Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik 12 Canonical and Non-canonical applicatives in Waray
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

12 Canonical and Non-canonical applicatives in Waray

  • Thomas E. Payne und Voltaire Q. Oyzon
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Applicative Morphology
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Applicative Morphology

Abstract

This chapter deals with applicative constructions in Waray, an Austronesian language spoken in Samar, Northern and Eastern Leyte, and parts of Biliran islands in the Eastern Visayas region of the Philippines. The existence of applicative constructions in Philippine languages is controversial. One view sees reflexes of the Proto-Austronesian affixes ✶-an and ✶Si- (Wolff 1973, Blust 2002) as components of simulfixal “voice” markers. The other view, represented in this chapter, is that the reflexes of these affixes in Waray are insightfully analyzed as markers of applicative constructions. First we show that Waray verb morphology includes three productive affixes, -an, -i and i- (reflexes of Proto-Austronesian voice affixes), which qualify as markers of applicative constructions according to the characteristics outlined in the introduction to this volume. Next, we show that between them, these affixes participate in five additional constructions that lack one or more of the definitional characteristics of “canonical” applicatives. We name these additional constructions “non-canonical” applicatives. We argue that each of the non-canonical constructions is a logical extension of a canonical applicative construction. Our conclusion is that the overarching semantic function of the canonical and non-canonical applicative constructions in Waray is to mitigate transitivity. The applicative 1 forms, -an and -i, mitigate transitivity by reducing or diffusing the affectedness of the undergoer, while the applicative 2 form, i-, mitigates transitivity by reducing the sovereign control of the actor.

Abstract

This chapter deals with applicative constructions in Waray, an Austronesian language spoken in Samar, Northern and Eastern Leyte, and parts of Biliran islands in the Eastern Visayas region of the Philippines. The existence of applicative constructions in Philippine languages is controversial. One view sees reflexes of the Proto-Austronesian affixes ✶-an and ✶Si- (Wolff 1973, Blust 2002) as components of simulfixal “voice” markers. The other view, represented in this chapter, is that the reflexes of these affixes in Waray are insightfully analyzed as markers of applicative constructions. First we show that Waray verb morphology includes three productive affixes, -an, -i and i- (reflexes of Proto-Austronesian voice affixes), which qualify as markers of applicative constructions according to the characteristics outlined in the introduction to this volume. Next, we show that between them, these affixes participate in five additional constructions that lack one or more of the definitional characteristics of “canonical” applicatives. We name these additional constructions “non-canonical” applicatives. We argue that each of the non-canonical constructions is a logical extension of a canonical applicative construction. Our conclusion is that the overarching semantic function of the canonical and non-canonical applicative constructions in Waray is to mitigate transitivity. The applicative 1 forms, -an and -i, mitigate transitivity by reducing or diffusing the affectedness of the undergoer, while the applicative 2 form, i-, mitigates transitivity by reducing the sovereign control of the actor.

Heruntergeladen am 3.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110777949-012/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen