Home Linguistics & Semiotics 6 Contrast via information structure: On topic development with German aber in post-initial position
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

6 Contrast via information structure: On topic development with German aber in post-initial position

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In order to distinguish different relations of contrast, research on German aber ‘but’ also takes into account its syntactic position. In post-initial position, i.e. between prefield-constituent and finite verb (‘Forefield particle’ in Sabo 2003) which is generally associated with signaling a topic shift (cf. Breindl 2011), aber is said to express one of the contrastive relations defined via information structural properties (cf. e.g. Sabo 2003). As corpus data reveal, however, post-initial aber may also ‘formally isolate’ non-topical constituents such as comparative constructions (e.g. noch weniger ‘even less’) and even sentence adverbials such as tatsachlich ‘indeed/in reality’. Interestingly, such divergences from potential topicality also involve different contrastive relations commonly analyzed in terms of inferences instead of information structural properties. In this paper, we investigate how topic development, i.e. the topic potential of the prefield constituent, as well as the topic progression between the conjuncts, can be employed as a formal means to distinguish different kinds of contrast in corpus data: a Structural Contrast relying on specific patterns of topic development and a Non-Structural Contrast where topicality is not the primary level of contrast, but other formal means may be indicative.

Abstract

In order to distinguish different relations of contrast, research on German aber ‘but’ also takes into account its syntactic position. In post-initial position, i.e. between prefield-constituent and finite verb (‘Forefield particle’ in Sabo 2003) which is generally associated with signaling a topic shift (cf. Breindl 2011), aber is said to express one of the contrastive relations defined via information structural properties (cf. e.g. Sabo 2003). As corpus data reveal, however, post-initial aber may also ‘formally isolate’ non-topical constituents such as comparative constructions (e.g. noch weniger ‘even less’) and even sentence adverbials such as tatsachlich ‘indeed/in reality’. Interestingly, such divergences from potential topicality also involve different contrastive relations commonly analyzed in terms of inferences instead of information structural properties. In this paper, we investigate how topic development, i.e. the topic potential of the prefield constituent, as well as the topic progression between the conjuncts, can be employed as a formal means to distinguish different kinds of contrast in corpus data: a Structural Contrast relying on specific patterns of topic development and a Non-Structural Contrast where topicality is not the primary level of contrast, but other formal means may be indicative.

Downloaded on 1.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110986594-006/html
Scroll to top button