Simulation of personalised haemodynamics by various mounting positions of a prosthetic valve using computational fluid dynamics

References

[1] Eurostat. Health Statistics – Atlas on Mortality in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (Theme-Population and social conditions), 2009:107–13.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Destatis. Deaths, by selected causes of death. Federal Statistical Office [published in 2015, accessed July 2015]. Available from https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/SocietyState/Health/CausesDeath/Tables/BasicdataCausesDeath.html.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Krieger T. Gesamtzahl der herzchirurgischen Eingriffe leicht gestiegen. German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery [published 12 February 2015, accessed July 2015]. Available from https://idw-online.de/en/news624647.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Fleck E, Limberg C. Ein Meilenstein zur Verbesserung der Patientensicherheit. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung [published 29 June 2010, accessed in September 2010]. Available from http://www.dgk.org/presse_alt/includes/pdf/20100629Aorten.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Geißler HJ, Schlensak C, Südkamp M, Beyersdorf F. Heart valve surgery today. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 2009;106: 224–34.10.3238/arztebl.2009.0224Search in Google Scholar

[6] Sotiropoulos F, Le TB, Gilmanov A. Fluid mechanics of heart valves and their replacements. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2016;48:259–83.10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034314Search in Google Scholar

[7] Kleine P, Scherer M, Abdel-Rahman U, Klesius AA, Ackermann H, Moritz A. Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:925–32.10.1067/mtc.2002.126046Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kheradvar A, Groves EM, Falahatpisheh A, Mofrad MK, Hamed Alavi S, Tranquillo R, et al. Emerging trends in heart valve engineering: part IV. Computational modeling and experimental studies. Ann Biomed Eng 2015;43:2314–33.10.1007/s10439-015-1394-4Search in Google Scholar

[9] Hong T, Kim CN. A numerical analysis of the blood flow around the bileaflet mechanical heart valves with different rotational Implantation angles. J Hydrodynam 2011;23:607–14.10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60156-4Search in Google Scholar

[10] Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthetic heart valves – selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation 2009;119:1034–48.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.778886Search in Google Scholar

[11] Wurzel D, Panidis I, Gonzales R. In vitro continuous wave Doppler gradients of mechanical valves in less than optimal orientations. ASAIO Trans 1991;37:448–51.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Laas J, Kleine P, Hasenkam MJ, Nygaard H. Orientation of tilting disc and bileaflet aortic valve substitutes for optimal hemodynamics. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1096–9.10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00780-8Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kleine P, Perthel M, Nygaard H, Hansen SB, Paulsen PK, Riis C, et al. Medtronic Hall versus St. Jude Medical mechanical aortic valve: downstream turbulences with respect to rotation in pigs. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:548–55.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Hartrumpf M, Albes JM, Krempl T, Rudolph V, Wahlers T. The hemodynamic performance of standard bileaflet valves is impaired by a tilted implantation position. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:283–91.10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00804-7Search in Google Scholar

[15] Bongert M, Geller M, Pennekamp W, Nicolas V. Numerical simulation of hemodynamic in the patient-specific aorta after aortic valve replacement based on MRI-data. In: Bennington EH, editor. Horizons in World Cardiovascular Research. Vol. 2. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc., 2010:247–63.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Pennekamp W, Geyhan N, Peters S, Nicolas V. Determination of flow profiles of different mechanical aortic valve prostheses using phase-contrast MRI. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2011;52:277–84.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Cheng Y, Oertel H, Schenkel T. Fluid-structure coupled CFD simulation of the left ventricular flow during filling phase. Ann Biomed Eng 2005;35:567–76.10.1007/s10439-005-4388-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Gao F, Watanabe M, Matsuzawa T. Stress analysis in a layered aortic arch model under pulsatile blood flow. Biomed Eng Online 2006;5:25.10.1186/1475-925X-5-25Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[19] Vande Geest J, Wang DHJ, Wisniewski SR, Makaroun MS, Vorp DA. Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 2006;34:1098–106.10.1007/s10439-006-9132-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Lehmpfuhl M, Hao C, Martirosian P, Schick F. Fluid studies on flow behaviour in narrowing vessels with PC-velocity and numerical simulations. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2009;54:38–47.10.1515/BMT.2009.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] de Tullio MD, Pascazio G, Weltert L, De Paulis R, Verzicco R. Evaluation of prosthetic-valved devices by means of numerical simulations. Phil Trans R Soc A 2011;369:2502–9.10.1098/rsta.2010.0365Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Institute of Thermo- and Fluiddynamic (D). Medizinische Verfahrenstechnik – Ausgewählte Themen der Biofluidmechanik. Bochum: The Institute 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Dwyer HA, Matthews PB, Azadani A, Jaussaud N, Ge L, Guy TS, et al. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009;9:301–8.10.1510/icvts.2008.200006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Paul R, Apel J, Klaus S, Schügner F, Schwindke P, Reul H. Shear stress related blood damage in laminar couette flow. Artif Organs 2003;27:517–29.10.1046/j.1525-1594.2003.07103.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Trauzeddel RF, Barker AJ, Gruettner H, Markl M, Schulz-Menger J. Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement – a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI. Int J Cardiol 2014;170:426–33.10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.11.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[26] Okafor I, Raghav V, Midha P, Kumar G, Yoganathan A. The hemodynamic effects of acute aortic regurgitation into a stiffened left ventricle resulting from chronic aortic stenosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2016;310:H1801–7.10.1152/ajpheart.00161.2016Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] Holzapfel GA, Ogden RW. Biomechanical modeling at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels. CISM Courses and Lectures 2009;508:179–258.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Anssari-Benam A, Bucchi A, Screen HR, Evans SL. A transverse isotropic viscoelastic constitutive model for aortic valve tissue. R Soc Open Sci 2017;4:160585.10.1098/rsos.160585Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Bongert M, Geller M, Pennekamp W, Roggenland D, Nicolas V. Transient simulation of the blood flow in the thoracic aorta based on MRI-data by fluid-structure-interaction. IFMBE Proceedings 2008;22:2614–8.10.1007/978-3-540-89208-3_627Search in Google Scholar

[30] Redaelli A, Bothorel H, Votta E, Soncini M, Morbiducci U, Gaudio CD, et al. 3D simulation of the St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve opening process: fluid-structure interaction study and experimental validation. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13:804–13.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Wenbin M, Kewei L, Wei S. Fluid-structure interaction study of transcatheter aortic valve dynamics using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2016;7:374–88.10.1007/s13239-016-0285-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[32] Toma M, Einstein DR, Bloodworth CH 4th, Cochran RP, Yoganathan AP, Kunzelman KS. Fluid-structure interaction and structural analyses using a comprehensive mitral valve model with 3D chordal structure. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2017;33: doi: 10.1002/cnm.2815. Epub 2016 Jul 28.10.1002/cnm.2815Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[33] Haya L, Tavoularis S. Effects of bileaflet mechanical heart valve orientation on fluid stresses and coronary flow. J Fluid Mech 2016;806:129–64.10.1017/jfm.2016.582Search in Google Scholar

[34] Le TB, Sotiropoulos F. Fluid-structure interaction of an aortic heart valve prosthesis driven by an animated anatomic left ventricle. J Comput Phys 2013;244:41–62.10.1016/j.jcp.2012.08.036Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Okafor IU, Santhanakrishnan A, Chaffins BD, Mirabella L, Oshinski JN, Yoganathan AP. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance compatible physical model of the left ventricle for multi-modality characterization of wall motion and hemodynamics. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015;17:51.10.1186/s12968-015-0154-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[36] Votta E, Le TB, Stevanella M, Fusini L, Caiani EG, Redaelli A, et al. Toward patient-specific simulations of cardiac valves: state-of-the-art and future directions. J Biomech 2013;46: 217–28.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.10.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central