Differential osteogenicity of multiple donor-derived human mesenchymal stem cells and osteoblasts in monolayer, scaffold-based 3D culture and in vivo
Abstract
We set out to compare the osteogenicity of human mesenchymal stem (hMSCs) and osteoblasts (hOBs). Upon osteogenic induction in monolayer, hMSCs showed superior matrix mineralization expressing characteristic bone-related genes. For scaffold cultures, both cell types presented spindle-shaped, osteoblast-like morphologies forming a dense, interconnected network of high viability. On the scaffolds, hOBs proliferated faster. A general upregulation of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), osteoprotegrin (OPG), receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL), sclerostin (SOST), and dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1) was observed for both cell types. Simultaneously, PTHrP, RANKL and DMP-1 expression decreased under osteogenic stimulation, while OPG and SOST increased significantly. Following transplantation into NOD/SCID mice, μCT and histology showed increased bone deposition with hOBs. The bone was vascularized, and amounts further increased for both cell types after recombinant human bone morphogenic protein 7 (rhBMP-7) addition also stimulating osteoclastogenesis. Complete bone organogenesis was evidenced by the presence of osteocytes and hematopoietic precursors. Our study results support the asking to develop 3D cellular models closely mimicking the functions of living tissues suitable for in vivo translation.
Introduction
Bone is an organ with inherent tissue regenerative properties; however, high-energy trauma or disease may necessitate supporting treatments or bone augmentation. The most common material used to augment critical-sized bone defects are autologous bone grafts, but this approach has clear limitations such as scarcity and donor site morbidity [49]. Alternative strategies have focused on the use of allogenic or heterologous bone grafts [46] or the application of tissue-engineered constructs consisting of a synthetic scaffold seeded with human mesenchymal stem or precursor (hMSCs) or osteoblast cells (hOBs) [64] that are implanted into the site of defect. Prior to application in humans, cell-based approaches require thorough cell characterization in vitro to predict the cellular responses of a living organism. To present, the majority of cell-related data gathering efforts driving the integration of cell biology and engineering have relied on cultures on two-dimensional (2D) surfaces. These flat and hard substrates lead to a loss of essential cellular functions present in native tissues [1]. Cells residing in a tissue vividly interact with adjoining cells and the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM) exchanging biochemical and mechanical stimuli [14]. These interactions establish a three-dimensional (3D) communication network maintaining the specificity and homeostasis of a tissue [32] regulating key events in the life cycle of a cell such as migration, proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis [5]. The 3D cell culture systems aiming to reestablish this interplay can mimic the specificity of real tissues to a higher degree than conventional 2D cultures. As such, 3D cultures are increasingly used in a broad range of cell biology studies.
Following in vitro characterization, novel cell-based concepts necessitate proof of concept studies confirming their safety and efficacy. With bone engineering, critical-sized segmental bone defects have been promoted as first choice translational models to assess bone regeneration strategies [39]. The biological environment of such defects is usually margined by sound cortical bone enlaced by periosteum, endosteum, and bone marrow. In large bone defects, however, considerable parts of the site are in apposition to surrounding soft tissue including muscle, adipose tissue, and residues of tendinous insertion sites as replicated in ectopic bone tissue engineering models. Ectopic models can, therefore, provide valuable findings to the field [28, 33, 45].
The objective of the present study was to investigate and compare the osteogenic potential of hMSCs and hOBs in 2D culture, 3D culture, and in vivo to reveal the influence of a preserved 3D microenvironment on cellular behavior and to determine the role of donor cell commitment on bone synthesis, neovascularization, and maturation.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Human primary osteoblasts (hOBs) were isolated from nonsclerotic, trabecular bone taken from the tibial plateau as described previously [50] (three healthy male donors, age 62–67 years). The procedure was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Queensland University of Technology and the Prince Charles Hospital (Approval number 0600000232) and conducted according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Trabecular bone-derived osteoblastic cells have extensively been characterized regarding their morphological and functional criteria [22, 41, 50, 54, 60]. Cells were expanded to passage 3 for subsequent experiments.
Human primary mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) were purchased from the Tulane Center for the Preparation and Distribution of Adult Stem Cells (http://www.som.tulane.edu/gene_therapy/distribute.shtml, three healthy male donors, age 35–42). The multipotent differentiation potential and cell surface marker profile of these cells have been described previously [13, 34, 58]. After pooling, passage 3 hOBs and hMSCs were maintained in α-minimal essential medium (α-MEM, Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia), 100 IU/ml penicillin (Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia), and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia).
2D culture
HOBs and hMSCs were seeded at a density of 3000 cells/cm2 into 6-well polystyrene tissue culture plates (Nunc, ThermoFisher Scientific, Scoresby, Victoria, Australia). At confluency, mineralization was induced as described previously [50] over a period of 28 days. Controls were cultured in normal culture medium.
To assess the level of mineralization after osteogenic induction, alizarin red s staining and a Wako HRII calcium (Wako, Osaka, Japan) assay were performed as described previously [50].
Alkaline phosphatase activity
Two-dimensional cultures were washed and incubated with 1 ml phenol red- and serum-free α-MEM for 24 h. Then, 100 μl of media supernatant was transferred in triplicates to a 96-well plate (Nunc). After 3 h of incubation with 100 μl of 1 mg/ml p-nitrophenylphosphate/0.2 M Tris(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane (Tris) buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, Castle Hill, New South Wales, Australia), optical density at 405 nm was measured using a plate reader (Polar Star Optima, BMG Labtech, Offenburg, Germany). Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was normalized against the sample deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) content determined using a Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA assay kit (Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia).
Scaffold fabrication
Medical-grade polycaprolactone tricalcium phosphate (mPCL-TCP) scaffolds produced by fused deposition modeling (FDM) were purchased from Osteopore International (www.osteopore.com.sg). The scaffold properties have been characterized as described previously [51].
Scaffold seeding and 3D culture
Prior to cell seeding, scaffolds were prepared as described by Reichert et al. [51]. The 150,000 hOBs or hMSCs suspended in 50 μl media were equally distributed onto the scaffolds and incubated for 2 h at 37°C, 5% CO2 to allow cell attachment. One milliliter of α-MEM/10% FBS was then added carefully. Cells were cultured in osteogenic media over a period of 4 weeks with semi-weekly media changes.
Seeding efficiency and proliferation in 3D culture
To assess seeding efficiency and proliferation of hMSCs and hOBs on the 3D scaffolds, total DNA was quantified using the Quant-iT PicoGreen™ proliferation assay (Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fluorescence of triplicates was measured using a plate reader (Polar Star Optima, BMG Labtech, Offenburg, Germany) at 485 nm/520 nm excitation/emission wavelength.
Cell viability in 3D culture
After 28 days of culture, seeded scaffolds were incubated with 2 μg/ml fluorescein diacetate (FDA, Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) and 10 μg/ml propidium iodide (PI, Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) in phenol red-free medium (α-MEM, Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) at 37°C for 15 min. The specimens were then rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Invitrogen, Melbourne, Australia), and images of the hydrated samples were captured using a Leica SP5 laser scanning confocal microscope (Wetzlar, Germany).
