Startseite Digitizing the Old English Anonymous and Wulfstanian Homilies through the Electronic Corpus of Anonymous Homilies in Old English (ECHOE) Project
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Digitizing the Old English Anonymous and Wulfstanian Homilies through the Electronic Corpus of Anonymous Homilies in Old English (ECHOE) Project

  • Winfried Rudolf EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. April 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Anglia
Aus der Zeitschrift Anglia Band 139 Heft 1

Abstract

This article first outlines the challenges involved in the editing of Old English anonymous and Wulfstanian homilies before introducing the Electronic Corpus of Anonymous Homilies in Old English (ECHOE) project. This new initiative at the University of Göttingen reverses the traditional collation of texts and instead celebrates the book-historical significance of every individual manuscript version, its textual and palaeographical idiosyncrasies, and its revisional layers up through c. 1200 AD. The project provides new forms of display to expose the complex interversional network of textual representations, and develops a range of digital tools to facilitate the identification and swift comparison of related passages. It includes digital facsimiles, palaeographical and rhetorical version profiles, and the Latin sources for each homily, creating opportunities for unprecedented research on the transmission, composition, variation, and performance of the fluid preaching text.

Works Cited

Bately, Janet. 1993. Anonymous Old English Homilies: A Preliminary Bibliography of Source Studies. Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, SUNY-Binghamton.Suche in Google Scholar

Bedingfield, Brad. 2002. “Public Penance in Anglo-Saxon England”. Anglo-Saxon England 31: 223–255.10.1017/S0263675102000091Suche in Google Scholar

Bethurum, Dorothy (ed.). 1957. The Homilies of Wulfstan. Oxford: Clarendon.10.1093/actrade/9780198111016.book.1Suche in Google Scholar

Bredehoft, Thomas A. 2009. Authors, Audiences, and Old English Verse. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442698413Suche in Google Scholar

Bumke, Joachim. 1996. Die vier Fassungen der ‚Nibelungenklage‘: Untersuchungen zur Überlieferungsgeschichte und Textkritik der höfischen Epik im 13. Jahrhundert. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110812923Suche in Google Scholar

Cameron, Angus. 1973. “A List of Old English Texts”. In: Roberta Frank and Angus Cameron (eds.). A Plan for the Dictionary of Old English. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 25–306.Suche in Google Scholar

Cerquiglini, Bernard. 1989. Éloge de la variante: Histoire critique de la philologie. Paris: Seuil.Suche in Google Scholar

CLASP = A Consolidated Library of Anglo-Saxon Poetry. Ed. Andy Orchard et al. Oxford: University of Oxford. <http://clasp.eu> [accessed 20 November 2020].Suche in Google Scholar

Clayton, Mary. 1985. “Homiliaries and Preaching in Anglo-Saxon England”. Peritia 4: 207–242. [Reprinted with corrections in Paul E. Szarmach (ed.). 2000. Old English Prose: Basic Readings. New York: Garland. 151–198.]10.1484/J.Peri.3.106Suche in Google Scholar

Dance, Richard. 2004. “Sound, Fury and Signifiers; Or Wulfstan’s Language”. In: Matthew Townend (ed.). Wulfstan, Archbishop of York: The Proceedings of the Second Alcuin Conference. Turnhout: Brepols. 29–61.10.1484/M.SEM-EB.3.3704Suche in Google Scholar

Dekker, Ronald H., Dirk van Hulle, Gregor Middell, Vincent Neyt and Joris van Zundert. 2015. “Computer-Supported Collation of Modern Manuscripts: CollateX and the Beckett Digital Manuscript Project”. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 30.3: 452–470.10.1093/llc/fqu007Suche in Google Scholar

DigiPal = Digital Rescource and Database of Palaeography, Manuscript Studies and Diplomatic. London: 2011–2014. <http://digipal.eu> [accessed 20 November 2020]. Suche in Google Scholar

DOE = Dictionary of Old English in Electronic Form, A–H. 2016. Ed. Antonette diPaolo Healey et al. Toronto: University of Toronto. <http:// www.doe.utoronto.ca> [accessed 20 November 2020]. Suche in Google Scholar

DOEC = Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. 2007. Ed. Antonette diPaolo Healey et al. Toronto: University of Toronto. <http://www.doe.utoronto.ca/pages/pub/web-corpus.html> [accessed 20 November 2020]. Suche in Google Scholar

Driscoll, Matthew J. and Elena Pierazzo. 2016. “Introduction: Old Wine in New Bottles?”. In: Matthew J. Driscoll and Elena Pierazzo (eds.). Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories and Practices. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. 1–18.10.11647/OBP.0095.01Suche in Google Scholar

Early English Laws. University of London: Institute of Historical Research. <http://earlyenglishlaws.ac.uk> [accessed 01 November 2020]. Suche in Google Scholar

ECHOE = Electronic Corpus of Anonymous Homilies in Old English. Eds. Winfried Rudolf et al. Göttingen: University of Göttingen. <http://echoe.uni-goettingen.de> [accessed 03 December 2020]. Suche in Google Scholar

Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: A Register of Written Sources Used by Anglo-Saxon Authors (CD-ROM Version 1.1). Oxford: Fontes Anglo-Saxonici Project, English Faculty, Oxford University, 2002. Reprinted online. <http://fontes.english.ox.ac.uk> [accessed 17 October 2019].Suche in Google Scholar

Franzen, Christine. 1991. The Tremulous Hand of Worcester: A Study of Old English in the Thirteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198117421.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Godden, Malcolm R. 1975. “Old English Composite Homilies from Winchester”. Anglo-Saxon England 4: 57–65.10.1017/S0263675100002714Suche in Google Scholar

Gneuss, Helmut. 1997. “Origin and Provenance of Anglo-Saxon Manuscripts: The Case of Cotton Tiberius A.III”. In: Pamela. R. Robinson and Rivkah Zim (eds.). Of the Making of Books: Medieval Manuscripts, their Scribes and Readers. Essays Presented to M. B. Parkes. Aldershot: Scolar Press. 13–48.Suche in Google Scholar

Gneuss, Helmut. 1998. “Old English Texts and Modern Readers: Notes on Editing and Textual Criticism”. In: Peter S. Baker and Nicholas Howe (eds.). Words and Works: Studies in Medieval English Language and Literature in Honour of Fred C. Robinson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 127–141.10.3138/9781442683631-010Suche in Google Scholar

Hassner, Tal, Malte Rehbein, Peter A. Stokes and Lior Wolf (eds.). 2013. “Computation and Palaeography: Potentials and Limits”. Dagstuhl Manifestos 2.1: 14–35.Suche in Google Scholar

Holub, Robert. 1995. “Reception Theory: School of Constance”. In: Raman Selden (ed.). The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Volume 8: From Formalism to Poststructuralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 319–346.10.1017/CHOL9780521300131.013Suche in Google Scholar

IIIF Consortium. 2020. International Image Interoperability Framework. <http://iiif.io> [accessed 20 November 2020]. Suche in Google Scholar

Irvine, Susan. 2000. “Linguistic Peculiarities in Late Copies of Ælfric and Their Implications”. In: Jane Roberts and Janet Nelson (eds.). Essays on Anglo-Saxons and Related Themes in Memory of Lynne Grundy. London: Centre for Late Antique and Medieval Studies. 237–257.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, David F. 2019. “The Micro-Texts of the Tremulous Hand of Worcester: Genesis of a Vernacular liber exemplorum”. In: Ursula Lenker and Lucia Kornexl (eds.). Anglo-Saxon Micro-Texts. Berlin: De Gruyter. 225–265.10.1515/9783110630961-012Suche in Google Scholar

Jost, Karl. 1932. “Einige Wulfstantexte und ihre Quellen”. Anglia 56: 265–315.10.1515/angl.1932.1932.56.448Suche in Google Scholar

Jost, Karl. 1959 (ed.). Die “Institutes of Polity, Civil and Ecclesiastical”: Ein Werk Erzbischof Wulfstans von York. Bern: Francke.Suche in Google Scholar

Ker, Neil R. 1937. “The Date of the ‘Tremulous’ Worcester Hand”. Leeds Studies in English 6: 28–29.Suche in Google Scholar

Ker, Neil R. 1957. A Catalogue of Manuscripts Containing Anglo-Saxon. Oxford: Clarendon.Suche in Google Scholar

Ker, Neil R. 1971. “The Handwriting of Archbishop Wulfstan”. In: Peter Clemoes and Kathleen Hughes (eds.). England before the Conquest: Studies in Primary Sources Presented to Dorothy Whitelock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 315–331.Suche in Google Scholar

Koch, Peter and Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte”. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36: 15–43.10.1515/9783110244922.15Suche in Google Scholar

Lapidge, Michael. 1991. “Textual Criticism and the Literature of Anglo-Saxon England”. Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 73.1: 17–46. Reprinted in Donald G. Scragg (ed.). 2003. Textual Criticism and Material Culture in Anglo-Saxon England: Thomas Northcote Toller and the Toller Memorial Lectures. Cambridge: Brewer. 107–136.10.7227/BJRL.73.1.3Suche in Google Scholar

Napier, Arthur (ed). 1883. Wulfstan: Sammlung der ihm zugeschriebenen Homilien nebst Untersuchungen über ihre Echtheit. Berlin: Weidmann. [Reprint with bibliographical appendix by Klaus Ostheeren 1967. Dublin and Basel: Niehans.]Suche in Google Scholar

O’Brien O’Keeffe, Katherine. 1994. “Editing and the Material Text”. In: Donald G. Scragg and Paul E. Szarmach (eds.). The Editing of Old English: Papers from the 1990 Manchester Conference. Cambridge: Brewer. 147–154.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, Tomás. 2011. “Praedicationes Palatinae: The Sermons in Vat. Pal. Lat. 220 as an Insular Resource for the Christianization of Early Medieval Germany”. Unpubl. PhD dissertation, University of St Louis.Suche in Google Scholar

Orchard, Andy 1992. “Crying Wolf: Oral Style and the Sermones Lupi”. Anglo-Saxon England 21: 239–264.10.1017/S0263675100004233Suche in Google Scholar

Orchard, Andy. 1997. “Oral Tradition”. In: Katherine O’Brien O’Keeffe (ed.). Reading Old English Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 101–123.10.1017/CBO9780511518751.007Suche in Google Scholar

Orchard, Andy. 2007. “Wulfstan as Reader, Writer, and Rewriter”. In: Aaron J. Kleist (ed.). The Old English Homily: Precedent, Practice, and Appropriation. Turnhout: Brepols. 311–341.10.1484/M.SEM-EB.3.3782Suche in Google Scholar

PASE = Prosopography of Anglo-Saxon England. King’s College London. <http://www.pase.ac.uk> [accessed 01 September 2018]. Suche in Google Scholar

Pierazzo, Elena. 2016. “Modelling Digital Scholarly Editing: From Plato to Heraclitus”. In: Matthew J. Driscoll and Elena Pierazzo (eds.). Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories and Practices. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. 41–58.10.4324/9781315577227Suche in Google Scholar

Price, Kenneth M. 2016. “Social Scholarly Editing”. In: Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens and John Unsworth (eds.). A New Companion to Digital Humanities. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 137–149.10.1002/9781118680605.ch10Suche in Google Scholar

Rehbein, Malte. 1999. “Komplexe Textkritik in dynamischer Darstellung: Ein Modell für Digitale Texteditionen”. Historical Social Research 24: 113–144.Suche in Google Scholar

Renear, Allen 1997. “Out of Praxis: Three (Meta)Theories of Textuality”. In: Kathryn Sutherland (ed.). Electronic Text: Investigations in Method and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 107–126.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198236634.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter M. W. 1996. “Is There a Text in these Variants?”. In: Richard J. Finneran (ed.). The Literary Text in the Digital Age. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 99–115.Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2013. “Towards a Theory of Digital Editions”. Variants: The Journal of the European Society for Textual Scholarship 10: 105–131.10.1163/9789401209021_009Suche in Google Scholar

Rudolf, Winfried. 2012. “The Addition and Use of Running Titles in Manuscripts Containing Old English”. In: Elaine Treharne, Orietta Da Rold and Mary Swan (eds.). Producing and Using English Manuscripts in the Post-Conquest Period. Turnhout: Brepols. 49–97.10.1484/J.NML.1.102439Suche in Google Scholar

Rudolf, Winfried. 2015. “Quoting and Translating Latin in the Old English Homilies of the Vercelli Book”. In: Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig (eds.). The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter. 271–290.10.1515/9783110427561-013Suche in Google Scholar

Rudolf, Winfried. 2019. “Wulfstan at Work: Recovering the Autographs of London, British Library, Additional 38651, fols. 57r–58v”. In: Ursula Lenker and Lucia Kornexl (eds.). Anglo-Saxon Micro-Texts. Berlin: De Gruyter. 267–306. 10.1515/9783110630961-013Suche in Google Scholar

Sahle, Patrick. 2013. Digitale Editionsformen: Zum Umgang mit der Überlieferung unter den Bedingungen des Medienwandels. Teil 3: Textbegriffe und Recodierung. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.Suche in Google Scholar

Sahle, Patrick. 2016. “What is a Scholarly Digital Edition?”. In: Matthew J. Driscoll and Elena Pierazzo (eds.). Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories and Practices. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. 19–40.10.11647/OBP.0095.02Suche in Google Scholar

Schäuble, Joshua and Hans Walter Gabler. 2018. “Encodings and Visualisations of Text-Processes across Document Borders”. In: Roman Bleier, Martina Bürgermeister, Helmut W. Klug, Frederike Neuber and Gerlinde Schneider (eds.). Digital Scholarly Editions as Interfaces. Norderstedt: Books on Demand. 165–191.Suche in Google Scholar

Schreibman, Susan. 2002. “Computer-Mediated Texts and Textuality: Theory and Practice”. Computers and the Humanities 36: 283–293.10.1023/A:1016178200469Suche in Google Scholar

Schreibman, Susan. 2013. “Digital Scholarly Editing”. In: Kenneth M. Price and Ray Siemens (eds.). Literary Studies in the Digital Age: An Evolving Anthology. Modern Language Association Commons. DOI: 10.1632/lsda.2013.4.10.1632/lsda.2013.4Suche in Google Scholar

Scragg, Donald G. 1977. “Napier’s ‘Wulfstan’ Homily XXX: Its Sources, its Relationship to the Vercelli Book and its Style”. Anglo-Saxon England 6: 197–211.10.1017/S0263675100001010Suche in Google Scholar

Scragg, Donald G. 1990. “Anonymous Old English Homilies”. In: Frederick M. Biggs, Thomas D. Hill and Paul E. Szarmach (eds.). Sources of Anglo-Saxon Literary Culture: A Trial Version. Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, SUNY-Binghamton. 124–130.Suche in Google Scholar

Scragg, Donald G. (ed.). 1992 a. The Vercelli Homilies and Related Texts. EETS OS 300. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Scragg, Donald G. 1992 b. “An Old English Homilist of Archbishop Dunstan’s Day”. In: Michael Korhammer, Karl Reichl and Hans Sauer (eds.). Words, Texts and Manuscripts: Studies in Anglo-Saxon Culture Presented to Helmut Gneuss on the Occasion of His Sixty-Fifth Birthday. Cambridge: Brewer. 181–192.Suche in Google Scholar

Scragg, Donald G. 2012. A Conspectus of Scribal Hands Writing English: 960–1100. Cambridge: Brewer.10.1515/9781782047421Suche in Google Scholar

Singhal, Amit. 2001. “Modern Information Retrieval: A Brief Overview”. Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering 24: 35–43.Suche in Google Scholar

Slotkin, Edgar M. 1979. “Medieval Irish Scribes and Fixed Texts”. Éigse 17: 437–450.Suche in Google Scholar

SOEALLC = Sources of Old English and Anglo-Latin Literary Culture [formerly known as Sources of Anglo-Saxon Literary Culture]. <https://github.com/SOEALLC/>[accessed 20 July 2020]. Suche in Google Scholar

Stokes, Peter A. 2015. “Digital Approaches to Paleography and Book History: Some Challenges, Present and Future”. Frontiers in Digital Humanities 2.5: n. pag.10.3389/fdigh.2015.00005Suche in Google Scholar

Stolz, Michael. 2016. “Von den Fassungen zur Eintextedition: Eine neue Leseausgabe von Wolfram’s ‘Parzival’”. In: Dorothea Klein (ed.), with Horst Brunner and Freimut Löser. Überlieferungsgeschichte transdisziplinär: Neue Perspektiven auf ein germanistisches Forschungsparadigma. Wiesbaden: Reichert. 353–388.Suche in Google Scholar

TEI = TEI Consortium. 2016. TEI P5v3.1.0: Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange. <www.tei-c.org/Vault/P5/3.1.0/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/> [accessed 31 August 2020]. Suche in Google Scholar

Thorpe, Benjamin (ed.). 1842. Codex Exoniensis: A Collection of Anglo-Saxon Poetry from a Manuscript in the Library of the Dean and Chapter of Exeter. London: Society of Antiquaries.Suche in Google Scholar

Trahern, Joseph B., Jr. 1977 for 1975. “An Old English Verse Paraphrase of Matthew 25:41”. Mediaevalia 1.2: 109–114.Suche in Google Scholar

Tristram, Hildegard L. C. 1970. “Vier altenglische Predigten aus der heterodoxen Tradition, mit Kommentar, Übersetzung und Glossar sowie drei weiteren Texten im Anhang”. Unpubl. PhD dissertation, University of Freiburg im Breisgau.Suche in Google Scholar

Tristram, Hildegard L. C. 1995. Early Insular Preaching: Verbal Artistry and Method of Composition. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, Charles D. 2002. “More Old English Poetry in Vercelli Homily XXI”. In: Elaine M. Treharne and Susan Rosser (eds.). Early Medieval English Texts and Interpretations: Studies Presented to Donald G. Scragg. Tempe, AZ: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies. 245–262.Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, Charles D. 2007 a. “Old English Homilies and Latin Sources”. In: Aaron J. Kleist (ed.). The Old English Homily: Precedent, Practice and Appropriation. Turnhout: Brepols. 15–66.10.1484/M.SEM-EB.3.3772Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, Charles D. 2007 b. “A New Latin Source for Two Old English Homilies (Fadda I and Blickling I): Pseudo-Augustine, Sermo App. 125, and the Ideology of Chastity in the Anglo-Saxon Benedictine Reform”. In: Charles D. Wright, Frederick M. Biggs and Thomas N. Hall (eds.). Source of Wisdom: Old English and Early Medieval Latin Studies in Honour of Thomas D. Hill. Toronto: Toronto University Press. 239–265.10.3138/9781442684812Suche in Google Scholar

Zacher, Samantha. 2009. “The Source of Vercelli VII: An Address to Women”. In: Samantha Zacher and Andy Orchard (eds.). New Readings in the Vercelli Book. Toronto: Toronto University Press. 98–149.10.3138/9781442657335Suche in Google Scholar

Zumthor, Paul. 1972. Essai de poétique médiévale. Paris: Seuil.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-04-01
Published in Print: 2021-03-04

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Frontmatter
  3. Articles
  4. Book Histories in the Digital Age: Challenges, Promises, Achievements
  5. Holistically Modelling the Medieval Book: Towards a Digital Contribution
  6. Tradition and Innovation in Cataloguing Medieval Manuscripts
  7. Learning to Let Go: Ownership, Rights, Fees, and Permissions of Readers’ Photographs
  8. A New Age of Photography: ‘DIY Digitization’ in Manuscript Studies
  9. Habemus Corpora: Reapproaching Philological Problems in the Age of ‘Big’ Data
  10. Digitizing the Old English Anonymous and Wulfstanian Homilies through the Electronic Corpus of Anonymous Homilies in Old English (ECHOE) Project
  11. The Reader at Large: A Computational Approach to London, British Library, Cotton Caligula A.ii (Part One)
  12. Digitized Beckett: Samuel Beckett’s Self-Translation Praxes Mediated through Digital Technology
  13. Computing Literary Surplus Value: Alan Moore and the Density of the Comic Book as Graphic Novel
  14. Literary Reviewing and the Velocity of Book Histories in Times of Digitization
  15. Reviews
  16. Hans Sauer and Rüdiger Pfeiffer-Rupp (eds.). 2020. Ihr werdet die Wahrheit erkennen / Ye shall know the truth: Zum Gedenken an den Philologen / In Memory of the Philologist Ewald Standop. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, x + 306 pp., 35 figures, 21 tables, € 35.00.
  17. Ursula Lenker and Lucia Kornexl (eds.). 2019. Anglo-Saxon Micro-Texts. Anglia Book Series 67. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, viii + 377 pp., € 99.95/$ 114.99/£ 91.00.
  18. Arvind Thomas. 2019. “Piers Plowman” and the Reinvention of Church Law in the Late Middle Ages. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, xiv + 267 pp., $ 75.00.
  19. Monika Pietrzak-Franger. 2017. Syphilis in Victorian Literature and Culture: Medicine, Knowledge and the Spectacle of Victorian Invisibility. Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, xiv + 338 pp., 17 illustr., € 117.69/£ 99.99/$ 139.99.
  20. Baylee Brits. 2017. Literary Infinities: Number and Narrative in Modern Fiction. New York/London: Bloomsbury, 224 pp., £ 85.00/$ 115.00.
  21. James Smith (ed.). 2019. The Cambridge Companion to British Literature of the 1930 s. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 250 pp., £ 74.99.
  22. Ulla Rahbek. 2019. British Multicultural Literature and Superdiversity. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, vii + 224 pp., € 74.89.
  23. Monika Fludernik and Marie-Laure Ryan (eds.). 2020. Narrative Factuality: A Handbook. Revisionen: Grundbegriffe der Literaturtheorie 6. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, ix + 780 pp., 3 illustr., 1 table, € 159.95/£ 145.50.
  24. Jonathan Senchyne. 2020. The Intimacy of Paper in Early and Nineteenth-Century American Literature. Studies in Print Culture and the History of the Book. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 176, 10 illustr., $ 90.00.
  25. Maria Löschnigg and Melanie Braunecker (eds.). 2019. Green Matters: Ecocultural Functions of Literature. Nature, Culture and Literature 15. Leiden: Brill, xiv + 385 pp., € 132.00/$ 159.00.
Heruntergeladen am 27.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ang-2021-0007/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen