Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Re-expressing judgment
-
Pranav Anand
Published/Copyright:
October 16, 2007
Abstract
Potts (this issue) claims that non-speaker-oriented expressive content may be handled by the introduction of an expressive judge to the context. Given both that expressives may express sentiments temporally and modally displaced from the utterance and that there may be multiple expressive judges per sentence, I argue that a unitary judge is insuffcient, and suggest that non-speaker-oriented expressives are more directly captured as a species of partial quotation.
Published Online: 2007-10-16
Published in Print: 2007-10-19
© Walter de Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- The expressive dimension
- Re-expressing judgment
- Really fucking brilliant
- Filling the emotion gap in linguistic theory: Commentary on Potts' expressive dimension
- Expressives, perspective and presupposition
- Beyond unpluggability
- Expressive presuppositions
- I like that damn paper – Three comments on Christopher Potts' The expressive dimension
- The centrality of expressive indices
Articles in the same Issue
- The expressive dimension
- Re-expressing judgment
- Really fucking brilliant
- Filling the emotion gap in linguistic theory: Commentary on Potts' expressive dimension
- Expressives, perspective and presupposition
- Beyond unpluggability
- Expressive presuppositions
- I like that damn paper – Three comments on Christopher Potts' The expressive dimension
- The centrality of expressive indices
