Startseite Medizin Automated analysis of pleural fluid total and differential leukocyte counts with the Sysmex XE-2100
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Automated analysis of pleural fluid total and differential leukocyte counts with the Sysmex XE-2100

  • Robert de Jonge , Rob Brouwer , Marcel van Rijn , Bernadette A.C. van Acker , Henk J.A.M. Otten und Jan Lindemans
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 7. November 2006
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background: Determination of leukocyte (WBC) counts in pleural fluid is routinely performed by microscopic examination. In this study, we evaluated the performance of automated (differential) WBC counting in comparison with manual counting.

Methods: Pleural fluid samples (n=45) were obtained from patients undergoing diagnostic thoracocentesis. The manual total WBC count was determined after Samson staining in a Fuchs-Rosenthal hemocytometer; microscopic differential counts were performed on May-Grünwald Giemsa-stained cytospin slides. The Sysmex XE-2100 hematology analyzer was used for automated (differential) WBC counting. The functional detection limit was determined by serial dilution of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) fluid and replicate measurements of each dilution.

Results: The automated WBC count (×106/L) was highly correlated with that of the microscopic reference method (r2=0.95; WBC-analyzer=0.97×WBC-reference method+16; n=45). Good agreement was also observed for the absolute lymphocyte count (r2=0.92; WBC-analyzer=0.99×WBC-reference method+32; n=36), neutrophil count (r2=0.94; WBC-analyzer=0.91×WBC-reference method+6; n=35), and monocyte count (r2=0.73; WBC-analyzer=0.83×WBC-reference method+6; n=38). The functional detection limit for WBCs was calculated at 50×106/L (coefficient of variation 20%).

Conclusions: With some limitations, total and differential WBC counts in pleural fluid can be reliably determined using the Sysmex XE-2100 instrument.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:1367–71.


Corresponding author: Dr. Robert de Jonge, Department of Clinical Chemistry (L-137), Erasmus MC, POB 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands

References

1. Balfour-Lynn IM, Abrahamson E, Cohen G, Hartley J, King S, Parikh D, et al. BTS guidelines for the management of pleural infection in children. Thorax 2005; 60(Suppl 1):i1–21.10.1136/thx.2004.030676Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Light RW, Erozan YS, Ball WC, Jr. Cells in pleural fluid. Their value in differential diagnosis. Arch Intern Med 1973; 132:854–60.10.1001/archinte.1973.03650120060011Suche in Google Scholar

3. Maskell NA, Butland RJ. BTS guidelines for the investigation of a unilateral pleural effusion in adults. Thorax 2003; 58(Suppl 2):ii8–17.10.1136/thx.58.suppl_2.ii8Suche in Google Scholar

4. Salinas M, Rosas J, Iborra J, Manero H, Pascual E. Comparison of manual and automated cell counts in EDTA preserved synovial fluids. Storage has little influence on the results. Ann Rheum Dis 1997; 56:622–6.10.1136/ard.56.10.622Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Aune MW, Sandberg S. Automated counting of white and red blood cells in the cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Lab Haematol 2000; 22:203–10.10.1046/j.1365-2257.2000.00275.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Aulesa C, Mainar I, Prieto M, Cobos N, Galimany R. Use of the Advia 120 hematology analyzer in the differential cytologic analysis of biological fluids (cerebrospinal, peritoneal, pleural, pericardial, synovial, and others). Lab Hematol 2003; 9:214–24.Suche in Google Scholar

7. de Jonge R, Brouwer R, Smit M, de Frankrijker-Merkestijn M, Dolhain RJ, Hazes JM, et al. Automated counting of white blood cells in synovial fluid. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43:170–3.10.1093/rheumatology/keh021Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Ziebig R, Lun A, Sinha P. Leukocyte counts in cerebrospinal fluid with the automated hematology analyzer CellDyn 3500 and the urine flow cytometer UF-100. Clin Chem 2000; 46:242–7.10.1093/clinchem/46.2.242Suche in Google Scholar

9. Hoffmann JJ, Janssen WC. Automated counting of cells in cerebrospinal fluid using the CellDyn-4000 haematology analyser. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40:1168–73.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Aune MW, Becker JL, Brugnara C, Canfield W, Dorfman DM, Fiehn W, et al. Automated flow cytometric analysis of blood cells in cerebrospinal fluid: analytic performance. Am J Clin Pathol 2004; 121:690–700.10.1309/EKFW9E3LLFXE15X9Suche in Google Scholar

11. Kresie L, Benavides D, Bollinger P, Walters J, Pierson D, Richmond T, et al. Performance evaluation of the application of body fluids on the Sysmex XE-2100 series automated hematology analyzer. Lab Hematol 2005; 11:24–30.10.1532/LH96.04067Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Angeloni S, Nicolini G, Merli M, Nicolao F, Pinto G, Aronne T, et al. Validation of automated blood cell counter for the determination of polymorphonuclear cell count in the ascitic fluid of cirrhotic patients with or without spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98:1844–8.10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07620.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Conner BD, Lee YC, Branca P, Rogers JT, Rodriguez RM, Light RW. Variations in pleural fluid WBC count and differential counts with different sample containers and different methods. Chest 2003; 123:1181–7.10.1378/chest.123.4.1181Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Wyler D, Marty W, Bar W. Correlation between the postmortem cell content of cerebrospinal fluid and time of death. Int J Legal Med 1994; 106:194–9.10.1007/BF01371336Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Spencer CA, Takeuchi M, Kazarosyan M, MacKenzie F, Beckett GJ, Wilkinson E. Interlaboratory/intermethod differences in functional sensitivity of immunometric assays of thyrotropin (TSH) and impact on reliability of measurement of subnormal concentrations of TSH. Clin Chem 1995; 41:367–74.10.1093/clinchem/41.3.367Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2006-5-11
Accepted: 2006-8-29
Published Online: 2006-11-7
Published in Print: 2006-11-1

©2006 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Renal function – estimation of glomerular filtration rate
  2. Research translation: a new frontier for clinical laboratories
  3. Association of APOA5 c.553G>T polymorphism with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Chinese population
  4. MTRR 66A>G polymorphism in relation to congenital heart defects
  5. Increased homocysteine in heart failure: a result of renal impairment?
  6. Urine flow cytometry and detection of glomerular hematuria
  7. Chymotrypsin effects on the determination of sperm parameters and seminal biochemistry markers
  8. Evaluation of cardiac involvement following major orthopedic surgery
  9. Increased sensitivity in detecting renal impairments by quantitative measurement of marker protein excretion compared to detection of pathological particles in urine sediment analysis
  10. Clinical chemistry reference values for 75-year-old apparently healthy persons
  11. Serum pro-hepcidin concentrations and their responses to oral iron supplementation in healthy subjects manifest considerable inter-individual variation
  12. Comparability of five analytical systems for the determination of triiodothyronine, thyroxine and thyroid-stimulating hormone
  13. Automated analysis of pleural fluid total and differential leukocyte counts with the Sysmex XE-2100
  14. Automation and validation of a fast method for the assessment of in vivo oxidative stress levels
  15. Analytical validation of the new plasma calibrated Accu-Chek® Test Strips (Roche Diagnostics)
  16. Use of insulin immunoassays in clinical studies involving rapid-acting insulin analogues: Bi-insulin IRMA preliminary assessment
  17. Analytical and clinical evaluation of a new heart-type fatty acid-binding protein automated assay
  18. A caveat for OV-Monitor (CA 125 antigen) measurement: something is improving, something is not
  19. Reply to the letter written by Dorizzi et al.
Heruntergeladen am 7.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2006.242/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen