Home Linguistics & Semiotics 6 Morphosyntax-semantics mapping in the grammar of property concepts: the view from English, Mandarin, and beyond
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

6 Morphosyntax-semantics mapping in the grammar of property concepts: the view from English, Mandarin, and beyond

  • Thomas Grano and Yiwen Zhang
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Generative Perspectives on Degrees
This chapter is in the book Generative Perspectives on Degrees

Abstract

Two oppositions in the grammar of property concept lexemes are: the positive–comparative opposition (e. g., wise–wiser) and the adjective–noun opposition (e. g., wisewisdom). We ask: How does each of these oppositions’ morphosyntactic relationship relate to its semantic relationship, and how (if at all) do these morphosyntax-semantic relations vary cross-linguistically? Reviewing and building on previous work on this question, we argue for three main points. First, comparative semantics is provided by a morpheme in syntax whereas positive semantics is achieved via covert contextual domain restriction of a quantifier. This quantifier is supplied by a possessive morpheme in the case of nominal property concept words and by the property concept word itself in the case of adjectives. Second, an investigation of the word-internal compositional semantics of derivationally complex property concept words like joy-ful and wis-dom suggests that adjectives like wise and their possessed nominal counterparts like have wisdom are truth-conditionally and in some cases compositionally equivalent. Third, we show that many Mandarin phrasal possessed property predicates like you jiazhi ‘have value’ and you pinwei ‘have taste’ closely parallel English derivationally complex predicates like valu-able and taste-ful, respectively, and we argue that this reflects a broader (analytic vs. synthetic) typological distinction between Mandarin and English. In this way, we aim to provide a first step toward connecting cross-linguistic variation in the grammar of property concepts to a broader theory of parametric variation.

Abstract

Two oppositions in the grammar of property concept lexemes are: the positive–comparative opposition (e. g., wise–wiser) and the adjective–noun opposition (e. g., wisewisdom). We ask: How does each of these oppositions’ morphosyntactic relationship relate to its semantic relationship, and how (if at all) do these morphosyntax-semantic relations vary cross-linguistically? Reviewing and building on previous work on this question, we argue for three main points. First, comparative semantics is provided by a morpheme in syntax whereas positive semantics is achieved via covert contextual domain restriction of a quantifier. This quantifier is supplied by a possessive morpheme in the case of nominal property concept words and by the property concept word itself in the case of adjectives. Second, an investigation of the word-internal compositional semantics of derivationally complex property concept words like joy-ful and wis-dom suggests that adjectives like wise and their possessed nominal counterparts like have wisdom are truth-conditionally and in some cases compositionally equivalent. Third, we show that many Mandarin phrasal possessed property predicates like you jiazhi ‘have value’ and you pinwei ‘have taste’ closely parallel English derivationally complex predicates like valu-able and taste-ful, respectively, and we argue that this reflects a broader (analytic vs. synthetic) typological distinction between Mandarin and English. In this way, we aim to provide a first step toward connecting cross-linguistic variation in the grammar of property concepts to a broader theory of parametric variation.

Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111547688-009/html
Scroll to top button