Home Maternal Labour Supply and School Enrolment Laws: Empirical Evidence from Brazilian Primary School Reforms
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Maternal Labour Supply and School Enrolment Laws: Empirical Evidence from Brazilian Primary School Reforms

  • Alessandro Cusimano ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Diego da Silva Rodrigues and Ian Jackson ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: March 18, 2024

Abstract

The relationship between childcare provision and mothers’ labour supply decisions is highly debated due to the potential reverse causality and resultant empirical challenges. We contribute meaningfully to this debate by discussing the effects from a reform on Brazil’s primary education system on maternal labour supply. This reform, which advanced the compulsory children’s enrolment in primary education schools from the age of 7–6, is interpreted as the provision of free childcare. Due to the imperfect compliance of the reform implementation, children’s month of birth is used as an instrumental variable to control for the endogeneity present in any actual school enrolment. We show that the reform presented a positive effect on the labour supply of (1) the Brazilian single mothers and (2) the least educated mothers, increasing their participation in labour market by 12.9 % and furthermore a probability of becoming full time workers by 10.9 %.


Corresponding author: Alessandro Cusimano, Department of Economics, Business and Statistics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy, E-mail:

Appendix

The World Bank data for female labor force participation rates are shown in Table A1. For Brazil, the rate of about 55 % provides an interesting contextualization for our study. This rate for Brazil is comparatively higher than other countries in the neighboring region and the average for Latin America and the Caribbean as well as higher than the global average value. However, the Brazilian figure is lower than developed countries in North America plus it is also lower than East Asia and Pacific, although still in line with the European figure.

Table A1:

Selected female labour force participation rates (2005).

Female labour force participation rate: selected regions and areas (%) 2005
Argentina 49.1
Australia 57.0
Brazil 55.6
Canada 61.7
France 50.5
Germany 51.2
Greece 42.4
Mexico 41.2
United Kingdom 55.4
United States 58.2
East Asia & Pacific 61.9
Europe 49.0
Latin America & Caribbean 50.2
World 49.8
  1. Source: World Bank.

Table A2:

Descriptive statistics of the variables.

Variable Description Mean Standard deviation
Policy implementation Dummy variable equal to 1 if the mother lives in a state where the reform is implemented, and zero in the opposite case 0.735 0.128
Attending school Dummy variable equal to 1 if the youngest child of the household, aged 6, is attending the first grade of the primary school, and zero in the opposite case 0.425 0.286
Child’s month of birth Discrete variable which indicates the month of birth of the youngest child of the household, aged 6 (January =1, February=2 … December =12) 5.264 3.157
Mother’s age Age of the mother, in years. 28.753 6.824
White Dummy variable equal to 1 if the mother is (self-declared) white, and zero in the opposite case 0.475 0.126
5 years of study Dummy variable equal to 1 if the mother has 5 years of study, and zero in the opposite case 0.257 0.169
6–8 years of study Dummy variable equal to 1 if the mother has between 6 and 8 years of study, and zero in the opposite case 0.384 0.175
9 years of study Dummy variable equal to 1 if the mother has 9 years of study, and zero in the opposite case 0.182 0.169
10–11 years of study Dummy variable equal to 1 if the mother has 10 or 11 years of study, and zero in the opposite case 0.137 0.187
12 years of study Dummy variable equal to 1 if the mother has 12 years of study, and zero in the opposite case 0.149 0.092
13 or more years of study Dummy variable equal to 1 if the mother has 13 or more years of study, and zero in the opposite case 0.095 0.194
Youngest child is male Dummy variable equal to 1 if the youngest child of the household, aged 6, is male, and zero in the opposite case 0.483 0.152
Other mother’s income Monthly deflated incomes of the mother not related to their labour, including cash transfers, in BRL 328.74 152.86
Other incomes in the household Monthly deflated incomes available in mother’s household, excluding mother’s income, in BRL 1758.26 752.45
2 children else in the household Dummy variable equal to 1 if there are 2 children else in the household apart from the youngest one, and zero in the opposite case 0.257 0.214
3 to 6 children else in the household Dummy variable equal to 1 if there are between 3 and 6 children else in the household apart from the youngest one, and zero in the opposite case 0.356 0.276
7 children else or more in the household Dummy variable equal to 1 if there are 7 or more children else in the household apart from the youngest one, and zero in the opposite case 0.084 0.128
1 adult in the household Dummy variable equal to 1 if there are 2 children else in the household apart from the youngest one, and zero in the opposite case 0.752 0.362
3 adults or more in the household Dummy variable equal to 1 if there are 3 adults or more in the household, including mother’s partner, and zero in the opposite case 0.352 0.214
Mother is a migrant Dummy variable equal to 1 if the mother lives in state where she was not born, and zero in the opposite case 0.114 0.368
Grandmother lives in the same household Dummy variable equal to 1 if the youngest child’s grandmother lives in the same household, and zero in the opposite case 0.196 0.175
State unemployment rate Average annual unemployment rate (state level in %) 8.42 1.16

