Home Linguistics & Semiotics 12 Number in Gooniyandi
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

12 Number in Gooniyandi

  • William B. McGregor
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Number in the World's Languages
This chapter is in the book Number in the World's Languages

Abstract

This paper discusses the category of number in the non-Pama-Nyungan Australian Aboriginal language Gooniyandi. Number marking has various loci in the language, predominantly phrasal, where it is optionally realised by free numerals and/or number marking enclitics. Words are by and large number unspecified; there are just a few exceptions, primarily pronouns, which show number as an inflectional category, and a smallish set of nominal and verbal stems - rarely roots - that are specified for a number value. Nominals themselves are predominantly transnumeral, and unspecified for the count vs. mass distinction. Nominal number is indicated by NP-level enclitics, and also inflectionally in finite verbs, both in the forms of classifiers that occur in all finite verbs, and by number enclitics. Number agreement is at best marginal; instead, the choices of marking or not marking number, and the values assigned, are effectively independent at the various loci. Obligatory number marking in the finite verb apparently plays a significant role in reference management; optional number marking in both the NP and verb seems to be motivated by other considerations, which are not yet adequately understood.

Abstract

This paper discusses the category of number in the non-Pama-Nyungan Australian Aboriginal language Gooniyandi. Number marking has various loci in the language, predominantly phrasal, where it is optionally realised by free numerals and/or number marking enclitics. Words are by and large number unspecified; there are just a few exceptions, primarily pronouns, which show number as an inflectional category, and a smallish set of nominal and verbal stems - rarely roots - that are specified for a number value. Nominals themselves are predominantly transnumeral, and unspecified for the count vs. mass distinction. Nominal number is indicated by NP-level enclitics, and also inflectionally in finite verbs, both in the forms of classifiers that occur in all finite verbs, and by number enclitics. Number agreement is at best marginal; instead, the choices of marking or not marking number, and the values assigned, are effectively independent at the various loci. Obligatory number marking in the finite verb apparently plays a significant role in reference management; optional number marking in both the NP and verb seems to be motivated by other considerations, which are not yet adequately understood.

Downloaded on 23.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110622713-013/html
Scroll to top button