A new in vitro spine test rig to track multiple vertebral motions under physiological conditions

References

[1] Bass CR, Planchak CJ, Salzar RS, et al. The temperature-dependent viscoelasticity of porcine lumbar spine ligaments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: E436–E442.10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180b7fa58Search in Google Scholar

[2] Costi JJ, Hearn TC, Fazzalari NL. The effect of hydration on the stiffness of intervertebral discs in an ovine model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002; 17: 446–455.10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00035-9Search in Google Scholar

[3] Crawford NR, Brantley AG, Dickman CA, Koeneman EJ. An apparatus for applying pure nonconstraining moments to spine segments in vitro. Spine 1995; 20: 2097–2100.10.1097/00007632-199510000-00005Search in Google Scholar

[4] Faber M, Schamhardt H, Van Weeren P. Determination of 3d spinal kinematics without defining a local vertebral coordinate system. J Biomech 1999; 32: 1355–1358.10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00131-1Search in Google Scholar

[5] Gédet P, Thistlethwaite PA, Ferguson SJ. Minimizing errors during in vitro testing of multisegmental spine specimens: considerations for component selection and kinematic measurement. J Biomech 2007; 40: 1881–1885.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.07.024Search in Google Scholar

[6] Goel VK, Nye TA, Clark CR, Nishiyama K, Weinstein JN. A technique to evaluate an internal spinal device by use of the selspot system: an application to luque closed loop. Spine 1987; 12: 150–159.10.1097/00007632-198703000-00011Search in Google Scholar

[7] Goertzen DJ, Lane C, Oxland TR. Neutral zone and range of motion in the spine are greater with stepwise loading than with a continuous loading protocol. an in vitro porcine investigation. J Biomech 2004; 37: 257–261.10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00307-5Search in Google Scholar

[8] Huang CY, Wang VM, Flatow EL, Mow VC. Temperature-dependent viscoelastic properties of the human supraspinatus tendon. J Biomech 2009; 42: 546–549.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.11.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Hummel J, Figl M, Birkfellner W, et al. Evaluation of a new electromagnetic tracking system using a standardized assessment protocol. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51: N205.10.1088/0031-9155/51/10/N01Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Kindratenko VV. A survey of electromagnetic position tracker calibration techniques. Virt Real 2000; 5: 169–182.10.1007/BF01409422Search in Google Scholar

[11] Knop C, Lange U, Bastian L, Blauth M. Three-dimensional motion analysis with synex. Euro Spine J 2000; 9: 472–485.10.1007/s005860000185Search in Google Scholar

[12] Lee RY. Kinematics of rotational mobilisation of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech 2001; 16: 481–488.10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00036-5Search in Google Scholar

[13] McLachlin SD. An Investigation of Subaxial Cervical Spine Trauma and Surgical Treatment through Biomechanical Simulation and Kinematic Analysis. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Western Ontario 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Milne A, Chess D, Johnson J, King G. Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking device: a study of the optimal operating range and metal interference. J Biomech 1996; 29: 791–793.10.1016/0021-9290(96)83335-5Search in Google Scholar

[15] Niosi CA, Zhu QA, Wilson DC, Keynan O, Wilson DR, Oxland TR. Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study. Euro Spine J 2006; 15: 913–922.10.1007/s00586-005-0948-9Search in Google Scholar

[16] Nixon MA, McCallum BC, Fright WR, Price NB. The effects of metals and interfering fields on electromagnetic trackers. Presence Teleop Virt Environ 1998; 70: 204–218.10.1162/105474698565587Search in Google Scholar

[17] Northern Digital Inc. Aurora V2 User Guide. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2V 1C5: Northern Digital Inc. 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Panjabi MM. Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: I. a conceptual framework. Spine 1988; 13: 1129–1134.10.1097/00007632-198810000-00013Search in Google Scholar

[19] Pearcy M, Hindle R. New method for the non-invasive three-dimensional measurement of human back movement. Clin Biomech 1989; 4: 73–79.10.1016/0268-0033(89)90042-9Search in Google Scholar

[20] Pflaster DS, Krag MH, Johnson CC, Haugh LD, Pope MH. Effect of test environment on intervertebral disc hydration. Spine 1997; 22: 133–139.10.1097/00007632-199701150-00003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Raab FH, Blood EB, Steiner TO, Jones HR. Magnetic position and orientation tracking system. IEEE Trans Aero Elec Sys 1979; 15: 709–718.10.1109/TAES.1979.308860Search in Google Scholar

[22] Schmoelz W, Huber J, Nydegger T, Dipl-Ing, Claes L, Wilke H. Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 160: 418–423.10.1097/00024720-200308000-00015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Serhan H, Mhatre D, Defossez H, Bono CM. Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons. SAS J 2011; 5: 75–89.10.1016/j.esas.2011.05.001Search in Google Scholar

[24] Stoffel M, Willenberg W, Azarnoosh M, Fuhrmann-Nelles N, Zhou B, Markert B. Towards bioreactor development with physiological motion control and its applications. Med Eng Phys 2017; 39: 106–112.10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.10.010Search in Google Scholar

[25] Stolworthy DK, Zirbel SA, Howell LL, Samuels M, Bowden AE. Characterization and prediction of rate-dependent flexibility in lumbar spine biomechanics at room and body temperature. Spine J 2014; 14: 789–798.10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.043Search in Google Scholar

[26] Strube P, Tohtz S, Hoff E, Gross C, Perka C, Putzier M. Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part i. biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion. Euro Spine J 2010; 19: 2171–2180.10.1007/s00586-010-1549-9Search in Google Scholar

[27] Van der Veen AJ, Dieen JH, Nadort A, Stam B, Smit TH. Intervertebral disc recovery after dynamic or static loading in vitro: Is there a role for the endplate? J Biomech 2000; 10: 2230–2235.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.10.018Search in Google Scholar

[28] Van Herp G, Rowe P, Salter P, Paul J. Three-dimensional lumbar spinal kinematics: a study of range of movement in 100 healthy subjects aged 20 to 60+ years. Rheumatology 2000; 39: 1337–1340.10.1093/rheumatology/39.12.1337Search in Google Scholar

[29] Volkheimer D, Malakoutian M, Oxland TR, Wilke HJ. Limitations of current in vitro test protocols for investigation of instrumented adjacent segment biomechanics: critical analysis of the literature. Euro Spine J 2015; 24: 1882–1892.10.1007/s00586-015-4040-9Search in Google Scholar

[30] Wang Y, Spangler C, Tai BL, Shih AJ. Positional accuracy and transmitter orientation of the 3d electromagnetic tracking system. Measur Sci Technol 2013; 24: 105105.10.1088/0957-0233/24/10/105105Search in Google Scholar

[31] Wilke HJ, Claes L, Schmitt H, Wolf S. A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation. Euro Spine J 1994; 3: 91–97.10.1007/BF02221446Search in Google Scholar

[32] Wilke HJ, Jungkunz B, Wenger K, Claes LE. Spinal segment range of motion as a function of in vitro test conditions: Effects of exposure period, accumulated cycles, angular-deformation rate, and moisture condition. Anat Rec 1998; 251: 15–19.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199805)251:1<15::AID-AR4>3.0.CO;2-DSearch in Google Scholar

[33] Wilke HJ, Rohlmann F, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Werner K, Claes L, Kettler A. Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part i. lumbar spine. Euro Spine J 2006; 15: 720–30.10.1007/s00586-005-1029-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[34] Wilke HJ, Wenger K, Claes L. Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Euro Spine J 1998; 7: 148–154.10.1007/s005860050045Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Wilson E, Yaniv Z, Zhang H, et al. A hardware and software protocol for the evaluation of electromagnetic tracker accuracy in the clinical environment: a multi-center study. Proc SPIE Med Img 2007; 6509: 65092T1–65092T11.10.1117/12.712701Search in Google Scholar

[36] Zirbel SA, Stolworthy DK, Howell LL, Bowden AE. Intervertebral disc degeneration alters lumbar spine segmental stiffness in all modes of loading under a compressive follower load. Spine J 2013; 13: 1134–1147.10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed