Home Medicine Neutrophil CD64: a diagnostic marker for infection and sepsis
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Neutrophil CD64: a diagnostic marker for infection and sepsis

  • Johannes J.M.L. Hoffmann
Published/Copyright: August 1, 2009

Abstract

Neutrophilic granulocytes express Fcγ receptor (FcγR) [cluster of differentiation 64 (CD64) antigen] only when they are activated. Neutrophil CD64, demonstrated using flow cytometry, can be used as a diagnostic marker of infection and sepsis. Neutrophil CD64 is superior to C-reactive protein and hematological determinations for detecting systemic infection or sepsis, since it combines high sensitivity (90% or more) with high specificity (90%–100%) in both adults and children. In addition, the test performs well in distinguishing infection from flares in autoimmune inflammatory diseases and has somewhat more limited utility for differentiating bacterial from viral infection. This review summarizes the available literature regarding CD64 as a marker of infection, and outlines future clinical studies for confirming the diagnostic performance of this promising marker.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:903–16.


Corresponding author: Dr. J.J.M.L. Hoffmann, Abbott Diagnostics Division, Abbott GmbH and Co. KG, Max-Planck-Ring 2, 65205 Wiesbaden-Delkenheim, Germany Phone: + 49 6122 581445,

Received: 2009-3-29
Accepted: 2009-5-25
Published Online: 2009-08-01
Published in Print: 2009-08-01

©2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial
  2. Hemolysis index: quality indicator or criterion for sample rejection?
  3. Review
  4. Neutrophil CD64: a diagnostic marker for infection and sepsis
  5. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  6. Chromosome 9p21 polymorphism is associated with myocardial infarction but not with clinical outcome in Han Chinese
  7. Differential expression of microRNAs in the placentae of Chinese patients with severe pre-eclampsia
  8. Clinical, biochemical, and genetic analysis of a Korean neonate with hereditary tyrosinemia type 1
  9. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  10. Multicenter evaluation of the hemolysis index in automated clinical chemistry systems
  11. Haemolysis index – an estimate of preanalytical quality in primary health care
  12. Evaluation of the Innovance D-DIMER analytical performance
  13. Heterophile antibodies may falsely increase or decrease thyroglobulin measurement in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma
  14. Variation of barrier permeability for albumin and immunoglobulin G influx into cerebrospinal fluid
  15. Anti-citrullinated protein antibody and rheumatoid factor in patients with end-stage renal disease
  16. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  17. Quality of interpretative commenting on common clinical chemistry results in the Asia-Pacific region and Africa
  18. Analysis and interpretation of drug testing results from patients on chronic pain therapy: a clinical laboratory perspective
  19. Cancer Diagnostics
  20. HER1-4 protein concentrations in normal breast tissue from breast cancer patients are expressed by the same profile as in the malignant tissue
  21. Comparison of fifteen immunoassays for the measurement of serum MUC-1/CA 15-3 in breast cancer patients
  22. Serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 and conventional tumor markers (CEA and CA 19-9) in patients with colorectal and gastric cancers
  23. Unstimulated high sensitive thyroglobulin measurement predicts outcome of differentiated thyroid carcinoma
  24. Relationship of serum antioxidant micronutrients and sociodemographic factors to cervical neoplasia: a case-control study
  25. Letters to the Editor
  26. Clinical efficacy of two cardiac troponin I assays
  27. Impeded centrifugation in plasmocytoma serum
Downloaded on 16.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2009.224/html
Scroll to top button