Home Philosophy Three Types and Traditions of Logic: Syllogistic, Calculus and Predicate Logic
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Three Types and Traditions of Logic: Syllogistic, Calculus and Predicate Logic

  • Wolfgang Kienzler
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics
This chapter is in the book Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics

Abstract

Modern logic grew out of the work of Frege and of the tradition which Boole initiated. However, as the Quine-Putnam exchange illustrates, the relations between the respective camps are far from being well understood.We can get some clues from the way Frege critically discusses the Boole-Schröder tradition. Furthermore Michael Wolff has suggested that there is a close and internal relatedness of all three major types of logic, even declaring syllogistic logic to be the one and only “strictly formal” type of logic. A closer look at the Euler diagrams and their influence on the understanding of logic in the 19th century can highlight something of a silent revolution under way, preparing logicians to accept the non-exclusive alternative as basic, to accept tautologies as the paradigm of truth, and to introduce truth-functionality. The second half of this contribution offers an overview of the three traditions, in giving brief answers to the same series of questions. In addition, Wittgenstein’s Tractatus is included in the questionnaire. All of this will may help to view the history of logic as the interaction of the three distinct, yet intrinsically related paradigms of Syllogistic, Calculus and Predicate logic.

Abstract

Modern logic grew out of the work of Frege and of the tradition which Boole initiated. However, as the Quine-Putnam exchange illustrates, the relations between the respective camps are far from being well understood.We can get some clues from the way Frege critically discusses the Boole-Schröder tradition. Furthermore Michael Wolff has suggested that there is a close and internal relatedness of all three major types of logic, even declaring syllogistic logic to be the one and only “strictly formal” type of logic. A closer look at the Euler diagrams and their influence on the understanding of logic in the 19th century can highlight something of a silent revolution under way, preparing logicians to accept the non-exclusive alternative as basic, to accept tautologies as the paradigm of truth, and to introduce truth-functionality. The second half of this contribution offers an overview of the three traditions, in giving brief answers to the same series of questions. In addition, Wittgenstein’s Tractatus is included in the questionnaire. All of this will may help to view the history of logic as the interaction of the three distinct, yet intrinsically related paradigms of Syllogistic, Calculus and Predicate logic.

Chapters in this book

  1. Frontmatter I
  2. Contents V
  3. Preface IX
  4. Part I: Philosophy of Logic
  5. Link’s Revenge: A Case Study in Natural Language Mereology 3
  6. Universal Translatability: An Optimality- Based Justification of (Classical) Logic 37
  7. Invariance and Necessity 55
  8. Translations Between Logics: A Survey 71
  9. On the Relation of Logic to Metalogic 91
  10. Free Logic and the Quantified Argument Calculus 105
  11. Dependencies Between Quantifiers Vs. Dependencies Between Variables 117
  12. Three Types and Traditions of Logic: Syllogistic, Calculus and Predicate Logic 133
  13. Truth, Paradox, and the Procedural Conception of Fregean Sense 153
  14. Wittgenstein and Frege on Assertion 169
  15. Assertions and Their Justification: Demonstration and Self-Evidence 183
  16. Surprises in Logic: When Dynamic Formality Meets Interactive Compositionality 197
  17. Part II: Philosophy of Mathematics
  18. Neologicist Foundations: Inconsistent Abstraction Principles and Part-Whole 215
  19. What Hilbert and Bernays Meant by “Finitism” 249
  20. Wittgenstein and Turing 263
  21. Remarks on Two Papers of Paul Bernays 297
  22. The Significance of the Curry-Howard Isomorphism 313
  23. Reductions of Mathematics: Foundation or Horizon? 327
  24. What Are the Axioms for Numbers and Who Invented Them? 343
  25. Part III: Wittgenstein
  26. Following a Rule: Waismann’s Variation 359
  27. Propositions in Wittgenstein and Ramsey 375
  28. An Unexpected Feature of Classical Propositional Logic in the Tractatus 385
  29. Ontology in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: A Topological Approach 397
  30. Adding 4.0241 to TLP 415
  31. Understanding Wittgenstein’s Wood Sellers 429
  32. On the Infinite, In-Potentia: Discovery of the Hidden Revision of Philosophical Investigations and Its Relation to TS 209 Through the Eyes of Wittgensteinian Mathematics 441
  33. Incomplete Pictures and Specific Forms: Wittgenstein Around 1930 457
  34. „Man kann die Menschen nicht zum Guten führen“ – Zur Logik des moralischen Urteils bei Wittgenstein und Hegel 473
  35. Der Status mathematischer und religiöser Sätze bei Wittgenstein 485
  36. Gutes Sehen 499
  37. Wittgenstein’s Conjecture 515
  38. Index of Names 535
  39. Index of Subjects 539
Downloaded on 17.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110657883-009/html
Scroll to top button