Abstract
Aristotle offers apparently inconsistent explanations for paronymous expressions derived from matter: on the received picture, derived from Metaphysics Θ.7, such expressions are used in all and only cases of substantial change, because predicating the matter directly of a substance would be false; on the error picture, derived from Metaphysics Z.7, the same expressions are used in all and only cases of change from an unclear and nameless privation, because ordinary language users conflate such privations with matter. I propose a resolution: the received picture explains why the usage is fitting, but the error picture explains how the usage originated.
References
Ackrill, J. L. 1963. Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione. Translated with Notes and a Glossary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Beere, J. 2006. “Potentiality and the Matter of Composite Substance.” Phronesis 51 (4): 303–29. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852806778876592.Search in Google Scholar
Blackwell, R. 1955. “Matter as a Subject of Predication in Aristotle.” The Modern Schoolman 33 (1): 19–30, https://doi.org/10.5840/schoolman19553312.Search in Google Scholar
Bostock, D. 1994. Aristotle: Metaphysics Books Z and H. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00262329Search in Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 2001. A Map of Metaphysics Zeta. Pittsburgh: Mathesis Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Chappell, V. 1973. “Matter.” Journal of Philosophy 70 (19): 679–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025076.Search in Google Scholar
Code, A. 1976. “The Persistence of Aristotelian Matter.” Philosophical Studies 29 (6): 357–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00646313.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, S. M. 1978. “Essentialism in Aristotle.” Review of Metaphysics 31 (3): 387–405.Search in Google Scholar
Corkum, P. 2023. “Aristotle on Artefactual Substances.” Metaphysics 6 (1): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.5334/met.123.Search in Google Scholar
Dancy, R. 1978. “On Some of Aristotle’s Second Thoughts about Substances: Matter.” Philosophical Review 87 (3): 372–413. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184902.Search in Google Scholar
Fait, P. 2004. “La predicazione lingustica nelle Categorie di Aristotele.” Rivista di estetica 44 (26): 23–36.Search in Google Scholar
Fait, P. 2011. “Aristotele, Categorie, 1: Omonimi, Sinonimi, Paronimi.” In Studi sulle Categorie di Aristotele, edited by M. Bonelli and F. Masi, 33–50. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.Search in Google Scholar
Ferejohn, M. 1994. “The Definition of Generated Composites in Aristotle’s Metaphysics.” In Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, edited by T. Scaltsas, D. Charles, and M. L. Gill, 291–318. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198240679.003.0014Search in Google Scholar
Frede, M., and G. Patzig. 1988. Aristoteles ‘Metaphysik Z’: Text, Übersetzung, und Kommentar, Vol. 2. Munich: C. H. Beck.Search in Google Scholar
Furth, M. 1985. Aristotle: Metaphysics Books VII–X (Zeta, Eta, Theta, Iota). Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar
Furth, M. 1988. Substance, Form, and Psyche: An Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511552557Search in Google Scholar
Galluzzo, G. 2019. “Is Aristotle’s Matter Ordinary Stuff?” In Third Pisa Colloquium in Logic, Language, and Epistemology: Essays in Honour of Mauro Mariani and Carlo Marletti, edited by L. Bellotti, L. Gili, E. Moriconi, and G. Turbanti, 167–80. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Search in Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. 1989. Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. 1993. “Matter against Substance.” Synthese 96 (3): 379–97, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01064008.Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1988. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kung, J. 1978. “Can Substance Be Predicated of Matter?” Archive für Geschichte der Philosophie 60 (2): 140–59. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.1978.60.2.140.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, F. 1985. “Form and Predication in Aristotle’s Metaphysics.” In How Things Are: Studies in Predication and the History of Philosophy and Science, edited by J. Bogen and J. McGuire, 59–83. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-5199-0_3Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, F. 1991. Substance and Predication in Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, F. 1995a. “Aristotle on the Unity of Substance.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3–4): 222–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1995.tb00150.x.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, F. 1995b. “Substance, Predication, and Unity in Aristotle.” Ancient Philosophy 15 (2): 521–49. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil19951529.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, F. 2011. “Predication, Things, and Kinds in Aristotle’s Metaphysics.” Phronesis 56 (4): 350–87, https://doi.org/10.1163/156852811x588697.Search in Google Scholar
Londinenses. 1979. Notes on Book Zeta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics: Being the Record by Myles Burnyeat and Others of a Seminar held in London, 1975-1979. Oxford: Sub-faculty of Philosophy.Search in Google Scholar
Londinenses. 1984. Notes on Books Eta and Theta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics: Being the Record by Myles Burnyeat and Others of a Seminar held in London, 1979–82. Oxford: Sub-faculty of Philosophy.Search in Google Scholar
Loux, M. 1991. Primary Ousia: An Essay on Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z and H. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Makin, S. 2006. Aristotle: Metaphysics Book Θ. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00258589Search in Google Scholar
Menn, S. (unpublished). The Aim and Argument of Aristotle’s Metaphysics.Search in Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1967. “Tithenai Ta Phainomena.” In Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by J. Moravcsik, 167–90. New York: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Owens, J. 1951. The Doctrine of Being in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.Search in Google Scholar
Owens, J. 1967. “Matter and Predication in Aristotle.” In Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by J. Moravcsik, 191–214. New York: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-15267-4_10Search in Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 1994. “Casus – πτῶσις: Zum aristotelischen Ursprung eines umstrittenen grammatischen Terminus.” Antike und Abendland 40 (1): 86–97, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241525.86.Search in Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotle’s Metaphysics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1936. Aristotle’s Physics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. 1921. “ΤΟΔΕ ΤΙ in Aristotle.” Classical Review 35 (1–2): 19, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009840x00014359.Search in Google Scholar
Wardy, R. 1990. The Chain of Change: A Study of Aristotle’s Physics VII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Surveying the Types of Tables in Ancient Greek Texts
- Something New Under the Sun in Anaximenes’ Astronomy?
- Aristotle and the Stoics on the Notion of ἐνέργεια
- The Social Contract in Epicureanism
- The Stoic Theory of Case
- The Many Do Not Recollect: The Nature and Scope of Recollection in Plato’s Phaedrus
- Aristotle on Materiate Paronymy: Concerning an Apparent Inconsistency in Aristotle’s Metaphysics
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Surveying the Types of Tables in Ancient Greek Texts
- Something New Under the Sun in Anaximenes’ Astronomy?
- Aristotle and the Stoics on the Notion of ἐνέργεια
- The Social Contract in Epicureanism
- The Stoic Theory of Case
- The Many Do Not Recollect: The Nature and Scope of Recollection in Plato’s Phaedrus
- Aristotle on Materiate Paronymy: Concerning an Apparent Inconsistency in Aristotle’s Metaphysics