Home Philosophy From Self-Preservation to Cosmopolitan Friendship: Kant and the Conceptual Structure of Love
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

From Self-Preservation to Cosmopolitan Friendship: Kant and the Conceptual Structure of Love

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Kant on Sex, Love, and Friendship
This chapter is in the book Kant on Sex, Love, and Friendship

Abstract

This article provides a concise overview of some of the main features of the conceptual structure of love in Kant’s major writings. I have previously argued (Rinne 2018) that by analysing Kant’s notion of love in the contexts of his discussions of self-love, sexual love, love of God, love of neighbour and love in friendship, we can detect an ‘ascent of love’ from the strongest impulses of human nature to the highest ethical ideals of cosmopolitan friendship. Here I supplement my previous ‘ascent model’ of love in Kant with a different model, which I call the ‘expanding circle model’. This model builds on the Stoic metaphor of expanding spheres of subjective concern and affection, and highlights the continuity between Kant’s different notions of love. The two models are not mutually exclusive and rather complement each other. In conclusion, I problematise the practical import and the actual universality of Kant’s cosmopolitan notions of love.

Abstract

This article provides a concise overview of some of the main features of the conceptual structure of love in Kant’s major writings. I have previously argued (Rinne 2018) that by analysing Kant’s notion of love in the contexts of his discussions of self-love, sexual love, love of God, love of neighbour and love in friendship, we can detect an ‘ascent of love’ from the strongest impulses of human nature to the highest ethical ideals of cosmopolitan friendship. Here I supplement my previous ‘ascent model’ of love in Kant with a different model, which I call the ‘expanding circle model’. This model builds on the Stoic metaphor of expanding spheres of subjective concern and affection, and highlights the continuity between Kant’s different notions of love. The two models are not mutually exclusive and rather complement each other. In conclusion, I problematise the practical import and the actual universality of Kant’s cosmopolitan notions of love.

Downloaded on 30.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111291130-008/html
Scroll to top button