No Decorum in the Forum? Comic Invective in the Theatre of Justice
-
Jan Lukas Horneff
Abstract
This chapter examines the performative role of humour and invective in Roman forensic interaction. An orator taking centre stage was expected to provide entertainment and demonstrate his dominance in the “theatre of justice”. He had to craft the better gibes and portray his opponent as an inferior comic character, exploiting social and sexual stereotypes in Roman gender discourse. Thus, presenting a case had much in common with staging a comedy. We find evidence of this in the correspondence of the philosopher and rhetorician Fronto with his friend and pupil Marcus Aurelius. In a remarkable letter, Marcus Aurelius anticipates that Fronto would very likely ridicule and defame the philosopher Herodes Atticus, also a friend and teacher of Marcus Aurelius, and Fronto’s opponent in a forthcoming trial. While the adequacy of personal attacks is never questioned in principle, Marcus Aurelius asks Fronto for moderation in this specific case. From a few hints in Fronto’s letters, we can conclude that he had planned to portray Herodes Atticus as an effeminate intellectual, a cinaedus. This kind of mockery was widespread in antiquity and apparently had the potential to entertain the public: it was the perfect ingredient for comic invective in the theatre of justice.
Abstract
This chapter examines the performative role of humour and invective in Roman forensic interaction. An orator taking centre stage was expected to provide entertainment and demonstrate his dominance in the “theatre of justice”. He had to craft the better gibes and portray his opponent as an inferior comic character, exploiting social and sexual stereotypes in Roman gender discourse. Thus, presenting a case had much in common with staging a comedy. We find evidence of this in the correspondence of the philosopher and rhetorician Fronto with his friend and pupil Marcus Aurelius. In a remarkable letter, Marcus Aurelius anticipates that Fronto would very likely ridicule and defame the philosopher Herodes Atticus, also a friend and teacher of Marcus Aurelius, and Fronto’s opponent in a forthcoming trial. While the adequacy of personal attacks is never questioned in principle, Marcus Aurelius asks Fronto for moderation in this specific case. From a few hints in Fronto’s letters, we can conclude that he had planned to portray Herodes Atticus as an effeminate intellectual, a cinaedus. This kind of mockery was widespread in antiquity and apparently had the potential to entertain the public: it was the perfect ingredient for comic invective in the theatre of justice.
Chapters in this book
- Frontmatter I
- Contents V
- Acknowledgements VII
- Killing with a Smile: Comic Invective in Greek and Roman Oratory 1
-
Part I: Intertextual and Multi-genre Invective
- Comedy and Insults in the Athenian Law-courts 25
- Comic Invective and Public Speech in Fourth-Century Athens 43
- Comic Invective in Attic Forensic Oratory: Private Speeches 65
- Rhetorical Defence, Inter-poetic Agōn and the Reframing of Comic Invective in Plato’s Apology of Socrates 81
- “You are Mad!” Allegations of Insanity in Greek Comedy and Rhetoric 107
- Comic Invective in Cicero’s Speech Pro M. Caelio 125
- How to Start a Show: Comic Invectives in the Prologues of Terence and Decimus Laberius 147
-
Part II: The Cultural Workings of Invective
- Comic Somatisation and the Body of Evidence in Aeschines’ Against Timarchus 171
- Comic Invective, Decorum and Ars in Cicero’s De Oratore 191
- No Decorum in the Forum? Comic Invective in the Theatre of Justice 211
-
Part III: Invective in Ancient Socio-political Contexts
- Political Rhetoric and Comic Invective in Fifth-Century Athens: The Trial of the Dogs in Aristophanes’ Wasps 235
- Democracy, Poverty, Comic Heroism and Oratorical Strategy in Lysias 24 257
- Notes on Editors and Contributors 273
- General Index 275
- Index Locorum 279
Chapters in this book
- Frontmatter I
- Contents V
- Acknowledgements VII
- Killing with a Smile: Comic Invective in Greek and Roman Oratory 1
-
Part I: Intertextual and Multi-genre Invective
- Comedy and Insults in the Athenian Law-courts 25
- Comic Invective and Public Speech in Fourth-Century Athens 43
- Comic Invective in Attic Forensic Oratory: Private Speeches 65
- Rhetorical Defence, Inter-poetic Agōn and the Reframing of Comic Invective in Plato’s Apology of Socrates 81
- “You are Mad!” Allegations of Insanity in Greek Comedy and Rhetoric 107
- Comic Invective in Cicero’s Speech Pro M. Caelio 125
- How to Start a Show: Comic Invectives in the Prologues of Terence and Decimus Laberius 147
-
Part II: The Cultural Workings of Invective
- Comic Somatisation and the Body of Evidence in Aeschines’ Against Timarchus 171
- Comic Invective, Decorum and Ars in Cicero’s De Oratore 191
- No Decorum in the Forum? Comic Invective in the Theatre of Justice 211
-
Part III: Invective in Ancient Socio-political Contexts
- Political Rhetoric and Comic Invective in Fifth-Century Athens: The Trial of the Dogs in Aristophanes’ Wasps 235
- Democracy, Poverty, Comic Heroism and Oratorical Strategy in Lysias 24 257
- Notes on Editors and Contributors 273
- General Index 275
- Index Locorum 279