Home Cooperation as Joint Action
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Cooperation as Joint Action

  • Raimo Tuomela
Published/Copyright: January 12, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The paper studies cooperation as joint action, where joint action can, first, be conceptualized either individualistically in terms of the participants' individual goals and beliefs that the joint action is taken to serve. This is individualistic or ‛I-mode’ cooperation. Special version of it is ‛ pro-group I-mode’ cooperation, where the goals are shared. Second, cooperation can be of the kind where a group of persons act together as a group in terms of the non-aggregative ‛ we’ that they form. The results of the paper support the conjecture that we-mode conceptualization and an account of cooperation is needed to complement the individualistic (pro-group) I-mode account(s) in social science theorizing and experimentation.

Published Online: 2016-01-12
Published in Print: 2011-05-01

© 2011 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Contents
  2. Editorial: Work and Cooperation
  3. On the Logic and Ethics of Cooperation
  4. Potentials of Cooperation
  5. The Idiocy of Strategic Reasoning. Towards an Account of Consensual Action
  6. Comment on Hans Bernhard Schmid. Coordination, Cooperation and the Origin of Normative Expectations
  7. Cooperation as Joint Action
  8. Comment on Raimo Tuomela. Joint Action: How Rational? How Irreducible?
  9. Justice as Fairness and Reciprocity
  10. Comment on Andrew Lister. Just Distribution(s) for Mutual Recognition
  11. Cooperating to Promote the Good
  12. Comment on Robert H. Myers. Finding Out What is Substantive in Cooperation
  13. Reply to Anton Leist. Keeping Constructivism in Its Place
  14. Cooperation and Efficiency in Economic Contexts
  15. Cooperation for Economic Success: The Mondragon Case
  16. Comment on Ramon Flecha and Ignacio Santa Cruz. The Priority of Labor and Capital Accounts
  17. Are Multinational Companies Responsible for Working Conditions in Their Supply Chains? From Intuition to Argument
  18. Comment on Sonja Dänzer. Structural Injustice in Global Production Networks: Shared Responsibility for Working Conditions
  19. From Niche to Mass Markets: Rival Strategies in Promoting Fair Trade Organic Commodity Chains
  20. Recognition, Cooperation and the Moral Presuppositions of Capitalist Organization of Work
  21. Comment on Hermann Kocyba. The Regime of Esteem, or Recognition as Affirmation
  22. Fairness and Cooperation in Experimental Research
  23. Contractarian Compliance and the 'Sense of Justice': A Behavioral Conformity Model and Its Experimental Support
  24. Comment on Lorenzo Sacconi, Marco Faillo and Stefania Ottone. Contractarian Compliance, Welfarist Justice, and Conformist Utility
  25. Equity and Efficiency in Multi-Worker Firms: Insights from Experimental Economics
  26. Reciprocity in Economic Games
  27. Authors
Downloaded on 26.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/auk-2011-0106/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button