Ideas and Explanation in Early Modern Philosophy

Allen, K. 2008. “Mechanism, Resemblance and Secondary Qualities: From Descartes to Locke”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16, 273–91.10.1080/09608780801969092Suche in Google Scholar

– . 2010. “Locke and the Nature of Ideas”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92, 236–55.10.1515/agph.2010.011Suche in Google Scholar

Anstey, P. R. 2009. “The Experimental History of the Understanding from Locke to Sterne”. Eighteenth-Century Thought 4, 143–69.Suche in Google Scholar

– . 2011. John Locke and Natural Philosophy. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589777.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Anstey, P. R./Burrows, J. 2009. “John Locke, Thomas Sydenham, and the Authorship of Two Medical Essays”. Electronic British Library Journal.Suche in Google Scholar

Astell, M. [1705]/2013. The Christian Religion: As Professed by a Daughter of the Church of England. Ed. J. Broad. Toronto.Suche in Google Scholar

Ayers, M. 1991. Locke: Epistemology and Ontology. 2 vols. London/New York.Suche in Google Scholar

– . 2011. “Primary and Secondary Qualities in Locke’s Essay”. In Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate. Ed. L. Nolan. Oxford, 136–57.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556151.003.0007Suche in Google Scholar

Bacon, F. [1620]/2000. The New Organon. Ed. L. Jardine/M. Silverthorne. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139164030Suche in Google Scholar

Berkeley, G. [1735]/1948–1957. A Defence of Free-Thinking in Mathematics. In The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. Ed. A. A. Luce/T. E. Jessop. London, vol. 4, 109–141.Suche in Google Scholar

–. [1734]/1992. The Analyst: Or, a Discourse Addressed to an Infidel Mathematician. In De Motu and the Analyst: A Modern Edition, with Introductions and Commentary. Ed./trans. D. M. Jesseph. Dordrech, 159–221.Suche in Google Scholar

Bolton, M. B. 2004. “Locke on the Semantic and Epistemic Role of Simple Ideas of Sensation”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85, 301–21.10.1111/j.1468-0114.2004.00200.xSuche in Google Scholar

Boyle, R. [1674]/1991. About the Excellency and Grounds of the Mechanical Hypothesis. In Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle. Ed. M. A. Stewart. Indianapolis, 138–52.10.1093/oseo/instance.00249916Suche in Google Scholar

Broad, J. 2015. The Philosophy of Mary Astell: An Early Modern Theory of Virtue. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716815.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Browne, P. 1697. A Letter in Answer to a Book Entitled Christianity Not Mysterious. Dublin.Suche in Google Scholar

Clarke, D. M. (ed.) 2009. Philosophical Writings by George Berkeley. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511802577Suche in Google Scholar

Connolly, P. J. 2018. “Locke and the Methodology of Newton’s Principia”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 100, 311–35.10.1515/agph-2018-3003Suche in Google Scholar

Cook, M. 1974. “Arnauld’s Alleged Representationalism”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 12, 53–62.10.1353/hph.2008.0620Suche in Google Scholar

–. 1991. “Malebranche Versus Arnauld”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 29, 183–99.10.1353/hph.1991.0042Suche in Google Scholar

–. 1998. “The Ontological Status of Malebranchean Ideas”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 36, 525–44.10.1353/hph.2008.0956Suche in Google Scholar

Curley, E. M. 1972. “Locke, Boyle, and the Distinction Between Primary and Secondary Qualities”. Philosophical Review 81, 438–64.10.2307/2183887Suche in Google Scholar

Descartes, R. [1641]/1984–1991. Meditations on First Philosophy. In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Trans. J. Cottingham/R. Stoothoff/D. Murdoch/A. Kenny. Cambridge, vol. 2, 3–397.10.1017/CBO9781107340824Suche in Google Scholar

Hacking, I. 1974. Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511627873Suche in Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. 1987. “Causes and Empiricism: A Problem in the Interpretation of Later Greek Medical Method”. Phronesis 32, 329–48.10.1163/156852887X00181Suche in Google Scholar

Harrison, J./Laslett, P. (eds.) 1971. The Library of John Locke. Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar

Hight, M. A. 2001. “Locke’s Implicit Ontology of Ideas”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9, 17–42.10.1080/09608780010012675Suche in Google Scholar

–. 2008. Idea and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas. University Park, PA.10.1515/9780271049366-003Suche in Google Scholar

–. (ed.) 2013. The Correspondence of George Berkeley. Cambridge.10.1017/9780511732348Suche in Google Scholar

Hoffman, P. 2002. “Direct Realism, Intentionality, and the Objective Being of Ideas”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83, 163–79.10.1111/1468-0114.00141Suche in Google Scholar

Hooke, R. 1667. Micrographia: Or Some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies Made by Magnifying Glasses. London.10.5962/bhl.title.113984Suche in Google Scholar

Jacovides, M. 1999. “Locke’s Resemblance Theses.” Philosophical Review 108, 461–96.10.2307/2998285Suche in Google Scholar

–. 2007. “Locke’s Distinctions Between Primary and Secondary Qualities”. In The Cambridge Companion to Locke’s “Essay Concerning Human Understanding”. Ed. L. Newman. Cambridge, 101–29.10.1017/CCOL0521834333.005Suche in Google Scholar

–. 2017. Locke’s Image of the World. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198789864.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Jolley, N. 1990. The Light of the Soul: Theories of Ideas in Leibniz, Malebranche, and Descartes. Oxford.10.1093/0198238193.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

–. 2003. “Reason’s Dim Candle: Locke’s Critique of Enthusiasm.” In The Philosophy of John Locke: New Perspectives. Ed. P. R. Anstey. London/New York, 179–91.Suche in Google Scholar

–. 2007. “Locke on Faith and Reason”. In The Cambridge Companion to Locke’s “Essay Concerning Human Understanding”. Ed. L. Newman. Cambridge, 436–55.10.1017/CCOL0521834333.016Suche in Google Scholar

Kambouchner, D. 1995. “Des vraies et des fausses tenébrès: la connaissance de l’âme d’après la controverse avec Malebranche”. In Antoine Arnauld: Philosophie du langage et de la connaissance. Ed. J.-C. Pariente. Paris, 153–90.Suche in Google Scholar

King, W. 1732. An Essay on the Origin of Evil. Trans. E. Law. 2 vols. London.Suche in Google Scholar

Lennon, T. M. 1992. “Malebranche’s Argument for Ideas and Its Systematic Importance”. In Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy. Ed. P. Cummins/G. Zoeller. Atascadero, CA, 57–72.Suche in Google Scholar

– . 1993. The Battle of the Gods and Giants: The Legacies of Descartes and Gassendi, 1655–1715. Princeton.10.1515/9781400863396Suche in Google Scholar

Locke, J. [1706a]/1823. An Examination of P. Malebranche’s Opinion of Seeing All Things in God. In LW 9, 211–55.Suche in Google Scholar

–. [1706b]/1823. Remarks Upon Some of Mr. Norris’s Books, Wherein He Asserts P. Malebranche’s Opinion of Seeing All Things in God. In LW 10, 247–59.Suche in Google Scholar

Malebranche, N. [1684]/1958–1978. Reponse de l’auteur de La recherche de la verité, au livre de Mr. Arnauld, des vrayes & des fausses idées. In Oeuvres Complètes. Ed. A. Robinet. Paris, vol. 6, 1–189.Suche in Google Scholar

McCann, E. 2011. “Locke’s Distinction Between Primary Primary Qualities and Secondary Primary Qualities”. In Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate. Ed. L. Nolan. Oxford, 158–89.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556151.003.0008Suche in Google Scholar

McCracken, C. J. 1983. Malebranche and British Philosophy. Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar

Moreau, D. 2000. “The Malebranche-Arnauld Debate”. In The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche. Ed. S. Nadler. Cambridge, 87–111.10.1017/CCOL0521622123.005Suche in Google Scholar

Nadler, S. 1989. Arnauld and the Cartesian Philosophy of Ideas. Princeton.Suche in Google Scholar

–. 1992. Malebranche and Ideas. New York.Suche in Google Scholar

–. 1994. “Malebranche’s Theory of Perception.” In The Great Arnauld and Some of His Philosophical Correspondents. Ed. E. J. Kremer. Toronto, 108–28.Suche in Google Scholar

Ndiaye, A. R. 1991. La Philosophie d’Antoine Arnauld. Paris.Suche in Google Scholar

Newman, L. 2004. “Locke on Sensitive Knowledge and the Veil of Perception – Four Misconceptions”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85, 273–300.10.1111/j.1468-0114.2004.00199.xSuche in Google Scholar

