thallus Scattered over the distal ends of branchlets or on the swollen apices On the distal end of branches On the distal end of branches or proliferations On the distal end of branches
Size of tetrasporangium 11–13 × 40–55 µm 13–18 × 43–55 µm 10–11 × 46–52 µm 11–12 × 42–45 µm 13–17 × 40–48 µm 13–17 × 40–52 µm
Cystocarps On the circular proliferations Scattered over the thallus Scattered over the distal ends of branches or the swollen apices as sorus-like groups On the distal end of branches On the distal end of branches and proliferations as sorus-like groups On the distal end of branches as sorus-like groups
Pericarp Secondary medullary filaments N/A Secondary medullary filaments Poorly developed Vegetative cells and ampullar filament Vegetative cells and ampullar filament
Habitat Rocky lower intertidal zone or tide pools Rocky lower intertidal zone Shallow coral reef or rocky shores or 2–12 m in depth Rocky lower intertidal zone or tide pools Rocky lower intertidal zone to upper subtidal zone Rocky lower intertidal zone
References This study Okamura 1937; Yoshida 1998 Rodríguez-Prieto et al. (2022) Kawaguchi 1989; Yoshida 1998 (as Prionitis crispata) Okamura 1937; Kawaguchi 1989 (as Prionitis cornea) Kawaguchi 1989 (as Prionitis divaricata)
  1. N/A, not applicable.

Female reproductive features, such as the number of cells in carpogonial branch ampullae and the type of auxiliary cell ampullae, are key distinguishing characteristics among genera in the Halymeniales (Calderon et al. 2014b; Gargiulo et al. 2013; Lin et al. 2008; Rodríguez-Prieto et al. 2022). Of the six types of auxiliary cell ampullae identified by Chiang (1970) and later expanded by Lee and Kim (2019), Pa. shinchonai sp. nov. exhibits Grateloupia-type, which features a simple ampullary filament structure composed of three orders of ampullary filaments (Figure 4). The Grateloupia-type auxiliary cell ampullae are a characteristic found in members of the Grateloupiaceae (Kim et al. 2021). Within the Grateloupiaceae, Lin et al. (2008) proposed two distinct patterns of auxiliary cell ampullae development; (1) G. taiwanensis type, characterized by ampullae consisting of three orders of unbranched filaments that branch after diploidization of the auxiliary cell, and (2) the G. orientalis type, in which the ampullae are composed of two orders of unbranched filaments, with only a few cells incorporated into a basal fusion cell after diploidization of the auxiliary cell. Our observation of Pa. shinchonai sp. nov. revealed the presence of three orders of unbranched ampullary filaments that divide several times to form a cellular cluster (Figure 4), which aligns with the G. taiwanensis type. This type of auxiliary cell ampullae development has also been found in Pa. lanceolata (Kawabata 1962; Kawaguchi 1997), “G”. elliptica (Kawabata 1962), “G”. kurogii (Kawaguchi 1990), “G”. angusta (Kawaguchi 1989), “Pr”. taiwani-borealis (Rodríguez-Prieto et al. 2022), which are included in the Pachymeniopsis clade, and “G”. patens and “G”. schmitziana (Kawaguchi 1989), of the Prionitis clade, as well as Ph. gibbesii (Rodríguez-Prieto et al. 2022), Ph. taiwanensis (Lin et al. 2008), Ph. nhatrangensis (Nguyen et al. 2023), and “G”. sparsa (Kawabata 1963) of the Phyllymenia clade. Currently, the G. orientialis type of auxiliary cell ampullae is recognized as characteristic of the Grateloupia clade (Lin et al. 2008, Rodríguez et al. 2022).

The generic distinctions among Pachymeniopsis, Prionitis, and Phyllymenia are obscure when molecular data are excluded, and this historically led to their merger with Grateloupia (Kawaguchi 1997; Wang et al. 2001). These genera exhibit similar auxiliary cell ampullae (G. taiwanensis type), as previously mentioned, and lack consistent diagnostic characteristics both superficially and anatomically (Kim et al. 2023). However, a large-scale phylogenetic analysis of the Halymeniales using rbcL data has strongly supported the separation of Pachymeniopsis and Prionitis as distinct genera, while Phyllymenia remains unsupported (Kim et al. 2021), findings that are corroborated by this study (Figure 1, Supplementary Figures S1–S2). Recently, Rodríguez et al. (2022) suggested that the clade including “G”. subpectinata and Dermocorynus dichotomus belong to the Phyllymenia clade, based on concatenated rbcL and LSU rDNA data, which received high support. However, our study, dealing with the full range of analyzed taxa within the Grateloupiaceae (Kim et al. 2021), reveals instability of Phyllymenia, notably the node splitting with Neorubra in the middle in the BI tree (Supplementary Figure S2).

In contrast, the generic status of Pachymeniopsis and Prionitis are stable in both ML and BI trees (Supplementary Figures S1–S2), which strongly support their monophyly. Unfortunately, this study does not identify clear morphological characteristics that distinctly separate the two genera, as each encompasses a mixture of species with variable morphological features. Additionally, different views among researchers regarding the interpretation of the origin of the auxiliary cells, supporting cell, and involucral filaments (=nutritive filaments) have contributed to confusion (Chiang 1970; Gargiulo et al. 2013; Lin et al. 2008; Rodríguez-Prieto et al. 2022). Given the monophyly of the Grateloupiaceae, further examination of the internal genetic relationships within family is required, necessitating comprehensive collections and multi-gene analyses. However, it is crucial that these analyses encompass all recognized taxa within the group to avoid misinterpretation (Kim et al. 2023).

Compared to other related genera, members of Pachymeniopsis are primarily distributed in Asia, particularly in Korea, Japan, and China (Guiry and Guiry 2024). Korea and Japan share the distribution of most Pachymeniopsis species, though several species such as “G”. chiangii, “G”. cornea, and “G”. crispata have been identified only in Japan, based on molecular evidence (Yang and Kim 2015). In Korea, the taxonomy of Grateloupiaceae has been extensively explored using molecular data (Kim et al. 2021, 2023; Lee et al. 2009, Yang and Kim 2015), as they are significant component of the macroalgal ecosystem, with 15 species confirmed to occur (Yang and Kim 2015). The discovery of Pa. shinchonai sp. nov. in Korea is remarkable, as this species is restricted to a narrow intertidal zone in Shinchon, Jeju Island, despite its abundant populations. Given its confined habitat, ongoing monitoring is essential to protect Pa. shinchonai sp. nov. from potential threats of habitat destruction.


Corresponding author: Myung Sook Kim, Research Institute for Basic Sciences, Jeju National University, 102 Jejudaehakno, 63243, Jeju, Korea; and Department of Biology, Jeju National University, 102 Jejudaehakno, 63243, Jeju, Korea, E-mail:

Funding source: National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK) and Basic Science Research Program

Award Identifier / Grant number: RS-2019-NR040080 and RS-2020-NR054743

About the authors

Mi Yeon Yang

Mi Yeon Yang is a research professor at Jeju National University. She is interested in the systematics of various red algal groups, such as Gigartinales and Halymeniales. Her research, which combines morphological and molecular approaches, has led to the description of several new species. She is also interested in the phylogeography of red macroalgae.

Myung Sook Kim

Myung Sook Kim is the Director of the Research Institute for Basic Sciences and a Professor of Biology at Jeju National University, Korea. Her current research focuses on the systematics of macroalgae, the phylogeography of red algae, and understanding biodiversity changes caused by climate change.

Acknowledgments

We thank the students and teacher, Dr. Byeongseok Kim, of Shinchon Elementary School for their initial collection of the new species.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this article.

  6. Research funding: This work was supported by the management of the Marine and Fishery Bio-resources Center (2025) funded by the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK) and Basic Science Research Program (RS-2019-NR040080 and RS-2020-NR054743) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

Agardh, J.G. (1848). Anadema, ett nytt slägte bland Algerne, 1846. Öfvers. Kongl. Vetensk.-akad. Förh., Stockholm, pp. 1–16.Search in Google Scholar

Calderon, M.S., Boo, G.H., and Boo, S.M. (2014a). Neorubra decipiens gen. & comb. nov. and Phyllymenia lancifolia comb. nov. (Halymeniales, Rhodophyta) from South America. Phycologia 53: 409–422, https://doi.org/10.2216/14-027.1.Search in Google Scholar

Calderon, M.S., Boo, G.H., and Boo, S.M. (2014b). Morphology and phylogeny of Ramirezia osornoensis gen. & sp. nov. and Phyllymenia acletoi sp. nov. (Halymeniales, Rhodophyta) from South America. Phycologia 53: 23–36, https://doi.org/10.2216/13-158.1.Search in Google Scholar

Chiang, Y.M. (1970). Morphological studies of red algae of the family Cryptonemiaceae, 58. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot., London, pp. 1–95.Search in Google Scholar

D’Archino, R. and Zuccarello, G.C. (2021). Two red macroalgae newly introduced into New Zealand: Pachymeniopsis lanceolata (K. Okamura) Y. Yamada ex S. Kawabata and Fushitsunagia catenata Filloramo et G.W. Saunders. Bot. Mar. 64: 129–138, https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2021-0013.Search in Google Scholar

De Clerck, O., Gavio, B., Fredericq, S., Cocquyt, E., and Coppejans, E. (2005). Systematic reassessment of the red algal genus Phyllymenia (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 40: 169–178, https://doi.org/10.1080/09670260500128343.Search in Google Scholar

Garcia-Jiménez, P., Gerladino, P.J.L., Boo, S.M., and Robaina, R.R. (2008). Red alga Grateloupia imbricata (Halymeniaceae), a species introduced into the Canary islands. Phycol. Res. 56: 166–171.10.1111/j.1440-1835.2008.00498.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gargiulo, G.M., Morabito, M., and Manghisi, A. (2013). A re-assessment of reproductive anatomy and postfertilization development in the systematics of Grateloupia (Halymeniales, Rhodophyta). Cryptogam. Algol. 34: 3–25, https://doi.org/10.7872/crya.v34.iss1.2013.3.Search in Google Scholar

Guiry, M.D. and Guiry, G.M. (2024). AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication. University of Galway, Available at: https://www.algaebase.org (Searched on 15 August 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Kawabata, S. (1962). A contribution to the systematic study of Grateloupiaceae from Japan (1), 13. Mem. Hokkaido Gakugei Univ., Hokkaido, pp. 22–51.Search in Google Scholar

Kawabata, S. (1963). A contribution to the systematic study of Grateloupiaceae from Japan (2), 13. Mem. Hokkaido Gakugei Univ., Hokkaido, pp. 190–210.Search in Google Scholar

Kawaguchi, S. (1989). The genus Prionitis (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) in Japan. J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido. Univ. Ser. V (Botany) 16: 193–257.Search in Google Scholar

Kawaguchi, S. (1990). Grateloupia kurogii, a new species of the Halymeniaceae (Rhodophyta) from Japan. Jap. J. Phycol. 38: 135–146.Search in Google Scholar

Kawaguchi, S. (1997). Taxonomic notes on the Halymeniaceae (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) from Japan, III. Synonymization of Pachymeniopsis Yamada in Kawabata with Grateloupia C. Agardh. Phycol. Res. 45: 9–21, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1835.1997.tb00057.x.Search in Google Scholar

Kawaguchi, S., Wang, H.W., Horiguchi, T., Sartoni, G., and Masuda, M. (2001). A comparative study of the red alga Grateloupia filicina (Halymeniaceae) from the Northwestern Pacific and Mediterranean with the description of Grateloupia asiatica, sp. nov. J. Phycol. 37: 433–442, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.037003433.x.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, M.S., Kim, S.Y., and Nelson, W. (2010). Symphyocladia lithophila sp. nov. (Rhodomelaceae, Ceramiales), a new Korean red algal species based on morphology and rbcL sequences. Bot. Mar. 53: 233–241, https://doi.org/10.1515/bot.2010.031.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, S.Y., Manghisi, A., Morabito, M., Yang, E.C., Yoon, H.S., Miller, K.A., and Boo, S.M. (2014). Genetic diversity and haplotype distribution of Pachymeniopsis gargiuli sp. nov. and P. lanceolata (Halymeniales, Rhodophyta) in Korea, with notes on their non-native distributions. J. Phycol. 50: 885–896, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12218.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Kim, S.Y., Lee, H.W., Yang, E.C., Boo, S.M., Lopez-Bautista, J., Fredericq, S., D’Archino, R., Yoon, H.S., and Kim, M.S. (2021). Resurrection of the family Grateloupiaceae emend. (Halymeniales, Rhodophyta) based on a multigene phylogeny and comparative reproductive morphology. Fron. Ecol. Evol. 9: 775627, https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.775627.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, S.Y., Boo, S.M., Yoon, H.S., and Kim, M.S. (2023). Insight into the species identification and distribution of Grateloupiaceae (Halymeniales, Rhodophyta) having Grateloupia filicina-like morphology in the Northwest Pacific. Algae 38: 23–38, https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2023.38.3.14.Search in Google Scholar

Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., and Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35: 1547–1549, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Lee, H.B. and Lee, I.K. (1993). A taxonomic study on the genus Pachymeniopsis (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) in Korea. The Korean Journal of Phycology 8: 55–65.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, H.W. and Kim, M.S. (2019). Female reproductive structures define the novel genus, Nesoia (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 54: 66–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2018.1513166.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J.I., Kim, H.G., Geraldino, P.L.J., Hwang, I.K., and Boo, S.M. (2009). Molecular classification of the genus Grateloupia (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) in Korea. Algae 24: 231–238, https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2009.24.4.231.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, S.-M., Liang, H.-Y., and Hommersand, M.H. (2008). Two types of auxiliary cell ampullae in Grateloupia (Halymeniaceae) including G. taiwanensis sp. nov. and G. orientalis sp. nov. from Taiwan based on rbcL gene sequence analysis and cystocarp development. J. Phycol. 44: 196–214, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00443.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Lin, S.-M. and Liang, H.-Y. (2011). Grateloupia huangiae (Halymeniaceae, Rhodphyta), a new species from Taiwan previously confused with Polyopes lancifolius, with emphasis on the development of the auxiliary-cell ampullae. Phycologia 50: 232–240, https://doi.org/10.2216/10-29.1.Search in Google Scholar

Montes, M., Rico, J.M., García-Vázquez, E., and Borrell, Y.J. (2016). Morphological and molecular methods reveal the Asian alga Grateloupia imbricata (Halymeniaceae) occurs on Cantabrian Sea shores (Bay of Biscay). Phycologia 55: 365–370, https://doi.org/10.2216/15-112.1.Search in Google Scholar

Montes, M., Rico, J.M., García-Vazquez, E., and Pichs, Y.J.B. (2017). Molecular barcoding confirms the presence of exotic Asian seaweeds (Pachymeniopsis gargiuli and Grateloupia turuturu) in the Cantabrian Sea, Bay of Biscay. Peer J 5: e3116, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3116.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Nguyen, X.-V., Liao, L.M., and Lin, S.-M. (2023). Systematic revision of the Grateloupia complex (Rhodophyta) from Vietnam using rbcL and LSU sequences, with the description of Phyllymenia nhatrangensis sp. nov. Phycologia 62: 436–444, https://doi.org/10.1080/00318884.2023.2247175.Search in Google Scholar

Okamura, K. (1937). Icones of Japanese algae, Vol. 7, Tokyo, Kazamasjpbp, pp. 73–80, (English), 65–70 (Japanese), plates 341–345.Search in Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Prieto, C., De Clerck, O., Guiry, M.D., and Lin, S.-M. (2022). Revisiting the systematics of the genera Grateloupia, Phyllymenia, and Prionitis (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) with a description of a new species−Prionitis taiwani-borealis. J. Phycol. 58: 234–250, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.13226.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., van der Mark, P., Ayres, D.L., Darling, A., Hohna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Suchard, M.A., and Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2012). MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61: 539–542, https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Saunders, G.W. (2005). Applying DNA barcoding to red macroalgae: a preliminary appraisal holds promise for future applications. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Bio. Sci. 360: 1879–1888, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1719.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Schmitz, F. (1889). Systematische Übersicht der bisher bekannten Gattungen der Florideen. Flora Allg. Bot. Ztg. 72: 435–456.Search in Google Scholar

Setchell, W.A., and Gardner, N.L. (1936). Iridophycus gen. nov. and its representation in South America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 22: 469–473, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.22.8.469.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Verlaque, M., Brannock, P.M., Komatsu, T., Villalard-Bohnsack, M., and Marston, M. (2005). The genus Grateloupia C. Agardh (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) in the Thau Lagoon (France, Mediterranean): a case study of marine plurispecific introductions. Phycologia 44: 477–496, https://doi.org/10.2216/0031-8884(2005)44[477:tggcah]2.0.co;2.10.2216/0031-8884(2005)44[477:TGGCAH]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Wang, H.W., Kawaguchi, S., Horiguchi, T., and Masuda, M. (2001). A morphological and molecular assessment of the genus Prionitis J. Agardh (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta). Phycol. Res. 49: 251–262, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1835.2001.tb00255.x.Search in Google Scholar

Wilkes, R.J., McIvor, L.M., and Guiry, M.D. (2005). Using rbcL sequence data to reassess the taxonomic position of some Grateloupia and Dermocorynus species (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) from the North-Eastern Atlantic. Eur. J. Phycol. 40: 53–60, https://doi.org/10.1080/09670260400024634.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, M.Y. and Kim, M.S. (2015). Taxonomy of Grateloupia (Halymeniales, Rhodophyta) by DNA barcode marker analysis and a description of Pachymeniopsis volvita sp. nov. J. Appl. Phycol. 27: 1373–1384, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-014-0432-1.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, M.Y., Kim, S.Y., and Kim, M.S. (2021a). Population genetic structure and phylogeography of co-distributed Pachymeniopsis species (Rhodophyta) along the coast of Korea and Japan. Diversity 13: 336, https://doi.org/10.3390/d13080336.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, M.Y., Kim, S.Y., and Kim, M.S. (2021b). Verification of hotspots of genetic diversity in Korean population of Grateloupia asiatica and G. jejuensis (Rhodophyta) show low genetic diversity and similar geographic distribution. Genes Genom. 43: 1463–1469, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-021-01168-y.Search in Google Scholar

Yoshida, T. (1998). Marine algae of Japan. Uchida Rokakuho Publishing Co., Ltd., Tokyo, pp. 1–25, [1]–1222 [in Japanese].Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2024-0095).


Received: 2024-10-24
Accepted: 2025-02-20
Published Online: 2025-03-18
Published in Print: 2025-06-26

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 30.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bot-2024-0095/html?recommended=sidebar
Scroll to top button