Weak function word shift
-
Ralf Vogel
Abstract
The fact that object shift only affects weak pronouns in mainland Scandinavian is seen as an instance of a more general observation that can be made in all Germanic languages: weak function words tend to avoid the edges of larger prosodic domains. This generalization has been formulated within optimality theory in terms of alignment constraints on prosodic structure by Selkirk (1996) in explaining the distribution of prosodically strong and weak forms of English function words, especially modal verbs, prepositions, and pronouns. But a purely phonological account fails to integrate the syntactic licensing conditions for object shift in an appropriate way. The standard semantico-syntactic accounts of object shift, however, fail to explain why it is only weak pronouns that undergo object shift. This paper uses an optimality theoretic model of the syntax-phonology interface which determines linear order by the interaction of syntactic and prosodic factors. The account can successfully be applied to further related phenomena in English and German.
© Walter de Gruyter
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Introduction: Current issues in optimality theoretic syntax
- Aligning restricted objects
- Matrix unloaded: binding in a local derivational approach
- The winner takes it all — almost: cumulativity in grammatical variation
- Constraining nominalization: function/form competition
- Person and number agreement in Dumi
- Weak function word shift
- Freezing and marking
- Publications received between 2 May 2005 and 1 June 2006
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Introduction: Current issues in optimality theoretic syntax
- Aligning restricted objects
- Matrix unloaded: binding in a local derivational approach
- The winner takes it all — almost: cumulativity in grammatical variation
- Constraining nominalization: function/form competition
- Person and number agreement in Dumi
- Weak function word shift
- Freezing and marking
- Publications received between 2 May 2005 and 1 June 2006
