Home Photodynamic Effects In Vitro in Fresh GynecologicTumors Analyzed with a Bioluminescence Method
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Photodynamic Effects In Vitro in Fresh GynecologicTumors Analyzed with a Bioluminescence Method

  • Viola Schlosser , Ossi R. Koechli , Rosanna Cattaneo , Brigitte Jentsch , Urs Haller and Heinrich Walt
Published/Copyright: June 1, 2005
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
From the journal Volume 37 Issue 2

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising alternative method for clinical cancer treatment. In the present study, cells from four breast carcinomas, seven ovarian carcinomas of various stages of differentiation, and ascites from a diffuse metastatic tumor were treated by PDT in vitro. Tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)-chlorin (m-THPC) was used as the photosensitizer. Surviving cell rate was evaluated by the ATP-Cell-Viability-Assay (ATP-CVA), which measures light production as an interaction of intracellular ATP with the luciferin-luciferase complex. The most effective PDT of the tumor cells was achieved at an m-THPC concentration of 0.2 μg/ml following incubation of the cells with photosensitizer for 24 hours. PDT toxicity resulted in a cell survival rate of 1 % to 42 % compared to untreated control cells (survival rate of control = 100 %). The inhibitor concentration IC50 of m-THPC was determined both in the dark (dark toxicity) and in combination with laser irradiation. IC50 was defined as the concentration of photosensitizer which caused 50 % of cell death. The IC50 values were heterogeneous in all tumor specimens examined. IC50 values for dark toxicity were on average 0.14 μg m-THPC/ml for primary ovarian carcinoma, 2.16 μg m-THPC ml for refractory ovarian carcinoma and 0.3 μg m-THPC/ml for breast carcinoma. After PDT, average IC50 value for refractory ovarian carcinoma was 0.04 μg m-THPC/ml, for primary ovarian carcinoma 0.05 μg m-THPC/ml and for breast carcinoma 0.03 μg m-THPC/ml. These data might indicate that clinical PDT of gynecological carcinoma requires individual treatment conditions to achieve optimal results.

:
Published Online: 2005-06-01
Published in Print: 1999-02-01

Copyright (c)1999 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Evolution or Revolution in Clinical Chemistry
  2. Low Levels of Plasma Proteins: Malnutrition or Inflammation?
  3. Laboratory Medicine: The Need for a Broader View. The “Multiple Bundle” Model of Clinical Laboratory Function
  4. Activated Protein C (APC)-Resistance: Automated Detection of the Point Mutation at Position 1691 in the Factor V Gene
  5. A Rapid and Sensitive Automated Light Scattering Immunoassay for Serum C-Reactive Protein and the Definition of a Reference Range in Healthy Blood Donors
  6. Photodynamic Effects In Vitro in Fresh GynecologicTumors Analyzed with a Bioluminescence Method
  7. An ELISA for the H-Subunit of Human Ferritin which Employs a Combination of Rabbit Poly- and Mice Monoclonal Antibodies and an Enzyme Labeled Anti-Mouse-IgG
  8. The Use of Free Cortisol Index for Laboratory Assessment of Pituitary-Adrenal Function
  9. Allele-Specific Amplification for the Diagnosis of Autosomal Recessive Spinal Muscular Atrophy
  10. Diagnostic Value of Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover and Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
  11. Isoenzmyes of Class I and II Alcohol Dehydrogenase in Chronic Hepatitis
  12. Screening School Children for Albuminuria, Proteinuria and Occult Blood with Dipsticks
  13. Evaluation of the First Automated Thyroglobulin Assay
  14. Selective Imidazoline Receptor Agonists and Lipid Metabolism
  15. Judgement on Analytical Quality Requirements from Published Clinical Vignette Studies Is Flawed
  16. The Meaning of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) for the Medical Laboratory
  17. Improved Procedure of Measuring on Radiometer 500 and 600 Series Bloodgas Analysers
  18. Scientific Papers and Presentations by Martha Davis
  19. New Myocardial Marker Proteins in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Quantitative Aspects by J. A. Kragten
  20. Normalwerte by Michael Jakob
  21. Meetings
Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.1999.021/html
Scroll to top button