Classical Realism is not ‘Everything, Everywhere, All at Once’
-
Jonathan Kirshner
Abstract
In their assessments of An Unwritten Future: Realism and Uncertainty in World Politics, two distinguished scholars of World Politics engage in a spirited contestation about the role of classical realism in International Relations (IR) theory. Richard Ned Lebow aspires to defend the paradigm from what he suggests are barbarians at the gate. In this response I offer rejoinders to his treatment of E. H. Carr and Robert Gilpin, and his characterization of the ways in which we each engage Thucydides’ The Peloponnesian War as an inspirational text. Stephen Krasner raises a number of thoughtful and savvy constructive criticisms of An Unwritten Future, some of which ring true. Yet he and I continue to markedly disagree about the importance of analytical uncertainty for understanding IR, and also with regard to the role of history in explaining behavior in world politics. And in an otherwise sophisticated critique, Krasner ultimately reduces classical realism to a caricature. In my response I clarify why in fact it is his preferred approach, structural realism, which, on its own, is irretrievably indeterminate and leaves scholars needing much more that its minimalist disposition can possibly hope to provide. I conclude with a short elaboration of why classical realism offers a more productive way forward.
References
Adeney, Bernard T. 1988. Just War, Political Realism, and Faith. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. 1948/1938. Introduction to the Philosophy of History: An Essay on the Limits of Historical Objectivity. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Suche in Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. 1990/1983. Memoirs: Fifty Years of Political Reflection. New York: Holmes & Meier.Suche in Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard K. 1984. “The Poverty of Neorealism.” International Organization 38 (2): 225–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300026709.Suche in Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W. 1985. “Realism, Positivism and Historicism.” In Reprinted in Robert W. Cox with Timothy Sinclair, Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1996.Suche in Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1997. Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism. New York: Norton.Suche in Google Scholar
Forde, Steven. 1995. “International Realism and the Science of Politics: Thucydides, Machiavelli, and Neorealism.” International Studies Quarterly 39 (2): 141–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600844.Suche in Google Scholar
Frankel, Benjamin, ed. 1996. Roots of Realism. London: Frank Cass.Suche in Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511664267Suche in Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 2005. “War Is Too Important to Be Left to Ideological Amateurs.” International Relations 19 (1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805050059.Suche in Google Scholar
Guzzani, Stefano. 1998. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy. New York: Rutledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Higgott, Richard, ed. 1988. New Directions in International Politics? Canberra: Australian National University.Suche in Google Scholar
Hixson, Walter. 1989. George F. Kennan: Cold War Iconoclast. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., ed. 1986. Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kirshner, Jonathan. 2022. An Unwritten Future: Realism and Uncertainty in World Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691233123Suche in Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 1957. A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problems of Peace, 1812–22. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Suche in Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 2024. “Do We Learn Anything from Kirshner?” Analyse & Kritik 46 (1), 229–35.10.1515/auk-2024-2001Suche in Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2024. “What Is Classical Realism?” Analyse & Kritik 46 (1), 215–28.10.1515/auk-2023-2012Suche in Google Scholar
Lepgold, Joseph. 1987. Hegemonic Decline and Adaptation in American Foreign Policy the United States and European Defense, 1960–80. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Loriaux, Michael. 1992. “The Realists and Saint Augustine: Skepticism, Psychology, and Moral Action in International Relations Thought.” International Studies Quarterly 36 (4): 401–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600732.Suche in Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 1999. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511491733Suche in Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Suche in Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1986. “A Response to My Critics.” In Neorealism and its Critics, edited by Robert O. Keohane. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Williams, Michael C. 1996. “Hobbes and International Relations: A Reconsideration.” International Organization 50 (2): 213–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002081830002854x.Suche in Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William. 1993. The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions During the Cold War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501738081Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Do Socially Constructed Norms have Moral Force? Précis to a Symposium
- Moralism and Realism in Theorizing Social Norms
- Two Types of Social Norms
- Political Obligations and Respect for Social Norms
- Must I Honor Your Convictions? On Laura Valentini’s Agency-Respect View
- Social Norms and Obligation: Rescuing the Joint Commitment Account
- General Part
- Moral Paradigms of Intergenerational Solidarity in the Coronavirus-Pandemic
- The Weight of History After October 7 and the Gaza War: Shaping a New Future
- Germany, Israel’s Security, and the Fight Against Anti-Semitism: Shadows from the Past and Current Tensions
- Kantian Rights and the Zionist Settlement in Palestine
- War and Self-Defense: Some Reflections on the War on Gaza
- Discussion
- What is Classical Realism?
- Do We Learn Anything from Kirshner?
- Classical Realism is not ‘Everything, Everywhere, All at Once’
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Do Socially Constructed Norms have Moral Force? Précis to a Symposium
- Moralism and Realism in Theorizing Social Norms
- Two Types of Social Norms
- Political Obligations and Respect for Social Norms
- Must I Honor Your Convictions? On Laura Valentini’s Agency-Respect View
- Social Norms and Obligation: Rescuing the Joint Commitment Account
- General Part
- Moral Paradigms of Intergenerational Solidarity in the Coronavirus-Pandemic
- The Weight of History After October 7 and the Gaza War: Shaping a New Future
- Germany, Israel’s Security, and the Fight Against Anti-Semitism: Shadows from the Past and Current Tensions
- Kantian Rights and the Zionist Settlement in Palestine
- War and Self-Defense: Some Reflections on the War on Gaza
- Discussion
- What is Classical Realism?
- Do We Learn Anything from Kirshner?
- Classical Realism is not ‘Everything, Everywhere, All at Once’
