Home Philosophy Kant on Menschenliebe as a Moral Predisposition of the Mind
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Kant on Menschenliebe as a Moral Predisposition of the Mind

  • Dieter Schönecker
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Kant on Sex, Love, and Friendship
This chapter is in the book Kant on Sex, Love, and Friendship

Abstract

I will first offer a brief interpretation of Kant’s theory of “Aesthetic preconcepts of the mind’s receptivity to concepts of duty as such” (section XII of the “Introduction to the Doctrine of Virtue”). These moral predispositions (moral feeling, conscience, love of human beings, and self-respect), I argue, lie at the ground of morality inasmuch as they are the subjective conditions for being affected by concepts of duty to become aware of the necessitation that lies in the concept of duty and, hence, to be able to think of a duty and thus to be obligated at all. I shall then argue that the “love of human beings” as one of those four moral predispositions must be identified with “love that is delight (amor complacentiae); this Menschenliebe is not to be confused with “benevolence (amor benevolentiae)” nor is it the “dexterity of the inclination to beneficence in general”.

Abstract

I will first offer a brief interpretation of Kant’s theory of “Aesthetic preconcepts of the mind’s receptivity to concepts of duty as such” (section XII of the “Introduction to the Doctrine of Virtue”). These moral predispositions (moral feeling, conscience, love of human beings, and self-respect), I argue, lie at the ground of morality inasmuch as they are the subjective conditions for being affected by concepts of duty to become aware of the necessitation that lies in the concept of duty and, hence, to be able to think of a duty and thus to be obligated at all. I shall then argue that the “love of human beings” as one of those four moral predispositions must be identified with “love that is delight (amor complacentiae); this Menschenliebe is not to be confused with “benevolence (amor benevolentiae)” nor is it the “dexterity of the inclination to beneficence in general”.

Downloaded on 20.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111291130-007/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOopHBV6S_6dbmGX707pHITCMf0Mgwe77J_mNj232rwlAjWN4ntdY
Scroll to top button