Pleasure, Judgment and the Function of the Painter-Scribe Analogy
-
Emily Fletcher
Abstract
This paper puts forward a new interpretation of the argument at Philebus 36c–40d that pleasures can be false. Protarchus raises an objection at 37e–38a, and in response Socrates presents the elaborate painter-scribe analogy (38e–40c). Most previous interpretations do not explain how the analogy answers Protarchus’ objection. On my account, Protarchus’ objection relies on the plausible intuition that pleasure is simply not in the business of assessing the world, and so it cannot be charged with doing so incorrectly. Socrates responds by demonstrating that pleasure can be mistaken about the world, despite not making an independent assessment of it. The painter-scribe analogy demonstrates how pleasure comes to be mistaken about the world by reproducing the mistake of a judgment. Socrates persuades Protarchus that pleasure can be mistaken in part by preserving his intuition that pleasure itself is not the source of the mistake.
Carpenter, A. 2006. “Hedonistic Persons. The Good Man Argument in Plato’s Philebus”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14(1), 5–26.10.1080/09608780500449123Suche in Google Scholar
Delcomminette, S. 2006. Le Philèbe de Platon: introduction à l’agathologie platonicienne. Leiden/Boston.10.1163/9789047409137Suche in Google Scholar
–. 2003. “False Pleasures, Appearance and Imagination in the Philebus”. Phronesis 48, 215–37.10.1163/156852803322519226Suche in Google Scholar
Dybikowski, J. C. 1970. “False Pleasure and the Philebus”. Phronesis 15, 147–65.10.1163/156852870X00116Suche in Google Scholar
Evans, M. 2008. “Plato on the Possibility of Hedonic Mistakes”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 35, 89–124.Suche in Google Scholar
Fletcher, E. 2018. “Plato on Incorrect and Deceptive Pleasures”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 100(4), 379–410.10.1515/agph-2018-4001Suche in Google Scholar
–. 2016. “Aisthēsis, Reason and Appetite in the Timaeus”. Phronesis 61, 397–434.10.1163/15685284-12341313Suche in Google Scholar
–. 2014. “Plato on Pure Pleasure and the Best Life”. Phronesis 59, 113–42.10.1163/15685284-12341263Suche in Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1997. Platon: Philebos, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Göttingen.Suche in Google Scholar
–. 1993. Plato: Philebus. Translated, with Introduction & Notes. Indianapolis.Suche in Google Scholar
–. 1992. “Disintegration and Restoration: Pleasure and Pain in Plato’s Philebus”. In The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Ed. R. Kraut. Cambridge, 425–63.10.1017/CCOL0521430186.014Suche in Google Scholar
–. 1985. “Rumpelstiltskin’s Pleasures: True and False Pleasures in Plato’s Philebus”. Phronesis 30, 151–80.10.1163/156852885X00039Suche in Google Scholar
Gallop, D. 1960. “True and False Pleasures”. The Philosophical Quarterly 10, 331–42.10.2307/2216408Suche in Google Scholar
Gosling J. C. B./Taylor, C. C. W. 1982. The Greeks on Pleasure. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198246664.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
–. 1975. Plato: Philebus, Translated with Notes and Commentary. Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar
–. 1961. “Father Kenny on False Pleasures in Plato’s Philebus”. Phronesis 6, 41–5.10.1163/156852861X00053Suche in Google Scholar
–. 1959. “False Pleasures: Philebus 35c-41b”. Phronesis 4, 44–54.10.1163/156852859X00065Suche in Google Scholar
Hackforth, R. 1945. Plato’s Examination of Pleasure. New York.Suche in Google Scholar
Harte, V. 2004. “The Philebus on Pleasure: The Good, the Bad and the False”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104, 111–28.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2004.00148.xSuche in Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1960. “False Pleasures in the Philebus: A Reply to Mr. Gosling”. Phronesis 5, 45–52.10.1163/156852860X00144Suche in Google Scholar
Lorenz, H. 2012. “The Cognition of Appetite in Plato’s Timaeus”. In Plato and the Divided Self. Eds. R. Barney/T. Brennan/C. Brittain. Cambridge, 238–58.10.1017/CBO9780511977831.014Suche in Google Scholar
McLaughlin, A. 1969. “A Note on False Pleasures in the Philebus”. Philosophical Quarterly 19, 57–61.10.2307/2218188Suche in Google Scholar
Mooradian, N. 1996. “Converting Protarchus: Relativism and False Pleasures of Anticipation in Plato’s Philebus”. Ancient Philosophy 16, 93–112.10.5840/ancientphil199616114Suche in Google Scholar
–. 1995. “What to Do about False Pleasures of Overestimation? Philebus 41a5–42a5”. Apeiron 28(2), 91–112.Suche in Google Scholar
Moss, J. 2012. “Pictures and Passions in the Timaeus and Philebus”. In Plato and the Divided Self. Eds. R. Barney/T. Brennan/C. Brittain. Cambridge, 259–80.10.1017/CBO9780511977831.015Suche in Google Scholar
Muniz, F. 2014. “Propositional Pleasures in Plato’s Philebus”. Journal of Ancient Philosophy 8.1, 49–75.10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v8i1p49-75Suche in Google Scholar
Penner, T. 1970. “False Anticipatory Pleasures: Philebus 36a3–41a6”. Phronesis 15, 166–78.10.1163/156852870X00125Suche in Google Scholar
Poste, E. 1860. The Philebus of Plato, A Revised Text and English Notes. Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar
Ogihara, S. 2012. “False Pleasure: Philebus 36c-40d”. In Presocratics and Plato: Festschrift at Delphi in Honor of Charles Kahn. Eds. R. Patterson/V. Karasmanis/A. Hermann. Las Vegas/Zurich/Athens, 291–310.Suche in Google Scholar
Thein, K. 2012. “Imagination, Self-Awareness and Modal Thought at Philebus 39–40”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 42, 109–49.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644384.003.0004Suche in Google Scholar
Vogt, K. 2017. “Imagining Good Future States: Hope and Truth in Plato’s Philebus”. In On the Psyche: Studies in Literature, Health, and Psychology. Ed. J. Wilkins. Oxford, 34–49.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198777250.003.0003Suche in Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2014. The Pleasures of Reason in Plato, Aristotle and the Hellenistic Hedonists. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139178976Suche in Google Scholar
Whiting, J. 2014. “Fool’s Pleasures in Plato’s Philebus”. In Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology and Logic. Ed. Mi-Kyoung Lee. Oxford, 21–59.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199890477.003.0002Suche in Google Scholar
Williams, B. and Bedford, E. 1959. “Pleasure and Belief”. Proceeding of Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 39, 57–72.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/33.1.57Suche in Google Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. 1974. “False Pleasures”. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 26(3/4), 295–97.10.1007/BF00398890Suche in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Titelseiten
- Articles
- Pleasure, Judgment and the Function of the Painter-Scribe Analogy
- “This” and “Such” in the Receptacle Passage of Plato’s Timaeus
- Substancehood and Subjecthood in Z-H
- Augustine on the Existence of the Past and the Future
- Epicureans and the City’s Laws
- Spinoza’s Infinite Shortcut to the Contingent Appearance of Things
- Culture and the Unity of Kant’s Critique of Judgment
- Book Reviews
- Helmig, Christoph (ed.), World Soul – Anima Mundi. On the Origins and Fortunes of a Fundamental Idea. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2020, 364 pp.
- Owen Ware, Kant’s Justification of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021, xii+176 pp.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Titelseiten
- Articles
- Pleasure, Judgment and the Function of the Painter-Scribe Analogy
- “This” and “Such” in the Receptacle Passage of Plato’s Timaeus
- Substancehood and Subjecthood in Z-H
- Augustine on the Existence of the Past and the Future
- Epicureans and the City’s Laws
- Spinoza’s Infinite Shortcut to the Contingent Appearance of Things
- Culture and the Unity of Kant’s Critique of Judgment
- Book Reviews
- Helmig, Christoph (ed.), World Soul – Anima Mundi. On the Origins and Fortunes of a Fundamental Idea. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2020, 364 pp.
- Owen Ware, Kant’s Justification of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021, xii+176 pp.
