Home Linguistics & Semiotics Lying as a transaction of value: explorations in semiosis and communication from a new perspective
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Lying as a transaction of value: explorations in semiosis and communication from a new perspective

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Differences, Similarities and Meanings
This chapter is in the book Differences, Similarities and Meanings

Abstract

In the first part of the paper I introduce a new, complementary approach to understanding the deep question of lying, a question that has concerned the major philosophical figures of our tradition - Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Montaigne, Rousseau, Kant, Derrida - to mention only the most prominent. This new approach considers the lie as an act of value transfer similar to theft. In the rest of the paper I develop a basic dichotomy to distinguish the two typologies of value abused by lying (although in the real practice they most often go together): instrumental and ego values. In instrumental lying the liar’s gain is commeasurable with monetary or economic value, whereas in ego lying the universal currency is recognition, according to the way Todorov defines this intriguing notion. Probably the most original contribution of this chapter is its reflection on the dynamic relation between these two types of value in our everyday life, of which the analysis of lying makes more explicit and evident but glosses only one part.

Abstract

In the first part of the paper I introduce a new, complementary approach to understanding the deep question of lying, a question that has concerned the major philosophical figures of our tradition - Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Montaigne, Rousseau, Kant, Derrida - to mention only the most prominent. This new approach considers the lie as an act of value transfer similar to theft. In the rest of the paper I develop a basic dichotomy to distinguish the two typologies of value abused by lying (although in the real practice they most often go together): instrumental and ego values. In instrumental lying the liar’s gain is commeasurable with monetary or economic value, whereas in ego lying the universal currency is recognition, according to the way Todorov defines this intriguing notion. Probably the most original contribution of this chapter is its reflection on the dynamic relation between these two types of value in our everyday life, of which the analysis of lying makes more explicit and evident but glosses only one part.

Downloaded on 31.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110662900-007/html
Scroll to top button