Phalloidin staining
The 3D cultures were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS (PFA) for 20 min and permeabilized using 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS for 5 min. After washing with PBS, samples were blocked for 10 min in 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich, Castle Hill, New South Wales, Australia) in PBS. Samples were then incubated with 3 μl/ml PicoGreen™ (Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) and 8 U/ml rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin (Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) in 2% BSA/PBS for 1 h. After rinsing with PBS, the hydrated samples were imaged using a Leica SP5 laser scanning confocal microscope.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
On day 28, 3D cultures were fixed with 3% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.3) overnight at 4°C. After washing in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, they were dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol. Finally, samples were incubated in hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS, Prositech, Thuringowa, Queensland, Australia) for 60 min and air dried. Specimens were mounted and gold coated (SC500, Bio-Rad) prior to visualization using a Quanta 200 scanning electron microscope (FEI).
RNA isolation, primer design, and qRT-PCR
Total ribonucleic acid (RNA) was harvested in triplicate from control as well as differentiated samples at day 28. Samples were isolated using Trizol (Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using the SuperScript III kit (Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed on a 7900HT FAST Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) using a 384-well plate layout. Templates and reagents were aliquoted using an Eppendorf 5075 epMotion pipetting robot (Quantum Scientific, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia). The following volumes were used per reaction (total volume 10 μl): 5 μl of 2× SybrGreen reaction mix (Applied Biosystems, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia), 1 μl of forward and reverse primer (1 μM, Table 1), 2 μl cDNA template dilution (1:10 from stock), and 1 μl RNAse and DNAse free water (Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia). The thermocycling conditions were 1 cycle of 10 min at 95°C, 40 cycles of a 10-s step at 95°C followed by a 1 min step at 60°C. Levels of genes of interest were normalized to the geometrical mean of three housekeeping genes (18s, GAPDH, and β-actin).
Primer sequences.
| Gene | Primer sequences | |
|---|---|---|
| Runx-2 | Forward: | CCTCCTACCTGAGCCAGATG |
| Reverse: | ATGAAATGCTTGGGAACTGC | |
| PTHrP | Forward: | GGAGACTGGTTCAGCAGTGG |
| Reverse: | TCAGCTGTGTGGATTTCTGC | |
| ON | Forward: | CAAATACATCCCCCCTTGCC |
| Reverse: | GATCTTCTTCACCCGCAGCTT | |
| OC | Forward: | GATGTGGTCAGCCAACTC |
| Reverse: | ACACTCCTCGCCCTATTG | |
| TGFB1 | Forward: | ACCAACTACTGCTTCAGCTCCAC |
| Reverse: | TGGTTGTACAGGGCCAGGAC | |
| ALP | Forward: | CCACGTCTTCACATTTGGTG |
| Reverse: | AGACTGCGCCTGGTAGTTGT | |
| Col I | Forward: | AGAACAGCGTGGCCTACATG |
| Reverse: | TCCGGTGTGACTCGTGC | |
| Reverse: | CGGGGATGCAGCGGAAGTC | |
| 18s | Forward: | GATCCATTGGAGGGCAAGTCT |
| Reverse: | CCAAGATCCAACTACGAGCTTTTT | |
| GAPDH | Forward: | GCAAATTCCATGGCACCGT |
| Reverse: | TCGCCCCACTTGATTTTGG | |
| Actin-β | Forward: | TTCGAGCAAGAGATGGCCAC |
| Reverse: | ACAGGACTCCATGCCCAG |
Scaffold implantation
Cell scaffold constructs were implanted subcutaneously in dorsal pockets of 7-week-old female non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mice (Australian Research Council, Perth, Australia). Approved by the Ethics Committee of Queensland University of Technology (Approval number 0900000915) and conducted according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Experimental groups included (1) scaffold+hMSCs; (2) scaffold+hOBs; (3) scaffold+hMSCs+recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 7 (rhBMP-7); (4) scaffold+hOBs+rhBMP-7. To administer rhBMP-7 (5 μg/scaffold; Olympus Biotech, Mt Waverley, Victoria, Australia) to the inner duct of the scaffold intraoperatively, 50.5 μl of fibrin glue (Tisseel, Baxter, Old Toongabbie, New South Wales, Australia) were used [51]. Eight weeks after transplantation, specimens were retrieved and fixed with 4% PFA for 24 h followed by 48 h in 2% PFA. Samples were stored in 70% ethanol until analysis.
Calcein labeling and live imaging
Five days prior to termination, a fluorescent calcein solution was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Sigma-Aldrich, Castle Hill, New South Wales, Australia) (1 mg/ml, pH 7.4) and injected intraperitoneally (10 mg/kg body weight). Before euthanasia, mice were imaged (day 5) under isoflurane anesthesia using a Xenogen IVIS® imaging system (Glen Waverley, Victoria, Australia) to detect calcein deposits within the newly formed tissue-engineered bone.
μCT analysis and biomechanical testing
Microcomputed tomography (μCT) analysis and biomechanical testing was performed as described by Reichert et al. [51].
Histochemistry and immunohistochemistry
Following paraffin embedding [51], 5-μm sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, rinsed with distilled water, and immersed in 0.2 M Tris-hydrochloric acid (Tris-HCl) buffer (pH 7.4). Sections were stained with Meyer’s Haematoxylin and Eosin using a standard protocol [23] or processed for immunohistochemistry. For immunohistochemistry, sections were incubated with 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 20 min at room temperature (RT). After three washes with 0.2 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.4,) sections were incubated for 10 min with a ready-to-use Proteinase K solution (Dako, Noble Park, Victoria, Australia) or in sodium citrate buffer at 95°C for 4 min. After blocking with 2% BSA/PBS for 20 min, samples were incubated with 2 mg/ml dilution primary mouse anti-human osteocalcin (Abcam, ab13418, Waterloo, New South Wales, Australia) or 1 mg/ml rabbit anti-human von Willebrand factor (vWF) antibody (Milipore, AB7356, Kilsyth, Victoria, Australia) or human specific nuclear mitotic apparatus protein 1 (NuMA) antibody (Abcam, S2825, Waterloo, New South Wales, Australia) in 2% BSA/PBS overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber (Table 2). Controls were incubated with mouse or rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia). After washing with PBS, sections were incubated for 30 min with peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibodies (Dako EnVison+ Dual Link System Peroxidase, Noble Park, Victoria, Australia), respectively. Sections were incubated with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate (Dako, Noble Park, Victoria, Australia) until a brown staining was evident, and counterstained with hematoxylin. After dehydration in an ethanol series (50%, 70%, 95%) and xylene, sections were mounted with Eukitt® mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich, Castle Hill, New South Wales, Australia), and images were captured using a Zeiss Axio Imager A.1 (Jena, Germany).
List of antibodies.
| Antibody | Mouse anti-human osteocalcin (ab13418) | Rabbit anti-human von Willebrand factor (vWF)(AB7356) | Rabbit anti-human NuMA (S2825) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antigen retrieval method | Proteinase K (Dako) (10 min at RT) | Proteinase K (Dako) (10 min at RT) | Sodium citrate buffer (95°C for 4 min) |
| Dilution | 2 mg/ml | 1 mg/ml | 1:100 |
| Company | Abcam | Millipore | Abcam |
Blood vessel counting
Blood vessel counting was performed on 15 representative vWF-stained slides for each experimental condition. Herein, five randomly selected regions of interest were photographed at a magnification of 60× using a Carl Zeiss Axio Imager A1 microscope (North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia). Blood vessels were then counted using the AxioVision 3.1 software package, and the mean numbers of vessels/mm2 was calculated [7].
Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining
The presence of osteoclasts was assessed using TRAP staining as previously published [51].
Undecalcified poly-methyl-methacrylate sections
Samples were dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol (30 min in 70%,1 h in 90%, 95% and 100% ethanol) and processed through xylene for 40 min three times. Samples were then infiltrated with methyl methacrylate (MMA, Sigma-Aldrich, Castle Hill, New South Wales, Australia) for 4 h (vacuum conditions) and subsequently incubated with MMA containing 3% polyethylene glycol (PEG) (three changes, 24 h each, vacuum conditions). To initiate polymerization, the catalyst Perkadox (0.3%) was added to the MMA/PEG solution, which was then incubated at 50°C for 10 min. Specimens were put to rest until fully polymerized. Embedded samples were cut into 5-μm sections using an automated sledge microtome (Reichert-Jung, Polycut SM 2500), stretched with 70% ethanol and mounted onto gelatin-coated microscope slides. Sections were overlaid with a plastic film, and slides were clamped together and dried for 12 h at 60°C. Sections were deplastified in xylene, rehydrated, and stained using a combined von Kossa/van Gieson staining procedure [59].
Histomorphometry
To determine the amount of mineralization on von Kossa/van Gieson-stained sections, semiquantitative analysis was performed using Image J software as described by Reichert et al. [51].
Scanning electron microscopy for osteocytes in mineralized matrix
A mirror finish polish was achieved on the MMA-embedded sections by sequential wet sanding with 400, 600, and 1200 grit sandpapers, and a final polish with 1.0 α alumina powder polishing using a soft cloth polishing wheel. These polished faces were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 2–10 s, and washed in sodium hypochlorite (bleach) for 5 min, followed by a brief rinse in dH2O (distilled water). After drying, the blocks were gold sputtered coated (Leica EM SCD005) and then examined with a FEI Quanta 200 Environmental scanning electron microscope (SEM) operating at 10 kV.
To calculate the osteocyte density within the mineralized matrix, 10 fields of view were examined at 1000× magnification, and the area of the mineralized matrix present in each field was calculated with Image J software.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA, SPSS 19), and p<0.05 were considered significant, the Tukey post hoc test was performed following ANOVA. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Results are presented as the mean±standard error of the mean.
Results
2D hMSC cultures show increased matrix mineralization compared to hOB cultures
The potential of hMSCs and hOBs to deposit a mineralized extracellular matrix was investigated by culturing these cells in osteogenic differentiation medium. After 4 weeks of osteogenic induction in monolayer culture, extensive amounts of alizarin red-positive mineral deposits were seen in both hMSC and hOB cultures (Figure 1A–D). In contrast, control cultures grown under non-osteogenic conditions showed no significant alizarin red staining. This was in line with the significantly lower calcium levels measured utilizing the Wako HR II calcium assay (d14: hOB 404.66 ng±63.73 vs. 524.67 ng±44.51; hMSC 1694.81 ng±260.99 vs. 712.80 ng±177.33; d28: hOB 944.76 ng±40.63 vs. 492.70 ng±167.62; hMSC 4007.62 ng±949.84 vs. 888.27 ng±160) (Figure 1E). Compared to hMSCs, hOBs formed significantly fewer mineralized nodules (p<0.05), which was in accordance with the lower amounts of calcium detected in hOB cultures after 14 and 28 days (Figure 1B). We further assessed alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, a marker of osteogenic differentiation, at day 21. ALP activity was significantly increased in osteogenically induced hOBs (0.28±0.05) and hMSCs (0.34±0.02) (p<0.05) compared to non-osteogenic controls (hOB 0.18±0.01; hMSC 0.23±0.01) (Figure 1F). To compare hOB and hMSC proliferation, DNA contents were quantified over a culture period of 14 days using a PicoGreen assay (Figure 1G). Starting from day 5, significantly higher cell numbers were detected for hOBs (683.24 ng±23.82) compared to hMSCs (376.34 ng±9.21) (p<0.05) indicating a higher proliferative potential of hOBs.

Assessment of mineralization, alkaline phosphatase activity and proliferation. Under osteogenic conditions extracellular matrix calcium concentrations, visualized by alizarin red staining (A–D) and quantified using a Ca2+ assay (E), increased significantly on days 14 and 28 also stimulating alkaline phosphatase activity (F). In 2D, hOBs showed a higher proliferation rate compared to hMSCs (G) (*statistical significance).
In 3D culture, hOBs show a higher proliferation potential than hMSCs
Three-dimensional cell culture systems have become increasingly popular in cell biology as they are believed to reflect native tissue conditions much closer compared to conventional 2D cell cultures [44]. Moreover, scaffolds utilized for 3D in vitro cultures can also be used in analogous in vivo experiment consecutively allowing for a better comparison of obtained in vitro and in vivo data. Thus, hOBs and hMSCs were cultured on mPCL-TCP scaffolds. After 28 days, light microscopy, confocal laser scanning microscopy, and SEM analysis revealed elongated, spindle-shaped, osteoblast-like cell morphologies for both cell types. Cells formed a dense, interconnected 3D network throughout the pores of the mPCL-TCP scaffolds (Figure 2). FDA/PI staining indicated a high cell viability of >90% (Figure 2C and H). Furthermore, cell proliferation of hOBs and hMSCs in 3D culture was compared. Similar to the findings in 2D cultures, hOBs (d28: 2381.12 ng±100.37) proliferated at a higher rate when compared to hMSCs (d28: 1613.6 ng±86.34) as indicated by the higher DNA contents detected after 14 and 28 days (Figure 2K); furthermore, higher calcium levels were detected in 3D hMSC cultures (0.15 mg±0.03) compared to hOB cultures (0.08 mg±0.03).

Morphology, viability and proliferation of 3D cultures. Cultures of hMSCs and hOBs on mPCL-TCP scaffolds on day 28. Both cell types showed high rates of survival (C, H), displayed a spindle-shaped morphology (B, G), proliferated well, and synthesized mineralized extracellular matrix forming dense interconnected networks on the scaffold struts and within its pores (D, E, I, J).
Osteogenic markers are expressed differentially in 2D and 3D cultures
To investigate the influence of 2D vs. 3D culture conditions on osteogenic marker gene expression levels, hOBs and hMSCs were grown for 28 days in monolayer and on mPCL-TCP scaffolds. Under osteogenic conditions, hMSCs and hOBs upregulated mRNA levels of ALP both in 2D and 3D culture. For osteogenically induced hMSCs, higher relative expression levels of ALP were detected in 2D rather than in 3D culture. In contrast, expression levels in hOB cultures were found to be significantly higher in 3D than in monolayer culture.
Osteocalcin (OC), a late osteogenic expression marker, was expressed at relatively low levels in hMSC and hOB controls. Human OBs exhibited increased levels of OC expression levels under osteogenic stimulation in 2D, while significantly higher OC levels were found in 3D cultures compared to 2D cultures. In hMSCs, low levels of OC expression were found for both 2D and 3D cultures.
Moreover, osteonectin (ON) expression levels were decreased in osteogenic hOB and hMSC cultures compared to controls. Significantly increased levels were found for hOBs in 3D cultures, opposed to hMSCs. Generally, in 3D cultures PTHrP, OPG, RANKL, SOST, and DMP1 levels were remarkably higher than in 2D cultures. At the same time, PTHrP, RANKL, and DMP-1 expression decreased under osteogenic stimulation, while expression levels of OPG and SOST increased significantly. Relative expression of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) decreased under osteogenic conditions for both cell types in 2D and 3D cultures. However, TGF-β expression levels were significantly higher in 2D cultures. Taken together, both cell types expressed osteogenic markers when stimulated with osteogenic media, while significant differences in gene expression were observed between 2D and 3D cultures (Figure 3).

Expression of osteogenic marker genes of hMSCs and hOBs cultured in 2D and 3D culture. For hOBs, higher levels of expression for ALP (A), osteonectin (B), osteocalcin (C), and PTHrP (D), osteoprotegerin (G), and RANKL (H) were found in 3D culture, while collagen type I (E) and TGF-β (F) were expressed to a lower extent. #Significant difference between 2D and 3D at day 28 within one group. *Significant difference between control and osteogenically induced samples at day 28 either in 2D or in 3D.
In vivo, hOBs deposit more bone in the presence of rhBMP-7 when compared to hMSCs
To analyze the potential of hMSCs and hOBs to induce bone formation in vivo, scaffolds with both cell types were implanted subcutaneously into NOD/SCID mice with or without rhBMP-7. Prior to euthanasia at 8 weeks, calcein was injected to visualize the tissue-engineered bone constructs in vivo. A seemingly higher fluorescent signal was detected for scaffolds implanted in combination with rhBMP-7 (Figure S1 A). When explanting the scaffolds, all constructs appeared well vascularized (Figure S1 D, E). MicroCT revealed little and scattered bone formation in scaffolds seeded with cells only. More deposited bone was observed when cell-seeded scaffolds were combined with rhBMP-7. The highest amount of mineralized tissue had formed in tissue-engineered constructs consisting of hOBs and rhBMP-7 (5.85 mm3), followed by hMSCs combined with rhBMP-7 (4.79 mm3), hMSCs (3.33 mm3), and hOBs (2.67 mm3) (Figure 4V). A similar bone mineral density was found for all groups with values ranging from 619.98 to 652.71 mg HA/cm3. Concomitantly, with an increased amount of mineralized tissue, higher compressive stiffness values were measured (Figure 4U, hOB 32.26 N/mm±1.42, hOB-BMP 45.85 N/mm±3.66, hMSC 33.76 N/mm±1.7, hMSC-BMP 34.54 N/mm±1.0). In H&E staining, newly formed bone (NB), adipose tissue (AT), fibrous connective tissue (CT), and blood vessel formation (Figure 4D, E, I, J, S, T, asterisks) could be observed. In any group, bone formation occurred preferably in peripheral regions of the scaffold, but was constrained by the scaffold boundaries. The formation of heterotopic bone marrow (BM) was only observed in groups including BMP-7 (Figure S2). Von Kossa/van Gieson staining confirmed the highest amount of mineralization found in the hOB-BMP-7 group (Figure 4 W, hOB 4.83%±0.35, hOB-BMP 10.52%±0.79, hMSC 5.75%±0.49, hMSC-BMP 7.87%±0.53). TRAP staining indicated high osteoclastic activity in all groups with rhBMP-7, while no osteoclasts were detected in the other experimental groups (Figure 5A–D). Osteoclasts were lining the outer boundary of areas of new bone formation in close proximity to the surrounding fibrous connective tissue. Furthermore, high levels of OC were detected in the bone matrix, in bone-lining osteoblasts, and in osteocytes (arrows). Multiple blood vessels were observed in both the periphery and center of the transplanted constructs as analysed by v. Willebrand factor (vWF) stainings. A significantly higher blood vessel density was determined for hMSC-BMP-7 constructs (19.47/mm2±2.61) and hOB-BMP-7 samples (18.95/mm2±1.82) compared to scaffolds that had been implanted in the absence of BMP-7 (11.91/mm2±5.42 for hMSC and 12.42/mm2±3.93 for hOB seeded scaffolds).

MicroCT 3D reconstructions, von Kossa/van Gieson and H&E-stained sections, quantification of mineralization, and biomechanical testing. MicroCT 3D reconstructioins (first column), von Kossa/van Gieson (second and third columns), and H&E (fourth and fifth column) staining showed the highest amount of mineralized tissue in combination with rhBMP-7.

TRAP, OC, vWF, and NuMA staining on paraffin-embedded specimens. High osteoclastic activity was detected in all rhBMP-7-groups but not in control groups (A–D). In the case of bone formation, strong extracellular matrix-associated and cytoplasmatic OC expression was detected (arrows). Multiple areas positive for vWF were observed (I–L). NuMA staining visualized the presence of human cells in the tissue-engineered bone constructs (M–P).
To investigate if the seeded hMSC and hOB cells survived the implantation and contributed to bone formation 8 weeks after transplantation, immunohistochemical staining specific to human, not mouse, cell nuclei was performed. A positive staining was observed in the hOB, hMSC-BMP-7, and the hOB-BMP-7 group (Figure 5N–P) whereas absent in hMSC samples (Figure 5M). NuMA-positive cells were mainly detected in the fibrous tissue surrounding the scaffold, as well as in areas of increased bone formation in the hMSC-BMP-7 and the hOB-BMP-7 groups. NuMA-positively stained cells were absent within the mineralized tissue as well as in the negative controls.
Higher osteocyte density in hOB-rhBMP-7 group than in the hMSC-rhBMP-7 group
Resin-cast SEM technique was used to image and characterize resin-embedded undecalicifed tissue-engineered bone constructs. It has previously been demonstrated [18] that after MMA infiltration of bone, a standard histological method for mineralized samples, acid etching the surface allows for the removal of the mineralized matrix, exposing a replica morphology of the lacuna-canalicular system at the bone-scaffold interface. An abundance of well-preserved, morphologically intact osteocytes with a high degree of interconnecting processes, suggesting a functional syncytium (Figure 6A–F) could be shown in the hOB+rhBMP-7 and hMSCs+rhBMP-7 group. In some areas, osteocytes were observed interacting with blood vessels. Empty lacunae were occasionally visualized for both these samples. Significantly more osteocytes per unit area were observed in the hOBs+rhBMP-7 (33.87/50 mm2±5.63) group (Figure 6G) compared to hMSCs+rhBMP-7 (18.9/50 mm2±3.61).

SEM of osteocytes and the lacuno-canalicular network and osteocyte quantification. Scanning electron micrographs of resin-cast sections demonstrating the degree of connectivity between osteocytes, and osteocytes with blood vessels (bv) in the mineralized matrix in the hMSC+rhBMP-7 (A–C) and hOB+rhBMP-7 (D–F) samples. A higher amount of osteocytes was found in the hOB+rhBMP-7 group (G).
Discussion
Tissue function generally relies on complex, three-dimensional, multicellular structures. Mounting evidence suggests that most cells require cues from an actual 3D environment to form relevant physiological tissue structures in vitro. However, the cellular effects of 3D organization are not well understood.
