Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik A cross-linguistic approach to sentential subjects in Kannada
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A cross-linguistic approach to sentential subjects in Kannada

  • Anuradha Sudharsan
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Trends in South Asian Linguistics
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Trends in South Asian Linguistics

Abstract

In Kannada, only nominalized clauses can occupy the canonical subject position whereas non-nominalized clauses can occupy only the object position. Nominalized clauses have an overt D head, whereas non-nominalized clauses lack it. Two factors explain this subject/object asymmetry. Firstly, finite T is always +Case, whereas only transitive v has Case. Secondly, the fact that only nominalized clauses can occupy Case positions shows that only an overt nominal head can receive Case. A (Non-)Overt Head Constraint is proposed to exclude non-nominalized clauses from Case positions. Cross-linguistic facts corroborate this claim and also explain why that-clauses in English tend to extrapose.

Abstract

In Kannada, only nominalized clauses can occupy the canonical subject position whereas non-nominalized clauses can occupy only the object position. Nominalized clauses have an overt D head, whereas non-nominalized clauses lack it. Two factors explain this subject/object asymmetry. Firstly, finite T is always +Case, whereas only transitive v has Case. Secondly, the fact that only nominalized clauses can occupy Case positions shows that only an overt nominal head can receive Case. A (Non-)Overt Head Constraint is proposed to exclude non-nominalized clauses from Case positions. Cross-linguistic facts corroborate this claim and also explain why that-clauses in English tend to extrapose.

Heruntergeladen am 15.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110753066-005/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen