Abstract
In the Critique of the Power of Judgment, Kant calls purposiveness the “lawfulness of the contingent”. I argue that this should be interpreted not as lawfulness assumed in order to remove unacceptable mechanical indeterminacy, but rather as an additional kind of lawfulness which, in the case of organisms, inexplicably coincides with mechanical determination. Schelling adapts Kant’s notion of natural purposiveness in his own conception of the relation between mechanism and organism. He states in his 1798 work, On the World Soul, that nature is “lawless in its lawfulness, and lawful in its lawlessness”. This should be interpreted similarly: there is a coincidence of two orders of lawfulness in nature. However, while Kant maintains that the coincidence or unity of these two orders is inexplicable for beings like us, Schelling explains the unity by assigning these laws to distinct levels of operation in nature. Organic organization is generated by a second-order operation of an organic principle on the first-order mechanical forces that are characteristic of matter. Schelling thereby builds on Kant’s third Critique framework in a creative way in order to offer a more fully unified account of nature. In this account, mechanism and organism maintain distinct roles but are both grounded in a further, higher principle.
Beierwaltes, W. 2003. “Plato’s Timaeus in German Idealism: Schelling and Windischmann”. In Plato’s Timaeus as Cultural Icon. Ed. by G. J. Reydam-Schils. Notre Dame, IN.Search in Google Scholar
Beiser, F. C. 2002. German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781–1801. Cambridge, MA.10.4159/9780674020702Search in Google Scholar
Berger, B./Whistler, D. 2020. The Schelling-Eschenmayer Controversy. Edinburgh.10.1515/9781474434416Search in Google Scholar
Blumenbach, J. F. 1789. Über den Bildungstrieb. Göttigen.Search in Google Scholar
Breitenbach, A. 2009. Die Analogie von Vernunft und Natur: Eine Umweltphilosophie nach Kant. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2017. “Laws in Biology and the Unity of Nature”. In Kant and the Laws of Nature. Ed. by M. Massimi/A. Breitenbach. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Bruno, G. 1789. “Auszug aus Jordan Bruno von Nola: Von der Ursache, dem Prinzip und dem Einen”. In Jacobi, F. H. Über die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefen an den Herrn Moses Mendelssohn. Neue vermehrte Ausgabe. Breslau.Search in Google Scholar
Fisher, N. 2019. “Organisms and the Form of Freedom in Kant’s Third Critique.” European Journal of Philosophy 27(1), 55–74.10.1111/ejop.12384Search in Google Scholar
–. 2021. “The Unity of Nature in Schelling’s World Soul.” In The Review of Metaphysics 74(4), 527–52.10.1353/rvm.2021.0002Search in Google Scholar
Fisher, N./Fisher, J. forthcoming. “Schelling and the Philebus: Limit and the Unlimited in Schelling’s Philosophy of Nature.” To appear in Epoché.Search in Google Scholar
Förster, E. 2008. “Von der Eigentümlichkeit unseres Verstands in Ansehung der Urteilskraft (§§ 74–78)”. In Kritik der Urteilskraft. Klassiker Auslegen 33. Ed. by O. Höffe. Berlin.10.1524/9783050050157.259Search in Google Scholar
–. 2012. The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar
Frank, M. 2018. “Reduplikative Identität”: der Schlüssel zu Schellings reifer Philosophie. Stuttgart-Bad Constatt.10.5771/9783772832109Search in Google Scholar
Franks, P. 2020. “From World-Soul to Universal Organism: Maimon’s Hypothesis and Schelling’s Physicalization of a Platonic-Kabbalistic Concept”. In Schelling’s Philosophy: Freedom, Nature, and Systematicity. Ed. G. A. Bruno. Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780198812814.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Franz, M. 2012. Tübinger Platonismus: die gemeinsamen philosophischen Anfangsgründe von Hölderlin, Schelling, und Hegel. Tübingen.Search in Google Scholar
Garcia, L. F. 2021. “Nature at the Core of Idealism: The Birth of Two Strands of Post-Kantian Philosophy”. Idealistic Studies 51(1), 27–49.10.5840/idstudies2021312126Search in Google Scholar
Ginsborg, H. 2015. “Two Kinds of Mechanical Inexplicability in Kant and Aristotle”. In her The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547975.003.0013Search in Google Scholar
–. 2017. “Why Must We Presuppose the Systematicity of Nature?”. In Kant and the Laws of Nature. Ed. M. Massimi/A. Breitenbach. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, P. 2005. “Organisms and the Unity of Science”. In Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom. Selected Essays. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273461.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
–. 2017. “Imperfect Knowledge of Nature: Kant, Hume, and the Laws of Nature”. In Kant and the Laws of Nature. Ed. M. Massimi/A. Breitenbach. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Grant, I. H. 2006. Philosophies of Nature after Schelling. London.Search in Google Scholar
Heuser-Kessler, M.-L. 1986. Die Produktivität der Natur: Schellings Naturphilosophie und das neue Paradigma der Selbstorganisation der Naturwissenschaften. Berlin.10.3790/978-3-428-46079-3Search in Google Scholar
Jacobs, W. G. 1989. Zwischen Revolution und Orthodoxie: Schelling und seine Freunde im Stift und an der Universität Tübingen. Texte und Untersuchungen. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1900–). Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie Ausgabe. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. by P. Guyer/A. Wood. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. by P. Guyer/E. Matthews. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2004. Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Trans. by M. Friedman. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Kosch, M. 2006. Freedom and Reason in Kant, Schelling, and Kierkegaard. Oxford.10.1093/0199289115.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Krings, H. 1994. “Genesis und Materie – Zur Bedeutung der Timaeus-Handschrift für Schellings Naturphilosophie”. In Timaeus (1794). Ed. H. Buchner. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt.Search in Google Scholar
Lenoir, T. 1980. “Kant, Blumenbach, and Vital Materialism in German Biology”. In Isis 70, 77–108.10.1086/352408Search in Google Scholar
McLaughlin, P. 1982. “Blumenbach und der Bildungstrieb: Zum Verhältnis von epigenetischer Embryologie und typologischem Artbegriff”. In Medizinhistorisches Journal 17(4), 357–72.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1990. Kant’s Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation. Antinomy and Teleology. Lampeter.Search in Google Scholar
Nassar, D. 2010. “From a Philosophy of Self to a Philosophy of Nature: Goethe and the Development of Schelling’s Naturphilosophie”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92(3), 304–2110.1515/agph.2010.014Search in Google Scholar
Noller, J. 2020. “Higher Necessity: Schelling’s Volitional Compatibilism”. In Idealistic Studies, published online ahead of print.10.5840/idstudies202061112Search in Google Scholar
Ostaric, L. 2014. “The Concept of Life in Early Schelling”. In Interpreting Schelling: Critical Essays. Ed. by Ostaric. Cambridge, 48–70.10.1017/CBO9781139093569.005Search in Google Scholar
Plato 1997. Timaeus. Trans. by D. J. Zeyl. In Complete Works of Plato. Ed. J. M. Cooper. Indianapolis/Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Richards, R. J. 2000. “Kant and Blumenbach on the Bildungstrieb: A Historical Misunderstanding”. Stud. Hist. Phil. Biol. & Biomed. Sci., 31(1), 11–32.10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00042-4Search in Google Scholar
–. 2002. The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Sandkaulen-Bock, B. 1990. Ausgang vom Unbedingten: über den Anfang in der Philosophie Schellings. Göttingen.10.13109/9783666305023Search in Google Scholar
Schelling, F. J. W. (1856–1861). Sämmtliche Werke. Ed. K. F. A. Schelling. Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1976–. Historische-kritische Ausgabe. Stuttgart. (HkA I/5: Ideen zu einer Philosophie der Natur; HkA I/6: Von der Weltseele; HkA I/7: Erster Entwurf eines Systems der Naturphilosophie; HkA I/8: Einleitung zu seinem Entwurf eines Systems der Naturphilosophie; HkA II/5: Kommentar zum »Timaeus«).Search in Google Scholar
–. 1980. The Unconditional in Human Knowledge: Four Early Essays. Trans. F. Marti. Lewisburg, PA.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1994. On the History of Modern Philosophy. Trans. A. Bowie. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2004. First Outline of a System of the Philosophy of Nature. Trans. K. R. Peterson. Albany.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2008. “Timaeus (1794)”. Trans. A. Arola/J. Jolissaint/P. Warnek. Epoché 12(2), 205–48.10.5840/epoche20081222Search in Google Scholar
Teufel, T. 2011. “What is the Problem of Teleology in Kant’s Critique of the Power of Teleological Judgment?” In SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 12(2), 198–236.10.1515/sats.2011.014Search in Google Scholar
van den Berg, H. 2013. “Wolff and Kant on Scientific Demonstration and Mechanical Explanation”. In Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95(2), 178–205.10.1515/agph-2013-0008Search in Google Scholar
–. 2014. Kant on Proper Science: Biology in the Critical Philosophy and the Opus Postumum. Studies in German Idealism, vol. 15. Dordrecht.Search in Google Scholar
–. /Demarest, B. 2020. “Axiomatic Natural Philosophy and the Emergence of Biology as a Science”. In Journal of the History of Biology 53(3), 379–422.10.1007/s10739-020-09609-2Search in Google Scholar
Zammito, J. H. 2012. “The Lenoir Thesis Revisited: Blumenbach and Kant”. In Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43(1), 120–32.10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.05.011Search in Google Scholar
–. 2017. The Gestation of German Biology: Philosophy and Physiology from Stahl to Schelling. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Zuckert, R. 2007. Kant on Beauty and Biology. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511487323Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Articles
- Temperance and Epistemic Purity in Plato’s Phaedo
- Categories in Topics I 9: A New Plea For a Traditional Interpretation
- Aristotle’s First Moves Regarding Perception: A Reading of (most of) De Anima 2.5
- Kant on Civil Self-Sufficiency
- Kant’s Argument for Transcendental Idealism in the Transcendental Aesthetic Revisited
- Life, Lawfulness, and Contingency: Kant and Schelling on Organic Nature
- Book Reviews
- Muratori, Cecilia. Renaissance Vegetarianism: The Philosophical Afterlives of Porphyry’s On Abstinence. Cambridge: Legenda 2020, xiv + 276 pp.
- Abazari, Arash. Hegel’s Ontology of Power: The Structure of Social Domination in Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2020, xvii + 218 pp.
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Articles
- Temperance and Epistemic Purity in Plato’s Phaedo
- Categories in Topics I 9: A New Plea For a Traditional Interpretation
- Aristotle’s First Moves Regarding Perception: A Reading of (most of) De Anima 2.5
- Kant on Civil Self-Sufficiency
- Kant’s Argument for Transcendental Idealism in the Transcendental Aesthetic Revisited
- Life, Lawfulness, and Contingency: Kant and Schelling on Organic Nature
- Book Reviews
- Muratori, Cecilia. Renaissance Vegetarianism: The Philosophical Afterlives of Porphyry’s On Abstinence. Cambridge: Legenda 2020, xiv + 276 pp.
- Abazari, Arash. Hegel’s Ontology of Power: The Structure of Social Domination in Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2020, xvii + 218 pp.