Therefore, in the current study, bone marrow-derived hMSCs and hOBs isolated from trabecular bone were characterized regarding their behavior and osteogenic potential both in 2D and 3D culture. Our study has proven previous findings that hMSCs and hOBs generally display a similar surface marker expression profile [12, 65] but lower proliferative and higher mineralization rate of marrow-derived MSC in vitro compared to mesenchymal progenitor cells isolated from other tissues [24, 35, 68]. The underlying reasons for the observed higher proliferative potential of hOB are yet to be elucidated. In monolayer culture, the deposition of a mineralized ECM by primary osteoblasts is limited. It was shown to take up to 30 days in vitro [27]. Owen et al. [43] suggested a functional relationship between the inhibition of proliferation and the induction of genes associated with cell differentiation and matrix maturation. The reported effect of the respective cell seeding density on MSC proliferation and differentiation favoring low densities could also contribute to these observations [19].
The expression of Col I, the most abundant protein present in bone [40, 66], was always lower at 28 days with osteogenic induction. It is generally considered that ON, similar to ALP and collagen type I (Col I), usually appear in the early stage of osteogenic differentiation. A downregulation of Col I in both osteogenic hMSC and hOB cultures could, therefore, indicate terminal differentiation into osteocytes [29]. It is well known that bone formation and remodeling involve complex molecular mechanisms and an exquisite interplay of cues, signaling proteins, transcription factors, and their coregulatory proteins that control gene expression and support differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells to mature osteocytes in mineralized connective tissue [45]. Our findings indicate differentiation to a certain extent, but further analysis needs to be done to prove terminal differentiation into mature osteocytes.
Osteocalcin (OC) is the most abundant non-collagenous protein in bone. It is synthesized by mature osteoblasts and osteocytes and has a high binding affinity for mineralized extracellular matrix. Clinically, OC is considered a marker for bone formation. Its exact role within the organism yet remains to be determined. Reports indicate, however, that OC acts as a multifunctional hormone that stimulates pancreatic insulin secretion and β-cell proliferation, muscular energy expenditure, insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue, muscle and liver, and testosterone synthesis in the testis [31, 36].
In our study, OC levels in hOBs increased significantly in 3D compared to hMSC, which might be explained by the fact that after prolonged periods of osteogenic stimulation, OC is found to be downregulated in mesenchymal progenitor cells [55].
We observed an increased expression of osteoprotegrin (OPG), the receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) in 3D cultures. The differential expression of bone-related markers in 3D culture has been described previously [27]. PTHrP and RANKL expression appeared to decrease in cells stimulated with osteogenic supplements with OPG expression increasing. This is in line with reports associating OPG overexpression with osteoblast maturation [69] and describing upregulated OPG mRNA expression in osteoblasts after mineralization onset [62].
The receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK), RANKL, and the secreted decoy receptor OPG are critical molecules regulating bone remodeling. Genetic evidence obtained from mouse knockout models and human studies demonstrate their important role in normal bone modeling and remodeling [3] by modulating osteoclast differentiation and function [9]. RANKL stimulates osteoclast differentiation, whereas OPG leads to an inhibition. In osteoblasts, OPG expression is regulated by canonical Wnt signaling [21].
PTHrP is a systemically active anabolic factor regulating bone mass and is produced in articular chondrocytes and osteoblasts. It plays an important role during bone development through effects on cell survival, preventing immature mesenchymal cells from apoptosis but inducing apoptosis in more mature cells [3]. Consequently, PTHrP promotes the differentiation and survival of osteoblasts, which in turn upregulate RANKL expression. Osteoblastic PTHrP expression itself is regulated by hedgehog signaling [37]. The observed decrease in PTHrP expression and RANKL expression under osteogenic conditions could be attributed to the supplemented dexamethasone [2].
Further regulator genes, sclerostin (SOST) and dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1), were expressed at significantly higher levels in 3D cultures with SOST expression increasing under osteogenic conditions and DMP1 decreasing when compared to controls. The secreted protein SOST is another key regulator of bone formation in humans and is structurally related to a family of BMP antagonists and inhibits the activation of Wnt signaling pathways [15, 57]. It is specifically produced by osteocytes and acts as a negative regulator of osteoblast activity [48, 67].
In our settings, the increase of SOST expression under osteogenic 3D culture conditions could indicate osteocyte formation. This is in accordance with Sutherland and colleagues who reported that SOST expression was increased in mineralized cultures of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and primary human osteoblasts [61]. However, to date, very little is known concerning the target cell type(s) for SOST and its effect on human osteoblast function.
DMP1 is also thought to play an important role in tissue biomineralization. In vitro, DMP1 acts as a hydroxyapatite (HA) crystal nucleator with very high calcium ion-binding capability [25] and binds specifically to type I collagen [26]. In addition, in vivo studies showed that the expression of DMP1 is closely associated with “bone nodule” formation and mineralization [17]. Literature suggests that DMP1 expression in the extracellular matrix is required for downregulation of osteoblast markers and normal osteocyte differentiation, and the transient, nuclear DMP1 expression might trigger repression of osteoblast markers [56]. As the DMP1 upregulation is of transient nature, we might not have been able to capture the phase of maximal expression with the chosen experimental setting.
Taken together, our findings in 2D monolayer and 3D culture clearly suggest that osteogenically induced hMSCs undergo osteogenic differentiation processes resulting in well-mineralized cell sheets after 28 days with hMSCs expressing characteristic markers on mRNA level such as ALP, ON, OC, and collagen type I. In 3D cultures established on mPCL-TCP scaffolds, hMSCs and hOBs were found to show similar spreading morphologies. Remarkably, significant differences in the relative expression of osteogenic markers were seen in 3D when compared to 2D cultures. This indicates that cellular behavior including survival, motility, and differentiation depends not only on the presence or absence of specific cues such as cell surface receptors and soluble effector molecules. In fact, their absolute and relative amounts, their spatial arrangements in the cell environment, and the temporal sequence in which they are presented appear to play a pivotal role.
From the ability to form mineralized ECM in vitro, however, no conclusions can be drawn about cell-mediated osteoinductivity in vivo and the ability to actively contribute to bone regeneration. As a result, cell types potentially applied for bone tissue engineering strategies require thorough investigation in both ectopic and orthotopic animal models.
Eight weeks after subcutaneous transplantation, the hOB-rhBMP-7 group displayed a higher rate of ossification and mechanical stiffness when compared to the hMSC-rhBMP-7 group as quantified by μCT analysis, compression testing, and histomorphometry. Less bone formation was observed in the scaffold/cell groups. The events related to ostegenic marker expression and mineral deposition in vitro were not predictive for the ectopic bone formation in vivo. The relatively low extent of bone formation observed may be explained by predifferentiation of the transplanted cells with calcium and phosphate-containing media as previously described for periosteum-derived cells [11]. This may be attributed to the calcium-mediated activation of Wnt-5a or calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) signaling subsequently inducing β-catenin degradation negatively affecting bone formation [63].
The lower bone volume in the hMSC-rhBMP-7 group could be correlated to a lower osteocyte density compared to the hOB-rhBMP-7 group. This is in line with the previously described in vivo results of osteoporotic sheep [70]. Furthermore, osteocytes have been considered to be involved in new bone formation and suppression of bone resorption, resulting in a higher bone volume [4, 38].
Notably, the delicate skin of NOD/SCID mice and the marginal amount of subcutaneous adipose tissue did not allow for formation of a hematoma within the entire scaffolds and a consecutive sufficient vascularization and integration of the tissue-engineered construct into the soft tissue of the mouse flank. MicroCT assessment, therefore, showed bone formation in proximity to the muscle tissue with a distinct gradient of less bone formation toward the skin. This phenomenon mimics closely the tissue situation at the tibia. The ventral part of this bone is only protected by a thin layer of periosteum, hardly any subcutaneous adipose tissue and skin, like the ventral part of the implanted tissue-engineered construct. The dorsal part of the shinbone in contrast lays in direct proximity to the well-vascularized calf muscles that are protected by a sufficient layer of subcutaneous adipose tissue and skin. This specific tissue situation is also known to be responsible for an aggravated wound healing after serious trauma to the shinbone [28, 33, 45].
Newly formed bone in the rhBMP-7-supplemented groups stained positive for the bone-specific ECM protein OC, which is secreted by osteoblasts determining terminal osteoblast formation and binds to hydroxyapatite-regulating crystal formation. The tissue within the bone construct was well vascularized. An increased formation of new blood vessels was observed with rhBMP-7 supplementation. These findings are congruent with previous literature reports describing the promotion of angiogenesis by sustained BMP signaling [71].
The newly formed bone in the rhBMP-7 groups was subject to osteoclast-mediated remodeling. Osteoclast activity has previously been shown to be stimulated by rhBMP-7 [30, 47]. BMPs play a vital role in de novo bone formation, and the osteoinductive effects of BMP-7 are well documented [47, 52]. These effects, however, appear to be dose dependent [6, 8]. Moreover, different types of osteogenic cells or cells in different stages of differentiation of one cell type might elicit varying responses to BMP stimulation with most hMSCs showing a poor osteogenic reaction [20, 42]. With BMP, we observed the formation of an organ-like bone structure including a hematopoietic marrow stroma. This reflects the interaction of circulating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells of the host with a locally established hematopoietic microenvironment ultimately resulting in bone marrow organogenesis [53].
Notably, the fate of cells after transplantation remains largely unclear. In our study, the presence of remaining human cells was proven by positive NuMA staining of bone lining cells, chondrocytes, bone marrow cells, and neighboring fibroblasts. In fully differentiated osteocytes and osteoclasts, no positive staining was detected, which is in line with previously described results [16]. Given the results of preclinical studies demonstrating functional recovery of injured tissues following injection without differentiation of injected cells into tissue-appropriate phenotypes and large numbers of injected cells becoming apoptotic in vivo, it has been proposed that transplanted cells stimulate host recovery and regeneration through the secretion of multiple anti-inflammatory, angiogenic, osteogenic, immunomodulatory, and antifibrotic factors [10].
As our understanding of skeletal stem cells and their role in bone development and repair advances, tissue engineering seeks to harness the regenerative capacity innate to bone for the replacement of impaired tissue. Nevertheless, further work is required to ensure safe and successful translation of tissue engineering-based approaches to effective inexpensive clinical applications.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the Queensland University of Technology, the Australian Research Council (ARC), and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for funding and Olympus Biotech for supplying the rhBMP-7. We acknowledge Thor Friis for his assistance with the RT-PCR work.
References
[1] Abbott A. Cell culture: biology’s new dimension. Nature 2003; 424: 870–872.10.1038/424870aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[2] Ahlstrom M, Pekkinen M, Lamberg-Allardt C. Dexamethasone downregulates the expression of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) in mesenchymal stem cells. Steroids 2009; 74: 277–282.10.1016/j.steroids.2008.12.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] Aoki S, Honma M, Kariya Y, et al. Function of OPG as a traffic regulator for RANKL is crucial for controlled osteoclastogenesis. J Bone Miner Res 2010; 25: 1907–1921.10.1002/jbmr.89Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] Atkins GJ, Findlay DM. Osteocyte regulation of bone mineral: a little give and take. Osteoporos Int 2012; 23: 2067–2079.10.1007/s00198-012-1915-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[5] Bissell MJ, Radisky DC, Rizki A, Weaver VM, Petersen OW. The organizing principle: microenvironmental influences in the normal and malignant breast. Differentiation 2002; 70: 537–546.10.1046/j.1432-0436.2002.700907.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[6] Boerckel JD, Kolambkar YM, Dupont KM, et al. Effects of protein dose and delivery system on BMP-mediated bone regeneration. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 5241–5251.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.063Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[7] Bolland BJ, Kanczler JM, Dunlop DG, Oreffo RO. Development of in vivo muCT evaluation of neovascularisation in tissue engineered bone constructs. Bone 2008; 43: 195–202.10.1016/j.bone.2008.02.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] Bonilla-Claudio M, Wang J, Bai Y, Klysik E, Selever J, Martin JF. Bmp signaling regulates a dose-dependent transcriptional program to control facial skeletal development. Development 2012; 139: 709–719.10.1242/dev.073197Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[9] Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature 2003; 423: 337–342.10.1038/nature01658Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Caplan AI, Dennis JE. Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. J Cell Biochem 2006; 98: 1076–1084.10.1002/jcb.20886Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Chai YC, Roberts SJ, Desmet E, et al. Mechanisms of ectopic bone formation by human osteoprogenitor cells on CaP biomaterial carriers. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 3127–3142.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.015Search in Google Scholar
[12] Coipeau P, Rosset P, Langonne A, et al. Impaired differentiation potential of human trabecular bone mesenchymal stromal cells from elderly patients. Cytotherapy 2009; 11: 584–594.10.1080/14653240903079385Search in Google Scholar
[13] Colter DC, Sekiya I, Prockop DJ. Identification of a subpopulation of rapidly self-renewing and multipotential adult stem cells in colonies of human marrow stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 7841–7845.10.1073/pnas.141221698Search in Google Scholar
[14] Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, Yamada KM. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001; 294: 1708–1712.10.1126/science.1064829Search in Google Scholar
[15] Ellies DL, Viviano B, McCarthy J, et al. Bone density ligand, Sclerostin, directly interacts with LRP5 but not LRP5G171V to modulate Wnt activity. J Bone Miner Res 2006; 21: 1738–1749.10.1359/jbmr.060810Search in Google Scholar
[16] Feister HA, Onyia JE, Miles RR, et al. The expression of the nuclear matrix proteins NuMA, topoisomerase II-alpha, and -beta in bone and osseous cell culture: regulation by parathyroid hormone. Bone 2000; 26: 227–234.10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00269-0Search in Google Scholar
[17] Fen JQ, Zhang J, Dallas SL, et al. Dentin matrix protein 1, a target molecule for Cbfa1 in bone, is a unique bone marker gene. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17: 1822–1831.10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.10.1822Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[18] Feng JQ, Ward LM, Liu S, et al. Loss of DMP1 causes rickets and osteomalacia and identifies a role for osteocytes in mineral metabolism. Nat Genet 2006; 38: 1310–1315.10.1038/ng1905Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[19] Fossett E, Khan WS. Optimising human mesenchymal stem cell numbers for clinical application: a literature review. Stem Cells Int 2012; 2012: 465259.10.1155/2012/465259Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[20] Friedman MS, Long MW, Hankenson KD. Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells is regulated by bone morphogenetic protein-6. J Cell Biochem 2006; 98: 538–554.10.1002/jcb.20719Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] Glass DA 2nd, Bialek P, Ahn JD, et al. Canonical Wnt signaling in differentiated osteoblasts controls osteoclast differentiation. Dev Cell 2005; 8: 751–764.10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.017Search in Google Scholar
[22] Gronthos S, Zannettino AC, Graves SE, Ohta S, Hay SJ, Simmons PJ. Differential cell surface expression of the STRO-1 and alkaline phosphatase antigens on discrete developmental stages in primary cultures of human bone cells. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 47–56.10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.1.47Search in Google Scholar
[23] Haas AR, Tuan RS. Chondrogenic differentiation of murine C3H10T1/2 multipotential mesenchymal cells: II. Stimulation by bone morphogenetic protein-2 requires modulation of N-cadherin expression and function. Differentiation 1999; 64: 77–89.10.1046/j.1432-0436.1999.6420077.xSearch in Google Scholar
[24] Hayashi O, Katsube Y, Hirose M, Ohgushi H, Ito H. Comparison of osteogenic ability of rat mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, periosteum, and adipose tissue. Calcif Tissue Int 2008; 82: 238–247.10.1007/s00223-008-9112-ySearch in Google Scholar
[25] He G, Dahl T, Veis A, George A. Nucleation of apatite crystals in vitro by self-assembled dentin matrix protein 1. Nat Mater 2003; 2: 552–558.10.1038/nmat945Search in Google Scholar
[26] He G, George A. Dentin matrix protein 1 immobilized on type I collagen fibrils facilitates apatite deposition in vitro. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 11649–11656.10.1074/jbc.M309296200Search in Google Scholar
[27] Jahn K, Richards RG, Archer CW, Stoddart MJ. Pellet culture model for human primary osteoblasts. Eur Cell Mater 2010; 20: 149–161.10.22203/eCM.v020a13Search in Google Scholar
[28] Janicki P, Boeuf S, Steck E, Egermann M, Kasten P, Richter W. Prediction of in vivo bone forming potency of bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells. Eur Cell Mater 2011; 21: 488–507.10.22203/eCM.v021a37Search in Google Scholar
[29] Kamiya N, Takagi M. Differential expression of dentin matrix protein 1, type I collagen and osteocalcin genes in rat developing mandibular bone. Histochem J 2001; 33: 545–552.10.1023/A:1014955925339Search in Google Scholar
[30] Kaneko H, Arakawa T, Mano H, et al. Direct stimulation of osteoclastic bone resorption by bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 and expression of BMP receptors in mature osteoclasts. Bone 2000; 27: 479–486.10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00358-6Search in Google Scholar
[31] Karsenty G, Ferron M. The contribution of bone to whole-organism physiology. Nature 2012; 481: 314–320.10.1038/nature10763Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[32] Kleinman HK, Philp D, Hoffman MP. Role of the extracellular matrix in morphogenesis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2003; 14: 526–532.10.1016/j.copbio.2003.08.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[33] Kruyt MC, Dhert WJ, Oner FC, van Blitterswijk CA, Verbout AJ, de Bruijn JD. Analysis of ectopic and orthotopic bone formation in cell-based tissue-engineered constructs in goats. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 1798–1805.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.038Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[34] Larson BL, Ylostalo J, Prockop DJ. Human multipotent stromal cells undergo sharp transition from division to development in culture. Stem Cells 2008; 26: 193–201.10.1634/stemcells.2007-0524Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[35] Lee RH, Kim B, Choi I, et al. Characterization and expression analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow and adipose tissue. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2004; 14: 311–324.10.1159/000080341Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[36] Long F. Building strong bones: molecular regulation of the osteoblast lineage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012; 13: 27–38.10.1038/nrm3254Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[37] Mak KK, Bi Y, Wan C, et al. Hedgehog signaling in mature osteoblasts regulates bone formation and resorption by controlling PTHrP and RANKL expression. Dev Cell 2008; 14: 674–688.10.1016/j.devcel.2008.02.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[38] Moriishi T, Fukuyama R, Ito M, et al. Osteocyte network; a negative regulatory system for bone mass augmented by the induction of Rankl in osteoblasts and Sost in osteocytes at unloading. PLoS One 2012; 7: e40143.10.1371/journal.pone.0040143Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[39] Muschler GF, Raut VP, Patterson TE, Wenke JC, Hollinger JO. The design and use of animal models for translational research in bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2010; 16: 123–145.10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0658Search in Google Scholar
[40] Niyibizi C, Eyre DR. Structural characteristics of cross-linking sites in type V collagen of bone. Chain specificities and heterotypic links to type I collagen. Eur J Biochem/FEBS 1994; 224: 943–950.10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.00943.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[41] Noth U, Osyczka AM, Tuli R, Hickok NJ, Danielson KG, Tuan RS. Multilineage mesenchymal differentiation potential of human trabecular bone-derived cells. J Orthop Res 2002; 20: 1060–1069.10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00018-9Search in Google Scholar
[42] Osyczka AM, Leboy PS. Bone morphogenetic protein regulation of early osteoblast genes in human marrow stromal cells is mediated by extracellular signal-regulated kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling. Endocrinology 2005; 146: 3428–3437.10.1210/en.2005-0303Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[43] Owen TA, Aronow M, Shalhoub V, et al. Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix. J Cell Physiol 1990; 143: 420–430.10.1002/jcp.1041430304Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[44] Pampaloni F, Reynaud EG, Stelzer EH. The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8: 839–845.10.1038/nrm2236Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[45] Papadimitropoulos A, Scherberich A, Guven S, et al. A 3D in vitro bone organ model using human progenitor cells. Eur Cell Mater 2011; 21: 445–458; discussion 458.10.22203/eCM.v021a33Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[46] Pape HC, Evans A, Kobbe P. Autologous bone graft: properties and techniques. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24(Suppl 1): S36–S40.10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181cec4a1Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[47] Paul S, Lee JC, Yeh LC. A comparative study on BMP-induced osteoclastogenesis and osteoblastogenesis in primary cultures of adult rat bone marrow cells. Growth Factors 2009; 27: 121–131.10.1080/08977190802707324Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[48] Poole KE, van Bezooijen RL, Loveridge N, et al. Sclerostin is a delayed secreted product of osteocytes that inhibits bone formation. FASEB J 2005; 19: 1842–1844.10.1096/fj.05-4221fjeSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[49] Reichert JC, Epari DR, Wullschleger ME, et al. Establishment of a preclinical ovine model for tibial segmental bone defect repair by applying bone tissue engineering strategies. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2010; 16: 93–104.10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0455Search in Google Scholar
[50] Reichert JC, Quent VM, Burke LJ, Stansfield SH, Clements JA, Hutmacher DW. Mineralized human primary osteoblast matrices as a model system to analyse interactions of prostate cancer cells with the bone microenvironment. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 7928–7936.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.055Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[51] Reichert JC, Quent VM, Noth U, Hutmacher DW. Ovine cortical osteoblasts outperform bone marrow cells in an ectopic bone assay. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2011; 5: 831–844.10.1002/term.392Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[52] Ristiniemi J, Flinkkila T, Hyvonen P, Lakovaara M, Pakarinen H, Jalovaara P. RhBMP-7 accelerates the healing in distal tibial fractures treated by external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 265–272.10.1302/0301-620X.89B2.18230Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[53] Sacchetti B, Funari A, Michienzi S, et al. Self-renewing osteoprogenitors in bone marrow sinusoids can organize a hematopoietic microenvironment. Cell 2007; 131: 324–336.10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[54] Sakaguchi Y, Sekiya I, Yagishita K, Ichinose S, Shinomiya K, Muneta T. Suspended cells from trabecular bone by collagenase digestion become virtually identical to mesenchymal stem cells obtained from marrow aspirates. Blood 2004; 104: 2728–2735.10.1182/blood-2003-12-4452Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[55] Schantz JT, Teoh SH, Lim TC, Endres M, Lam CX, Hutmacher DW. Repair of calvarial defects with customized tissue-engineered bone grafts I. Evaluation of osteogenesis in a three-dimensional culture system. Tissue Eng 2003; 9(Suppl 1): S113–S126.10.1089/10763270360697021Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[56] Schiavi SC. Bone talk. Nat Genet 2006; 38: 1230–1231.10.1038/ng1106-1230Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[57] Schulze J, Seitz S, Saito H, et al. Negative regulation of bone formation by the transmembrane Wnt antagonist Kremen-2. PLoS One 2010; 5: e10309.10.1371/journal.pone.0010309Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[58] Sekiya I, Larson BL, Smith JR, Pochampally R, Cui JG, Prockop DJ. Expansion of human adult stem cells from bone marrow stroma: conditions that maximize the yields of early progenitors and evaluate their quality. Stem Cells 2002; 20: 530–541.10.1634/stemcells.20-6-530Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[59] Sheehan DC, Hrapchak BB. Theory and practice of histotechnology. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, CV 1980.Search in Google Scholar
[60] Song L, Young NJ, Webb NE, Tuan RS. Origin and characterization of multipotential mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult human trabecular bone. Stem Cells Dev 2005; 14: 712–721.10.1089/scd.2005.14.712Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[61] Sutherland MK, Geoghegan JC, Yu C, Winkler DG, Latham JA. Unique regulation of SOST, the sclerosteosis gene, by BMPs and steroid hormones in human osteoblasts. Bone 2004; 35: 448–454.10.1016/j.bone.2004.04.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[62] Thomas GP, Baker SU, Eisman JA, Gardiner EM. Changing RANKL/OPG mRNA expression in differentiating murine primary osteoblasts. J Endocrinol 2001; 170: 451–460.10.1677/joe.0.1700451Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[63] Topol L, Jiang X, Choi H, Garrett-Beal L, Carolan PJ, Yang Y. Wnt-5a inhibits the canonical Wnt pathway by promoting GSK-3-independent beta-catenin degradation. J Cell Biol 2003; 162: 899–908.10.1083/jcb.200303158Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[64] Tuan RS, Boland G, Tuli R. Adult mesenchymal stem cells and cell-based tissue engineering. Arthritis Res Ther 2003; 5: 32–45.10.1186/ar614Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[65] Tuli R, Tuli S, Nandi S, et al. Characterization of multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells derived from human trabecular bone. Stem Cells 2003; 21: 681–693.10.1634/stemcells.21-6-681Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[66] Viguet-Carrin S, Garnero P, Delmas PD. The role of collagen in bone strength. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17: 319–336.10.1007/s00198-005-2035-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[67] Winkler DG, Sutherland MK, Geoghegan JC, et al. Osteocyte control of bone formation via sclerostin, a novel BMP antagonist. EMBO J 2003; 22: 6267–6276.10.1093/emboj/cdg599Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[68] Yoshimura H, Muneta T, Nimura A, Yokoyama A, Koga H, Sekiya I. Comparison of rat mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow, synovium, periosteum, adipose tissue, and muscle. Cell Tissue Res 2007; 327: 449–462.10.1007/s00441-006-0308-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[69] Yu H, de Vos P, Ren Y. Overexpression of osteoprotegerin promotes preosteoblast differentiation to mature osteoblasts. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 100–106.10.2319/050210-238.1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[70] Zarrinkalam MR, Mulaibrahimovic A, Atkins GJ, Moore RJ. Changes in osteocyte density correspond with changes in osteoblast and osteoclast activity in an osteoporotic sheep model. Osteoporos Int 2012; 23: 1329–1336.10.1007/s00198-011-1672-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[71] Zhang F, Qiu T, Wu X, et al. Sustained BMP signaling in osteoblasts stimulates bone formation by promoting angiogenesis and osteoblast differentiation. J Bone Miner Res 2009; 24: 1224–1233.10.1359/jbmr.090204Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Supplemental Material
The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/bmt-2014-0159) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.
©2016 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- The face towards nature
- Special issue articles
- Differential osteogenicity of multiple donor-derived human mesenchymal stem cells and osteoblasts in monolayer, scaffold-based 3D culture and in vivo
- Calcium phosphate/microgel composites for 3D powderbed printing of ceramic materials
- Adhesive strength of total knee endoprostheses to bone cement – analysis of metallic and ceramic femoral components under worst-case conditions
- Radiostereometric migration analysis of the Cerafit femoral stem: 28 patients followed for 2 years
- Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion on surface-treated open-cell Ti6Al4V foams
- Research on polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) hollow-fiber hemodialyzer
- Research articles
- Influence of calibration method and material on the accuracy of stress distribution measurement systems
- A secure communication using cascade chaotic computing systems on clinical decision support
- Biomechanical effect of different femoral neck blade position on the fixation of intertrochanteric fracture: a finite element analysis
- Performance of a thrombectomy device for aspiration of thrombus with various sizes based on a computational fluid dynamic modeling
- Analysis of wrist bone motion before and after SL-ligament resection
- Changes of gait characteristics in a child with femoral nerve injury: a 16-month follow-up case study
- Assessing the eligibility of a non-invasive continuous blood pressure measurement technique for application during total intravenous anaesthesia
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- The face towards nature
- Special issue articles
- Differential osteogenicity of multiple donor-derived human mesenchymal stem cells and osteoblasts in monolayer, scaffold-based 3D culture and in vivo
- Calcium phosphate/microgel composites for 3D powderbed printing of ceramic materials
- Adhesive strength of total knee endoprostheses to bone cement – analysis of metallic and ceramic femoral components under worst-case conditions
- Radiostereometric migration analysis of the Cerafit femoral stem: 28 patients followed for 2 years
- Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion on surface-treated open-cell Ti6Al4V foams
- Research on polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) hollow-fiber hemodialyzer
- Research articles
- Influence of calibration method and material on the accuracy of stress distribution measurement systems
- A secure communication using cascade chaotic computing systems on clinical decision support
- Biomechanical effect of different femoral neck blade position on the fixation of intertrochanteric fracture: a finite element analysis
- Performance of a thrombectomy device for aspiration of thrombus with various sizes based on a computational fluid dynamic modeling
- Analysis of wrist bone motion before and after SL-ligament resection
- Changes of gait characteristics in a child with femoral nerve injury: a 16-month follow-up case study
- Assessing the eligibility of a non-invasive continuous blood pressure measurement technique for application during total intravenous anaesthesia