Startseite “C’est un bourgeois, mais non un bourgeois ordinaire”: The Contested Afterlife of Ingres’s Portrait of Louis-François Bertin
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

“C’est un bourgeois, mais non un bourgeois ordinaire”: The Contested Afterlife of Ingres’s Portrait of Louis-François Bertin

  • Richard Wrigley EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. Juni 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Ingres’s portrait of Louis-François Bertin (1832) has been universally accepted as a visual “apotheosis” of the newly powerful early 19th-century bourgeoisie in France. Here, we study the inconsistencies and contestation which contributed to this identification. Beginning with the moment of its first public exhibition in the 1833 Paris Salon, this article traces Bertin’s evolving reputation as an image of its epoch, focusing on its reappearance in public first at the Bazar Bonne-Nouvelle in 1846, and then in the display of Ingres’s works at the Exposition Universelle of 1855. This leads to a critical assessment of how the picture’s role as a political emblem has been related to later assertions that it also exemplified the artist’s incipient modernism. The exhibition of works by Ingres at the Paris Salon d’Automne in 1905 allows us to take stock of claims made about the picture’s status in the early 20th century. However, in contrast to the habitual desire to modernise Ingres (and thereby to detach him from a lingering taint of academicism), this article argues that a key element in the reception of Ingres’s portrait in the second half of the 19th century is a recognition of its rootedness in values emanating from the Revolution of 1789, embodied both in the person of LouisFrançois Bertin and Ingres’s representation of him.


I dedicate this article to the memory of my friend and teacher Jon Whiteley. I am grateful to the many people with whom I have discussed this material, and to the audiences for various papers where this has been presented. In particular, I should like to thank Emma Barker, Ting Chang, Henri Zerner, Meghan Metcalf for help at the Getty Research Institute, Olivier Meslay at the Clark for essential help at a difficult moment, and finally this journal’s anonymous readers for their constructive comments.


  1. Image credits: 1 Musée du Louvre, Paris / Angèle Dequier. — 2, 6 Private collection. — 3 Courtesy of The Hispanic Society of America, New York. — 4 Photo © RMN-Grand Palais / René-Gabriel Ojéda. — 5 Creative Commons. — 7 Modern Art, Oxford. — 8 Vincent Giroud, Picasso and Gertrude Stein, New Haven and London 2006, 6. — 9 The Baltimore Museum of Art, The Cone Collection, formed by Dr. Claribel Cone and Miss Etta Cone of Baltimore, Maryland. — 10, 11 © RMN-Grand Palais (Musée d’Orsay) / Hervé Lewandowski.

Published Online: 2021-06-17
Published in Print: 2021-06-17

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 10.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ZKG-2021-2004/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen