Use of the Free to Play model in games with a purpose: the RoboCorp game case study

References

1. Wissler L, Almashraee M, Monett D, Paschkeg A. The gold standard in corpus annotation. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Germany Students Conference, Germany, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

2. Law E, von Ahn L. Human Computation. San Rafael, California: Morgan and Claypool Publishers, 2011.10.2200/S00371ED1V01Y201107AIM013Search in Google Scholar

3. Snow R, O’Connor B, Jurafsky D, Ng AY. Cheap and fast – but is it good? Evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Honolulu, 2008: 254–63.10.3115/1613715.1613751Search in Google Scholar

4. Zaidan OF, Callison-Burch C. Crowdsourcing translation: professional quality from non-professionals. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, vol. 1, 2011: 1220–8.Search in Google Scholar

5. Hong Y, Kwak H, Baek Y, Moon S. Tower of Babel: a crowdsourcing game building sentiment lexicons for resource-scarce languages. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, 2013:549–56.10.1145/2487788.2487993Search in Google Scholar

6. von Ahn L. Games with a purpose. Computer 2006;39:92–410.1109/MC.2006.196Search in Google Scholar

7. von Ahn L, Dabbish L. Designing games with a purpose. Commun ACM 2008;51:58–67.10.1145/1378704.1378719Search in Google Scholar

8. Lee T, Dugan C, Geyer W, Ratchford T, Rasmussen J, Shami N, et al. Experiments on motivational feedback for crowdsourced workers. In: Proceedings of the 7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, North America, 2013:341–50.10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14428Search in Google Scholar

9. Poesio M, Chamberlain J, Kruschwitz U, Robaldo L, Ducceschi L. Phrase detectives: utilizing collective intelligence for internet-scale language resource creation. Trans Interact Intelll Syst 2013;3:1–44.10.1145/2448116.2448119Search in Google Scholar

10. Venhuizen N, Basile V, Evang K, Bos J. Gamification for word sense labeling. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2013), Short Papers, 2013:397–403.Search in Google Scholar

11. Jurgens D, Navigli R. It’s all fun and games until someone annotates: video games with a purpose for linguistic annotation. Trans Assoc Comput Linguist 2014;2:445–64.10.1162/tacl_a_00195Search in Google Scholar

12. Kleka P, Łupkowski P. Gamifying science – the issue of data validation. Homo Ludens 2014;6:45–54.Search in Google Scholar

13. Cooper S, Khatib F, Treuille A, Barbero J, Lee J, Beenen M, et al. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature 2010;466:756–60.10.1038/nature09304Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Bohannon J. Online video game plugs players into remote- controlled biochemistry lab. Science 2014;343:475.10.1126/science.343.6170.475Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Mäyrä F. Mobile games. In: Mansell R, Ang PH, editors. International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2015.10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs014Search in Google Scholar

16. Luton W. Free2Play. Making money from games you give away. San Francisco, California: New Riders, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

17. Waszczuk J, Głowińska K, Savary A, Przepiórkowski A, Lenart M. Annotation tools for syntax and named entities in the National Corpus of Polish. Int J Data Mining Modell Manage 2013;5:103–22.10.1504/IJDMMM.2013.053691Search in Google Scholar