Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik 12 Number in Gooniyandi
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

12 Number in Gooniyandi

  • William B. McGregor
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Number in the World's Languages
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Number in the World's Languages

Abstract

This paper discusses the category of number in the non-Pama-Nyungan Australian Aboriginal language Gooniyandi. Number marking has various loci in the language, predominantly phrasal, where it is optionally realised by free numerals and/or number marking enclitics. Words are by and large number unspecified; there are just a few exceptions, primarily pronouns, which show number as an inflectional category, and a smallish set of nominal and verbal stems - rarely roots - that are specified for a number value. Nominals themselves are predominantly transnumeral, and unspecified for the count vs. mass distinction. Nominal number is indicated by NP-level enclitics, and also inflectionally in finite verbs, both in the forms of classifiers that occur in all finite verbs, and by number enclitics. Number agreement is at best marginal; instead, the choices of marking or not marking number, and the values assigned, are effectively independent at the various loci. Obligatory number marking in the finite verb apparently plays a significant role in reference management; optional number marking in both the NP and verb seems to be motivated by other considerations, which are not yet adequately understood.

Abstract

This paper discusses the category of number in the non-Pama-Nyungan Australian Aboriginal language Gooniyandi. Number marking has various loci in the language, predominantly phrasal, where it is optionally realised by free numerals and/or number marking enclitics. Words are by and large number unspecified; there are just a few exceptions, primarily pronouns, which show number as an inflectional category, and a smallish set of nominal and verbal stems - rarely roots - that are specified for a number value. Nominals themselves are predominantly transnumeral, and unspecified for the count vs. mass distinction. Nominal number is indicated by NP-level enclitics, and also inflectionally in finite verbs, both in the forms of classifiers that occur in all finite verbs, and by number enclitics. Number agreement is at best marginal; instead, the choices of marking or not marking number, and the values assigned, are effectively independent at the various loci. Obligatory number marking in the finite verb apparently plays a significant role in reference management; optional number marking in both the NP and verb seems to be motivated by other considerations, which are not yet adequately understood.

Heruntergeladen am 23.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110622713-013/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen