The moderating effects of perceptual salience and language aptitude on the effectiveness of L2 recasts

References

Ammar, Ahlem. 2008. Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research 12(2). 183–210.10.1177/1362168807086287Search in Google Scholar

Ayoun, Dalila. 2001. The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the passé composé and imparfait. The Modern Language Journal 85(2). 226–243.10.1111/0026-7902.00106Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Wendy & Pavel Trofimovich. 2005. Interaction of native-and second-language vowel system (s) in early and late bilinguals. Language and Speech 48(1). 1–27.10.1177/00238309050480010101Search in Google Scholar

Blasdell, Richard & Paul Jensen. 1970. Stress and word position as determinants of imitation in first-language learners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 13(1). 193–202.10.1044/jshr.1301.193Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Roger. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Massachusetts: Harvard U. Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674732469Search in Google Scholar

Carpenter, Helen, K. Seon Jeon, David MacGregor & Alison Mackey. 2006. Learner’s Interpretations of Recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(2). 209–236.10.1017/S0272263106060104Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, John B. 1989. The Carroll model a 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Researcher 18(1). 26–31.10.3102/0013189X018001026Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, John B. 1990. Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In T. S. Parry & C. W. Stansfield (eds.), Language Aptitude Reconsidered 11–29. DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, Robert M. 2012. Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning 62(2). 189–200.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00712.xSearch in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, Robert M., I. Alfi-Shabtay, D. Ravid & M. Shi. 2005. The role of salience in the acquisition of Hebrew as a second language. International Symposium on Bilingualism (Volume 5). Barcelona, Spain, March 21, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, Robert M. & Joel Koeth. 2011. Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning. Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning 2. 395–406.10.4324/9780203836507.ch24Search in Google Scholar

Doughty, Catherine. 2001. Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction 206–257. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.010Search in Google Scholar

Egi, Takako. 2007. Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29(4). 511–537.10.1017/S0272263107070416Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod., Helen Basturkmen & Shawan Loewen. 2001. Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning 51(2). 281–318.10.1111/1467-9922.00156Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Shawn Loewen & Rosemary Erlam. 2006. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(2). 339–368.10.1017/S0272263106060141Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, Diane E. Larsen. 1975. The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESL students. TESOL Quarterly 9. 409–419.10.2307/3585625Search in Google Scholar

Gass, Susan. 1997. Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Goldschneider, Jennifer M. & Robert M. DeKeyser. 2001. Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta‐analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 51(1). 1–50.10.1111/1467-9922.00147Search in Google Scholar

Goo, Jaemyung. 2012. Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34(03). 445–474.10.1017/S0272263112000149Search in Google Scholar

Goo, Jaemyung & Alison Mackey. 2013. The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35(1). 1–39.10.1017/S0272263112000708Search in Google Scholar

Granena, Gisela. 2013. Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA language aptitude test. In Gisela Granena & Michael H. Long (eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment, 35. 105–129. John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/lllt.35.04graSearch in Google Scholar

Ha, Seunghee, Cynthia J. Johnson & David P. Kueh. 2009. Characteristics of Korean phonology: Review, tutorial, and case studies of Korean children speaking English. Journal of Communication Disorders 42(3). 163–179.10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Heo, Young-Hyon & Ahrong Lee. 2004. The phonological adaptation of foreign liquids in Korean. Workshop in General Linguistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Search in Google Scholar

Ishida, Midori. 2004. Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form-te i-(ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning 54(2). 311–394.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00257.xSearch in Google Scholar

Iwashita, Noriko. 2003. Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(01). 1–36.10.1017/S0272263103000019Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Ji-Hyun & Zhaohong Han. 2007. Recasts in communicative EFL classes: Do teacher intent and learner interpretation overlap? In Alison Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies, 269–297. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Soyoung & Gregory K. Iverson. 2008. The development of monophthongal vowels in Korean: Age and sex differences. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 22(7). 523–536.10.1080/02699200801945120Search in Google Scholar

Leeman, Jennifer. 2003. Recasts and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(01). 37–63.10.1017/S0272263103000020Search in Google Scholar

Loewen, Shawn & Jenefer Philp. 2006. Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal 90(4). 536–556.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.xSearch in Google Scholar

