Performance of a thrombectomy device for aspiration of thrombus with various sizes based on a computational fluid dynamic modeling

References

[1] Blanc R, Pistocchi S, Babic D, et al. Intravenous flat-detector CT angiography in acute ischemic stroke management. Interv Neuroradiol 2012; 54: 383–391.10.1007/s00234-011-0893-8Search in Google Scholar

[2] Chant H, Ashleigh R, McCollum C. Thrombectomy for acute internal carotid thrombosis: five thrombectomy devices compared. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 27: 403–408.10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.12.014Search in Google Scholar

[3] Cho YI, Kensey KR. Effects of the non-Newtonian viscosity of blood on flows in a diseased arterial vessel, Part 1: steady flows. Biorheology 1991; 28: 241–262.10.3233/BIR-1991-283-415Search in Google Scholar

[4] Costopoulos C, Gorog DA, Mario CD, Kukreja N. Use of thrombectomy devices in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2011; 163: 229–241.10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.014Search in Google Scholar

[5] Favaloro RG. Saphenous vein autograf replacement of severe segmental coronary artery occlusion: operative technique. Ann Thoracic Surg 1968; 5: 334–339.10.1016/S0003-4975(10)66351-5Search in Google Scholar

[6] Giessen AG, Schaap M, Gijsen FJH, Groen HC, Walsum T, Mollet NR. 3D fusion of intravascular ultrasound and coronary computed tomography for in-vivo wall shear stress analysis: a feasibility study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 26: 781–796.10.1007/s10554-009-9546-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Hong-bing Y, Wang J, Nan L, et al. Diver CE versus Guardwire plus for thrombectomy in patients with inferior myocardial infarction: a trial of aspiration of thrombus during primary angioplasty for inferior myocardial infarction. Chin Med J 2007; 120: 557–561.10.1097/00029330-200704010-00006Search in Google Scholar

[8] Johnston BM, Johnston PR, Corney S, Kilpatrick D. Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: steady state simulations. J Biomech 2004; 37: 709–720.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.09.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Kucher N, Windecker S, Banz Y, et al. Percutaneous catheter thrombectomy device for acute pulmonary embolism: in vitro and in vivo testing. Radiology 2005; 236: 852–858.10.1148/radiol.2363041287Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Muller-Hulsbeck S, Bengard C, Schwarzenberg H, Gluer CC, Heller M. In vitro effectiveness study of three hydrodynamic thrombectomy devices. Radiology 1999; 211: 433–439.10.1148/radiology.211.2.r99ma06433Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Pearce G, Perkinson RND, Wong J, et al. The “GP” mechanical thrombectomy device. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 18: 288–293.10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2008.11.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Pennati G, Balossino R, Dubini G, Migliavacca F. Numerical simulation of thrombus aspiration in two realistic models of catheter tips. Artif Organs 2010; 34: 301–310.10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00770.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Romero G, Martinez ML, Felez J, Pearce G, Perkinson ND. Applicability of the GP device to the circle of Willis arteries by using a mathematical model. International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK 2011.10.1109/UKSIM.2011.19Search in Google Scholar

[14] Romero G, Martinez ML, Felez J, Pearce G, Perkinson ND. Analysis and design of a thrombectomy device by using simulation techniques. Proceedings of the IMProVe 2011 International conference on Innovative Methods in Product Design Venice, Italy, 15–17 June 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Romero G, Martinez ML, Maroto J, Felez J. Modelling and simulation of a thrombectomy probe applied to the middle cerebral artery by using the bond graph technique. Proceedings of the 2010 Spring Simulation Multiconference. SpringSim 2010, Florida, USA, 11–15 April 2010.10.1145/1878537.1878768Search in Google Scholar

[16] Romero G, Martinez M, Pearce G, Mera M. An investigation into the performance of a new mechanical thrombectomy device using bond graph modeling: application to the extraction of blood thrombus in the middle cerebral artery. Simul Trans Soc Model Simul Int 2012; 89: 381–391.10.1177/0037549712463418Search in Google Scholar

[17] Sakurada M, Ikari Y, Isshiki T. Improved performance of a new thrombus aspiracatheter: outcomes from in vitro experiments and case presentation. Catheter Cardio Inte 2004; 63: 299–306.10.1002/ccd.20184Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Schomig A, Mehilli J, Waha A, Seyfarth M, Pache J, Kastrati A. A meta-analysis of 17 randomized trials of a percutaneous coronary intervention-based strategy in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 894–904.10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.051Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 961–972.10.1056/NEJMoa0804626Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions: the task force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 804–847.10.1016/j.accreview.2005.08.063Search in Google Scholar

[21] Soleimani S, Dubini G, Pennati G. Possible benefits of catheters with lateral hole on coronary thrombus aspiration: a computational study for different clot viscosity and vacuum pressure. Artif Organs 2014; 38: 845–855.10.1111/aor.12274Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Soleimani S, Pennati G, Dubini G. Effect of geometrical characteristic and clot mechanical properties on coronary clot aspiration catheter performance. In: Medical devices design in cardiovascular applications. 1st ed. London, UK: Mechanical Engineering Department, University College 2013: 254–281.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Soleimaniamiri S. Coronary thrombus removal by means of aspiration catheter: a numerical and experimental fluid dynamic study (dissertation). Politecnico di Mialno 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Svilaas T, Vlaar PJ, Horst IC, et al. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 557–567.10.1056/NEJMoa0706416Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Verbiest BCH. Thrombus formation in aneurysms: an experimental study, division of cardiovascular biomechanics. Eindhoven University of Technology 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Vink A, Kramer MC, Li X, et al. Clinical and angiographic predictors and prognostic value of failed thrombus aspiration in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Intervent 2011; 4: 634–642.10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Walvick RP, Bratane BT, Henninger N, et al. Visualization of thrombus lysis in a rat embolic stroke model: application to comparative lytic efficacy. Stroke 2011; 42: 1110–1115.10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.602102Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[28] Zijlstra F, Hoorntje JC, Boer MJ. Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1413–1419.10.1056/NEJM199911043411901Search in Google Scholar PubMed