–. 2009. “Ideas, Pictures, and the Directness of Perception in Descartes and Locke”. Philosophy Compass 4, 134–54.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00187.xSuche in Google Scholar

Ott, W. 2017. Descartes, Malebranche, and the Crisis of Perception. Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780198791713.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Pappas, G. S. 2000. Berkeley’s Thought. Ithaca, NY.10.7591/9781501729317Suche in Google Scholar

Pearce, K. L. 2016. “Arnauld’s Verbal Distinction Between Ideas and Perceptions”. History and Philosophy of Logic 37, 375–90.10.1080/01445340.2016.1177440Suche in Google Scholar

–. 2017. Language and the Structure of Berkeley’s World. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198790334.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

–. 2019. “Locke, Arnauld, and Abstract Ideas”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27, 75–94.10.1080/09608788.2018.1509294Suche in Google Scholar

Pessin, A. 2004. “Malebranche on Ideas”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34, 241–85.10.1080/00455091.2004.10716567Suche in Google Scholar

Plato. 1997. Meno, trans. G. M. A. Grube. In Complete Works. Ed. J. M. Cooper. Indianapolis, 870–97.Suche in Google Scholar

Priarolo, M. 2017. “Universals and Individuals in Malebranche’s Philosophy”. In The Problem of Universals in Early Modern Philosophy. Ed. S. Di Bella/T. Schmaltz. Oxford, 142–65.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190608040.003.0007Suche in Google Scholar

Pyle, A. 2003. Malebranche. London.10.4324/9780203417706Suche in Google Scholar

–. 2013. Locke. Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar

Radner, D. 1976. “Representationalism in Arnauld’s Act Theory of Perception”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 14: 96–98.10.1353/hph.2008.0290Suche in Google Scholar

Reid, T. [1785]/2002. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Ed. D. R. Brookes. Edinburgh.10.1515/9781474428125Suche in Google Scholar

Rogers, G. A. J. 2004. “Locke and the Objects of Perception”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85, 245–54.10.1111/j.1468-0114.2004.00197.xSuche in Google Scholar

–. 2007. “The Intellectual Setting and Aims of the Essay”. In The Cambridge Companion to Locke’s “Essay Concerning Human Understanding”. Ed. L. Newman. Cambridge, 7–32.10.1017/CCOL0521834333.002Suche in Google Scholar

Schmaltz, T. M. 2000. “Malebranche on Ideas and the Vision in God”. In The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche. Ed. S. Nadler. Cambirdge, 59–86.10.1017/CCOL0521622123.004Suche in Google Scholar

Sergeant, J. 1697. Solid Philosophy Asserted, Against the Fancies of the Ideists: Or, the Method of Science Farther Illustrated. London.Suche in Google Scholar

Sprat, T. 1667. The History of the Royal-Society of London: For the Improving of Natural Knowledge. London.Suche in Google Scholar

Squadrito, K. M. 1987. “Mary Astell’s Critique of Locke’s View of Thinking Matter”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 25, 433–39.10.1353/hph.1987.0053Suche in Google Scholar

Stillingfleet, E. 1697. A Discourse in Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity: With an Answer to the Late Socinian Objections Against It from Scripture, Antiquity and Reason. London.Suche in Google Scholar

Tomida, Y. 2005. “Locke’s Representationalism Without Veil”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13, 675–96.10.1080/09608780500293034Suche in Google Scholar

Van Cleve, J. 2015. “The Sun in the Sky and the Sun in My Mind: Or, Why Arnauld Is Not Steadfastly a Direct Realist”. Appendix H to Problems from Reid. New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Voltaire. [1734]/2007. Philosophical Letters: Or, Letters Regarding the English Nation. Ed. J. Leigh/trans. P. L. Steiner. Indianapolis.Suche in Google Scholar

Yaffe, G. 2004. “Locke on Ideas of Substance and the Veil of Perception”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85, 255–72.10.1111/j.1468-0114.2004.00198.xSuche in Google Scholar

Yolton, John W. 1956. Locke and the Way of Ideas. Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar

–. 1975. “Ideas and Knowledge in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 13, 145–65.10.1353/hph.2008.0068Suche in Google Scholar

–. 1984. Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid. Minneapolis.Suche in Google Scholar

–. 1996. Perception and Reality: A History from Descartes to Kant. Ithaca, NY.Suche in Google Scholar