Startseite Prescribed mean curvature equation on torus
Artikel Open Access

Prescribed mean curvature equation on torus

  • Yuki Tsukamoto EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 19. April 2021
Analysis
Aus der Zeitschrift Analysis Band 41 Heft 2

Abstract

Prescribed mean curvature problems on the torus have been considered in one dimension. In this paper, we prove the existence of a graph on the n-dimensional torus 𝕋n, the mean curvature vector of which equals the normal component of a given vector field satisfying suitable conditions for a Sobolev norm, the integrated value, and monotonicity.

MSC 2010: 35J93

1 Introduction

In this paper, we consider the following prescribed mean curvature problem on the torus 𝕋n:=n/n:

(1.1)-div(u1+|u|2)=ν(u)g(x,u(x))on 𝕋n,

where ν is the unit normal vector of u, that is,

ν(z)=11+|z|2(-z,1).

The vector field g(x,xn+1):𝕋n×n+1 is given, and we seek a solution u satisfying (1.1). The left-hand side of (1.1) represents the mean curvature of the graph of u, and the right-hand side is the normal component of the vector field g on the graph.

In the case of Dirichlet conditions of a bounded domain Ωn, prescribed mean curvature problems have been studied by numerous researchers. Bergner [3] solved the Dirichlet problem in the case where the right-hand side of (1.1) is H=H(x,u,ν(u)) under the assumptions of boundedness (|H|<), monotonicity (n+1H0), and convexity of Ω. Under the same conditions for the function H, Marquardt [9] imposed a condition on Ω depending on H that guarantees the existence of solutions even for a domain Ω that is not necessarily convex. In [13], we proved the existence of a solution only under the condition that the Sobolev norm of H is sufficiently small. In the case of a compact Riemannian manifold, Aubin [2] solved the linear elliptic problem -i[aij(x)ju]=H(x) if the integrated value of H is zero. The assumption of the integrated value plays an important role in the existence of solutions to elliptic equations on a compact Riemannian manifold. Denny [4] solved the quasilinear elliptic problem -div(a(u(x))u)=H(x) on the torus 𝕋n with n=2,3. Prescribed mean curvature problems on the one-dimensional torus

(u1+(u)2)=H(x,u,u)

have been investigated for a wide variety of conditions H (we refer to, for example, [5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14]).

As we noted in [13], the motivation for the present study comes from a singular perturbation problem, and we proved the following in [12]. Suppose a constant ε>0 and functions ϕεW1,2 and gεW1,p, with p>n+12, satisfy

-εΔϕε+W(ϕε)ε=εϕεgε,
(ε|ϕε|22+W(ϕε)ε)𝑑x+gεW1,p(Ω~)C,

where W is a double-well potential such as W(ϕ)=(1-ϕ2)2. Then the interface {ϕε=0} converges locally in the Hausdorff distance to a surface having a mean curvature given by νg as ε0. Here, ν is the unit normal vector of the surface, and g is the weak W1,p limit of gε. If the surface is represented locally as a graph of a function u on 𝕋n, we can observe that u satisfies (1.1). In this paper, we prove the existence of solutions to (1.1) assuming that the Sobolev norm of g is sufficiently small, gn+1 for the (n+1)-st component is monotonous, and the integrated value of gn+1 is zero. The following theorem is the main result.

Theorem 1.1.

Fix n+12<p<n+1 and q=npn+1-p. Then there exists a constant ε1=ε1(n,p)>0 with the following property: If ε<ε1, and

g=(g1,,gn,gn+1)=(g,gn+1)W1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1);n+1)

satisfies the relations

(1.2)gW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1))<ε23,
(1.3)n+1gn+1(x,xn+1)>ε+ε12|n+1g(x,xn+1)|,
(1.4)𝕋ngn+1(x,0)=0,

then there exists a function uW2,q(Tn) such that

(1.5)-div(u1+|u|2)=ν(u)g(x,u(x))on 𝕋n.

Moreover, the following inequality holds:

u-𝕋nu(y)𝑑yW2,q(𝕋n)ε12.

Assumptions (1.2) and (1.3) guarantee the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the linearized problem of (1.1) where a given function depends on u. Equation (1.4) is necessary for the existence of solutions to elliptic equations on the torus. To the best of our knowledge, prescribed mean curvature problems on the torus in the general dimension have been insufficiently studied. However, we have proved the existence of the solution under natural assumptions.

The following is the method of proof. First, we find the conditions of H for the linearized problem of (1.1), i.e.

-div(u1+|v|2)=H,

to have a unique solution. If we add a suitable constant term for any v, the function ν(v)g(x,v(x)) satisfies the conditions. By estimating the norm of this solution with g, the mapping T(v)=u has a fixed point using a fixed-point theorem, and Theorem 1.1 follows.

2 Proof of Theorem 1.1

A theorem that holds in the Euclidean space also holds on a torus, as we consider a function on a torus to be a periodic function in the Euclidean space.

Let X(𝕋n) be a function space on 𝕋n. We define a subspace Xave(𝕋n)X(𝕋n) as

Xave:={wX:𝕋nw=0}.

Theorem 2.1.

Suppose vC1(Tn) and HLave2(Tn). Then there exists a unique function uWave1,2(Tn) such that

𝕋nuϕ1+|v|2=𝕋nHϕ

for all ϕW1,2(Tn).

Proof.

We define a function B:Wave1,2(𝕋n)×Wave1,2(𝕋n) by

B[w1,w2,v]:=𝕋nw1w21+|v|2.

By the Hölder inequality, we obtain

|B[w1,w2,v]|𝕋n|w1||w2|
w1L2(𝕋n)w2L2(𝕋n)
(2.1)w1W1,2(𝕋n)w2W1,2(𝕋n).

Using the Poincaré inequality, we have

|B[w,w,v]|11+vC1(𝕋n)2wL2(𝕋n)2
(2.2)11+vC1(𝕋n)2wW1,2(𝕋n)2.

By (2.1), (2.2), and the Lax–Milgram theorem, for any HLave2(𝕋n), there exists a unique function

uWave1,2(𝕋n)

such that

(2.3)𝕋nuψ1+|v|2=𝕋nHψ

for all ψWave1,2(𝕋n). For any ϕW1,2(𝕋n), we define cϕ:=𝕋nϕ and ϕ~:=ϕ-cϕWave1,2(𝕋n). By (2.3) and HLave2(𝕋n), we obtain

𝕋nuϕ1+|v|2=𝕋nuϕ~1+|v|2=𝕋nHϕ~=𝕋nHϕ.

Thus, Theorem 2.1 follows. ∎

We define a mollifier as follows:

η(x):={Cexp(1|x|2-1)for |x|<1,0for |x|1,

where the constant C>0 is selected such that n+1η=1. We define

ηλ(x):=1λnη(xλ).

For any fL2(𝕋n×(-1,1)) and xn+1(-1+λ,1-λ),

fλ(x,xn+1):=𝕋n×(-1,1)ηλ(x-y,xn+1-yn+1)f(y,yn+1)𝑑y
=Bn+1(0,λ)ηλ(y,yn+1)f(x-y,xn+1-yn+1)𝑑y,

where Bn+1(x,λ) is an open ball with center x and radius λ in 𝕋n×. Moreover, for any

gW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1);n+1),

we define gλ:=(gλ1,,gλn,gλn+1)=(gλ,gλn+1).

Lemma 2.2.

Fix β1>0 and 0<λ<1. Suppose vC1(Tn) satisfies vC1(Tn)<β1, and

gW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1);n+1)

satisfies

n+1gn+1(x,xn+1)>β1|n+1g(x,xn+1)|.

For any positive constant c0>0, if v(Tn)+c0(-1+λ,1-λ), then

𝕋nν(v)gλ(x,v)<𝕋nν(v)gλ(x,v+c0).

Proof.

From the assumptions, we compute

𝕋nν(v)(gλ(x,v+c0)-gλ(x,v))
=𝕋n11+|v|2vv+c0-vn+1gλ(x,t)+n+1gλn+1(x,t)dt
𝕋n11+|v|2vv+c0-β1|n+1gλ(x,t)|+n+1gλn+1(x,t)dt
𝕋n11+|v|2vv+c0𝕋n×(-1,1)ηλ(x-y,t-yn+1){-β1|n+1g(y,yn+1)|+n+1gn+1(y,yn+1)}𝑑t
>0.

Lemma 2.2 follows. ∎

Lemma 2.3.

Suppose gW1,p(Tn×(-1,1) and vC1(Tn) with vC1(Tn)716. Let q=npn+1-p. Then there exists a constant c1=c1(n,p)>0 such that, if λ<18,

gλ(,v())Lq(𝕋n)c1gW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1)).

Proof.

By the same proof as in [13, Lemma 2.3], we obtain

(2.4)gλ(,v())Lq(𝕋n)c2gλW1,p(𝕋n×(-78,78)),

where c2=c2(n,p)>0. Using the Hölder inequality, we obtain

𝕋n×(-78,78)|gλ|p𝑑x𝕋n×(-78,78)(Bn+1(x,λ)ηλ1-1p+1p(x-y,xn+1-yn+1)|g(y,yn+1)|𝑑y)p𝑑x
𝕋n×(-78,78)(Bn+1(x,λ)ηλ(x-y,xn+1-yn+1)|g(y,yn+1)|p𝑑y)𝑑x
𝕋n×(-1,1)|g(y,yn+1)|p(Bn+1(y,λ)ηλ(x-y,xn+1-yn+1)𝑑x)𝑑y
(2.5)=𝕋n×(-1,1)|g(y,yn+1)|p𝑑y.

We can show that

gλLp(𝕋n×(-78,78))gLp(𝕋n×(-1,1))

in the exact same manner, and Lemma 2.3 follows by (2.4) and (2.5). ∎

Theorem 2.4.

Suppose vC1(Tn) and

gW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1);n+1).

Then there exist constants ε2=ε2(n,p)>0 such that, if λ<18, ε<ε2, and vC1(Tn)ε1/2, then g satisfies (1.2)–(1.4). Then there exist a unique function uWave1,2(Tn) and a unique constant -14<cv<14 such that

(2.6)𝕋nuϕ1+|v|2=𝕋nν(v)gλ(x,v+cv)ϕ

for all ϕW1,2(Tn).

Proof.

We define

F(t):=𝕋nν(v)gλ(x,v+t).

The function F is continuous. Suppose that ε<1162. We will consider that the domain of F is [-14,14]. By the mean value theorem, there exists a constant c3=c3(n,p)>0 such that

F(14)=𝕋n(ν(v)-ν(0)+ν(0))gλ(x,v+14)
(2.7)-c3vC1(𝕋n)gλ(,v()+14)Lq(𝕋n)+𝕋ngλn+1(x,v+14).

By Lemma 2.3 and v+14C1(𝕋n)516, we obtain

gλ(,v()+14)Lq(𝕋n)c1gW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1)).

By (1.3) and (1.4), there exists a constant c4=c4(n)>0 such that

𝕋ngλn+1(x,v+14)=𝕋nBn+1(0,λ)ηλ(y,yn+1)gn+1(x-y,v+14-yn+1)𝑑y𝑑x
>𝕋nBn+1(0,λ)ηλ(y,yn+1)gn+1(x-y,116)𝑑y𝑑x
>𝕋nBn+1(0,λ)ηλ(y,yn+1)(gn+1(x-y,0)+ε16)𝑑y𝑑x
(2.8)>c416ε.

By (1.2), (2.7)–(2.8), and vC1(𝕋n)<ε1/2, if

ε<(c416c1c3)6=:ε2(n,p),

then

F(14)>-c1c3vC1(𝕋n)gλW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1))+c416ε
>-c1c3ε76+c416ε
>ε(-c1c3ε16+c416)
>0.

Similarly, we can show that F(-14)<0. By Lemma 2.2 and the mean value theorem, there exists a unique constant -14<cv<14 that satisfies F(cv)=0. By using Theorem 2.1, Theorem 2.4 follows. ∎

Let us define an operator T:𝒜(s)Wave1,2(𝕋n)×[-14,14] by T(v)=(T1(v),T2(v)):=(u,cv) that satisfies (2.6), where

𝒜(s):={wWave2,q(𝕋n):wW2,q(𝕋n)s}.

Theorem 2.5.

There exist constants ε3=ε3(n,p)>0 and c5=c5(n,p)>0 such that, if λ<18, ε<min{ε2,ε3}, vA(ε1/2), and gW1,p(Tn×(-1,1);Rn+1) satisfies (1.2)–(1.4), then

T1(v)W2,q(𝕋n)c5gW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1)).

Proof.

We first assume that vC(𝕋n)𝒜(ε1/2). Using [6, Corollary 8.11], we obtain T1(v)C(𝕋n). Thus, we can rewrite (2.6) as

ΔT1(v)1+|v|2+T1(v)(11+|v|2)=-ν(v)gλ(x,v+T2(v)).

Using [6, Theorem 9.11], we find that there exists a constant c6=c6(n,p)>0 such that

T1(v)W2,q(𝕋n)c6(T1(v)Lq(𝕋n)+ν(v)gλ(x,v+T2(v))Lq(𝕋n)
(2.9)+T1(v)(11+|v|2)Lq(𝕋n)).

Using Lemma 2.3, we obtain

(2.10)ν(v)gλ(x,v+T2(v))Lq(𝕋n)c1gW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1)).

Using the Sobolev inequality, we find that there exists a constant c7=c7(n,p)>0 such that

T1(v)(11+|v|2)Lq(𝕋n)T1(v)C1(𝕋n)(11+|v|2)Lq(𝕋n)
(2.11)c7T1(v)W2,q(𝕋n)vW2,q(𝕋n).

Next, we estimate the term T1(v)Lq(𝕋n). If q2, then, by (2.2) and Lemma 2.3, we obtain

T1(v)Lq(𝕋n)c8(n,p)T1(v)L2(𝕋n)
c9(n,p)B[T1(v),T1(v),v]12.
=c9(𝕋nT1(v)T1(v)1+|v|2)12
=c9(𝕋nν(v)gλ(x,v+T2(v))T1(v))12
c10(n,p)gW1,p(𝕋n)12T1(v)L(𝕋n)12
(2.12)c11(n,p)gW1,p(𝕋n)+14c6T1(v)W2,q(𝕋n).

If q>2, by (2.12) and the Riesz–Thorin theorem, we obtain

T1(v)Lq(𝕋n)T1(v)L2(𝕋n)1qT1(v)L2(𝕋n)1-1q
c12(n,p)gW1,p(𝕋n)12qT1(v)L(𝕋n)12q+1-1q
(2.13)c13(n,p)gW1,p(𝕋n)+14c6T1(v)W2,q(𝕋n).

By (2.9)–(2.13), there exists a constant c14=c14(n,p)>0 such that

T1(v)W2,q(𝕋n)c14(gW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1))+T1(v)W2,q(𝕋n)vW2,q(𝕋n))+14T1(v)W2,q(𝕋n).

If ε<116c142, we obtain

(2.14)T1(v)W2,q(𝕋n)2c14gW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1)).

For the general case of vW2,q(𝕋n), suppose that {vm}mC(𝕋n) converges to v in the sense of C1(𝕋n). By (2.14), there exists a subsequence

{vmk}k{vm}m

such that T1(vmk) converges to a function wW2,q(𝕋n) in the sense of C1(𝕋n), and T2(vmk) converges to a constant d[-14,14]. For any ϕW1,2(𝕋n), we obtain

𝕋nν(v)gλ(x,v+d)ϕ-ν(vmk)gλ(x,vmk+T2(vmk))ϕ
𝕋n|ϕ||ν(v)-ν(vmk)||gλ(x,vmk+T2(vmk))|+𝕋n|ϕ||vmk+T2(vmk)v+dn+1gλ(x,s)|
(2.15)0(k)

and

𝕋nwϕ1+|v|2-T1(vmk)ϕ1+|vmk|2
𝕋n(w-T1(vmk))ϕ1+|v|2+𝕋n(T1(vmk)ϕ)(11+|v|2-11+|vmk|2)
(2.16)0(k).

By (2.15) and (2.16), we obtain

𝕋nwϕ1+|v|2-ν(v)gλ(x,v+d)ϕ
=limk𝕋nT1(vmk)ϕ1+|vmk|2-ν(vmk)gλ(x,vmk+T2(vmk))ϕ
(2.17)=0,

that is, T(v)=(w,d). By (2.14) and (2.17), Theorem 2.5 follows. ∎

Next, we provide the fixed-point theorem, which is needed later ([1, Theorem 1]). An operator T:XA is considered weakly sequentially continuous if, for every sequence {xm}mX and xX such that xm weakly converges to x, T(xm) weakly converges to T(x).

Theorem 2.6.

Let X be a metrizable, locally convex topological vector space and let Ω be a weakly compact convex subset of X. Then any weakly sequentially continuous map T:ΩΩ has a fixed point.

We first prove Theorem 1.1 in the case of gλ.

Theorem 2.7.

There exists a constant ε4=ε4(n,p)>0 such that, if λ<18 and ε<ε4, then

gW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1);n+1)

satisfies (1.2)–(1.4). Then there exists a function uλW2,q(Tn) such that

(2.18)-div(uλ1+|uλ|2)=ν(uλ)gλ(x,uλ(x))on 𝕋n.

Proof.

The set W2,q(𝕋n) is a metrizable, locally convex topological vector space, and the set 𝒜(ε1/2) is a weakly compact convex subset of W2,q(𝕋n). By (1.2) and Theorem 2.5, if ε<min{ε2,ε3,c5-6}=:ε4, we have

T1(v)W2,q(𝕋n)c5gW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1))
c5ε16ε12
(2.19)ε12for any v𝒜(ε12),

that is, T1(𝒜(ε1/2))𝒜(ε1/2). Suppose that {vm}m weakly converges to v in the sense of W2,q(𝕋n). According to Theorem 2.5, there exists a subsequence {vmk}k{vm}m such that T1(vmk) weakly converges to a function wW2,q(𝕋n) in the sense of W2,q(𝕋n), and T2(vmk) converges to a constant d[-14,14]. By the same argument (2.15)–(2.17), for any ϕW2,q(𝕋n),

𝕋nwϕ1+|v|2-ν(v)gλ(x,v+d)ϕ=0,

that is, we obtain limkT1(vmk)=T1(v) by the uniqueness of solution of Theorem 2.4. Therefore, every convergent subsequence of {T1(vm)} converges to T1(v), and T1 is a weakly sequentially continuous map. Using Theorem 2.6, we obtain a function vλWave2,q(𝕋n) satisfying

-div(vλ1+|vλ|2)=ν(vλ)gλ(x,vλ(x)+T2(vλ))on 𝕋n,

that is, uλ:=vλ+T2(vλ)W2,q(𝕋n) satisfying (2.18). ∎

Proof of Theorem 1.1.

Suppose uλW2,q(𝕋n) satisfies (2.18). By Theorem 2.5, there exists a convergent subsequence

{uλk}k{uλ}0<λ<18

with a limit uW2,q(𝕋n) in the sense of C1(𝕋n) and λk0. We show that u satisfies (1.5). For any ϕW1,2(𝕋n), we obtain

𝕋n-div(uλk1+|uλk|2-u1+|u|2)ϕ=𝕋n(uλk1+|uλk|2-u1+|u|2)ϕ
(2.20)0.

Using Lemma 2.3, we have

𝕋nν(uλk)gλk(x,uλk)-ν(u)g(x,u)
=𝕋n(ν(uλk)-ν(u))gλk(x,uλk)+𝕋nν(u)(gλk(x,uλk)-g(x,uλk))
   +𝕋nν(u)(g(x,uλk)-7g(x,u))
=c1ν(uλk)-ν(u)C0(𝕋n)gλkW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1))+c1gλk-gW1,p(𝕋n×(-1,1))+𝕋n|uuλkn+1g(x,s)|
(2.21)0.

By (2.20) and (2.21), we obtain

𝕋n-div(u1+|u|2)ϕ-ν(u)g(x,u)ϕ
=limk𝕋n-div(uλk1+|uλk|2)ϕ-ν(uλk)gλk(x,uλk)ϕ
0.

Thus, u satisfies (1.5) using the fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations. By (2.19), we obtain

u-𝕋nu(y)𝑑yW2,q(𝕋n)ε12,

and Theorem 1.1 follows. ∎

References

[1] O. Arino, S. Gautier and J.-P. Penot, A fixed point theorem for sequentially continuous mappings with application to ordinary differential equations, Funkcial. Ekvac. 27 (1984), no. 3, 273–279. Suche in Google Scholar

[2] T. Aubin, Some Nonlinear Problems in Riemannian Geometry, Springer Monogr. Math., Springer, Berlin, 1998. 10.1007/978-3-662-13006-3Suche in Google Scholar

[3] M. Bergner, The Dirichlet problem for graphs of prescribed anisotropic mean curvature in n+1, Analysis (Munich) 28 (2008), no. 2, 149–166. Suche in Google Scholar

[4] D. Denny, A unique solution to a nonlinear elliptic equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 365 (2010), no. 2, 467–482. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.10.073Suche in Google Scholar

[5] M. Feng, Periodic solutions for prescribed mean curvature Liénard equation with a deviating argument, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 13 (2012), no. 3, 1216–1223. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2011.09.015Suche in Google Scholar

[6] D. Gilbarg and N. S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, 2nd ed., Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 224, Springer, Berlin, 1983. Suche in Google Scholar

[7] W. Li and Z. Liu, Exact number of solutions of a prescribed mean curvature equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 367 (2010), no. 2, 486–498. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.01.055Suche in Google Scholar

[8] S. Lu, Homoclinic solutions for a class of prescribed mean curvature Liénard equations, Adv. Difference Equ. 2014 (2014), Paper No. 244. 10.1186/s13662-015-0579-3Suche in Google Scholar

[9] T. Marquardt, Remark on the anisotropic prescribed mean curvature equation on arbitrary domains, Math. Z. 264 (2010), no. 3, 507–511. 10.1007/s00209-009-0476-0Suche in Google Scholar

[10] H. Pan, One-dimensional prescribed mean curvature equation with exponential nonlinearity, Nonlinear Anal. 70 (2009), no. 2, 999–1010. 10.1016/j.na.2008.01.027Suche in Google Scholar

[11] H. Pan and R. Xing, Time maps and exact multiplicity results for one-dimensional prescribed mean curvature equations. II, Nonlinear Anal. 74 (2011), no. 11, 3751–3768. 10.1016/j.na.2011.03.020Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Y. Tonegawa and Y. Tsukamoto, A diffused interface with the advection term in a Sobolev space, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 59 (2020), no. 6, Paper No. 184. 10.1007/s00526-020-01860-zSuche in Google Scholar

[13] Y. Tsukamoto, The Dirichlet problem for a prescribed mean curvature equation, Hiroshima Math. J. 50 (2020), no. 3, 325–337. 10.32917/hmj/1607396492Suche in Google Scholar

[14] M. Zheng and J. Li, Nontrivial homoclinic solutions for prescribed mean curvature Rayleigh equations, Adv. Difference Equ. 2015 (2015), Paper No. 77. 10.1186/s13662-015-0417-7Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-11-12
Accepted: 2021-04-01
Published Online: 2021-04-19
Published in Print: 2021-05-01

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Heruntergeladen am 3.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/anly-2020-0054/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen