Home “A Notion of the True System of the World”: Berkeley and his Use of Plato in Siris
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“A Notion of the True System of the World”: Berkeley and his Use of Plato in Siris

  • Peter D. Larsen EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 10, 2022

Abstract

This paper considers Berkeley’s use of Plato in Siris. Berkeley’s engagement with ancient thinkers in Siris has been a source of puzzlement for many readers. In this paper I focus on Siris § 266. In particular, I consider why Berkeley says of the Platonists that they “distinguished the primary qualities in bodies from the secondary” and why, given his own well-known misgivings about the distinction, he characterizes this as part of a “notion of the true system of the world.” I argue that in Siris Berkeley accepts a distinctive form of corpuscularianism, and that he thinks a distinction between primary and secondary qualities follows from this. I further argue that in § 266, and elsewhere in Siris, Berkeley engages in a careful reading of Plato’s Timaeus, which he uses to bolster his defense of the compatibility between corpuscularianism and his immaterialist idealism.

Baltes, M. 1972. Timaios Lokros über die Natur des Kosmos und der Seele. Leiden.10.1163/9789004320413Search in Google Scholar

Banner, N. 2018. Philosophic Silence and the ‘One’ in Plotinus. Cambridge.10.1017/9781316650790Search in Google Scholar

Berkeley, G. 1948–57. The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. Ed. A. A. Luce/T. E. Jessop, 9 vols. London.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, S. 2008. “Leibniz and Berkeley: Platonic Metaphysics and the Mechanical Philosophy.” Platonism at the Origins of Modernity: Studies in Platonism and Early Modern Philosophy. Ed. D. Hedley/S. Hutton. Dordrecht, 239–53.10.1007/978-1-4020-6407-4_16Search in Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. 1979. “Conflicting Appearances.” Proceedings of the British Academy 65, 69–111.10.1017/CBO9780511974052.014Search in Google Scholar

–. 1982. “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed.” The Philosophical Review 91, 3–40.10.1017/CBO9780511974052.013Search in Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. 2018. “Ideal Intellectual Cognition in Timaeus 37a2–c5.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 54, 51–105.10.1093/oso/9780198825128.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Cornford, F. M. 1935. Plato’s Cosmology. London.10.4324/9781315822938Search in Google Scholar

Cudworth, R. 1678. The True Intellectual System of the Universe: The First Part Wherein all the Reason and Philosophy of Atheism is Confuted and its Impossibility Demonstrated. London, Printed for Richard Royston.10.1037/14226-000Search in Google Scholar

Daniel, S. H. 2018. “Berkeley on God’s Knowledge of Pain.” In Berkeley’s Three Dialogues: New Essays. Ed. S. Storrie. Oxford, 136–45.10.1093/oso/9780198755685.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Downing, L. 1995. “Siris and the Scope of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3, 279–300.10.1080/09608789508570918Search in Google Scholar

–. 2005. “Berkeley’s Natural Philosophy and Philosophy of Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. K. P. Winkler. Cambridge, 230–65.10.1017/CCOL0521450330.009Search in Google Scholar

–. 2018. “Sensible Qualities and Secondary Qualities in the First Dialogue.” In Berkeley’s Three Dialogues: New Essays. Ed. S. Storrie. Oxford, 7–23.10.1093/oso/9780198755685.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Garber, D. 1985. “Locke, Berkeley, and Corpuscular Scepticism.” In Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Ed. C. M. Turbayne. Minneapolis, MN, 174–96.Search in Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. 2013. From Plato to Platonism. Ithaca, NY.10.7591/cornell/9780801452413.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2004. Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus-Critias, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511518478Search in Google Scholar

Krizan, M. 2018. “Primary Qualities and Aristotle’s Elements.” Ancient Philosophy 38, 91–112.10.5840/ancientphil20183816Search in Google Scholar

Lee, M.-K. 2011. “The Distinction Between Primary and Secondary Qualities in Ancient Greek Philosophy,” in L. Nolan (ed.), Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15–40.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556151.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Locke, J. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. P. H. Nidditch. Oxford.10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020Search in Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. 1995. Locke: On Human Understanding. London.Search in Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. 1976. Problems from Locke. Oxford.10.1093/0198750366.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

McCann, E. 1994. “Locke’s Philosophy of Body.” In The Cambridge Companion to Locke. Ed. V. Chappell. Cambridge, 56–88.10.1017/CCOL0521383714.004Search in Google Scholar

Moked, G. 1988. Particles and Ideas: Bishop Berkeley’s Corpuscularian Philosophy. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Rickless, S. C. 2013. Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669424.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, J. R. 2010. “A Mystery at the Heart of Berkeley’s Metaphysics.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 5, 214–46.Search in Google Scholar

Silverman, A. 1991. “Plato on Phantasia.” Classical Antiquity 40, 123–47.10.2307/25010944Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, A. E. 1928. A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, M. D. 1985. “Berkeley and the Essence of the Corpuscularians.” In Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentenial Celebration. Ed. J. Foster/H. Robinson. Oxford, 131–48.Search in Google Scholar

Winkler, K. P. 1989. Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford.10.1093/0198235097.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Zeyl, D. 2000. Plato. Timaeus. Translated with Introduction. Indianapolis, IN.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-09-10
Published in Print: 2022-09-07

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/agph-2020-1018/html
Scroll to top button