Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Doppelweg und Biographie

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Probleme des Artusromans
This chapter is in the book Probleme des Artusromans

Abstract

This essay reexamines the long debated question of the Arthurian ›dual path‹-scheme which has long been held to constitute the fundamental generic device that distinguishes Arthurian romance from other forms of vernacular narrative. Our argument is based on the assumption that French Arthurian romance, which arose in the late 12th century in the wake of the notions of subjectivity, individuality and the subsequent emphasis laid on education, is on the whole biographical romance of the enfances-type and presents us with a large variety of modified, amplified or abbreviated forms of a basically archetypal pattern. In the light of this structural hypothesis the general practicality of the ›dual path‹-device in Arthurian criticism seems to be open to question. Actually, Chrétien seems to have fully developed the scheme only in Erec et Enide that - for very special thematic reasons - fulfills all the supposed requirements of the device, while the Chevalier au lion already proposes an ironic variation of the earlier model. Later authors seem to have followed their great predecessor in ironically playing with or altogether avoiding this pattern.

Abstract

This essay reexamines the long debated question of the Arthurian ›dual path‹-scheme which has long been held to constitute the fundamental generic device that distinguishes Arthurian romance from other forms of vernacular narrative. Our argument is based on the assumption that French Arthurian romance, which arose in the late 12th century in the wake of the notions of subjectivity, individuality and the subsequent emphasis laid on education, is on the whole biographical romance of the enfances-type and presents us with a large variety of modified, amplified or abbreviated forms of a basically archetypal pattern. In the light of this structural hypothesis the general practicality of the ›dual path‹-device in Arthurian criticism seems to be open to question. Actually, Chrétien seems to have fully developed the scheme only in Erec et Enide that - for very special thematic reasons - fulfills all the supposed requirements of the device, while the Chevalier au lion already proposes an ironic variation of the earlier model. Later authors seem to have followed their great predecessor in ironically playing with or altogether avoiding this pattern.

Downloaded on 12.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110694567-003/html
Scroll to top button