Home An international comparability study to determine the sources of uncertainty associated with a non-competitive sandwich fluorescent ELISA
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

An international comparability study to determine the sources of uncertainty associated with a non-competitive sandwich fluorescent ELISA

  • James E. Noble , Lili Wang , Eleonora Cerasoli , Alex E. Knight , Robert A. Porter , Elaine Gray , Chris Howe , Elisabeth Hannes , Philippe Corbisier , Jing Wang , Liqing Wu , Ilaria Altieri , Marina Patriarca , Angelika Hoffman , Ute Resch-Genger , Bernd Ebert , Jan Voigt , Yasushi Shigeri , Maxim S. Vonsky , Leonid A. Konopelko , Adolfas K. Gaigalas and Marc J.A. Bailey
Published/Copyright: May 22, 2008

Abstract

Background: Immunoassays allow the specific detection and quantitation of biological molecules in complex samples at physiologically relevant concentrations. However, there are concerns over the comparability of such techniques when the same assay is performed by different operators or laboratories. An international intercomparison study was performed to assess the uncertainty involved in the estimation of a protein cytokine concentration using a fluorescent ELISA.

Methods: The intercomparison study method was based on a non-competitive sandwich immunoassay with an enhancement step to generate a fluorescent readout. The intercomparison was performed in two phases, with the uncertainty of the instrument determined separately from that of the assay. The 11 laboratories participating in the study represented national metrology institutes or nominated expert laboratories.

Results: Participants were asked to determine an undisclosed concentration of interferon using a supplied standard. The mean participant estimate and experimental standard deviation of the mean was 3.54±0.22 mg/L, with the spread of data ranging around ±35% of the mean. The quantitation range of the ELISA and of participants' instruments displayed large variation that contributed to the overall uncertainty.

Conclusions: Identified sources of uncertainty within the ELISA methodology included pipetting, data fitting, model selection and instrument/plate variation.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1033–45.


Corresponding authors: James E. Noble, Analytical Science Group, National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, UK Phone: +44-20-89436927, Fax: +44-20-86140573, Lili Wang, Biochemical Science Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive Stop 8312, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8312, USA Phone: +1-301-9752447, Fax: +1-301-9755449,

Received: 2007-12-20
Accepted: 2008-2-29
Published Online: 2008-05-22
Published in Print: 2008-07-01

©2008 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial
  2. CCLM: Evolving to meet the needs of today's laboratory professionals and scientists
  3. Bacterial detection and blood product contamination
  4. Editorial: Rapid diagnostic tests to detect pathogenic microorganisms
  5. Reviews
  6. Rapid methods for diagnosis of bloodstream infections
  7. Validation criteria for nucleic acid amplification techniques for bacterial infections
  8. Incidence of bacterial transmission and transfusion reactions by blood components
  9. Strategies of bacteria screening in cellular blood components
  10. Methods for the detection of bacterial contamination in blood products
  11. Bacteria detection by flow cytometry
  12. Rapid screening by real-time 16S rDNA PCR for bacterial contamination of blood products
  13. Microbial safety of cell based medicinal products – what can we learn from cellular blood components?
  14. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  15. Screening for genetic heterogeneity in the interferon sensitivity determining region of the hepatitis C virus genome by polymerase chain reaction with melting curve analysis
  16. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) pharmacogenetics: three new mutations and haplotype analysis in the Estonian population
  17. Genetic testing for adult-type hypolactasia in Italian families
  18. Improved real-time detection of the H63D and S65C mutations associated with hereditary hemochromatosis using a SimpleProbe assay format
  19. Easy detection of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 1298A/C genotype by mutagenically separated PCR assay
  20. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  21. Mediterranean diet and plasma concentration of inflammatory markers in old and very old subjects in the ZINCAGE population study
  22. Plasma interleukin-1β, -6, -8 and tumor necrosis factor-α as highly informative markers of pelvic inflammatory disease
  23. The effect of hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and their treatment on parameters of oxidative stress and antioxidant status
  24. Breath isoprene – aspects of normal physiology related to age, gender and cholesterol profile as determined in a proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry study
  25. Prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (proBNP), BNP and N-terminal-proBNP circulating levels in chronic hemodialysis patients. Correlation with ventricular function, fluid removal and effect of hemodiafiltration
  26. A comparison of two different assays for determining S-100B in serum and urine
  27. Diagnostic, clinical and laboratory turnaround times in troponin T testing
  28. Validation and Outcome Studies
  29. An international comparability study to determine the sources of uncertainty associated with a non-competitive sandwich fluorescent ELISA
  30. A new general regression-based approach for method comparison studies
  31. Letters to the Editor
  32. Procalcitonin values in preeclamptic women are related to severity of disease
  33. Cross-reactivity between λ antiserum and fibrinogen: a double trap in interpretation of serum protein electrophoresis
  34. Erroneous result of white blood cell differential count in a patient with mixed hyperlipidemia
  35. Lack of association of GH T1663A variation and IGFBP3–202A/C polymorphism with risk of ischemic stroke in Chinese
  36. Erratum
  37. Quality planning and analytical quality requirements derived from biology
Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2008.182/html
Scroll to top button