Startseite Atomistic simulations of ultra-short pulse laser ablation of aluminum: validity of the Lambert-Beer law
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Atomistic simulations of ultra-short pulse laser ablation of aluminum: validity of the Lambert-Beer law

  • Eugen Eisfeld EMAIL logo und Johannes Roth
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. Mai 2018
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Informationen für Autor*innen
Advanced Optical Technologies
Aus der Zeitschrift Advanced Optical Technologies Band 7 Heft 3

Abstract

Based on hybrid molecular dynamics/two-temperature simulations, we study the validity of the application of Lambert-Beer’s law, which is conveniently used in various modeling approaches of ultra-short pulse laser ablation of metals. The method is compared to a more rigorous treatment, which involves solving the Helmholtz wave equation for different pulse durations ranging from 100 fs to 5 ps and a wavelength of 800 nm. Our simulations show a growing agreement with increasing pulse durations, and we provide appropriate optical parameters for all investigated pulse durations.

Keywords: computer modeling; laser ablation; molecular dynamics

  1. Funding: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Funder Id: 10.13039/501100001659, Grant Number: SFB 716, subproject B5.

References

[1] B. Lin and H. E. Elsayed-Ali, Surf. Sci. 498, 275–284 (2002).10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01764-2Suche in Google Scholar

[2] K. Sokolowski-Tinten, C. Blome, J. Blums, A. Cavalleri, C. Dietrich, et al., Nature 422, 287–289 (2003).10.1038/nature01490Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Z. Lin, L.V. Zhigilei and V. Celli, Appl. Phys. A 77, 776 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevB.77.075133Suche in Google Scholar

[4] J. P. Colombier, P. Combis, E. Audouard and R. Stoian, New J. Phys. 14, 13039 (2012).10.1088/1367-2630/14/1/013039Suche in Google Scholar

[5] J. P. Colombier, P. Combis, A. Rosenfeld, I. V. Hertel, E. Audouard, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 74, 311 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.74.224106Suche in Google Scholar

[6] N. M. Bulgakova, R. Stoian, A. Rosenfeld, I. V. Hertel and E. E. B. Campbell, Phys. Rev. B 69, 97 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevB.69.054102Suche in Google Scholar

[7] M. Kaganov, I. Lifshitz and L. Tanatarov, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 4, 173–178 (1957).Suche in Google Scholar

[8] N. E. Andreev, V. V. Kostin and M. E. Veisman, Phys. Scr. 58, 486 (1998).10.1088/0031-8949/58/5/010Suche in Google Scholar

[9] M. E. Povarnitsyn, V. B. Fokin, P. R. Levashov and T. E. Itina, Phys. Rev. B 92, 232 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.174104Suche in Google Scholar

[10] M. E. Povarnitsyn and N. E. Andreev, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 774, 12105 (2016).10.1088/1742-6596/774/1/012105Suche in Google Scholar

[11] L. V. Zhigilei, D. S. Ivanov, E. Leveugle, B. Sadigh and E. M. Bringa, in: ‘Computer Modeling of Laser Melting and Spallation of Metal Targets’, (SPIE, Taos, NM, 2004) p. 505.10.1117/12.548821Suche in Google Scholar

[12] S. Scharring, D. J. Förster, H.-A. Eckel, J. Roth and M. Povarnitsyn, in: HPLA/BEP 2014.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] W. E. Nagel, D. B. Kröner, M. M. Resch, J. Roth, C. Trichet, et al., Eds., in: ‘Laser Ablation of Metals: High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering 10’, (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011).Suche in Google Scholar

[14] J. Roth, A. Krauß, J. Lotze and H.-R. Trebin, Appl. Phys. A 117, 2207–2216 (2014).10.1007/s00339-014-8647-1Suche in Google Scholar

[15] D. S. Ivanov and L. V. Zhigilei, Phys. Rev. B 68, 433 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevB.68.064114Suche in Google Scholar

[16] V. V. Zhakhovskii, N. A. Inogamov, Y. V. Petrov, S. I. Ashitkov and K. Nishihara, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 9592–9596 (2009).10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.04.082Suche in Google Scholar

[17] G. Strang, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 5, 506–517 (1968).10.1137/0705041Suche in Google Scholar

[18] H. Holden, K. Karlsen, K.-A. Lie and N. H. Risebro, in ‘Splitting Methods for Partial Differential Equations with Rough Solutions’, (European Mathematical Society Publishing House, Zuerich, Switzerland, 2010).10.4171/078Suche in Google Scholar

[19] D. J. McCloskey, An Analytic Formulation of Equations of State, available at https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM3905.html.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] M. E. Povarnitsyn, N. E. Andreev, P. R. Levashov, K. V. Khishchenko and O. N. Rosmej, Phys. Plasmas 19, 23110 (2012).10.1063/1.3683687Suche in Google Scholar

[21] N. E. Andreev, M. E. Veisman, V. P. Efremov and V. E. Fortov, High Temp. 41, 594–608 (2003).10.1023/A:1026184309635Suche in Google Scholar

[22] M. B. Agranat, N. E. Andreev, S. I. Ashitkov, M. E. Veĭsman, P. R. Levashov, JETP Lett. 85, 271–276 (2007).10.1134/S0021364007060021Suche in Google Scholar

[23] M. Born and E. Wolf, in ‘Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light’, 7th ed., (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 1999).10.1017/CBO9781139644181Suche in Google Scholar

[24] M. Fang, S. Tang, Z. Li and X. Wang, Comput. Mech. 50, 645–655 (2012).10.1007/s00466-012-0696-8Suche in Google Scholar

[25] A. Stukowski, J. Met. 66, 399–407 (2014).10.1007/s11837-013-0827-5Suche in Google Scholar

[26] C. Wu and L. V. Zhigilei, Appl. Phys. A 114 11–32 (2014).10.1007/s00339-013-8086-4Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-01-15
Accepted: 2018-03-19
Published Online: 2018-05-01
Published in Print: 2018-05-24

©2018 THOSS Media & De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Cover and Frontmatter
  2. Views
  3. Disruptive: making lenses in a foundry
  4. Community
  5. News
  6. Topical Issue: Ultrafast Laser Matter Interaction
  7. Editorial
  8. The ultrafast laser is gearing up to become a tool for high-precision mass production – opportunities and challenges
  9. Review Articles
  10. Ablation dynamics – from absorption to heat accumulation/ultra-fast laser matter interaction
  11. Heat input and accumulation for ultrashort pulse processing with high average power
  12. Residual heat generated during laser processing of CFRP with picosecond laser pulses
  13. Ultrafast Bessel beams: advanced tools for laser materials processing
  14. Research Articles
  15. Residual heat during laser ablation of metals with bursts of ultra-short pulses
  16. Model of the final borehole geometry for helical laser drilling
  17. Atomistic simulations of ultra-short pulse laser ablation of aluminum: validity of the Lambert-Beer law
https://doi.org/10.1515/aot-2018-0005
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
computer modeling; laser ablation; molecular dynamics

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Cover and Frontmatter
  2. Views
  3. Disruptive: making lenses in a foundry
  4. Community
  5. News
  6. Topical Issue: Ultrafast Laser Matter Interaction
  7. Editorial
  8. The ultrafast laser is gearing up to become a tool for high-precision mass production – opportunities and challenges
  9. Review Articles
  10. Ablation dynamics – from absorption to heat accumulation/ultra-fast laser matter interaction
  11. Heat input and accumulation for ultrashort pulse processing with high average power
  12. Residual heat generated during laser processing of CFRP with picosecond laser pulses
  13. Ultrafast Bessel beams: advanced tools for laser materials processing
  14. Research Articles
  15. Residual heat during laser ablation of metals with bursts of ultra-short pulses
  16. Model of the final borehole geometry for helical laser drilling
  17. Atomistic simulations of ultra-short pulse laser ablation of aluminum: validity of the Lambert-Beer law
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 7.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/aot-2018-0005/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen