Startseite Philosophie Kant and Migration: State and Demos Borders
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Kant and Migration: State and Demos Borders

  • Angela Taraborrelli

    Angela Taraborrelli is Associate Professor of Political Philosophy at the University of Cagliari (Italy). Her research has focused on the political thought of Kant and Arendt and on cosmopolitanism. More recently, she has begun to focus on democracy and migration, with particular attention to the civic integration of migrants, from a cosmopolitan perspective. Her publications include Dal cittadino del mondo al mondo dei cittadini. Saggio su Kant (Asterios, 2004), Contemporary Cosmopolitanism (Bloomsbury, 2015) and Hannah Arendt and Cosmopolitanism: State, Community, Worlds in Common (Bloomsbury, 2024). Her monograph Kant on Migration (Elements, Cambridge University Press) is forthcoming. She founded and co-directs the series of cosmopolitan studies L’albero delle direzioni (Castelvecchi).

Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this article, I offer an outline of my on-going attempt to reconstruct a possible Kantian theory of migration both in the treatise Zum ewigen Frieden (1795) and in the Rechtslehre (1797). Such an attempt has already been made (with important results) by Pauline Kleingeld (2012, 72–91), Seyla Benhabib (2012), and Karoline Reinhardt (2019). There are several points of convergence between these authors and me. However, what distinguishes my work from theirs is my emphasis on the compatibility between republican states and cosmopolitanism in Kant. This compatibility is reflected both in the non-reducibility of his theory of migration to the open/closed borders dichotomy and in his still under-recognized openness regarding the question of integration and acquisition of citizenship by migrants and foreigners.

Abstract

In this article, I offer an outline of my on-going attempt to reconstruct a possible Kantian theory of migration both in the treatise Zum ewigen Frieden (1795) and in the Rechtslehre (1797). Such an attempt has already been made (with important results) by Pauline Kleingeld (2012, 72–91), Seyla Benhabib (2012), and Karoline Reinhardt (2019). There are several points of convergence between these authors and me. However, what distinguishes my work from theirs is my emphasis on the compatibility between republican states and cosmopolitanism in Kant. This compatibility is reflected both in the non-reducibility of his theory of migration to the open/closed borders dichotomy and in his still under-recognized openness regarding the question of integration and acquisition of citizenship by migrants and foreigners.

Heruntergeladen am 1.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111707426-011/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen