Skip to main content
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“‘Is it Life?’ [. . .] ‘I Would Rather Be Without it’”: Flann O’Brien and the Fictive State of Exception

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Pained Screams from Camps
This chapter is in the book Pained Screams from Camps

Abstract

“The characters of a novel are beings that are shut up, prisoners,” writes Emmanuel Levinas in 1948. This is not to say that a novelist only “represents beings crushed by fate,” but rather “beings enter their fate because they are represented.” Giorgio Agamben would credit the writings of Levinas with an early articulation of “this new ontological determination of man,” what the former would theorize as the “bare life” populating our modern biopolitical paradigm, the “camp.” Levinas’ identification of the novel as a fictional forerunner to the 20th Century’s permanent states of exception, aligns his work with Irish Modernist Flann O’Brien, who, in his first novel At Swim-Two-Birds, writes of the injustice of “despotic” novelists “compel[ling] characters” into their prescribed roles. Employing O’Brien as a case study, this paper will explore the connection between Levinas’ aesthetic critique of the antidemocratic novel and its material counterpart in Agamben’s theorisation of the “camp.”

Abstract

“The characters of a novel are beings that are shut up, prisoners,” writes Emmanuel Levinas in 1948. This is not to say that a novelist only “represents beings crushed by fate,” but rather “beings enter their fate because they are represented.” Giorgio Agamben would credit the writings of Levinas with an early articulation of “this new ontological determination of man,” what the former would theorize as the “bare life” populating our modern biopolitical paradigm, the “camp.” Levinas’ identification of the novel as a fictional forerunner to the 20th Century’s permanent states of exception, aligns his work with Irish Modernist Flann O’Brien, who, in his first novel At Swim-Two-Birds, writes of the injustice of “despotic” novelists “compel[ling] characters” into their prescribed roles. Employing O’Brien as a case study, this paper will explore the connection between Levinas’ aesthetic critique of the antidemocratic novel and its material counterpart in Agamben’s theorisation of the “camp.”

Downloaded on 8.5.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111297149-012/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button