Startseite The Cambridge and the Exeter Book Physiologi: Associative Imagery, Allegorical Circularity, and Isidorean Organization
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Cambridge and the Exeter Book Physiologi: Associative Imagery, Allegorical Circularity, and Isidorean Organization

  • Mercedes Salvador-Bello EMAIL logo und Mar Gutiérrez-Ortiz
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. November 2018
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Anglia
Aus der Zeitschrift Anglia Band 136 Heft 4

Abstract

The Physiologus has survived in some twenty-four manuscripts, two of which are of English origin: Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, 448, and Exeter, Cathedral Library, 3501. The latter codex, also known as the Exeter Book, contains a verse Physiologus (fols. 95v–98r) in Old English. In turn, the Cambridge manuscript provides a Latin prose Physiologus (fols. 88r–89r). These two texts bear witness to the knowledge of the Physiologus in the late Anglo-Saxon period and constitute the central piece of evidence extant for the dissemination of this work in England. Even though the two versions are formally and stylistically different, the manuscripts in which they occur are roughly contemporary and both of them are of Southern provenance. Each of these Physiologi comprises three chapters describing three animals: lion, unicorn and panther in the case of the Cambridge Physiologus, and panther, whale and an unknown bird – whose identification is problematic due to a textual gap – in the Exeter codex. Despite these striking affinities, no scholarly work has offered a comparative study of the two Physiologi, with the exception of Andrea Rossi-Reder’s unpublished PhD dissertation (1992), and only passing reference has been made to the Cambridge Physiologus in discussions of the better‑known Exeter text.

In order to remedy this critical neglect, the present article offers a detailed analysis of both Physiologi, together with a first edition of the Latin text. As we will show, the Cambridge and the Exeter Physiologi share the same cultural background and apply similar compilation criteria. In both cases, the zoological motifs were selected according to organizational principles based on Isidore’s Etymologiae, such as the animals’ unclean character and size. In both, too, the creatures described are interconnected by means of recurrent associative imagery and an allegorical circular design. This combination of encyclopedic criteria and the sensory characterization of the animals discloses remarkable parallelisms in the structure and the compositional technique of these two Physiologi. Moreover, this analogous organizational method offers additional evidence to support Michael D. C. Drout’s hypothesis that the bird described in the fragmentary third chapter of the Exeter version is the phoenix instead of the partridge, as some other scholars had traditionally maintained. Our reading also effectively harmonizes with the eschatological and anagogic elements which have been pointed out for the third chapter of the Exeter Physiologus, as well as with the allegorical and tropological roles of the panther and the whale.

Works Cited

Anderson, Earl R. 2001. “Old English Poetic Texts and Their Latin Sources. Iconicity in Caedmon’s Hymn and The Phoenix”. In: Olga Fischer and Max Nänny (eds.). The Motivated Sign. Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins. 109–132.10.1075/ill.2.11andSuche in Google Scholar

Barney, Stephen A., W. J. Lewis, J. A. Beach and Oliver Berghof, in collaboration with Muriel Hall (trans.). 2006. The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville: Translated, with Introduction and Notes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511482113Suche in Google Scholar

Baxter, Ron. 1998. Bestiaries and Their Users in the Middle Ages. Stroud: Sutton.Suche in Google Scholar

Biggs, Frederick M. 1989. “The Eschatological Conclusion of the Old English Physiologus”. Medium Ævum 58: 286–297.10.2307/43629257Suche in Google Scholar

Blake, Norman F. (ed.). 1964. The Phoenix. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Budny, Mildred. 1997. Insular, Anglo-Saxon, and Early Anglo-Norman Manuscript Art at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge: An Illustrated Catalogue. 2 vols. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Butler, Robert M. 2004. “Glastonbury and the Early History of the Exeter Book”. In: Joyce T. Lionarons (ed.). Old English Literature in its Manuscript Context. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press. 173–215.Suche in Google Scholar

Cahier, Charles and Arthur Martin. 1851. “Le Physiologus ou bestiaire”. Mélanges d’Archéologie, d’histoire et de littérature 2: 85–232.Suche in Google Scholar

Cahier, Charles and Arthur Martin. 1853. “Bestiaires”. Mélanges d’Archéologie, d’histoire et de littérature 3: 203–290.Suche in Google Scholar

Cahier, Charles and Arthur Martin. 1856. “Bestiaires”. Mélanges d’Archéologie, d’histoire et de littérature 4: 55–73.Suche in Google Scholar

Campbell, Thomas P. 1978. “Thematic Unity in the Old English Physiologus”. Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 215: 73–78.Suche in Google Scholar

Carmody, Francis J. (ed.). 1939. Physiologus Latinus: Versio B. Paris: Droz.Suche in Google Scholar

Carmody, Francis J. (ed.). 1941. “Physiologus Latinus Versio Y”. University of California Publications in Classical Philology 12: 95–134.Suche in Google Scholar

Carmody, Francis J. 1944. “Quotations in the Latin Physiologus from Latin Bibles Earlier than the Vulgate”. University of California Publications in Classical Philology 13: 1–8.Suche in Google Scholar

Chambers, Raymond W. (ed.). 1933. The Exeter Book of Old English Poetry, with Introductory Chapters by Max Förster and Robin Flower. London: Lund and Humphries.Suche in Google Scholar

Conner, Patrick W. 1993. Anglo-Saxon Exeter: A Tenth-Century Cultural History. Woodbridge: Boydell.Suche in Google Scholar

Curley, Michael J. (trans.). 1979. Physiologus. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Suche in Google Scholar

DeAngelo, Jeremy. 2013. “Discretio spirituum and The Whale”. Anglo-Saxon England 42: 271–289.10.1017/S0263675113000136Suche in Google Scholar

DOE = Dictionary of Old English in Electronic Form, A–H. Ed. Antonette diPaolo Healey et al. Toronto: University of Toronto. <http:// www.doe.utoronto.ca> [last accessed 30 April 2018].Suche in Google Scholar

DOEC = Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. 2009. Ed. Antonette diPaolo Healey et al. Toronto: University of Toronto. <http://www.doe.utoronto.ca/pages/pub/web- corpus.html> [last accessed 30 April 2018].Suche in Google Scholar

Drout, Michael D. C. 2006. How Tradition Works: A Meme-Based Poetics of the Anglo-Saxon Tenth Century. Tempe, AZ: Arizona Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies.Suche in Google Scholar

Drout, Michael D. C. 2007. “‘The Partridge’ is a Phoenix: Revising the Exeter Book Physiologus”. Neophilologus 91: 487–503.10.1007/s11061-006-9014-zSuche in Google Scholar

Drout, Michael D. C. 2013. Tradition and Influence in Anglo-Saxon Literature: An Evolutionary, Cognitivist Approach. New York: Palgrave.10.1057/9781137324603Suche in Google Scholar

Drout, Michael D. C. 2017. “Physiologus, Old English”. In: Sian Echard and Robert Rouse (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Medieval Literature in Britain. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 1523–1525.10.1002/9781118396957.wbemlb126Suche in Google Scholar

Ebert, Karl W. A. 1883. “Der angelsächsische Physiologus”. Anglia 6: 241–247.10.1515/angl.1883.1883.6.241Suche in Google Scholar

Edgar, Swift (ed. and trans.). 2010. The Vulgate Bible. Volume I: The Pentateuch. Cambridge, MA: University of Harvard Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Frank, Lothar. 1971. “Die Physiologus-Literatur des englischen Mittelalters und die Tradition”. Unpubl. PhD dissertation, University of Tübingen.Suche in Google Scholar

Fulk, R. D. 2001. “Cynewulf: Canon, Dialect, and Date”. In: Robert Bjork (ed.). The Cynewulf Reader. London: Routledge. 3–21.10.4324/9781003249184-2Suche in Google Scholar

Gameson, Richard. 1996. “The Origin of the Exeter Book of Old English Poetry”. Anglo-Saxon England 25: 135–185.10.1017/S0263675100001988Suche in Google Scholar

Glorie, Fr. (ed.). 1968. Collectiones aenigmatum merovingicae aetatis. Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina 133A. Turnhout: Brepols.Suche in Google Scholar

Gneuss, Helmut and Michael Lapidge. 2014. Anglo-Saxon Manuscripts: A Bibliographical Handlist of Manuscripts and Manuscript Fragments Written or Owned in England up to 1100. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442616288Suche in Google Scholar

Hoek, Michelle C. 1997. “Anglo-Saxon Innovation and the Use of the Senses in the Old English Physiologus Poems”. Studia Neophilologica 69: 1–10.10.1080/00393279708588191Suche in Google Scholar

Houwen, L. A. J. R. 1994. “Animal Parallelism in Medieval Literature and the Bestiaries: A Preliminary Investigation”. Neophilologus 78.3: 483–496.10.1007/BF01000364Suche in Google Scholar

James, M. R. 1912. A Descriptive Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. 2 vols. Cambridge: University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jones, Christopher A. 1995. “Envisioning the Cenobium in the Old English Guthlac A”. Mediaeval Studies 57: 259–291.10.1484/J.MS.2.306436Suche in Google Scholar

Ker, N. R. 1957. Catalogue of Manuscripts Containing Anglo-Saxon. Oxford: Clarendon.Suche in Google Scholar

Krapp, George P. and Elliot Van Kirk Dobbie (eds.). 1936. The Exeter Book. The Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records 3. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lauchert, Friedrich. 1889. Geschichte des Physiologus. Strasbourg: Trübner.Suche in Google Scholar

Letson, D. R. 1979. “The Old English ‘Physiologus’ and the Homiletic Tradition”. Florilegium 1: 15–41.10.3138/flor.1.003Suche in Google Scholar

McFadden, Brian. 2006. “Sweet Odors and Interpretative Authority in the Exeter Book Physiologus and Phoenix”. Papers on Language and Literature 42: 181–209.Suche in Google Scholar

Muir, B. J. 1989. “A Preliminary Report on a New Edition of the Exeter Book”. Scriptorium 43: 273–88.10.3406/scrip.1989.1550Suche in Google Scholar

Muir, Bernard J. (ed.). 1994. The Exeter Anthology of Old English Poetry: An Edition of Exeter Dean and Chapter MS 3501. 2 vols. Exeter: University of Exeter Press [2nd ed. 2000].Suche in Google Scholar

Muir, Bernard J. (ed.). 2006. The Exeter DVD: The Exeter Anthology of Old English Poetry. Exeter: Exeter University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Camb, Brian. 2009. “Bishop Æthelwold and the Shaping of the Old English Exeter Maxims”. English Studies 90: 253–273.10.1080/00138380902796714Suche in Google Scholar

Orchard, Andy. 2003. “Both Style and Substance: The Case for Cynewulf”. In: Catherine E. Karkov and George H. Brown (eds.). Anglo-Saxon Styles. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. 271–306.Suche in Google Scholar

Peebles, Rose J. 1911. “The Anglo-Saxon Physiologus”. Modern Philology 8: 571–579.10.1086/386849Suche in Google Scholar

Perry, Ben E. 1941. “Physiologus”. In: August Pauly et al. (eds.). Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Vol. 39. 1074–1129.10.2307/290300Suche in Google Scholar

Pope, John C. 1978. “Paleography and Poetry: Some Solved and Unsolved Problems of the Exeter Book”. In: M. B. Parkes and Andrew G. Watson (eds.). Medieval Scribes, Manuscripts and Libraries: Essays Presented to N. R. Ker. London: Scolar. 25–65.Suche in Google Scholar

Rossi-Reder, Andrea. 1992. “The Physiologus and Beast Lore in Anglo-Saxon England”. Unpubl. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut at Storrs.Suche in Google Scholar

Rossi-Reder, Andrea. 1999. “Beasts and Baptism: A New Perspective on the Old English Physiologus”. Neophilologus 83: 461–477.10.1023/A:1004389312704Suche in Google Scholar

Salvador-Bello, Mercedes. 2012. “Clean and Unclean Animals: Isidore’s Book XII from the Etymologiae and the Structure of Eusebius’s Zoological Riddles”. English Studies 93: 572–582.10.1080/0013838X.2012.698535Suche in Google Scholar

Salvador-Bello, Mercedes. 2014. “Allegorizing and Moralizing Zoology in Aldhelm’s Enigmata”. Revista canaria de estudios ingleses 68: 209–218.Suche in Google Scholar

Salvador-Bello, Mercedes. 2015. Isidorean Perceptions of Order: The Exeter Book Riddles and Medieval Latin Enigmata. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Salvador-Bello, Mercedes. 2017. “Exeter Book”. In: Sian Echard and Robert Rouse, (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Medieval Literature in Britain. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 767–771.10.1002/9781118396957.wbemlb205Suche in Google Scholar

Sokoll, Eduard. 1896–1897. “Zum angelsächsischen Physiologus”. XXVII. Jahresbericht der k. k. Staats-Oberrealschule in Marburg. Marburg: Verlag der k. k. Oberrealschule.Suche in Google Scholar

Squires, Ann (ed.). 1988. The Old English Physiologus. Durham: Durham Medieval Texts.Suche in Google Scholar

Stork, Nancy P. 1990. Through a Gloss Darkly: Aldhelm’s Riddles in the British Library MS Royal 12.C.xxiii. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Suche in Google Scholar

Wirtjes, Hanneke. 1991. The Middle English Physiologus. EETS OS 299. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Appendix

The Cambridge Physiologus (CCCC 448, fols. 88r/1–89r/12)

Editing Principles

In this edition, manuscript capitalization has been retained for the rubrics of the three chapters and chapter numbers have been added. We have also provided punctuation and have expanded abbreviations such as XP̅C for Christus. Biblical citations or paraphrases are underlined and references to them have been included in parentheses.

Edition

|fol. 88r| [I.] INCIPIT DE TRIMODA LEONIS NATURA

Leo tres naturas habet, quarum prima est: nam cum ambulet et uenatoris odor uenerit ei, cauda sua cooperit uestigia sua quocumque ierit, ne uestigia eius aut cubile uenator inueniat et capiat eum. Sic Christus Ihesus. Ortus de tribu Iuda, leo potens, uestigia deitatis sue carne cooperuit, ne eum, uerum filium Dei, diabolus agnosceret. Secunda natura: cum dormierit, uigilant eius oculi aperti. Sicut in canticis canticorum (Song of Songs 5:2) sponsi uoce dicitur: ego dormio et cor meum uigilat. Tertia eius est natura: cum enim genuerit catulum, mortuum eum generat lęena et tribus diebus custodit eum, donec ueniens pater eius die tertio inflans in faciem eius suscitet eum. Sic Deus pater, teste psalmista, ad filium dicens: exsurge gloria mea, fili. Et filius ad eum: exsurgam diluculo (Psalm 56:9). Pater omnis creaturae primogenitum suscitauit a mortuis (cf. Col. 1:18).

I.7 cor] added at the right margin (fol. 88r/11) with a thinner stroke of pen.

[II.] DE UNICORNIS NATURA

Unicornis animal est pulchrum, nimisque acerrimum hedi magnitudinem habens; portatque cornu suum in medio |fol. 88v| capitis; cui non potest uenator adpropiare nisi uirginem castam posuerit ante eum. Qui uidens uirginem statim exsilit in sinum illius et obdormit et sic capitur. Sic Deus omnipotens quem non pote`runt´ angeli et archangeli omnesque uirtutes tenere (Cf. Col. 1:16). In utero uirginis Marię figuratus factus est homo.

II.2 Unicornis animal] blank space between the two words; Unicornis pusillum animal Physiologus A, B (Carmody 1941: 128; 1939: 31). 5 pote`runt´] unt added above the line with the elongated r serving to connect pote to unt in upper level.

[III.] DE PANTHERA

Propheta dicit: factus sum sicut leo domui Iuda et sicut panthera domui Effraim (Hosea 5:14). Panthera, omnium animalium pulchritudine decoratus, hanc naturam habet: ut omnium animalium amicus sit; soli autem draconi inimicus. Est enim omnimodo uarius, sicut tunica Ioseph, et speciosus forma prae filiis omnium animalium. Sicut Christus est: speciosus forma prae filiis hominum (Psalm 44:3). Et hic panthera quietum animal est et mitissimum nimis. Christus mitem se et humilem dicit; quando enim satiatus `est´, dormit in fouea sua et tertia die |fol. 89r| surgit a somno et exclamat uoce magna et de eius ore procedit omnis odor bonus aromata cuncta superans, qui per L miliaria dispergitur. Et omnia animalia quae longe sunt et quae prope audientes uocem eius sequuntur odorem illum. Solus uero draco, ne audiat uocem eius abscondit se in spelunca sua. Sicut et dominus surrexit a mortuis, pacem euangelizans his qui prope et his qui longe omnibus (cf. Eph. 2:17), odor bonus factus est. Soli uero diabolo inimicus factus est.

III.3 pulchritudine] MS pulchritudinem. 7 Christus] MS SP̅C, i. e. Spiritus. 7 `est´] added over a blank space preceding dormit; reserved for another, longer word (alluding to eating)?; cf. manducauerit Physiologus A, comederit Physiologus B (Carmody 1941: 124; 1939: 40). 9 L] Roman numeral [for quinquaginta] not attested in any other Latin Physiologus version.

[I.] HERE BEGINS THE TRIPLE NATURE OF THE LION

The lion has three natures, the first of which is: when he is walking and the smell of the hunter comes to him, he covers his tracks with his tail wherever he goes so that the hunter does not discover his track or his lair and seizes him. Thus [is] Jesus Christ: sprung from the tribe of Judah, [who like] a mighty lion, covered the tracks of his divine nature with his flesh so that the devil did not recognize him [as] the true son of God. The second nature: when he has fallen asleep, his open eyes keep watch. Thus in the Song of Songs (5:2) the bridegroom says with his voice: I sleep, but my heart remains awake. His third nature is: when the lioness gives birth to her cub, she delivers it dead and keeps watch over it for three days until his father comes on the third day and awakens it by blowing into his face. Thus God the father, according to the psalmist’s witness, tells his son: rise by my glory, son, and the son [says] to him: I will rise at dawn (Psalm 56:9). And the father awakened the firstborn of every creature from the dead (Col. 1:18).

[II.] ON THE NATURE OF THE UNICORN

The unicorn is a small, beautiful and extremely cunning animal, which has the size of a kid; it bears a horn in the middle of his head; the hunter cannot draw near him unless a chaste virgin is placed before him. Seeing the virgin, he leaps into her lap at once and falls asleep and thus is caught. Thus [is] God almighty, whom angels or archangels or all virtues could not comprehend (cf. Col. 1:16). Shaped in the womb of the Virgin Mary, He was made a man.

[III.] ON THE PANTHER

The prophet says: I became like a lion to the house of Judah, and like a panther to the house of Ephraim (Hosea 5:14). Adorned with the beauty of all animals, the panther has this nature; he is friends with all animals; and he [is] only an enemy of the dragon. He is wholly mottled like Joseph’s tunic, and beautiful in his shape as compared with the sons of all animals. Thus is Christ: beautiful in his shape in comparison with the children of men (Psalm 44:3). And this panther is a peaceful and extremely meek animal. Christ says that he is meek and humble, as when he is satiated, he sleeps in his pit and on the third day awakens from his sleep and exclaims in a loud voice and from his mouth an excellent smell comes out which surpasses all spices and is dispersed around fifty miles. And hearing his voice, all animals that are far and near follow that smell. Actually, only the dragon hides in his cave so that he does not hear his voice. Just as the Lord rose from the dead proclaiming peace with the Gospel, he was turned into good smell to all those who were near and those who were far (cf. Eph. 2:17). In fact, he only became an enemy of the devil.

Figure 1 © The Parker Library. Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, 448, fol. 88r
Figure 1

© The Parker Library. Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, 448, fol. 88r

Figure 2 © The Parker Library. Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, 448, fol. 88v
Figure 2

© The Parker Library. Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, 448, fol. 88v

Figure 3 ©The Parker Library. Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, 448, fol. 89r
Figure 3

©The Parker Library. Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, 448, fol. 89r

Published Online: 2018-11-13
Published in Print: 2018-11-09

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Frontmatter
  3. Scytel: A New Old English Word for ‘Penis’
  4. Zelotes and elnvnges: The Extension of Genitive Singular ‑es in the Gloss to the Durham Collectar
  5. The Cambridge and the Exeter Book Physiologi: Associative Imagery, Allegorical Circularity, and Isidorean Organization
  6. Framing the Romantic Artist: Goethe’s Torquato Tasso and James’s Roderick Hudson
  7. “The sad, proud old man stared eternally out of his canvas...”: Media Criticism, Scopic Regimes and the Function of Rembrandt’s “Self-Portrait with Two Circles” in John Fowles’s Novel Daniel Martin
  8. Reviews
  9. Judith Huber. Motion and the English Verb: A Diachronic Study. Oxford Studies in the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, xvi + 363 pp., £ 64.00.
  10. Review
  11. Rebecca Shapiro (ed.). Foreword by Jack Lynch. Fixing Babel: An Historical Anthology of Applied English Lexicography. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 2017, xl + 608 pp., $ 150.00/£ 100.00.
  12. Tristan Major. Undoing Babel: The Tower of Babel in Anglo-Saxon Literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018, xiv + 292 pp., $ 70.00.
  13. Elise Louviot. Direct Speech in Beowulf and Other Old English Narrative Poems. Anglo-Saxon Studies 30. Cambridge: Brewer, 2016, vii + 285 pp., 5 figures, £ 65.00.
  14. Joshua Byron Smith. Walter Map and the Matter of Britain. The Middle Ages Series. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017, xi + 254 pp., $ 69.95/£ 58.00.
  15. Ian Cornelius. Reconstructing Alliterative Verse: The Pursuit of a Medieval Meter. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, x + 219 pp., 6 tables, £ 75.00.
  16. Frank Wilker. Cultural Memories of Origin: Trauma, Memory and Imagery in African American Narratives of the Middle Passage. American Studies: A Monograph Series 241. Heidelberg: Winter, 2017, 302 pp., 12 illustr., € 42.00.
  17. Carsten Junker. Patterns of Positioning: On the Poetics of Early Abolition. American Studies – A Monograph Series 271. Heidelberg: Winter, 2016, 515 pp., 9 illustr., € 48.00.
  18. Gero Guttzeit. The Figures of Edgar Allan Poe: Authorship, Antebellum Literature, and Transatlantic Rhetoric. Anglia Book Series 56. Berlin/Boston: DeGruyter, 2017, 256 pp., 99.95 €.
  19. Andrew S. Gross. The Pound Reaction: Liberalism and Lyricism in Midcentury American Literature. Heidelberg: Winter, 2015, 262 pp., € 36.00.
  20. John Parham and Louise Westling (eds.). A Global History of Literature and Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, 459 pp., £ 78.99.
  21. Books Received
Heruntergeladen am 21.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ang-2018-0059/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen