Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Prosody and Sievers' Law in Gothic

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. Januar 2008
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur
Aus der Zeitschrift Band 125 Heft 2

In 1878, Eduard Sievers proposed his eponymous law, in order to account for certain vowel/semivowel alternations found in a number of Indo-European language families (certainly in Germanic, Indic, and Iranian, possibly also in Greek, Latin, Baltic, Slavic, Celtic, and Tocharian). Sievers formulated his law as follows: »unbetontes […] i oder u ist consonant nach kurzer, vokal nach langer silbe ohne rücksicht auf die sonstige accentlage des wortes« (Sievers 1878, p. 129), thus accounting for the contrast between forms like Gothic nasjis ›thou savest‹ and sôkeis ›thou seekest‹, where nasjis contains a light initial syllable and therefore shows the semivowel alternant, while sôkeis contains a heavy initial syllable and thus exhibits the vocalic alternant.

Sievers' Law remains one of the classic problems of historical Germanic (and Indo-European) phonology; Sievers' deceptively simple formulation has resulted in an enormous body of literature. This paper critically examines one of the most recent treatments of this problem, the generally thoughtful essay by Yookang Kim (Kim 2001). Although Kim's analysis is careful and well-argued, some of his arguments and conclusions are not entirely supported by the Gothic data, and a response therefore seems appropriate.

Published Online: 2008-01-15
Published in Print: 2003-September-27

© Max Niemeyer Verlag GmbH, Tübingen 2003

Heruntergeladen am 16.4.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/BGSL.2003.223/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen