Home Comment on Lorenzo Sacconi, Marco Faillo and Stefania Ottone. Contractarian Compliance, Welfarist Justice, and Conformist Utility
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Comment on Lorenzo Sacconi, Marco Faillo and Stefania Ottone. Contractarian Compliance, Welfarist Justice, and Conformist Utility

  • David Copp
Published/Copyright: January 12, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This comment addresses two issues that arise in Sacconi/Faillo/Ottone's essay. The first is the problem of compliance as it arises in social contract theory. The second is the problem of avoiding an incoherence that arises in the formulation of welfarist principles of distributive justice if these principles are taken to be concerned with the distribution of welfare without restriction. Sacconi, Faillo, and Ottone define an interesting class of principles that govern only the distribution of 'material utility', which they distinguish from 'conformist utility'. Sacconi, Faillo, and Ottone are primarily concerned, however, to argue that there is a need to revise 'the utility maximization model of a rational economic man'. I discuss this claim briefly, in concluding the paper.

Published Online: 2016-01-12
Published in Print: 2011-05-01

© 2011 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Contents
  2. Editorial: Work and Cooperation
  3. On the Logic and Ethics of Cooperation
  4. Potentials of Cooperation
  5. The Idiocy of Strategic Reasoning. Towards an Account of Consensual Action
  6. Comment on Hans Bernhard Schmid. Coordination, Cooperation and the Origin of Normative Expectations
  7. Cooperation as Joint Action
  8. Comment on Raimo Tuomela. Joint Action: How Rational? How Irreducible?
  9. Justice as Fairness and Reciprocity
  10. Comment on Andrew Lister. Just Distribution(s) for Mutual Recognition
  11. Cooperating to Promote the Good
  12. Comment on Robert H. Myers. Finding Out What is Substantive in Cooperation
  13. Reply to Anton Leist. Keeping Constructivism in Its Place
  14. Cooperation and Efficiency in Economic Contexts
  15. Cooperation for Economic Success: The Mondragon Case
  16. Comment on Ramon Flecha and Ignacio Santa Cruz. The Priority of Labor and Capital Accounts
  17. Are Multinational Companies Responsible for Working Conditions in Their Supply Chains? From Intuition to Argument
  18. Comment on Sonja Dänzer. Structural Injustice in Global Production Networks: Shared Responsibility for Working Conditions
  19. From Niche to Mass Markets: Rival Strategies in Promoting Fair Trade Organic Commodity Chains
  20. Recognition, Cooperation and the Moral Presuppositions of Capitalist Organization of Work
  21. Comment on Hermann Kocyba. The Regime of Esteem, or Recognition as Affirmation
  22. Fairness and Cooperation in Experimental Research
  23. Contractarian Compliance and the 'Sense of Justice': A Behavioral Conformity Model and Its Experimental Support
  24. Comment on Lorenzo Sacconi, Marco Faillo and Stefania Ottone. Contractarian Compliance, Welfarist Justice, and Conformist Utility
  25. Equity and Efficiency in Multi-Worker Firms: Insights from Experimental Economics
  26. Reciprocity in Economic Games
  27. Authors
Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/auk-2011-0121/html
Scroll to top button