Long, Michael H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, 413–468. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3Search in Google Scholar

Long, Michael H. 2007. Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In Michael Long (ed.), Problems in SLA, 15–63. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Long, Michael H., Shunji Inagaki & Lourdes Ortega. 1998. The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal 82(3). 357–371.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01213.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy. 1998. Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20(01), 51–81.10.1017/S027226319800103XSearch in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy. 2004. Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(3). 399–432.10.1017/S0272263104263021Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy & J. Izquierdo. 2009. Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning 59(2). 453–498.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00512.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy & Hirohide Mori. 2006. Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(2). 269–300.10.1017/S0272263106060128Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy & Leila Ranta. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19(1). 37–66.10.1017/S0272263197001034Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, Alison. 2007. Interaction as practice. In Robert M. DeKeyser (ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from linguistics and psychology, 85–110. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667275.006Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, Alison, Susan Gass & Kim McDonough. 2000. How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(04). 471–497.10.1017/S0272263100004010Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, Alison & Jenefer Philp. 1998. Conversational interaction and second language development: recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal 82(3). 338–356.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.xSearch in Google Scholar

McDonough, K. & A. Mackey. 2006. Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning 56(4). 693–720.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00393.xSearch in Google Scholar

Meara, Paul. 2005. LLAMA language aptitude tests: The manual. Swansea: Lognostics.10.1037/t88467-000Search in Google Scholar

Nassaji, Hossein. 2009. Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning 59(2). 411–452.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00511.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ono, Lesley & Jeffrey Witzel. 2003. Recasts, salience and morpheme acquisition. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Tucson, AZ.Search in Google Scholar

Philp, Jenifer. 2003. Constraints on “noticing the gap”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(1). 99–126.10.1017/S0272263103000044Search in Google Scholar

Pye, Clifton. 1980. The acquisition of person markers in Quiche Mayan. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, Number 19.Search in Google Scholar

Révész, Andrea. 2012. Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning 62(1). 93–132.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00690.xSearch in Google Scholar

Roberts, Michael. 1995. Awareness and the efficacy of error correction. In Richard Schmidt & University of Hawaii at Manoa (ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning, 163–182. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2001. Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 17(4). 368–392.10.1177/026765830101700405Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2005. Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25. 46–73.10.1017/S0267190505000036Search in Google Scholar

Sagarra, Nuria & Rebekha Abbuhl. 2013. Optimizing the noticing of recasts via computer‐delivered feedback: Evidence that oral input enhancement and working memory help second language learning. The Modern Language Journal 97(1). 196–216.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.01427.xSearch in Google Scholar

Sheen, Younghee. 2006. Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research 10(4). 361–392.10.1191/1362168806lr203oaSearch in Google Scholar

Sheen, Younghee. 2008. Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning 58(4). 835–874.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00480.xSearch in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan Isaac. 1985. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Volume 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Snow, Richard E. 1992. Aptitude theory: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Educational Psychologist 27(1). 5–32.10.1207/s15326985ep2701_3Search in Google Scholar

Song, Jae Jung. 2006. The Korean language: Structure, use and context. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203390825Search in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill. 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Input in Second Language Acquisition 15. 165–179.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill. 2005. The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 495–508. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410612700-38Search in Google Scholar

Trofimovich, Pavel, Ahlem Ammar & Elizabeth Gatbonton. 2007. How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In Alison Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition, 171–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Yingli & Roy Lyster. 2010. Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(02). 235–263.10.1017/S0272263109990519Search in Google Scholar

Yilmaz, Yucel. 2012. The relative effects of explicit correction and recasts on two target structures via two communication modes. Language Learning 62(4). 1134–1169.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00726.xSearch in Google Scholar

Yilmaz, Yucel. 2013. Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics 34(3). 344–368.10.1093/applin/ams044Search in Google Scholar

Yilmaz, Yucel & Gisela Granena. 2016. The role of cognitive aptitudes for explicit language learning in the relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(01). 147–161.10.1017/S136672891400090XSearch in Google Scholar

Yilmaz, Yucel & Dogan Yuksel. 2011. Effects of communication mode and salience on recasts: A first exposure study. Language Teaching Research 15(4). 457–477.10.1177/1362168811412873Search in Google Scholar