Home Medicine Optimal level and order detection in wavelet decomposition for PCG signal denoising
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Optimal level and order detection in wavelet decomposition for PCG signal denoising

  • Mohamed Rouis EMAIL logo , Abdelkrim Ouafi EMAIL logo and Salim Sbaa EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 22, 2018

Abstract

The recorded phonocardiogram (PCG) signal is often contaminated by different types of noises that can be seen in the frequency band of the PCG signal, which may change the characteristics of this signal. Discrete wavelet transform (DWT) has become one of the most important and powerful tools of signal representation, but its effectiveness is influenced by the issue of the selected mother wavelet and decomposition level (DL). The selection of the DL and the mother wavelet are the main challenges. This work proposes a new approach for finding an optimal DL and optimal mother wavelet for PCG signal denoising. Our approach consists of two algorithms designed to tackle the problems of noise and variability caused by PCG acquisition in a real clinical environment for different categories of patients. The results obtained are evaluated by examining the coherence analysie (Coh) correlation coefficient (Corr) and the mean square error (MSE) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in simulated noisy PCG signals. The experimental results show that the proposed method can effectively reduce noise.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express grateful thanks to my friend Benhassine Nassereddine, the searcher in informatics, and to Mrs. Guennoun salah.

  1. Author Statement

  2. Research funding: Authors state no funding involved.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent is not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animals use.

References

[1] Alonso F. Detection of life threatening arrhythmias using feature selection and support vector machines. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2014;61:832–40.10.1109/TBME.2013.2290800Search in Google Scholar

[2] Sang YF, Wang D, Wu JC. Entropy-based method of choosing the decomposition level in wavelet threshold de-noising. Entropy 2010;12:1499–513.10.3390/e12061499Search in Google Scholar

[3] Sang Y-F, Wang D, Wu J-C, Wang L. The relation between periods’ identification and noises in hydrologic series data. J Hydrol 2009;368:165–77.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.042Search in Google Scholar

[4] Princy R, Thamarai P, Karthik B. Denoising EEG signal using wavelet transform. IJARCET 2015;4. ISSN: 2278 – 1323, March.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Peng YH. De-noising by modified soft-thresholding. In: Proc. IEEE Asia-Pacific Conf. Circuits and Systems, 2000:760–2.10.1109/APCCAS.2000.913631Search in Google Scholar

[6] Lei L, Wang C, Liu X. Discrete wavelet transform decomposition level determination exploiting sparseness measurement. International Journal of Electrical, Computer, Energetic, Electronic and Communication Engineering 2013;7.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Castro A, Vinhoza TT, Mattos SS, Coimbra MT. Heart sound segmentation of pediatric auscultations using wavelet analysis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013;2013:3909–12.10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610399Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kumar D, Carvalho P, Antunes M, Henriques J, Maldonado M, Schmidt R, et al. Wavelet transform and simplicity based heart murmur segmentation. J IEEE Comput Cardiol 2006;33:173–6.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Messer SR, Agzarian J, Abbout D. Optimal wavelet denoising for phonocardiograms. Microelectron J 2001;32:931–41.10.1016/S0026-2692(01)00095-7Search in Google Scholar

[10] Bentley P, Nordehn G, Coimbra M, Mannor S. The PASCAL Classifying Heart Sounds Challenge 2011. www.peterjbentley.com/heartchallenge/index.html.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Robertson DC, Camps OI, Mayer JS, Gish WB. Wavelets and electromagnetic power system transient. IEEE Trans Power Del 1996;11:1050–8.10.1109/61.489367Search in Google Scholar

[12] Donoho D. De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1995;41:613–27.10.1109/18.382009Search in Google Scholar

[13] Stein CM. Estimation of the mean of a multivariate normal distribution. Ann Statist 1981;9:1135–51.10.1214/aos/1176345632Search in Google Scholar

[14] Lu G, Brittain JS, Holland P, Yianni J, Green AL, Stein JF. Removing ECG noise from surface EMG signals using adaptive filtering. Neurosci Lett 2009;462:14–9.10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.063Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Cheng X, Zhang Z. Denoising method of heart sound signals based on self-construct heart sound wavelet. AIP Adv 2014;4:087108.10.1063/1.4891822Search in Google Scholar

[16] Omari T. An automatic wavelet denoising scheme for heart sounds. Int J Wavelets Multiresolut Inf Process 2015;13:1550016.10.1142/S0219691315500162Search in Google Scholar

[17] Abhishek M, Sinha GR. Denoising of PCG signal by using wavelet transforms. Adv Comput Res 2012;4:46–9.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Misal A, Sinha GR, Kowar M. Comparison of wavelet transforms for denoising and analysis of PCG signal. I Manag J Commun Eng Syst 2011;1:48–52.10.26634/jcs.1.1.1740Search in Google Scholar

[19] Dawid G, Redlarski G. Wavelet-based denoising method for real phonocardiography signal recorded by mobile devices in noisy environment. Comput Biol Med 2014;52:119–29.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.06.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Ali MN, El-Dahshan E-SA, Yahia AH. Denoising of heart sound signals using discrete wavelet transform. Circuits Syst Signal Process 2017;36:4482–97.10.1007/s00034-017-0524-7Search in Google Scholar

[21] Misal A, Sinha GR. Separation of lung sound from PCG signals using wavelet transform. JBAP 2012;1:57–61.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Bhanushali G, Narendra B. ECG signal de-noising using discrete wavelet transform for removal of AWGN noise by Daubenchies technique. JSRD – International Journal for Scientific Research and Development 2014;2. ISSN (online): 2321–0613.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Feng L, Wang Y, Wang Y. Research and implementation of heart sound denoising. Phys Procedia 2012;25:777–85.10.1016/j.phpro.2012.03.157Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-01-03
Accepted: 2018-04-09
Published Online: 2018-05-22
Published in Print: 2019-04-24

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 31.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2018-0001/html
Scroll to top button