Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert
Erfordert eine Authentifizierung
Expressives, perspective and presupposition
-
Peter Lasersohn
Veröffentlicht/Copyright:
16. Oktober 2007
Abstract
I compare Potts' use of a “judge” parameter in semantic interpretation with the use of a similar parameter in Lasersohn (2005). The latter technique portrays the content of expressives as constant across speakers, while Pott's technique does not. The idea that the content of expressives is a kind of presupposition is also briefly defended, and a technical problem in the “dynamics” of Pott's formalism is pointed out.
Published Online: 2007-10-16
Published in Print: 2007-10-19
© Walter de Gruyter
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- The expressive dimension
- Re-expressing judgment
- Really fucking brilliant
- Filling the emotion gap in linguistic theory: Commentary on Potts' expressive dimension
- Expressives, perspective and presupposition
- Beyond unpluggability
- Expressive presuppositions
- I like that damn paper – Three comments on Christopher Potts' The expressive dimension
- The centrality of expressive indices
Artikel in diesem Heft
- The expressive dimension
- Re-expressing judgment
- Really fucking brilliant
- Filling the emotion gap in linguistic theory: Commentary on Potts' expressive dimension
- Expressives, perspective and presupposition
- Beyond unpluggability
- Expressive presuppositions
- I like that damn paper – Three comments on Christopher Potts' The expressive dimension
- The centrality of expressive indices