Table A3 shows that the youngest child’s school attendance is not statistically correlated to mothers’ part-time labour supply. However, it is correlated to the mothers’ full-time labour supply.

Table A3:

Effects of youngest child’s attendance in the first grade of primary school on mother’s labour supply.

Outcome variable: mother’s labour supply Multinomial logit
Part-time Full-time
School attendance 0.003 0.202***
(0.072) (0.052)
  1. ***Significant 1 %; base outcome is mothers’ labour supply equal to 0 h (no labour supply).

References

Aaronson, D., R. Dehejia, A. Jordan, C. Pop-Eleches, C. Samii, and K. Schulze. 2021. “The Effect of Fertility on Mothers’ Labor Supply over the Last Two Centuries.” The Economic Journal 131 (633): 1–32.10.1093/ej/ueaa100Search in Google Scholar

Agénor, P. R., and O. Canuto. 2015. “Gender Equality and Economic Growth in Brazil: A Long-Run Analysis.” Journal of Macroeconomics 43: 155–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

Angrist, J. D., and A. B. Krueger. 1991. “Does Compulsory School Attendance Affect Schooling and Earnings?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 979–1014. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937954.Search in Google Scholar

Atal, V. 2010. “Say at Home, or Stay at Home? Few Policy Implications on Female Labour Supply.” Montclair State University. Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Attanasio, O., R. P. de Barros, P. Carneiro, D. K. Evans, L. Lima, P. Olinto, and N. Schady. 2022. Public Childcare, Labor Market Outcomes of Caregivers, and Child Development: Experimental Evidence from Brazil (No. w30653). National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w30653Search in Google Scholar

Azevedo, J. M. 2010. “O ensino fundamental de nove anos e a renovação de propostas na educação infantil.” Diálogos Acadêmico 1: 1.Search in Google Scholar

Barros, R, P. Olinto, P. Olinto, T. Lunde, and M. Carvalho 2011. The Impact of Access to Free Childcare on Women’s Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from a Randomized Trial in Low-Income Neighborhoods of Rio de Janeiro. World Bank Economists’ Forum.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, G. S. 1965. “A Theory of the Allocation of Time.” The Economic Journal 75 (299): 493–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2228949.Search in Google Scholar

Berlinski, S., and S. Galiani. 2007. “The Effect of a Large Expansion of Pre-Primary School Facilities on Pre-School Attendance and Maternal Employment.” Labour Economics 14 (3): 665–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2007.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

Berthelon, M., D. Kruger, and M. Oyarzun. 2014. “Children’s Time in School and Female Labour Force Participation in Chile.” Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Bhalotra, S., and M. Umana-Aponte. 2012. The Dynamics of Women’s Labour Supply in Developing Countries. University of Bristol.Search in Google Scholar

Connelly, R. 1991. “Women’s Labour Force Activity and Childcare in Brazil.” In XVI International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association.Search in Google Scholar

Connelly, R., D. S. DeGraff, and D. Levison. 1996. “Women’s Employment and Child Care in Brazil.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 44 (3): 619–56. https://doi.org/10.1086/452234.Search in Google Scholar

Costa, J., and A. Kassouf. 2011. L. Impacto da frequência pré-escolar dos filhos sobre o trabalho das mães no Brasil. REAP.Search in Google Scholar

Del Boca, D. 2002. “The Effect of Childcare and Part Time Opportunities on Participation and Fertility Decisions in Italy.” Journal of Population Economics 15 (3): 549–73, https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480100089.Search in Google Scholar

Drange, N., T. Havnes, and A. M. J. Sandsor. 2012. “Kindergarten for All: Long Run Effects of a Universal Intervention.” IZA Discussion Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Gambaro, L., J. Marcus, and F. Peter. 2019. “School Entry, Afternoon Care, and Mothers’ Labour Supply.” Empirical Economics 57: 769–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1462-3.Search in Google Scholar

Gelbach, J. B. 2002. “Public Schooling for Young Children and Maternal Labor Supply.” The American Economic Review 92 (1): 307–22. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802760015748.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, K., and D. Hawkes. 2009. “Early Childcare and Child Development.” Journal of Social Policy 38 (2): 211–39, https://doi.org/10.1017/s004727940800281x.Search in Google Scholar

Heckman, J. 1974. “Effects of Childcare Programs on Women’s Work Effort.” Journal of Political Economy 82 (2): 136–63, https://doi.org/10.1086/260297.Search in Google Scholar

IBGE. 2010. Censo Demográfico: educação e deslocamento. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.Search in Google Scholar

INEP. 2008. Forum Nacional de Educação Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira, Vol. 1.Search in Google Scholar

Joesch, J. M., and B. G. Hiedemann. 2002. “The Demand for Nonrelative Child Care Among Families with Infants and Toddlers: A Double-Hurdle Approach.” Journal of Population Economics 15 (3): 495–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480100112.Search in Google Scholar

Kosonen, T. 2014. “To Work or Not to Work? The Effect of Childcare Subsidies on the Labour Supply of Parents.” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 14 (3): 817–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2013-0073.Search in Google Scholar

Leone, E., and R. Hoffmann. 2004. “Participação da mulher no mercado de trabalho e desigualdade da renda domiciliar no Brasil: 1981–2002.” Nova Economia 14 (2): 35–58.Search in Google Scholar

Ministério da Educação. 2009. Ampliao do ensino fundamental para nove anos. Relatório do Programa.Search in Google Scholar

Nieuwenhuis, R., and W. Van Lancker. 2020. The Palgrave Handbook of Family Policy. Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-54618-2Search in Google Scholar

Ronsoni, M. L. 2009. “O ensino fundamental de nove anos: uma análise da implementação no sistema municipal de ensino de Santa Maria/RS.” In IX Congresso Nacional de Educação.Search in Google Scholar

Ryu, H. 2020. “The Effect of Compulsory Preschool Education on Maternal Labour Supply.” Journal of Development Studies 56 (7): 1384–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2019.1677890.Search in Google Scholar

Schlosser, A. 2005. Public Pre-School and the Labor Supply of Arab Mothers: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Department of Economics.Search in Google Scholar

Solís-Cordero, K., C. N. T. Palombo, L. S. Duarte, R. I. Munhoz, A. T. M. Toriyama, A. L. V. Borges, and E. Fujimori. 2021. “Developmental Surveillance in Primary Health Care: Absence of Child Development Milestones and Associated Factors.” Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil 20: 925–34. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042020000400002.Search in Google Scholar

Stock, J. H, and M. W. Watson. 2020. Introduction to Econometrics, 4th ed. Pearson Education Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Turon, H. 2022. “The Labour Supply of Mothers.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 15312. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4118213.10.2139/ssrn.4118213Search in Google Scholar

UNDP. 2013. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2013. United Nations Development Program.Search in Google Scholar

Verona, A. P. A., and J. R. Romero. 2004. A relação entre fecundidade e educação dos filhos: um experimento natural utilizando dados de gêmeos. CEDEPLAR.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-04-04
Accepted: 2024-02-02
Published Online: 2024-03-18

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejeap-2023-0108/html
Scroll to top button