Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Contextualizing dual-form adverbs in the Old Bailey Corpus: An assessment of semantic, pragmatic, and sociolinguistic factors
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Contextualizing dual-form adverbs in the Old Bailey Corpus: An assessment of semantic, pragmatic, and sociolinguistic factors

  • Ruth Möhlig-Falke
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Grammar – Discourse – Context
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Grammar – Discourse – Context

Abstract

This article is concerned with the so-called dual-form adverbs of English, which are a group of adverbs that may occur both with and without the adverbial suffix -ly in similar syntactic environments. Based on data taken from the Old Bailey Corpus 2.0 for the period between c. 1730-1910, this study explores the impact of micro- and macro-context on variable adverb marking with the aim of identifying factors that explain why these adverbs have resisted the general trend towards -LY-marking for so long, with some of them still appearing with variable adverb marking up to today. The main reasons for this variability are identified to be the semantic-pragmatic orientation of individual adverbs to different entities in the clause, the general fuzziness of the category boundary between adjective and adverb, and the adverbs’ highly context-sensitive interpretation. Sociolinguistic aspects, mentioned as possible additional factors in the literature on variable adverb marking, are identified as only secondarily responsible.

Abstract

This article is concerned with the so-called dual-form adverbs of English, which are a group of adverbs that may occur both with and without the adverbial suffix -ly in similar syntactic environments. Based on data taken from the Old Bailey Corpus 2.0 for the period between c. 1730-1910, this study explores the impact of micro- and macro-context on variable adverb marking with the aim of identifying factors that explain why these adverbs have resisted the general trend towards -LY-marking for so long, with some of them still appearing with variable adverb marking up to today. The main reasons for this variability are identified to be the semantic-pragmatic orientation of individual adverbs to different entities in the clause, the general fuzziness of the category boundary between adjective and adverb, and the adverbs’ highly context-sensitive interpretation. Sociolinguistic aspects, mentioned as possible additional factors in the literature on variable adverb marking, are identified as only secondarily responsible.

Heruntergeladen am 3.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110682564-006/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen