Hume’s Answer to Bayle on the Vacuum

Jonathan Cottrell

doi:10.1515/agph-2019-2003

Article

Hume’s Answer to Bayle on the Vacuum

Jonathan Cottrell

Published/Copyright: July 1, 2019

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie Volume 101 Issue 2

Abstract

Hume’s discussion of space in the Treatise addresses two main topics: divisibility and vacuum. It is widely recognized that his discussion of divisibility contains an answer to Bayle, whose Dictionary article “Zeno of Elea” presents arguments about divisibility as support for fideism. It is not so widely recognized that, elsewhere in the same article, Bayle presents arguments about vacuum as further support for fideism. This paper aims to show that Hume’s discussion of vacuum contains an answer to these vacuum-based fideistic arguments. Key to this answer is a distinction between two ways in which vacuum was conceived in the early modern period: i) as a genuine thing that has spatial properties, and yet is immobile, indivisible, and penetrable (positive vacuum); ii) as a mere absence of spatial things (privative vacuum). This paper also aims to provide a novel defense of Hume against the long-standing objection that he is inconsistent in denying that we can conceive of a vacuum, while allowing that we can conceive of “invisible and intangible distance.” As I interpret him, Hume consistently denies that we can conceive of a positive vacuum, while allowing that we can conceive of two or more objects’ being arranged so as to have privative vacuum between them.

Abs: Hume’s Abstract of a Book Lately Published
ECHU: Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding
LDH: The Letters of David Hume
T: Hume’s Treatise

Ainslie, D. 2010. “Adequate Ideas and Modest Scepticism in Hume’s Metaphysics of Space.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92, 39–67.10.1515/AGPH.2010.002Search in Google Scholar

–. 2015. Hume’s True Scepticism. New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593866.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Allison, H. 2008. Custom and Reason in Hume: A Kantian Reading of the First Book of the Treatise. New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199532889.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

–. 2016. “Hume and the Molyneux Problem.” In P. Russell (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Hume. New York, 158–72.Search in Google Scholar

Baxter, D. 2008. Hume’s Difficulty: Time and Identity in the Treatise. New York.10.1007/s11098-009-9433-3Search in Google Scholar

–. 2009. “Hume’s Theory of Space and Time in Its Skeptical Context.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume. 2^nd edn. Ed. D. Norton/J. Taylor. New York, 105–46.10.1017/CCOL9780521859868.004Search in Google Scholar

Bayle, P. 1991. Historical and Critical Dictionary, Selections. Trans/ed. R. Popkin. Indianapolis.Search in Google Scholar

Boehm, M. 2012. “Filling the Gaps in Hume’s Vacuums.” Hume Studies 38, 79–99.10.1353/hms.2012.0003Search in Google Scholar

Chambers, E. 1728. Cyclopædia. 2 vols. London.Search in Google Scholar

[Clarke, Joseph] 1732. A Defence of Dr. Clarke’s Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God, &c. London.Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, J. 1733. Dr. Clarke’s Notions of Space Examin’d. London.Search in Google Scholar

Cottrell, J. 2016. “A Puzzle about Fictions in the Treatise”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 54, 47–73.10.1353/hph.2016.0023Search in Google Scholar

–. 2019. “Hume on Space and Time: A Limited Defense”. In The Humean Mind. Ed. A. Coventry/A. Sager. New York, 83–95.Search in Google Scholar

–. Forthcoming. “Unperceived Existence and Hume’s Theory of Ideas.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy.10.1093/oso/9780198852452.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Descartes, R. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. 2 vols. Translated by J. Cottingham/R. Stoothoff/D. Murdoch. New York.10.1017/CBO9780511805042Search in Google Scholar

Falkenstein, L. 2006. “Space and Time.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hume’s Treatise. Ed. S. Traiger. Oxford, 59–76.10.1002/9780470776377.ch4Search in Google Scholar

–. 2013. “Hume on the Idea of a Vacuum.” Hume Studies 39, 131–68.10.1353/hms.2014.0006Search in Google Scholar

–. 2015. “The Ideas of Space and Time and Spatial and Temporal Ideas in Treatise 1.2.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume’s Treatise. Ed. D. Ainslie/A. Butler. New York, 31–68.10.1017/CCO9781139016100.005Search in Google Scholar

Flew, A. 1976. “Infinite Divisibility in Hume’s Treatise.” In Hume: A Re-Evaluation. Ed. D. Livingston/J. King. New York, 257–69.Search in Google Scholar

Fogelin, R. 1985. Hume’s Skepticism in the Treatise of Human Nature. London.10.4324/9780429061165Search in Google Scholar

Frasca-Spada, M. 1998. Space and the Self in Hume’s Treatise. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Garrett, D. 1997. Cognition and Commitment in Hume’s Philosophy. New York.10.2307/2653597Search in Google Scholar

–. 2015. Hume. New York.10.4324/9780203118351Search in Google Scholar

Green, T. 1882. “General Introduction.” In A Treatise of Human Nature. Vol. 1. Ed. T. Green/T. Grose, 1–299. London.Search in Google Scholar

Hume, D. 1932. The Letters of David Hume. 2 vols. Ed. J. Greig. New York.10.1093/oseo/instance.00219124Search in Google Scholar

–. 1975. Enquiries Concerning Human Understand and Concerning the Principles of Morals. Ed. L. Selby-Bigge. 3^rd edn. by P. Nidditch. Oxford.10.1093/actrade/9780198245353.book.1Search in Google Scholar

–. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. L. Selby-Bigge. 2^nd edn. by P. Nidditch. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2000. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. T. Beauchamp. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2007. A Treatise of Human Nature, Vol. 1: Texts. Ed. D. Norton/M. Norton. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Irwin, K. 2013. “Bayle on the (Ir)rationality of Religious Belief.” Philosophy Compass 8/6, 560–69.10.1111/phc3.12044Search in Google Scholar

Jacquette, D. 2001. David Hume’s Critique of Infinity. Leiden.10.1163/9789004247550Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, O. 1995. The Mind of David Hume. Urbana/Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

Kemp Smith, N. 1941. The Philosophy of David Hume. New York.10.1057/9780230511170Search in Google Scholar

King, W. 1731. An Essay on the Origin of Evil. Trans./ed. E. Law. London.Search in Google Scholar

Labrousse, E. 1983. Bayle. Trans. D. Potts. New York.Search in Google Scholar

Larivière, D./Lennon, T. 2002. “The History and Significance of Hume’s Burning Coal Example: Time, Identity, and Individuation.” Journal of Philosophical Research 27, 511–26.10.5840/jpr_2002_14Search in Google Scholar

Law, E. 1734. An Enquiry into the Ideas of Space, Time, Immensity, and Eternity. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Leibniz, G./Clarke, S. 1956. The Leibniz–Clarke Correspondence. Ed. H. Alexander. Manchester.Search in Google Scholar

Locke, J. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. P. Nidditch. Oxford.10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020Search in Google Scholar

Miller, J. 2013. “Hume’s Citation of Strabo and the Dating of the Memoranda.” Hume Studies 39, 197–202.10.1353/hms.2014.0000Search in Google Scholar

Mossner, E. 1948. “Hume’s Early Memoranda, 1729–1740: The Complete Text.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 9, 492–518.10.2307/2707220Search in Google Scholar

Newton, I. 1999. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Trans./ed. I. Cohen/A. Whitman. Berkeley/Los Angeles.10.1063/1.883005Search in Google Scholar

Pittion, J. 1977. “Hume’s Reading of Bayle: An Inquiry into the Source and Role of the Memoranda.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 15, 373–86.Search in Google Scholar

Popkin, R. 1964. “So, Hume did Read Berkeley.” The Journal of Philosophy, 61, 773–78.10.2307/2023392Search in Google Scholar

Powell, L. 2014. “Hume’s Treatment of Denial in the Treatise.” Philosophers’ Imprint, 14(26), 1–22.Search in Google Scholar

Rohault, J. 1735. System of Natural Philosophy. 2 vols. Trans. J. Clarke. London.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, P. 2008. The Riddle of Hume’s Treatise: Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion. New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195110333.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, T. 2009. Pierre Bayle’s Cartesian Metaphysics: Rediscovering Early Modern Philosophy. New York.10.4324/9780203876923Search in Google Scholar

Sakamoto, T. 2011. “Hume’s “Early Memoranda” and the Making of His Political Economy.” Hume Studies 37, 131–64.10.1353/hms.2011.0658Search in Google Scholar

Schliesser, E. 2007. “Hume’s Newtonianism and Anti-Newtonianism,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition), E. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/hume-newton/Search in Google Scholar

Stewart, M. 2000. “The Dating of Hume’s Manuscripts.” In P. Wood (ed.), “The Scottish Enlightenment: Essays in Reinterpretation”. Rochester, NY, 267–314.10.1093/oso/9780199547319.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Traiger, S. 1987. “Impressions, Ideas, and Fictions.” Hume Studies, 13, 381–99.Search in Google Scholar

Watts, I. 1733. Philosophical Essays on Various Subjects. London.Search in Google Scholar

Wollaston, W. 1722. The Religion of Nature Delineated.10.1037/11734-000Search in Google Scholar

Wood, P. 1986. “David Hume on Thomas Reid’s An Inquiry into the Human Mind, On the Principles of Common Sense: A New Letter to Hugh Blair from July 1762.” Mind, 95, 411–16.10.1093/mind/XCV.380.411Search in Google Scholar

Wright, J. 1983. The Sceptical Realism of David Hume. Minneapolis.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-07-01

Published in Print: 2019-06-28

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2019-2003